Our aim was to examine the symptoms and clinical characteristics of visual snow in a group of 6 patients from a Department of Ophthalmology and a Department of Neurology. Visual snow is now recognized as a true physiological disorder. Previously, physicians unaware of this syndrome may have misinterpreted its symptoms as a persistent visual aura. By promoting awareness of this syndrome, greater quantitative and qualitative research may expand our understanding and treatment of this disorder.

During recent years, the condition of visual snow (VS) has accelerated its acceptance as a true syndrome, separate from migraine. These patients experience similar visual symptoms with sensations of seeing “snow,” a persistent positive visual phenomenon comparable to grainy or pixelated television static [1-5]. This distressing condition impairs daily life, often leading to numerous unnecessary examinations and treatment attempts. Therefore, expanding our knowledge and understanding of this condition is important and beneficial for the patient and caregiver.

Symptoms vary, but can present with persistent, innumerable flickering black and white dots throughout the visual field, though they may occasionally appear as colorful, flashing, or transparent. The intensity may differ in ambient lighting, be more noticeable on plain backgrounds, or more attenuated on textured backgrounds [1-3, 5, 7]. Furthermore, patients may experience additional visual symptoms, such as palinopsia, photophobia, nyctalopia, and enhanced entopic phenomena, which arise from the structure of the visual system itself [1-3].

Case 1

An 18-year-old male presented with a past medical history only notable for asthma, and without a history of headaches or migraine. He complained of a persistent visual disturbance of squiggly worms moving in front of his eyes, without any connection to his head movement. This phenomenon first appeared after drinking alcohol. Prior to his examination, he began to see flashing white small dots and complained of seeing a shadow around moving objects and an orange glowing ball when closing his eyes. He also suffered from tinnitus, more so in the right ear. An electroretinogram showed insignificant changes. He was evaluated by a psychiatrist who diagnosed anxiety related to his symptoms, with no additional findings.

Case 2

A 32-year-old myopic female presented with a past medical history of migraine headaches without aura, familial Mediterranean fever, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Her visual symptoms began during her second trimester of pregnancy. She described the visual disturbance as small circles in front of her eyes lasting seconds, in addition to a constant visual disturbance similar to “snowflakes” in her whole visual field. She also suffered from tinnitus.

Case 3

A 28-year-old male presented with complaints of VS symptoms (VSS) over the past year, since he started using Roaccutane (isotretinoin) for acne treatment. His symptoms consisted of constant flickering white dots encompassing all his visual field, in addition to nyctalopia and a sizeable number of floaters. The patient also suffered from muscle pain, chronic tension-type headaches, concentration difficulties, impotence, and mild depression. Blood tests showed elevated CPK and prolactin, with a low testosterone level. A treatment trial consisting of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (Duloxetine) and tricyclic antidepressants (Amitriptyline) had failed.

Case 4

A 46-year-old myopic female patient with a past ocular history of keratoconus reported experiencing VSS since childhood, without complaints of headaches or tinnitus. The patient described the visual disturbances as constant flashing lights, similar to TV static noise, throughout her visual field.

Case 5

A 23-year-old woman, with a past medical history of migraine headaches with aura, experienced since the age of 12, presented with a 4-year history of VS, described as small flashing dots and a “granular” or “hazy” image with a “static”-like background and complaints of missing areas in her visual field. In addition, she complained of photophobia, nyctalopia, and numbness throughout her body. She is currently receiving vitamin B12 injection therapy. Her neurological examination was normal and imaging studies showed only mild sinusitis. The rest of the examination was normal.

Case 6

A 40-year-old male patient presented with a past medical history of depression and chronic treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (Vortioxetine). He had no complaints of headaches or tinnitus. Over the past 10 years, the patient suffered from a visual disturbance described as static dots, flickering throughout the visual field, worsening in dim light. Moreover, he described white shadows around moving objects that lasted for a few seconds.

All the patients’ ophthalmic and neuro-ophthalmic examinations were normal. Additional blood tests for all the patients described, including TSH, APLA, and vitamin B12, showed no important findings except for an elevated CPK and prolactin and reduced testosterone in Case 3. All the patients also underwent perimetry, brain MRI, electroretinogram, and visual evoked potentials, which were normal.

The first description of VS was termed in 1995 by Liu et al [3]. They described 10 patients suffering from migraines who developed a persistent positive visual phenomenon lasting for an extended period of time. VS was found to be common in 30–60% of patients suffering from migraines. Schankin et al. [1] hypothesized that VS is a clinically distinct entity which should be classified as a separate syndrome in its own right. Patients with “visual snow” suffer from continuous TV static-like tiny flickering dots filling the entire visual field. Most patients described a syndrome with additional visual symptoms which were included in the proposed diagnostic criteria for VSS (Table 1) [1]. It is important to emphasize that VSS is a diagnosis of exclusion. Similar entities that need to ruled out are migraine, retinal and vitreous diseases, and retinal detachment.

