Abstract
Introduction: Sex chromosomes have evolved independently across various lineages, often showing convergent degradation of the sex-limited chromosome. While extensively studied in model organisms with ancient sex chromosomal systems, the evolution of early-stage sex chromosomes remains poorly understood. Eulimnadia texana, a freshwater crustacean with a unique androdioecious breeding system (ZZ, ZW, and viable WW genotypes), provides a rare opportunity to study early sex chromosome evolution. This study examines E. texana’s W chromosome for evidence of a small localized non-recombining region, characterized by a transposable element (TE) “hotspot,” low gene density, and low GC content. Methods: Sex-linked markers were mapped onto the W chromosome (scaffold 1). TEs in the WW genome were identified using RepeatModeler and RepeatMasker. Statistical analyses compared TE distribution between the genome and scaffold 1, which was then divided into 20 equal-sized “bins” for finer-scale statistical analyses. Gene density and GC content were analyzed across these bins. Results: While no significant TE accumulation was found across the entire W chromosome compared to the remaining genome, a specific region (6.6–8.8 Mb, fourth bin) showed significantly higher TE accumulation. This region also exhibited low gene density and low GC content, indicative of reduced recombination. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that E. texana’s W chromosome contains a smaller region of crossover suppression, supporting the hypothesis that it is a proto-sex chromosome in early evolutionary development. This study provides valuable insights into early sex chromosome evolution and establishes E. texana as an ideal model for further investigation of evolutionary processes driving proto-sex chromosome differentiation.
Journal Section:
Original Article
References
1.
Bachtrog
D
, Mank
JE
, Peichel
CL
, Kirkpatrick
M
, Otto
SP
, Ashman
T-L
, et al. Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it
. PLoS Biol
. 2014
;12
(7
):e1001899
. 2.
Hiort
O
. Chapter 1: normal and variant sex development
. In: Legato
MJ
, editor. Principles of gender-specific medicine
. 3rd edn.Cambridge, MA
: Academic Press
; 2017
. p. 1
–16
.3.
Bull
J
. Evolution of sex determining mechanisms
. Menlo Park, CA
: Benjamin/Cummings
; 1983
.4.
5.
Marshall Graves
JA
, Peichel
CL
. Are homologies in vertebrate sex determination due to shared ancestry or to limited options
. Genome Biol
. 2010
;11
(4
):205
. 6.
Fraser
JA
, Heitman
J
. Evolution of fungal sex chromosomes
. Mol Microbiol
. 2004
;51
(2
):299
–306
. 7.
Abbott
JK
, Nordén
AK
, Hansson
B
. Sex chromosome evolution: historical insights and future perspectives
. Proc Biol Sci
. 2017
;284
(1854
):20162806
. 8.
Bachtrog
D
, Kirkpatrick
M
, Mank
JE
, McDaniel
SF
, Pires
JC
, Rice
W
, et al. Are all sex chromosomes created equal
. Trends Genet
. 2011
;27
(9
):350
–7
. 9.
Charlesworth
D
, Charlesworth
B
, Marais
G
. Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes
. Heredity
. 2005
;95
(2
):118
–28
. 10.
Beukeboom
L
, Perrin
N
. The evolution of sex determination
. Oxford
: Oxford University Press
; 2014
.11.
Charlesworth
B
. Model for evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation
. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
. 1978
;75
(11
):5618
–22
. 12.
Nakamura
M
. Sex determination in amphibians
. Semin Cell Dev Biol
. 2009
;20
(3
):271
–82
. 13.
Charlesworth
B
, Charlesworth
D
. The degeneration of Y chromosomes
. Philos T Roy Soc B
. 2000
;355
(1403
):1563
–72
. 14.
Biémont
C
, Vieira
C
. Genetics: junk DNA as an evolutionary force
. Nature
. 2006
;443
(7111
):521
–4
. 15.
