Human B cell lines were tested for the capacity to convert C3 to C3b/iC3b through the alternative C pathway (ACP) and to fix the generated C3 fragments. The panel of lines included four Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative Burkitt’s lymphomas and their sublines converted with two EBV strains: the prototype B958 (B virus) and the nontransforming P3HR-1 (P virus). Comparison of these groups of parallel lines (derived from a single patient) showed that the EBV-carrying cells were more efficient in activation and fixation of C3. All cell lines activated C3 with higher efficiency when treated with interferon gamma or tumor necrosis factor alpha. After treatment, the comparative relationships between the sublines changed. The treated EBV-negative and the P virus converted sublines showed similar levels of ACP activation, while the B virus carrying sublines were more efficient. The amounts of bound C3 fragments on the activating cells correlated with the ACP efficiencies. In accordance with the elevated ACP activation capacity of the cells after cytokine treatment, the amounts of C3 fragments detected on their surfaces were higher. Among the lines tested, only two (BL28 and Ramos) were sensitive to C-mediated lysis. The lytic sensitivity of these two lines increased after treatment with the cytokines. The results indicate, therefore, that the cytokine-induced increase in ACP activation by Burkitt’s lymphoma lines is not sufficient to overcome resistance to C lysis.

Keywords:
Alternative C pathway, Burkitt’s lymphoma, C3, Epstein-Barr virus, Interferon, Tumor necrosis factor
This content is only available via PDF.
1991
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.