Table 1.

Criteria for the definition of the visual snow syndrome

Criteria for the definition of the visual snow syndrome
Criteria for the definition of the visual snow syndrome

We describe herein 6 cases of patients suffering from VS: 5 without a trigger and 1 where VS was reported after being treated with oral Isoretinoine for acne (Case 3). Isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) has been used for many years in the treatment of severe cystic acne and various other skin disorders. At present, there is no report in the literature connecting this phenomenon to the drug. We assume this to be an incidental finding. CPK, testosterone, and prolactin levels may be affected by the use of this drug [8].

Comparable to these patients, studies have shown a relatively high prevalence of migraines in patients with VSS. One prospective study of 120 patients found a history of migraines with or without aura in 58% of VS patients and migraines with typical aura in 31% of the patients [1]. As in previous large case series published, our patients’ visual evoked potentials were normal [1, 4]. Eren et al. [6] found that VSS patients showed a unique pattern of increased N145 latency and reduced N75-P100 amplitudes. Tinnitus appears to be common in this population as well, occurring in up to 63% of patients, though the frequency and persistence of tinnitus has, as yet, not been described [1, 4].

Half of the patients suffered from VSS. The distribution of visual complaints is presented in Table 2. Three of the patients suffered from migraines (2 without aura), and 2 patients suffered from tinnitus. VSS prevalence is unknown; it is more frequent in males with a ratio of 1:2.2 [7]. Many believe that VS begins in young adulthood; however, some cases of childhood onset have been described [8, 9].

Table 2.

Additional visual complaints of patients suffering from visual snow

Additional visual complaints of patients suffering from visual snow
Additional visual complaints of patients suffering from visual snow

Several reports have described different treatment possibilities, yet treatment effectiveness varies, and thus far, no randomized controlled trials have been performed. One such example is the case report of Unal-Cevik et al. [10] of a 25-year-old female successfully treated with lamotrigine [see also 11]. The best evidence we have of investigating a greater cohort is the retrospective analysis of van Dongen et al. [12] where Lamotrigine was prescribed to more than half of the patients, with ∼20% experiencing a partial remission of symptoms. Other treatments described (i.e., valproate, topiramate, acetazolamide, and flunarizine) have not led to any improvement except for topiramate in one patient, who discontinued the medication due to adverse side effects [12, 13].

Although the pathophysiology of VSS is unknown, the description of the TV static pattern in the visual field points to a higher level of processing beyond the lateral geniculate body. A number of theories have been suggested such as a hyperactive visual cortex leading to a detection of visual stimuli that healthy individuals do not detect, or alternatively, an impaired processing of simultaneous afferent information projecting to the cortex, leading to the perception of visual stimuli in the absence of such, possibly due to decreased neuronal inhibition. Brain imaging studies have shown no specific structural abnormalities [1, 4, 5] and no regional functional changes in cerebral water diffusion and perfusion [14]. A recent functional brain imaging study performed on VSS patients reported that 18F-FDG PET lingual hyper metabolism, compared with healthy controls after adjusting for the presence of a typical migraine aura [15], strengthens the theory of visual cortex involvement. Recently, Lauschke et al. [4] formed a new hypothesis regarding the pathophysiological process of VS. The authors presumed that VSS is part of a thalamocortical dysrhythmia, with hyperexcitability playing a role, and is also associated with other disorders of sensory processing such as tinnitus, tremor, and migraine, possibly also involving the magnocellular pathway [1-4, 15]. An improvement in symptoms was also observed when using yellow-blue colored filters. McKendrick et al. [16] compared 16 patients with VSS with healthy controls and demonstrated suprathreshold processing of contrast and luminance, pointing to an imbalance between visual cortical inhibition and excitation, consistent with elevated spontaneous, cortical excitability in the primary visual cortex.

By promoting awareness of this syndrome, the fears of those who suffer from VSS will be alleviated and the initial labeling of these patients as mentally ill will be eliminated. Since the patients had constant complaints, without any visible cause, they had undergone a multitude of tests and examinations. We believe that if the complaints and history are typical according to the VSS syndrome criteria [17], further investigation is redundant, saving unnecessary and costly examinations. On the other hand, only after excluding other diagnoses can the doctor’s and patient’s fears be alleviated. In addition, greater quantitative and qualitative research may expand our understanding and treatment of this disorder, which appears to be connected to sensory processing, with no structural pathology found thus far. Patient education regarding this syndrome may possibly lead to faster improvement and recovery, better coping, and the minimization of the effect of this condition.

The authors thank Mrs. Phyllis Curchack Kornspan for her editorial services.

The study was approved by the Institution’s (HIllel Yaffe Medical Center) Helsinki Committee. Informed consent was not needed. All subjects’ identifications have been omitted/avoided.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

The authors have no funding sources to declare.