Slotkin
RK
, Martienssen
R
. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome
. Nat Rev Genet
. 2007
;8
(4
):272
–85
. 16.
Dolgin
ES
, Charlesworth
B
. The effects of recombination rate on the distribution and abundance of transposable elements
. Genetics
. 2008
;178
(4
):2169
–77
. 17.
Zhou
R
, Macaya-Sanz
D
, Rodgers-Melnick
E
, Carlson
CH
, Gouker
FE
, Evans
LM
, et al. Characterization of a large sex determination region in Salix purpurea L (Salicaceae)
. Mol Genet Genomics
. 2018
;293
(6
):1437
–52
. 18.
Sotero-Caio
CG
, Platt
RN
, Suh
A
, Ray
DA
. Evolution and diversity of transposable elements in vertebrate genomes
. Genome Biol Evol
. 2017
;9
(1
):161
–77
. 19.
Eickbush
TH
, Jamburuthugoda
VK
. The diversity of retrotransposons and the properties of their reverse transcriptases
. Virus Res
. 2008
;134
(1–2
):221
–34
. 20.
Jurka
J
, Kapitonov
VV
, Pavlicek
A
, Klonowski
P
, Kohany
O
, Walichiewicz
J
. Repbase update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements
. Cytogenet Genome Res
. 2005
;110
(1–4
):462
–7
. 21.
Jensen-Seaman
MI
, Furey
TS
, Payseur
BA
, Lu
Y
, Roskin
KM
, Chen
C-F
, et al. Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes
. Genome Res
. 2004
;14
(4
):528
–38
. 22.
Lander
ES
, Linton
LM
, Birren
B
, Nusbaum
C
, Zody
MC
, Baldwin
J
, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
. Nature
. 2001
;409
(6822
):860
–921
. 23.
Witherspoon
DJ
, Watkins
WS
, Zhang
Y
, Xing
J
, Tolpinrud
WL
, Hedges
DJ
, et al. Alu repeats increase local recombination rates
. BMC Genomics
. 2009
;10
:530
. 24.
Daron
J
, Glover
N
, Pingault
L
, Theil
S
, Jamilloux
V
, Paux
E
, et al. Organization and evolution of transposable elements along the bread wheat chromosome 3B
. Genome Biol
. 2014
;15
(12
):546
. 25.
Medstrand
P
, van de Lagemaat
LN
, Dunn
CA
, Landry
JR
, Svenback
D
, Mager
DL
. Impact of transposable elements on the evolution of mammalian gene regulation
. Cytogenet Genome Res
. 2005
;110
(1–4
):342
–52
. 26.
Bull
JJ
. Sex determining mechanisms: an evolutionary perspective
. Experientia
. 1985
;41
(10
):1285
–96
. 27.
Rice
WR
. Evolution of the Y sex chromosome in animals: Y chromosomes evolve through the degeneration of autosomes
. Bioscience
. 1996
;46
(5
):331
–43
. 28.
Úbeda
F
, Manus
M
, Wild
G
. On the origin of sex chromosomes from meiotic drive
. Proc Biol Sci
. 2014
;282
:20141932
.29.
Meunier
J
, Duret
L
. Recombination drives the evolution of gc-content in the human genome
. Mol Biol Evol
. 2004
;21
(6
):984
–90
. 30.
Sémon
M
, Mouchiroud
D
, Duret
L
. Relationship between gene expression and GC-content in mammals: statistical significance and biological relevance
. Hum Mol Genet
. 2005
;14
(3
):421
–7
. 31.
Innocenti
P
, Morrow
EH
. The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster
. PLoS Biol
. 2010
;8
(3
):e1000335
. 32.
Weeks
SC
, Benvenuto
C
, Reed
SK
. When males and hermaphrodites coexist: a review of androdioecy in animals
. Integr Comp Biol
. 2006
;46
(4
):449
–64
. 33.
