Background: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness and safety of eribulin used as an early-line (EL, i.e., first-/second-line) versus late-line (LL, i.e., third-line and beyond) chemotherapy for recurrent advanced or metastatic breast cancer (A/MBC) patients. Methods: This study conducted a retrospective observation of A/MBC patients initiating eribulin between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019, using medical database at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Taiwan. Patients were assigned into either the EL or LL group based on the timing of respective eribulin treatments and were observed for at least 6 months up to December 2019 for progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), disease response, and occurrence of adverse events. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression survival analyses were performed. Results: Of 127 patients, 23.6% (n = 30) and 76.4% (n = 97) were assigned to the EL and LL groups, respectively, between which no difference in patient characteristics was noted. Median PFS and TTF were 6.5 months and 5.0 months for the EL and 4.2 months and 3.4 months for the LL, respectively. Median OS could not be estimated in the EL group and was 20.5 months in the LL group. Eribulin as an EL treatment was the only factor associated with longer TTF and OS, whereas the number of metastatic sites was additionally associated with PFS in the multivariate analysis. No complete response was reported in either group, but a partial response was obtained in 6.7% in the EL group and 3.1% in the LL group. The common adverse events between two groups were similar, including leukopenia (80.0%), neutropenia (76.7%), and anemia (60.0%). Conclusions: The eribulin used as an EL of chemotherapy was effective for A/MBC patients with known toxicities in this study, while eribulin as the LL chemotherapy showed consistent results with previous reports.

Keywords:
Eribulin, Lines of treatment, Metastatic breast cancer, Real-world study, Progression-free-survival, Safety
1.
Cardoso F, Spence D, Mertz S, Corneliussen-James D, Sabelko K, Gralow J, et al. Global analysis of advanced/metastatic breast cancer: decade report (2005–2015). Breast. 2018;39:131–8.
2.
O’Shaughnessy J. Extending survival with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2005;10(Suppl 3):20–9.
3.
DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, Newman LA, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Nov;69(6):438–51.
4.
Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A, Papadopoulos E, Aapro M, André F, et al. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4). Ann Oncol. 2018;29(8):1634–57.
5.
Spring LM, Wander SA, Zangardi M, Bardia A. CDK 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: current controversies and future directions. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21(3):25.
6.
Hui R, de Boer R, Lim E, Yeo B, Lynch J. CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: the new standard of care. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2021;17(Suppl 1):3–14.
7.
Bredin P, Walshe JM, Denduluri N. Systemic therapy for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2020;47(5):259–69.
8.
Gennari A, Stockler M, Puntoni M, Sormani M, Nanni O, Amadori D, et al. Duration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2144–9.
9.
Tecza K, Pamula-Pilat J, Lanuszewska J, Butkiewicz D, Grzybowska E. Pharmacogenetics of toxicity of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2018;9(10):9114–36.
10.
Andreopoulou E, Sparano JA. Chemotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: an overview. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2013;5(1):42–50.
11.
Partridge AH, Rumble RB, Carey LA, Come SE, Davidson NE, Di Leo A, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(29):3307–29.
12.
Garrone O, Miraglio E, Vandone AM, Vanella P, Lingua D, Merlano MC. Eribulin in advanced breast cancer: safety, efficacy and new perspectives. Future Oncol. 2017;13(30):2759–69.
13.
O’Shaughnessy J, Kaklamani V, Kalinsky K. Perspectives on the mechanism of action and clinical application of eribulin for metastatic breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2019;15(14):1641–53.
14.
Cortes J, O’Shaughnessy J, Loesch D, Blum JL, Vahdat LT, Petrakova K, et al. Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet. 2011;377(9769):914–23.
15.
Yuan P, Hu X, Sun T, Li W, Zhang Q, Cui S, et al. Eribulin mesilate versus vinorelbine in women with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Cancer. 2019 May;112:57–65.
16.
Hayashida T, Jinno H, Mori K, Sato H, Matsui A, Sakurai T, et al. Phase II trial of eribulin mesylate as a first- or second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, single-arm trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):701.
17.
Kimura K, Iwamoto M, Tanaka S, Yamamoto D, Yoshidome K, Ogura H, et al. A phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial of eribulin as first- or second-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer: evaluation of efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;81(5):923–33.
18.
Maeda S, Saimura M, Minami S, Kurashita K, Nishimura R, Kai Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of eribulin as first- to third-line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Breast. 2017;32:66–72.
19.
Shingaki S, Kogawa T, Shimokawa M, Harano K, Naito Y, Kusuhara S, et al. Use of eribulin as an earlier-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. J Cancer. 2020;11(14):4099–105.
20.
Kaufman PA, Awada A, Twelves C, Yelle L, Perez EA, Velikova G, et al. Phase III open-label randomized study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(6):594–601.
21.