Eran Berkowitz: design, literature search, and manuscript preparation. Yaron River: data acquisition, manuscript editing, and manuscript review. Kathleen Digre: literature search, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, and manuscript review. Beatrice Tiosano: design, manuscript editing, and manuscript review. Anat Kesler: data acquisition, literature search, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, and manuscript review.

1.
Schankin
CJ
,
Maniyar
FH
,
Sprenger
T
,
Chou
DE
,
Eller
M
,
Goadsby
PJ
.
The relation between migraine, typical migraine aura and “visual snow”
.
Headache
.
2014
Jun
;
54
(
6
):
957
66
.
[PubMed]
0017-8748
2.
Santos-Bueso
E
,
Sastre-Ibanez
M
,
Saenz-Frances
F
,
Porta-Etessam
J
, Garcia-Sanchez J. Visual snow. From a symptom to a syndrome? Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol.
Jam
.
2015
;
90
(
1
):
51
2
.
3.
Liu
GT
,
Schatz
NJ
,
Galetta
SL
,
Volpe
NJ
,
Skobieranda
F
,
Kosmorsky
GS
.
Persistent positive visual phenomena in migraine
.
Neurology
.
1995
Apr
;
45
(
4
):
664
8
.
[PubMed]
0028-3878
4.
Lauschke
JL
,
Plant
GT
,
Fraser
CL
.
Visual snow: A thalamocortical dysrhythmia of the visual pathway?
J Clin Neurosci
.
2016
Jun
;
28
:
123
7
.
[PubMed]
0967-5868
5.
Bessero
AC
,
Plant
GT
.
Should ‘visual snow’ and persistence of after-images be recognised as a new visual syndrome?
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
.
2014
Sep
;
85
(
9
):
1057
8
.
[PubMed]
0022-3050
6.
Eren
O
,
Rauschel
V
,
Ruscheweyh
R
,
Straube
A
,
Schankin
CJ
.
Evidence of dysfunction in the visual association cortex in visual snow syndrome
.
Ann Neurol
.
2018
Dec
;
84
(
6
):
946
9
.
[PubMed]
0364-5134
7.
Schwartz
DP
,
Robbins
MS
.
Primary headache disorders and neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations
.
Eye Brain
.
2012
Sep
;
4
:
49
61
.
[PubMed]
1179-2744
8.
www.accessdata.fda.gov Reference ID: 4256834
9.
Simpson
JC
,
Goadsby
PJ
,
Prabhakar
P
.
Positive persistent visual symptoms (visual snow) presenting as a migraine variant in a 12-year-old girl
.
Pediatr Neurol
.
2013
Nov
;
49
(
5
):
361
3
.
[PubMed]
0887-8994
10.
Unal-Cevik
I
,
Yildiz
FG
.
Visual snow in migraine with aura: further characterization by brain imaging, electrophysiology, and treatment-case report
.
Headache
.
2015
Nov-Dec
;
55
(
10
):
1436
41
.
[PubMed]
0017-8748
11.
Luna
S
,
Lai
D
,
Harris
A
.
Antagonistic relationship between VEP potentiation and gamma power in visual snow syndrome
.
Headache
.
2018
Jan
;
58
(
1
):
138
44
.
[PubMed]
0017-8748
12.
van Dongen
RM
,
Waaijer
LC
,
Onderwater
GL
,
Ferrari
MD
,
Terwindt
GM
.
Treatment effects and comorbid diseases in 58 patients with visual snow
.
Neurology
.
2019
Jul
;
93
(
4
):
e398
403
.
[PubMed]
0028-3878
13.
Haan
J
,
Sluis
P
,
Sluis
LH
,
Ferrari
MD
.
Acetazolamide treatment for migraine aura status
.
Neurology
.
2000
Nov
;
55
(
10
):
1588
9
.
[PubMed]
0028-3878
14.
Jäger
HR
,
Giffin
NJ
,
Goadsby
PJ
.
Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging in persistent migrainous visual disturbances
.
Cephalalgia
.
2005
May
;
25
(
5
):
323
32
.
[PubMed]
0333-1024
15.
Schankin
CJ
,
Maniyar
FH
,
Digre
KB
,
Goadsby
PJ
.
‘Visual snow’ - a disorder distinct from persistent migraine aura
.
Brain
.
2014
May
;
137
(
Pt 5
):
1419
28
.
[PubMed]
0006-8950
16.
McKendrick
AM
,
Chan
YM
,
Tien
M
,
Millist
L
,
Clough
M
,
Mack
H
, et al
Behavioral measures of cortical hyperexcitability assessed in people who experience visual snow
.
Neurology
.
2017
Mar
;
88
(
13
):
1243
9
.
[PubMed]
0028-3878
17.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society
.
The International Classification of Headache Disorders
(2nd ed). Cephalalgia
2004
;24 (Suppl 1):9-160.
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.