Consanguineous marriage has long been a controversial topic, with particular attention focused on adverse health outcomes. Unfortunately, the studies that have been conducted on consanguinity to date have usually lacked control for important sociodemographic variables, such as maternal age and birth intervals, and in estimating specific disease gene frequency, they have ignored the influence of population sub-division. Inadequate attention has also been paid to the social benefits associated with intra-familial marriage, resulting in a biased overall cost-benefit assessment. Worldwide, some 1,000 million people live in countries where 20 to more than 50% of marriages are consanguineous, and large migrant communities from these regions are now resident in Western Europe, North America and Oceania. The need for comprehensive and more balanced investigations into all aspects of consanguineous marriage is pressing and merits a substantial international collaborative research effort.

Keywords:
Consanguinity, Endogamy, Sociocultural values
1.
Bittles AH: Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clin Genet 2001;60:89–98.
2.
Bittles AH: The bases of Western attitudes to consanguineous marriage. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:135–138.
3.
Bittles AH, Egerbladh I: The influence of past endogamy and consanguinity on genetic disorders in northern Sweden. Ann Hum Genet 2005;69:549–558.
4.
Anderson NF: The ‘Marriage with a Deceased Wife’s Sister Bill’ controversy: incest anxiety and the defense of family purity in Victorian England. J Brit Stud 1982;21:67–86.
5.
Ottenheimer M: Forbidden Relatives – the American Myth of Cousin Marriage. Chicago, University of Illinois Press, 1996.
6.
Darwin C: On the Various Contrivances by which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilized by Insects, and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing, ed 1. London, John Murray, 1862, p 360.
7.
Darwin GH: Marriages between first cousins in England and Wales and their effects. J Stat Soc 1875;38:153–184.
8.
Woods CG, Cox J, Springell K, Hampshire DJ, Mohamed MD, McKibbin M, Stren R, Raymond FL, Sandford R, Sharif SM, Karbani G, Ahmed M, Bond J, Clayton D, Inglehearn CF: Quantification of homozygosity in consanguineous individuals with autosomal recessive disease. Am J Hum Genet 2006;78:889–896.
9.
Hamamy H, Jamhawi L, Al-Darawsheh J, Ajlouni K: Consanguineous marriages in Jordan: why is the rate changing with time? Clin Genet 2005;67:511–516.
10.
Al-Abdulkareem AA, Ballal SG: Consanguineous marriage in an urban area of Saudi Arabia: rates and adverse health effects on the offspring. J Community Health 1998;23:75–83.
11.
Koc I: Prevalance and sociodemographic correlates of consanguineous marriages in Turkey. J Biosoc Sci 2008;40:137–148.
12.
Hussain R, Bittles AH: The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. J Biosoc Sci 1998;30:261–275.
13.
Pedersen J: Determinants of infant and child mortality in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. J Biosoc Sci 2000;32:527–546.
14.
Bener A, Alali KA: Consanguineous marriage in a newly developed country: the Qatari population. J Biosoc Sci 2006;38:239–246.
15.
Al-Gazali LI, Bener A, Abdulrazzaq YM, Micallef R, Al-Khayat AI, Gaber T: Consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. J Biosoc Sci 1997;29:491–497.
16.
Jurdi R, Saxena PC: The prevalence and correlates of consanguineous marriages in Yemen: similarities and contrasts with other Arab countries. J Biosoc Sci 2003;35:1–13.
17.
El-Hazmi MAF, Al-Swailem AR, Warsy AS, Al-Swailem AM, Sulaimani R, Al-Meshari AA: Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population. J Med Genet 1995;32:623–626.
18.
Saadat M, Ansari-Lari M, Farhud DD: Consanguineous marriage in Iran. Ann Hum Biol 2004;31:263–269.
19.
National Conference of Commissioners: Handbook on Uniform State Laws and Proceedings of the Annual Conference Meeting in its Seventy-Ninth Year. Baltimore, Port City Press, 1970.
20.
Norio R: Finnish Disease Heritage I: characteristics, causes, background. Hum Genet 2003;112:441–456.
21.
Bittles AH, Grant JC, Sullivan SG, Hussain R: Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility? Ann Hum Biol 2002;29:111–131.
22.
Bittles AH, Neel JV: The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level. Nat Genet 1994;8:117–121.
23.
Cavalli-Sforza LL, Moroni A, Zei G: Consanguinity, Inbreeding, and Genetic Drift in Italy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004, pp 197–198, 292.
24.
Bittles AH: Consanguineous marriage and childhood health. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:571–576.
25.
Rittler M, Liascovich R, López-Camelo J, Castilla EE: Parental consanguinity in specific types of congenital anomalies. Am J Med Genet 2001;102:36–43.
26.
Shami SA, Qaisar R, Bittles AH: Consanguinity and adult morbidity in Pakistan. Lancet 1991;338:954–955.
27.
Liede A, Malik IA, Aziz Z, Rios L, Kwan E, Narod SA: Contribution of BRAC1 and BRAC2 mutations of breast and ovarian cancer in Pakistan. Am J Hum Genet 2002;71:595–606.
28.
Ismail J, Jafar TH, Jafary FH, White F, Faruqui AM, Chaturvedi N: Risk factors for non-fatal myocardial infarction in young South Asian males. Heart 2004;90:259–263.
29.
Vézina H, Heyer É, Fortier I, Ouellette G, Robitaille Y, Gauvreau D: A genealogical study of Alzheimer disease in the Saguenay region of Québec. Genet Epidemiol 1999;16:412–425.
