Candida dubliniensis is an emerging pathogen implicated in a variety of infections in immunocompromised hosts. A 79-year-old male with autoimmune pancytopenia on chronic oral steroid therapy was admitted for suspected sepsis and started on empirical antibiotics and micafungin. He developed floaters and decreased vision while on this regimen and was diagnosed with bilateral candida endophthalmitis. Blood cultures grew C.dubliniensis. Intravenous therapy was switched to voriconazole and amphotericin B. He also received aggressive intravitreal antifungal therapy consisting of 100 μg/0.1 mL voriconazole (4 OD, 3 OS) and 5 μg/0.1 mL amphotericin B (3 OD, 1 OS) over 2 weeks that resulted in local control of infection. The right eye developed a retinal detachment 1 month after initial presentation that was repaired by 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckle, laser and silicone oil. At the 15-month follow-up exam, subsequent to silicone oil removal, membrane peel and cataract surgery, OD visual acuity had improved to 20/80. OS was phakic and 20/25. Aggressive intravitreal antifungal therapy combined with intravenous therapy may control endophthalmitis and avoid the risks associated with pars plana vitrectomy during acute infection.

Endogenous endophthalmitis (EE), also known as metastatic endophthalmitis, results from hematogenous spread of microorganisms from a distant focus. EE accounts for 3–5% of all cases of endophthalmitis [1]. Immunocompromised status, chronic illness, diabetes, indwelling intravenous line, systemic corticosteroids, systemic malignancy and peripheral hyperalimentation are major risk factors for EE. Candida albicans is the most common cause of EE in the West [2]. Ocular candidiasis (chorioretinitis with or without endophthalmitis) occurs in 0.9–44.6% of patients with candidemia, and routine dilated fundus examination of all patients with candidemia is currently recommended [3, 4].

Candida dubliniensis, a newly characterized species of Candida exhibiting a high prevalence of resistance to the azole group of antifungal agents, including fluconazole, is a rare cause of EE with only 11 reported cases in seven publications [5-11]. We present a case of an immunocompromised, elderly male patient who developed bilateral endogenous C. dubliniensis endophthalmitis in the setting of pancytopenia and candidemia.

A 79-year-old male with a history of autoimmune pancytopenia on 80 mg oral prednisone per day was admitted to the hospital for workup of fever and suspected sepsis. He was empirically started on intravenous cefepime, vancomycin and micafungin. The patient developed floaters in the right eye on day 2 which worsened over the next 2 days along with rapid decrease in vision. The blood culture grew C. dubliniensis on day 3. Ophthalmic evaluation on day 4 showed visual acuity of 20/200 in the right eye and 20/25 in the left. External and anterior segment examinations were unremarkable except for mild cataract. The intraocular pressures were normal OU. Dilated fundus examination of the right eye showed marked vitreous exudates and two prominent areas of chorioretinitis, one in the inferotemporal quadrant (Fig. 1) and another at the inferonasal periphery. In addition, there were several small foci of chorioretinitis. The left eye showed two foci of chorioretinitis, one superonasal to the fovea and the other inferotemporal to the macula. The inferotemporal focus was larger, measuring about ½ disk diameter and showed extension of exudates through the internal limiting membrane (Fig. 2). He was diagnosed with bilateral C. dubliniensis endophthalmitis in view of positive blood culture of the same organism.

Fig. 1.

Montaged fundus photograph of the right eye at presentation showing vitreous exudates (string of pearls appearance), a large area of chorioretinitis in the inferotemporal quadrant (arrow), and smaller foci of chorioretinitis (triangles).

Fig. 1.

Montaged fundus photograph of the right eye at presentation showing vitreous exudates (string of pearls appearance), a large area of chorioretinitis in the inferotemporal quadrant (arrow), and smaller foci of chorioretinitis (triangles).

Close modal
Fig. 2.

Montaged fundus photograph of the left eye showing a small focus of chorioretinitis (triangle) and a larger focus with inferotemporal to fovea with extension through internal limiting membrane (arrow).

