Background: The demand for traditional health care is rising. The study aims to investigate the profile, practice and treatment characteristics of traditional health practitioners who participated in the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS-5) in 2015. Methods: A national community facility cross-sectional survey was carried out with a probability sample of 4,461 traditional health practitioners in Indonesia. Results: Traditional health practitioners were typically female, over 50 years old, had no or lower levels of education, worked only as a healer, saw 8 patients a week and consulted for 60 min per patient. The most common treatment types provided included massage for babies (71.4%), followed by massage (reflexive massage) (25.6%), herbal remedies (23.4%), and delivery (22.0%). Many claimed to cure or solve the problems of stomachache or diarrhea (67.7%), flu or headache (64.7%), pain during pregnancy (52.0%), rheumatism (36.4%), and insomnia, stress or nervousness (35.5%). In adjusted logistic regression analysis, younger age, being male, having completed grades 1-6, urban residence, more years of practice, lower average consultation time, using tools or equipment, providing herbal remedies, and charging service fees were associated with high patient throughput. Conclusions: Our analysis provides insights into the profile, practice and treatment characteristics of traditional health practitioners in Indonesia. Sociodemographic, practice and treatment characteristics are accountable for a high patient throughput.

Keywords:
Survey, Traditional health practitioner, Complementary medicine, Epidemiology, Herbal medicine, Spiritual healing
1.
Ministry of Health, General Secretariat: Indonesia Health Profile 2013. Jakarta, Ministry of Health RI, 2014.
2.
Chuthaputti A, Boonterm B: Traditional Medicine in ASEAN. Bangkok, Medical Publisher, 2010.
3.
Peltzer K, Pengpid S: Utilization and practice of traditional/complementary/alternative medicine (T/CAM) in Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member states. Stud Ethno-Med 2015;9:209-218.
4.
ASEAN Secretariat: Towards harmonization of traditional medicine practices. e-Health Bull 2012;2:1-8. www.asean.org/.../asean-e-health-bulletin-towards-harmonisation-of- traditional-medicine-practices (last accessed October 10, 2017).
5.
Nurhayati L, Widowati L: The use of traditional health care among Indonesian family. Health Sci J Indonesia 2017;8:30-35.
6.
World Health Organization (WHO), Regional Office for South-East Asia: The Republic of Indonesia Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition, vol 7, no 1. New Delhi, WHO, 2017.
7.
World Health Organization (WHO): Legal status of traditional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine: a worldwide review. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Jh2943e/8.5.html, 2001 (last accessed February 15, 2018).
8.
Ritiasa K: Jamu and traditional medicine practices in Indonesia; in Traditional Medicine, Better Science, Policy and Services for Health Development: Proceedings of a WHO International Symposium, Awaji Island, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan, 11-13 September 2000. Kobe, World Health Organization Centre for Health Development, 2001.
9.
Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia: Keputusan menteri kesehatan Republik Indonesia nomor 1076/menkes/sk/vii/2003 tentang penyelenggaraan pengobatan tradisional. http://pelayanan.jakarta.go.id/download/regulasi/keputusan-menteri-kesehatan-republik-indonesia-no-1076-menkes-sk-vii-2003-tentang-penyelenggaraan-pengobatan-tradisional.pdf, 2003 (last accessed February 15, 2018).
10.
Gessler MC, Msuya DE, Nkunya MH, Schär A, Heinrich M, Tanner M: Traditional healers in Tanzania: sociocultural profile and three short portraits. J Ethnopharmacol 1995;48:145-160.
11.
Peltzer K: A community survey of traditional healers in rural South Africa. South Afr J Ethnol 1998;21:191-197.
12.
Semenya SS, Potgieter MJ: Bapedi traditional healers in the Limpopo Province, South Africa: their socio-cultural profile and traditional healing practice. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2014;10:4.
13.
Birhan W, Giday M, Teklehaymanot T: The contribution of traditional healers' clinics to public healthcare system in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2011;7:39.
14.
Cottingham P, Adams J, Vempati R, Dunn J, Sibbritt D: The characteristics, experiences and perceptions of naturopathic and herbal medicine practitioners: results from a national survey in New Zealand. BMC Complement Altern Med 2015;15:114.
15.
Kattge S, Goetz K, Glassen K, Steinhäuser J: Job profile of non-medical practitioners: a cross- sectional study from the health service perspective. Complement Med Res 2017;24:285-289.
16.
Ang SC, Wilkinson JM: A preliminary study of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners in Singapore. Complement Ther Med 2013;21:42-49.
17.
Leach MJ: Profile of the complementary and alternative medicine workforce across Australia, New Zealand, Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Complement Ther Med 2013;21:364-378.
18.
Steel A, Leach M, Wardle J, Sibbritt D, Schloss J, Diezel H, Adams J: The Australian Complementary Medicine Workforce: a profile of 1,306 practitioners from the PRACI study. J Altern Complement Med 2018;24:385-394.
19.
Goetz K, Kattge S, Steinhäuser J: The phenomena of naturopathic practitioner: predictors of a high patient throughput. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2017;2017:9758326.
20.
Strauss J, Witoelar F, Sikoki B: The Fifth Wave of the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS5): Overview and Field Report. March 2016. WR-1143/1-NIA/NICHD. Santa Monica, RAND Corporation, 2016.
21.
Long L, Huntley A, Ernst E: Which complementary and alternative therapies benefit which conditions? A survey of the opinions of 223 professional organizations. Complement Ther Med 2001;9:178-185.
22.
Elfahmi, Woerdenbag HJ, Kayse O: Jamu: Indonesian traditional herbal medicine towards rational phytopharmacological use. J Herbal Med 2014;4:51-73.
23.
Handayani L, Suparto H, Suprapto A: Traditional system of medicine in Indonesia; in Chaudhury RR, Rafei UM (eds): Traditional Medicine in Asia. New Delhi, World Health Organization, 2001, pp 47-68.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.