Abstract
Candida dubliniensis is an emerging pathogen implicated in a variety of infections in immunocompromised hosts. A 79-year-old male with autoimmune pancytopenia on chronic oral steroid therapy was admitted for suspected sepsis and started on empirical antibiotics and micafungin. He developed floaters and decreased vision while on this regimen and was diagnosed with bilateral candida endophthalmitis. Blood cultures grew C. dubliniensis. Intravenous therapy was switched to voriconazole and amphotericin B. He also received aggressive intravitreal antifungal therapy consisting of 100 μg/0.1 mL voriconazole (4 OD, 3 OS) and 5 μg/0.1 mL amphotericin B (3 OD, 1 OS) over 2 weeks that resulted in local control of infection. The right eye developed a retinal detachment 1 month after initial presentation that was repaired by 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckle, laser and silicone oil. At the 15-month follow-up exam, subsequent to silicone oil removal, membrane peel and cataract surgery, OD visual acuity had improved to 20/80. OS was phakic and 20/25. Aggressive intravitreal antifungal therapy combined with intravenous therapy may control endophthalmitis and avoid the risks associated with pars plana vitrectomy during acute infection.
Introduction
Endogenous endophthalmitis (EE), also known as metastatic endophthalmitis, results from hematogenous spread of microorganisms from a distant focus. EE accounts for 3–5% of all cases of endophthalmitis [1]. Immunocompromised status, chronic illness, diabetes, indwelling intravenous line, systemic corticosteroids, systemic malignancy and peripheral hyperalimentation are major risk factors for EE. Candida albicans is the most common cause of EE in the West [2]. Ocular candidiasis (chorioretinitis with or without endophthalmitis) occurs in 0.9–44.6% of patients with candidemia, and routine dilated fundus examination of all patients with candidemia is currently recommended [3, 4].
Candida dubliniensis, a newly characterized species of Candida exhibiting a high prevalence of resistance to the azole group of antifungal agents, including fluconazole, is a rare cause of EE with only 11 reported cases in seven publications [5-11]. We present a case of an immunocompromised, elderly male patient who developed bilateral endogenous C. dubliniensis endophthalmitis in the setting of pancytopenia and candidemia.
Case Report
A 79-year-old male with a history of autoimmune pancytopenia on 80 mg oral prednisone per day was admitted to the hospital for workup of fever and suspected sepsis. He was empirically started on intravenous cefepime, vancomycin and micafungin. The patient developed floaters in the right eye on day 2 which worsened over the next 2 days along with rapid decrease in vision. The blood culture grew C. dubliniensis on day 3. Ophthalmic evaluation on day 4 showed visual acuity of 20/200 in the right eye and 20/25 in the left. External and anterior segment examinations were unremarkable except for mild cataract. The intraocular pressures were normal OU. Dilated fundus examination of the right eye showed marked vitreous exudates and two prominent areas of chorioretinitis, one in the inferotemporal quadrant (Fig. 1) and another at the inferonasal periphery. In addition, there were several small foci of chorioretinitis. The left eye showed two foci of chorioretinitis, one superonasal to the fovea and the other inferotemporal to the macula. The inferotemporal focus was larger, measuring about ½ disk diameter and showed extension of exudates through the internal limiting membrane (Fig. 2). He was diagnosed with bilateral C. dubliniensis endophthalmitis in view of positive blood culture of the same organism.
Montaged fundus photograph of the right eye at presentation showing vitreous exudates (string of pearls appearance), a large area of chorioretinitis in the inferotemporal quadrant (arrow), and smaller foci of chorioretinitis (triangles).
Montaged fundus photograph of the right eye at presentation showing vitreous exudates (string of pearls appearance), a large area of chorioretinitis in the inferotemporal quadrant (arrow), and smaller foci of chorioretinitis (triangles).
Montaged fundus photograph of the left eye showing a small focus of chorioretinitis (triangle) and a larger focus with inferotemporal to fovea with extension through internal limiting membrane (arrow).
Montaged fundus photograph of the left eye showing a small focus of chorioretinitis (triangle) and a larger focus with inferotemporal to fovea with extension through internal limiting membrane (arrow).
Vancomycin, cefepime and micafungin were stopped on day 3 and i.v. amphotericin B and voriconazole were started. After 6 days of i.v. amphotericin B and voriconazole, intravenous antifungal therapy was switched to fluconazole for the next 6 days, followed by oral fluconazole for 6 weeks, per recommendations of the infectious disease department.