Fig. 2.

Montaged fundus photograph of the left eye showing a small focus of chorioretinitis (triangle) and a larger focus with inferotemporal to fovea with extension through internal limiting membrane (arrow).

Close modal

Vancomycin, cefepime and micafungin were stopped on day 3 and i.v. amphotericin B and voriconazole were started. After 6 days of i.v. amphotericin B and voriconazole, intravenous antifungal therapy was switched to fluconazole for the next 6 days, followed by oral fluconazole for 6 weeks, per recommendations of the infectious disease department.

After obtaining informed consent, off-label intravitreal voriconazole 100 μg/0.1 mL was administered to the right eye on days 6, 8, 10 and 11, and intravitreal amphotericin B 5 μg/0.1 mL on days 9, 12 and 19. The left eye received intravitreal voriconazole on days 6, 8 and 10, and intravitreal amphotericin B on day 9. Transesophageal echocardiogram was normal without any evidence of endocarditis. Repeat blood cultures 4 days after initial positive blood culture were negative. Sensitivity results from the initial blood culture showed sensitivity to amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, micafungin, voriconazole and other antifungal agents (Table 1).

The right eye showed gradual resolution of vitreous exudates. On day 24, lesions at the inferotemporal and inferonasal periphery had well-defined margins and the appearance of subretinal abscesses (Fig. 3, 4). The visual acuity was 20/200. The left eye lesions showed complete resolution of chorioretinitis and vitreous exudates while maintaining visual acuity of 20/25 (Fig. 5).

Fig. 3.

Fundus photograph on day 24 showing resolution of vitreous exudates and a large chorioretinal abscess at the site of chorioretinitis shown in Figure 1.

Fig. 3.

Fundus photograph on day 24 showing resolution of vitreous exudates and a large chorioretinal abscess at the site of chorioretinitis shown in Figure 1.

Close modal
Fig. 4.

Fundus photograph of the right eye on day 24 showing a choroidal abscess at the inferonasal periphery.

Fig. 4.

Fundus photograph of the right eye on day 24 showing a choroidal abscess at the inferonasal periphery.

Close modal
Fig. 5.

Fundus photograph of the left eye on day 24 showing resolution of vitreous exudates and chorioretinitis.

Fig. 5.

Fundus photograph of the left eye on day 24 showing resolution of vitreous exudates and chorioretinitis.

Close modal

The patient returned 10 days later (day 34) with a 2-day history of nasal visual field defect affecting central vision due to macula-off temporal retinal detachment caused by formation of a retinal break over the inferotemporal chorioretinal abscess. His visual acuity had decreased to hand motions only. A combined vitrectomy buckle procedure was performed 2 days later. After thorough vitrectomy, fluid air exchange was performed through the pre-existing retinal break in the inferotemporal quadrant. The inferonasal abscess was drained with a soft-tip extrusion needle under air (online suppl. Video 1; for all online suppl. material, see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000510500) and resulting retinal break was surrounded with laser. No laser was done around the break in the inferotemporal quadrant because of necrotic retina around it. Silicone oil (1,000 centistokes) was used for internal tamponade.

The retina was successfully re-attached. The patient underwent cataract surgery 3 months after retinal detachment surgery with implantation of a one-piece acrylic intraocular lens in the capsular bag. A prominent epiretinal membrane formed over the macula over the next few months (Fig. 6). Silicone oil removal and removal of the epimacular membrane was performed 1 year after initial presentation (online suppl. Video 2). Three months after silicone oil removal, his visual acuity had improved to 20/80 with an attached retina (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6.

Fundus photograph of the right eye 1 year after presentation, 8 months after cataract surgery, showing attached retina, a prominent epiretinal membrane over the macula and healed inferotemporal chorioretinal scar.

Fig. 6.

