Phase contrast microscopy, killing curves and turbidimetric growth curves were used in a comparative study of the antibacterial effects of imipenem and meropenem on Haemophilus influenzae. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and their ranges of meropenem and imipenem using five β-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae were 0.03 (0.015–0.06) and 0.6 (0.5–1) μ g/ml, respectively. Imipenem and meropenem induced spheroplast formation in cultures. Killing curves showed a bacteriostatic activity for meropenem and imipenem for MIC values, and a lag of 2 h in killing for MIC × 2 to MIC × 64. For these concentrations the killing rates of the two antibiotics were similar. Turbidimetric growth curves showed a higher early increase in optical density for meropenem. As far as the MIC value of meropenem was 10 times lower than the MIC value of imipenem, we may conclude that meropenem was more active than imipenem on β-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae.

Keywords:
Meropenem, Imipenem, Haemophilus influenzae
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1991 S. Karger AG, Basel
1991
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.