National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare. Coverage items and reimbursement criteria for National Health Insurance (全民健保給付項目及支付標準 [Chinese]). [cited 2020 Feb 23]. Available from: https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=58ED9C8D8417D00B.
22.
Mougalian SS, Copher R, Kish JK, McAllister L, Wang Z, Broscious M, et al. Clinical benefit of treatment with eribulin mesylate for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: long-term outcomes of patients treated in the US community oncology setting. Cancer Med. 2018;7(9):4371–8.
23.
Sirvén MB, Fernández-Ortega A, Stradella A, Morilla I, Falo C, Vázquez S, et al. Real-world efficacy and safety of eribulin in advanced and pretreated HER2-negative breast cancer in a Spanish comprehensive cancer center. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019;20(1):68.
24.
Pedersini R, Vassalli L, Claps M, Tulla A, Rodella F, Grisanti S, et al. Eribulin in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients in the real world: a retrospective study. Oncology. 2018;94 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):10–5.
25.
McIntyre K, O’Shaughnessy J, Schwartzberg L, Glück S, Berrak E, Song JX, et al. Phase 2 study of eribulin mesylate as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(2):321–8.
26.
Chabot I, Zhao Q, Su Y. Systematic review of real-world effectiveness of eribulin for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Dec;36(12):2025–36.
27.
Barni S, Livraghi L, Morritti M, Vici P, Michelotti A, Cinieri S, et al. Eribulin in the treatment of advanced breast cancer: real-world scenario from 39 Italian centers – ESEMPiO study. Future Oncol. 2019;15(1):33–44.
28.
Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Burzykowski T, Buyse M, Sledge G, Carmichael J, Lück HJ, et al. Taxanes alone or in combination with anthracyclines as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(12):1980–6.
29.
Adunlin G, Cyrus JWW, Dranitsaris G. Correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving anthracyclines, taxanes, or targeted therapies: a trial-level meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;154(3):591–608.
30.
Rau KM, Ou-Yang F, Chao TC, Kuo YL, Cheng TF, Chao TY, et al. Effect of eribulin on patients with metastatic breast cancer: multicenter retrospective observational study in Taiwan. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170(3):583–91.
31.
Inoue K, Takahashi M, Mukai H, Yamanaka T, Egawa C, Sakata Y, et al. Effectiveness and safety of eribulin in Japanese patients with HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: a 2-year post-marketing observational study in a real-world setting. Invest New Drugs. 2020 Oct;38(5):1540–9.
32.
Coe F, Misra V, McCabe Y, Adderley H, Woodhouse L, Ayub Z, et al. Average duration of prior treatment lines predicts clinical benefit to eribulin chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022;191(3):535–43.
33.
Gamucci T, Michelotti A, Pizzuti L, Mentuccia L, Landucci E, Sperduti I, et al. Eribulin mesylate in pretreated breast cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective observational study. J Cancer. 2014;5(5):320–7.
34.
Shieh SH, Hsieh VC, Liu SH, Chien CR, Lin CC, Wu TN. Delayed time from first medical visit to diagnosis for breast cancer patients in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014;113(10):696–703.
35.
De Sanctis R, Agostinetto E, Masci G, Ferraro E, Losurdo A, Viganò A, et al. Predictive factors of eribulin activity in metastatic breast cancer patients. Oncology. 2018;94 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):19–28.
36.
Largillier R, Ferrero JM, Doyen J, Barriere J, Namer M, Mari V, et al. Prognostic factors in 1,038 women with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(12):2012–9.
37.
Khanfir A, Lahiani F, Bouzguenda R, Ayedi I, Daoud J, Frikha M. Prognostic factors and survival in metastatic breast cancer: a single institution experience. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2013;18(3):127–32.
38.
Planchat E, Abrial C, Thivat E, Mouret-Reynier MA, Kwiatkowski F, Pomel C, et al. Late lines of treatment benefit survival in metastatic breast cancer in current practice? Breast. 2011;20(6):574–8.
39.
Tacca O, LeHeurteur M, Durando X, Mouret-Reynier MA, Abrial C, Thivat E, et al. Metastatic breast cancer: overall survival related to successive chemotherapies. What do we gain after the third line? Cancer Invest. 2009;27(1):81–5.
40.
Dufresne A, Pivot X, Tournigand C, Facchini T, Altweegg T, Chaigneau L, et al. Impact of chemotherapy beyond the first line in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;107(2):275–9.
41.
Palumbo R, Sottotetti F, Riccardi A, Teragni C, Pozzi E, Quaquarini E, et al. Which patients with metastatic breast cancer benefit from subsequent lines of treatment? An update for clinicians. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2013;5(6):334–50.
42.
Saad ED, Katz A. Progression-free survival and time to progression as primary end points in advanced breast cancer: often used, sometimes loosely defined. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(3):460–4.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2022
You do not currently have access to this content.