Fundus photograph of the right eye 1 year after presentation, 8 months after cataract surgery, showing attached retina, a prominent epiretinal membrane over the macula and healed inferotemporal chorioretinal scar.

Close modal
Fig. 7.

Fundus photograph of the right eye 3 months after silicone oil removal and peeling of epiretinal membrane showing a normal appearing macula and inferotemporal scar.

Fig. 7.

Fundus photograph of the right eye 3 months after silicone oil removal and peeling of epiretinal membrane showing a normal appearing macula and inferotemporal scar.

Close modal

C. dubliniensis is a newly characterized opportunistic pathogen. First isolated in 1995 by Sullivan et al. from the oral cavities of HIV-positive patients, the species was named dubliniensis after the city of Dublin where it was first identified. Since then, C. dubliniensis has been isolated in multiple countries. C. dubliniensis differs from the more common C. albicans by its inability to grow at 42 °C, formation of dark green colonies on CHROMagarTM (CHROMagar, Paris, France), inability to express beta-glucosidase activity on multilocular enzyme electrophoresis, inability to assimilate xylose or alpha methyl D glucoside, and DNA finger printing [12].

Unlike C. albicans, C. dubliniensis is rarely found in the microflora of normal healthy persons and is isolated in only about 2% cases of candidemia, compared to 65% for C. albicans [12]. C. dubliniensis demonstrates reduced susceptibility to azole drugs, such as fluconazole, due to overexpression of transporters such as mdr1p [13]. It causes a variety of infections from mucocutaneous candidiasis to invasive disease both in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. However, most patients with C. dubliniensis infection are immune suppressed, have liver disease or give history of substance abuse [14].

In candidemia patients, the rate of developing ocular involvement (chorioretinitis with or without vitritis) ranges from 0.9 to 44.6% [3], prompting the recommendation from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) for dilated fundus examination of all non-neutropenic patients with candidemia [4]. Systemic therapy might be adequate to treat patients with chorioretinitis, but those with vitritis also need intravitreal therapy or vitrectomy combined with intravitreal antifungal agents [4]. At this time, there is no evidence of superiority of pars plana vitrectomy over intravitreal injections alone. Although vitrectomy has theoretical advantage of reducing the fungal load, it can be difficult in patients with pre-existing cataract and can result in iatrogenic retinal breaks particularly in eyes with necrotic chorioretinitis lesions and attached posterior hyaloid. Vitrectomy has an additional drawback of reducing the half-life of almost all intravitreal administered medications by about half [15]. Despite treatment, the prognosis of candida endophthalmitis as opposed to chorioretinitis is poor according to a recent review particularly for those treated with vitrectomy, although this may be due to more severe disease in patients undergoing vitrectomy [16].

Intravitreal voriconazole has recently gained popularity for fungal endophthalmitis. However, it has a short half-life of 2.5 h. Assuming 4 mL volume of an average vitreous cavity, 100 μg of intravitreal voriconazole will have 25 μg/mL concentration in the vitreous cavity immediately after intravitreal injection, which will decrease to below 0.008 μg/mL after 8 half-lives, or about 20 h [17]. In view of this, we elected to give intravitreal voriconazole almost every 36–48 h for a total of four injections to the right eye and three to the less severely affected left eye.

The minimum inhibitory concentration for amphotericin B was 0.5 μg/mL. Intravitreal amphotericin B is expected to have 1.25 μg/mL concentration after intravitreal injection of 5 μg. Considering the half-life of intravitreal amphotericin B to be 8.9 days [18], an injection of amphotericin B can be expected to stay therapeutic for about 1 week. We gave a total of three amphotericin B injections to the right eye and one to the left on different days than those when he received intravitreal voriconazole. This approach resulted in good control of local disease. Daily intravitreal voriconazole and alternate day intravitreal amphotericin B combination has been previously used successfully for endophthalmitis caused by filamentous fungi [19], and recently for coccidioidal endophthalmitis [20].