After obtaining informed consent, off-label intravitreal voriconazole 100 μg/0.1 mL was administered to the right eye on days 6, 8, 10 and 11, and intravitreal amphotericin B 5 μg/0.1 mL on days 9, 12 and 19. The left eye received intravitreal voriconazole on days 6, 8 and 10, and intravitreal amphotericin B on day 9. Transesophageal echocardiogram was normal without any evidence of endocarditis. Repeat blood cultures 4 days after initial positive blood culture were negative. Sensitivity results from the initial blood culture showed sensitivity to amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, micafungin, voriconazole and other antifungal agents (Table 1).
The right eye showed gradual resolution of vitreous exudates. On day 24, lesions at the inferotemporal and inferonasal periphery had well-defined margins and the appearance of subretinal abscesses (Fig. 3, 4). The visual acuity was 20/200. The left eye lesions showed complete resolution of chorioretinitis and vitreous exudates while maintaining visual acuity of 20/25 (Fig. 5).
Fundus photograph on day 24 showing resolution of vitreous exudates and a large chorioretinal abscess at the site of chorioretinitis shown in Figure 1.
Fundus photograph on day 24 showing resolution of vitreous exudates and a large chorioretinal abscess at the site of chorioretinitis shown in Figure 1.
Fundus photograph of the right eye on day 24 showing a choroidal abscess at the inferonasal periphery.
Fundus photograph of the right eye on day 24 showing a choroidal abscess at the inferonasal periphery.
Fundus photograph of the left eye on day 24 showing resolution of vitreous exudates and chorioretinitis.
Fundus photograph of the left eye on day 24 showing resolution of vitreous exudates and chorioretinitis.
The patient returned 10 days later (day 34) with a 2-day history of nasal visual field defect affecting central vision due to macula-off temporal retinal detachment caused by formation of a retinal break over the inferotemporal chorioretinal abscess. His visual acuity had decreased to hand motions only. A combined vitrectomy buckle procedure was performed 2 days later. After thorough vitrectomy, fluid air exchange was performed through the pre-existing retinal break in the inferotemporal quadrant. The inferonasal abscess was drained with a soft-tip extrusion needle under air (online suppl. Video 1; for all online suppl. material, see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000510500) and resulting retinal break was surrounded with laser. No laser was done around the break in the inferotemporal quadrant because of necrotic retina around it. Silicone oil (1,000 centistokes) was used for internal tamponade.
The retina was successfully re-attached. The patient underwent cataract surgery 3 months after retinal detachment surgery with implantation of a one-piece acrylic intraocular lens in the capsular bag. A prominent epiretinal membrane formed over the macula over the next few months (Fig. 6). Silicone oil removal and removal of the epimacular membrane was performed 1 year after initial presentation (online suppl. Video 2). Three months after silicone oil removal, his visual acuity had improved to 20/80 with an attached retina (Fig. 7).
Fundus photograph of the right eye 1 year after presentation, 8 months after cataract surgery, showing attached retina, a prominent epiretinal membrane over the macula and healed inferotemporal chorioretinal scar.
Fundus photograph of the right eye 1 year after presentation, 8 months after cataract surgery, showing attached retina, a prominent epiretinal membrane over the macula and healed inferotemporal chorioretinal scar.
Fundus photograph of the right eye 3 months after silicone oil removal and peeling of epiretinal membrane showing a normal appearing macula and inferotemporal scar.
Fundus photograph of the right eye 3 months after silicone oil removal and peeling of epiretinal membrane showing a normal appearing macula and inferotemporal scar.
Discussion
C. dubliniensis is a newly characterized opportunistic pathogen. First isolated in 1995 by Sullivan et al. from the oral cavities of HIV-positive patients, the species was named dubliniensis after the city of Dublin where it was first identified. Since then, C. dubliniensis has been isolated in multiple countries. C. dubliniensis differs from the more common C. albicans by its inability to grow at 42 °C, formation of dark green colonies on CHROMagarTM (CHROMagar, Paris, France), inability to express beta-glucosidase activity on multilocular enzyme electrophoresis, inability to assimilate xylose or alpha methyl D glucoside, and DNA finger printing [12].