30.
Farrer LA, Bowirrat A, Friedland RP, Waraska K, Korczyn AD, Baldwin CT: Identification of multiple loci for Alzheimer disease in a consanguineous Israeli-Arab community. Hum Mol Genet 2003;12:415–422.
31.
Rudan I, Smolej-Narancic N, Campbell H, Carothers A, Wright A, Janicijevic B, Rudan P: Inbreeding and the genetic complexity of human hypertension. Genetics 2003;163:1011–1021.
32.
Rudan I, Rudan D, Campbell H, Carothers A, Wright A, Smolej-Narancic N, Janicijevic B, Jin L, Chakraborty R, Deka R, Rudan P: Inbreeding and risk of late onset complex disease. J Med Genet 2003;40:925–932.
33.
Bittles AH: The role and significance of consanguinity as a demographic variable. Pop Dev Rev 1994;20:561–584.
34.
Bittles AH: Endogamy, consanguinity and community disease profiles. Community Genet 2005;8:17–20.
35.
Zlotogora J, Hujerat Y, Barges S, Shalev SA, Chakravarti A: The fate of 12 recessive mutations in a single village. Ann Hum Genet 2006;71:202–208.
36.
Bittles AH: Population stratification and genetic association studies in South Asia. J Mol Genet Med 2005;1:43–48.
37.
Miller EN, Fadl M, Mohamed HS, Elzein A, Jamieson SE, Cordell HJ, Peacock CS, Fakiola M, Raju M, Khalil EA, Elhassan A, Musa AM, Ibrahim ME, Blackwell JM: Y chromosome lineage- and village-specific genes on chromosomes 1p22 and 6q27 control visceral leishmaniasis in Sudan. PLoS Genet 2007;3:e71.
38.
Overall ADJ, Ahmad M, Thomas MG, Nichols RA: An analysis of consanguinity and social structure with the UK Asian population using microsatellite data. Ann Hum Genet 2003;67:525–537.
39.
Al Aqeel AI: Islamic ethical framework for research into and prevention of genetic diseases. Nat Genet 2007;39:1293–1298.
40.
Ozand PT, Devol EB, Gascon GG: Neurometabolic diseases at a national referral center: five years experience at the King Faisal Specilist Hospital and Research Centre. J Child Neurol 1992;7(suppl):S4–S11.
41.
Rashed M, Ozand PT, Al Aqeel A, Gascon GG: Experience of King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center with Saudi organic acid disorders. Brain Dev 1994;16 (suppl):1–6.
42.
Ozand PT, Gascon G, al Aqeel A, Roberts G, Dhalla M, Subramanyam SB: Prevalence of different types of lysosomal storage diseases in Saudi Arabia. J Inherit Dis 1990;13:849–861.
43.
March of Dimes: Global Report on Birth Defects. White Plains, March of Dimes, 2006.
44.
Bennett R, Motulsky AG, Bittles AH, Hudgins L, Uhlrich S, Lochner Doyle D, Silvey K, Scott RC, Cheng E, McGillivray B, Steiner RD, Olson D: Genetic counseling and screening of consanguineous couples and their offspring: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2002;11:97–119.
45.
Port KE, Mountain H, Nelson J, Bittles AH: The changing profile of couples seeking genetic counseling for consanguinity in Australia. Am J Med Genet 2005;132A:159–163.
46.
Lander ES, Botstein D: Homozygosity mapping: a way to map human recessive traits with the DNA of inbred children. Science 1987;236:1567–1570.
47.
Pollak MR, Chou YHW, Cerda JJ, Steinmann B, La Du BN, Seidman JG, Seidman CE: Homozygosity mapping of the gene for alkaptonuria to chromosome 3q2. Nat Genet 1993;5:201–204.
48.
Ahmad W, Irvine AD, Lam H, Buckley C, Bingham EA, Panteleyev AA, Ahmad M, McGrath JA, Christiano AM: A missense mutation in the zinc-finger domain of the human hairless gene underlies congenital atrichia in a family of Irish travellers. Am J Hum Genet 1998;63:984–991.
49.
Dyer O: MP is criticized for saying that marriage of first cousins is a health risk. Brit Med J 2005;331:1292.
50.
Modell B, Darr A: Genetic counselling and customary consanguineous marriage. Nat Rev Genet 2002;3:225–229.
51.
Basel-Vanagaite L, Taub E, Halpern GJ, Drasinover V, Magal N, Davidov B, Zlotogora J, Shohat M: Genetic screening for autosomal recessive nonsyndromic mental retardation in an isolated population in Israel. Eur J Hum Genet 2007;15:250–253.
52.
Hathout H: Islamic views on some reproductive issues; in Teebi AS, Farag TI (eds): Genetic Disorders among Arab Populations. New York, Oxford University Press, 1997, pp 469–473.
53.
Stern GH: Marriage in Early Islam. London, The Royal Asiatic Society, 1939, pp 165–166.
54.
Armstrong K: Muhammad: a Western Attempt to Understand Islam. London, Victor Gollancz, 1991, pp 79–81, 181, 195–197.
55.
World Health Organization: Medical Genetics in Developing Countries: the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Genetic Testing and Screening. Geneva, WHO, 2006, p 40.
56.
Population Reference Bureau: 2007 World Population Data Sheet. Washington DC, PRB, 2007.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.