Background/Aims: Flow restoration to ischemic myocardium reduces infarct size (IS), but it also promotes reperfusion injury. A burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and/or NHE-1 reactivation were proposed to explain this injury. Our study was aimed to shed light on this unresolved issue. Methods: Regional infarction (40 min-ischemia/2 hs-reperfusion) was induced in isolated and perfused rat hearts. Maximal doses of N-(2-mercaptopropionyl)-glycine (MPG 2mmol/L, ROS scavenger), cariporide (10µmol/L, NHE-1 inhibitor), or sildenafil (1µmol/L, phosphodiesterase5A inhibitor) were applied at reperfusion onset. Their effects on IS, myocardial concentration of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), ERK1/2, p90RSK, and NHE-1 phosphorylation were analyzed. Results: All treatments decreased IS ∼ 50% vs. control. No further protection was obtained by combining cariporide or MPG with sildenafil. Myocardial TBARS increased after infarction and were decreased by MPG or cariporide, but unaffected by sildenafil. In line with the fact that ROS induce MAPK-mediated NHE-1 activation, myocardial infarction increased ERK1/2, p90RSK, and NHE-1 phosphorylation. MPG and cariporide cancelled these effects. Sildenafil did not reduce the phosphorylated ERK1/2-p90RSK levels but blunted NHE-1 phosphorylation suggesting a direct dephosphorylating action. Conclusions: 1) Reperfusion injury would result from ROS-triggered MAPK-mediated NHE-1 phosphorylation (and reactivation) during reperfusion; 2) sildenafil protects the myocardium by favouring NHE-1 dephosphorylation and bypassing ROS generation.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.