Although inferonasal subretinal abscess was drained during the vitrectomy procedure for retinal detachment, no additional intravitreal antifungal agents were administered. Previous reports have shown that administration of intravitreal agents may not be necessary after internal drainage of subretinal abscess [21].

To the best of our knowledge, there are only 11 previously reported cases of C. dubliniensis endophthalmitis in the literature till date (Table 2). Most were immune suppressed, gave history of intravenous drug use or had liver disease. Only two eyes had bilateral involvement, and only one had documented candidemia.

The emergence of nonalbicans Candida species as increasingly frequent pathogens has led to the recommendation from IDSA that patients with candidemia should receive an echinocandin initially, with de-escalation to an azole after susceptibility is confirmed [4]. However, echinocandins being large molecules do not penetrate into the vitreous nor provide protection against ocular candidiasis [16]. Our patient developed symptoms despite being on empirical echinocandin therapy.

To conclude, we presented a case of bilateral C. dubliniensis in an immune suppressed patient. Aggressive intravitreal therapy controlled local disease. The retinal detachment in one eye was successfully managed with vitrectomy buckle laser and silicone oil procedure followed by cataract surgery, silicone oil and epiretinal membrane removal with good results.

All procedures were done in accordance with the tenets of Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2013. Approval from Institutional Review Board (IRB) was not required for this retrospective study involving a single case report. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

No funding was received.

K.K. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript, collection of data, and discussion. D.S.M. contributed to the revision, formatting, and submitting of the manuscript, and worked on the references. T.C. and B.H. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript, data collection, and critical review.

