A randomised prospective clinico-laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of ornidazole versus clindamycin in anaerobic infections was performed in 140 patients; 67 were given ornidazole and 73 received clindamycin. Patients were mainly suffering from peritonitis, pelvic cellulitis, endometritis, soft tissue infections and abdominal abscesses, which were distributed rather equally in both groups. Ornidazole was administered at a dose of 500 mg every 12 h i.v. or/and orally, and clindamycin 600 mg every 8 h i.v. for 7–60 days. In pus cultures, Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis were the main isolates. The coexistence of aerobes necessitated the addition of an aminoglycoside in 111 patients, while six times chloramphenicol had proved ineffective against anaerobes. Between the two groups no statistically significant difference was found in the excellent response rate, although the overall cure rate was superior in the ornidazole group (80.6 vs. 68.5%), with a prompt response within less than 48 h in the case of ornidazole. Side effects necessitating discontinuation of chemotherapy included severe nausea in 1 patient treated with ornidazole and diarrhea in 8 patients given clindamycin.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.