Unlike C. albicans, C. dubliniensis is rarely found in the microflora of normal healthy persons and is isolated in only about 2% cases of candidemia, compared to 65% for C. albicans [12]. C. dubliniensis demonstrates reduced susceptibility to azole drugs, such as fluconazole, due to overexpression of transporters such as mdr1p [13]. It causes a variety of infections from mucocutaneous candidiasis to invasive disease both in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. However, most patients with C. dubliniensis infection are immune suppressed, have liver disease or give history of substance abuse [14].
In candidemia patients, the rate of developing ocular involvement (chorioretinitis with or without vitritis) ranges from 0.9 to 44.6% [3], prompting the recommendation from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) for dilated fundus examination of all non-neutropenic patients with candidemia [4]. Systemic therapy might be adequate to treat patients with chorioretinitis, but those with vitritis also need intravitreal therapy or vitrectomy combined with intravitreal antifungal agents [4]. At this time, there is no evidence of superiority of pars plana vitrectomy over intravitreal injections alone. Although vitrectomy has theoretical advantage of reducing the fungal load, it can be difficult in patients with pre-existing cataract and can result in iatrogenic retinal breaks particularly in eyes with necrotic chorioretinitis lesions and attached posterior hyaloid. Vitrectomy has an additional drawback of reducing the half-life of almost all intravitreal administered medications by about half [15]. Despite treatment, the prognosis of candida endophthalmitis as opposed to chorioretinitis is poor according to a recent review particularly for those treated with vitrectomy, although this may be due to more severe disease in patients undergoing vitrectomy [16].
Intravitreal voriconazole has recently gained popularity for fungal endophthalmitis. However, it has a short half-life of 2.5 h. Assuming 4 mL volume of an average vitreous cavity, 100 μg of intravitreal voriconazole will have 25 μg/mL concentration in the vitreous cavity immediately after intravitreal injection, which will decrease to below 0.008 μg/mL after 8 half-lives, or about 20 h [17]. In view of this, we elected to give intravitreal voriconazole almost every 36–48 h for a total of four injections to the right eye and three to the less severely affected left eye.
The minimum inhibitory concentration for amphotericin B was 0.5 μg/mL. Intravitreal amphotericin B is expected to have 1.25 μg/mL concentration after intravitreal injection of 5 μg. Considering the half-life of intravitreal amphotericin B to be 8.9 days [18], an injection of amphotericin B can be expected to stay therapeutic for about 1 week. We gave a total of three amphotericin B injections to the right eye and one to the left on different days than those when he received intravitreal voriconazole. This approach resulted in good control of local disease. Daily intravitreal voriconazole and alternate day intravitreal amphotericin B combination has been previously used successfully for endophthalmitis caused by filamentous fungi [19], and recently for coccidioidal endophthalmitis [20].
Although inferonasal subretinal abscess was drained during the vitrectomy procedure for retinal detachment, no additional intravitreal antifungal agents were administered. Previous reports have shown that administration of intravitreal agents may not be necessary after internal drainage of subretinal abscess [21].
To the best of our knowledge, there are only 11 previously reported cases of C. dubliniensis endophthalmitis in the literature till date (Table 2). Most were immune suppressed, gave history of intravenous drug use or had liver disease. Only two eyes had bilateral involvement, and only one had documented candidemia.
The emergence of nonalbicans Candida species as increasingly frequent pathogens has led to the recommendation from IDSA that patients with candidemia should receive an echinocandin initially, with de-escalation to an azole after susceptibility is confirmed [4]. However, echinocandins being large molecules do not penetrate into the vitreous nor provide protection against ocular candidiasis [16]. Our patient developed symptoms despite being on empirical echinocandin therapy.
To conclude, we presented a case of bilateral C. dubliniensis in an immune suppressed patient. Aggressive intravitreal therapy controlled local disease. The retinal detachment in one eye was successfully managed with vitrectomy buckle laser and silicone oil procedure followed by cataract surgery, silicone oil and epiretinal membrane removal with good results.
Statement of Ethics
All procedures were done in accordance with the tenets of Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2013. Approval from Institutional Review Board (IRB) was not required for this retrospective study involving a single case report. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding Sources
No funding was received.
Author Contributions
K.K. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript, collection of data, and discussion. D.S.M. contributed to the revision, formatting, and submitting of the manuscript, and worked on the references. T.C. and B.H. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript, data collection, and critical review.