1.
Jackson
TL
,
Paraskevopoulos
T
,
Georgalas
I
.
Systematic review of 342 cases of endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis
.
Surv Ophthalmol
.
2014
Nov-Dec
;
59
(
6
):
627
35
.
[PubMed]
0039-6257
2.
Connell
PP
,
O’Neill
EC
,
Fabinyi
D
,
Islam
FM
,
Buttery
R
,
McCombe
M
, et al.
Endogenous endophthalmitis: 10-year experience at a tertiary referral centre
.
Eye (Lond)
.
2011
Jan
;
25
(
1
):
66
72
.
[PubMed]
0950-222X
3.
Vinikoor
MJ
,
Zoghby
J
,
Cohen
KL
,
Tucker
JD
.
Do all candidemic patients need an ophthalmic examination?
Int J Infect Dis
.
2013
Mar
;
17
(
3
):
e146
8
.
[PubMed]
1201-9712
4.
Pappas
PG
,
Kauffman
CA
,
Andes
DR
,
Clancy
CJ
,
Marr
KA
,
Ostrosky-Zeichner
L
, et al.
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America
.
Clin Infect Dis
.
2016
Feb
;
62
(
4
):
e1
50
.
[PubMed]
1058-4838
5.
Sedeek
RW
,
Shah
M
,
Gentile
R
,
Samson
CM
.
First Case Report of Candida Dubliniensis Endogenous Endophthalmitis
.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
.
2008
;
49
:
952
952
.0146-0404
6.
Pelegrín
L
,
Mesquida
M
,
Adán
A
,
Cervera
C
,
Bosch-Mestres
J
,
Esteban-Redondo
C
, et al.
Candida dubliniensis endophthalmitis in a HIV-infected intravenous drug abuser
.
Mycoses
.
2011
Nov
;
54
(
6
):
e856
8
.
[PubMed]
0933-7407
7.
Espinosa-Heidmann
DG
,
McMillan
BD
,
Lasala
PR
,
Stanley
J
,
Larzo
CR
.
Candida dubliniensis endophthalmitis: first case in North America
.
Int Ophthalmol
.
2012
Feb
;
32
(
1
):
41
5
.
[PubMed]
0165-5701
8.
Moloney
TP
,
Park
J
. Candida dubliniensis endophthalmitis: five cases over 15 years. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect
2013
; 3:66-5760-3-66.
9.
Rosenberger
E
,
Youssef
DA
,
Safdar
S
,
Larzo
CR
,
Myers
J
.
Third case of Candida dubliniensis endogenous endophthalmitis in North America: case report and review of the literature
.
Int Ophthalmol
.
2014
Aug
;
34
(
4
):
945
50
.
[PubMed]
0165-5701
10.
McMillan
BD
,
Miller
GJ
,
Nguyen
J
. Rare case of exogenous Candida dubliniensis endophthalmitis: a case report and brief review of the literature. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect
2014
; 4:11-5760-4-11. eCollection 2014.
11.
Gittins-Núñez
LO
,
Hernández-Núñez
F
.
[Endogenous Candida dubliniensis endophtalmitis. First case in Mexico]
.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc
.
2015
Jan-Feb
;
53
(
1
):
92
6
.
[PubMed]
2448-5667
12.
Sullivan
DJ
,
Moran
GP
,
Pinjon
E
,
Al-Mosaid
A
,
Stokes
C
,
Vaughan
C
, et al.
Comparison of the epidemiology, drug resistance mechanisms, and virulence of Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans
.
FEMS Yeast Res
.
2004
Jan
;
4
(
4-5
):
369
76
.
[PubMed]
1567-1356
13.
Gutiérrez
J
,
Morales
P
,
González
MA
,
Quindós
G
.
Candida dubliniensis, a new fungal pathogen
.
J Basic Microbiol
.
2002
;
42
(
3
):
207
27
.
[PubMed]
0233-111X
14.
Khan
Z
,
Ahmad
S
,
Joseph
L
,
Chandy
R
.
Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen
.
PLoS One
.
2012
;
7
(
3
):
e32952
.
[PubMed]
1932-6203
15.
Radhika
M
,
Mithal
K
,
Bawdekar
A
, et al.
Pharmacokinetics of intravitreal antibiotics in endophthalmitis. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect
2014
; 4:22-014-0022-z. eCollection 2014.
16.
Breazzano
MP
,
Day
HR
 Jr
,
Bloch
KC
,
Tanaka
S
,
Cherney
EF
,
Sternberg
P
 Jr
, et al.
Utility of Ophthalmologic Screening for Patients With Candida Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review
.
JAMA Ophthalmol
.
2019
Jun
;
137
(
6
):
698
710
.
[PubMed]
2168-6165
17.
Gao
H
,
Pennesi
ME
,
Shah
K
,
Qiao
X
,
Hariprasad
SM
,
Mieler
WF
, et al.
Intravitreal voriconazole: an electroretinographic and histopathologic study
.
Arch Ophthalmol
.
2004
Nov
;
122
(
11
):
1687
92
.
[PubMed]
0003-9950
18.
Wingard
LB
 Jr
,
Zuravleff
JJ
,
Doft
BH
,
Berk
L
,
Rinkoff
J
.
Intraocular distribution of intravitreally administered amphotericin B in normal and vitrectomized eyes
.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
.
1989
Oct
;
30
(
10
):
2184
9
.
[PubMed]
0146-0404
19.
Mithal
K
,
Pathengay
A
,
Bawdekar
A
,
Jindal
A
,
Vira
D
,
Relhan
N
, et al.
Filamentous fungal endophthalmitis: results of combination therapy with intravitreal amphotericin B and voriconazole
.
Clin Ophthalmol
.
2015
Apr
;
9
:
649
55
.
[PubMed]
1177-5467
20.
Ahmad
T
,
Li
J
,
Wu
F
, et al.
Coccidioidal Endophthalmitis: Excellent Recovery of Vision with Aggressive Use of Intravitreal Antifungals and Vitrectomy. Retinal Cases and Brief Reports
2020
; Publish Ahead of Print.
21.
Halperin
LS
,
Roseman
RL
.
Successful treatment of a subretinal abscess in an intravenous drug abuser Case report
.
Arch Ophthalmol
.
1988
Dec
;
106
(
12
):
1651
2
.
[PubMed]
0003-9950
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.