Weeks
SC
, Sanderson
TF
, Zofkova
M
, Knott
B
. Breeding systems in the clam shrimp family Limnadiidae (Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata)
. Invertebr Biol
. 2008
;127
(3
):336
–49
. 34.
Sassaman
C
, Weeks
SC
. The genetic mechanism of sex determination in the conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana
. Am Nat
. 1993
;141
(2
):314
–28
. 35.
Weeks
SC
, Benvenuto
C
, Sanderson
TF
, Duff
RJ
. Sex chromosome evolution in the clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana
. J Evol Biol
. 2010
;23
(5
):1100
–6
. 36.
Charlesworth
D
. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy
. Biol J Linn Soc
. 1984
;22
(4
):333
–48
. 37.
Pannell
J
. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy
. Annu Rev Ecol Syst
. 2002
;33
(1
):397
–425
. 38.
Baldwin-Brown
JG
, Weeks
SC
, Long
AD
. A new standard for crustacean genomes: the highly contiguous, annotated genome assembly of the clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana reveals hox gene order and identifies the sex chromosome
. Genome Biol Evol
. 2018
;10
(1
):143
–56
. 39.
Baldwin-Brown
JG
, Long
AD
. Genomic signatures of local adaptation in clam shrimp (Eulimnadia texana) from natural vernal pools
. Genome Biol Evol
. 2020
;12
(7
):1194
–206
. 40.
Lang
C
, Ediriweera
C
, Weeks
SC
. Sex chromosome evolution in the clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana
. Invertebr Biol
. 2024
;143
(2
):e12426
. 41.
Lewis
J
. What a randomization test is and how to run one in R. Measuring U
. 2020
. [cited 2022 Dec 16]. Available from: https://measuringu.com/randomization-test/42.
Cantarel
BL
, Korf
I
, Robb
SM
, Parra
G
, Ross
E
, Moore
B
, et al. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes
. Genome Res
. 2008
;18
(1
):188
–96
. 43.
Altschul
SF
, Gish
W
, Miller
W
, Myers
EW
, Lipman
DJ
. Basic local alignment search tool
. J Mol Biol
. 1990
;215
(3
):403
–10
. 44.
UniProt Consortium
. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023
. Nucleic Acids Res
. 2023
;51
(D1
):D523
–31
. 45.
Iwase
M
, Satta
Y
, Hirai
Y
, Hirai
H
, Imai
H
, Takahata
N
. The amelogenin loci span an ancient pseudoautosomal boundary in diverse mammalian species
. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
. 2003
;100
(9
):5258
–63
. 46.
Xu
L
, Auer
G
, Peona
V
, Suh
A
, Deng
Y
, Feng
S
, et al. Dynamic evolutionary history and gene content of sex chromosomes across diverse songbirds
. Nat Ecol Evol
. 2019
;3
(5
):834
–44
. 47.
Lynch
DB
, Logue
ME
, Butler
G
, Wolfe
KH
, Chromosomal
G
. Chromosomal G + C content evolution in yeasts: systematic interspecies differences, and GC-poor troughs at centromeres
. Genome Biol Evol
. 2010
;2
:572
–83
. 48.
Marsolier-Kergoat
MC
, Yeramian
E
. GC content and recombination: reassessing the causal effects for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome
. Genetics
. 2009
;183
(1
):31
–8
. 49.
Anderson
JL
, Rodríguez Marí
A
, Braasch
I
, Amores
A
, Hohenlohe
P
, Batzel
P
, et al. Multiple sex-associated regions and a putative sex chromosome in zebrafish revealed by RAD mapping and population genomics
. PLoS One
. 2012
;7
(7
):e40701
. 50.
Ma
WJ
, Rovatsos
M
. Sex chromosome evolution: the remarkable diversity in the evolutionary rates and mechanisms
. J Evol Biol
. 2022
;35
(12
):1581
–8
. 51.
Yue
J
, Krasovec
M
, Kazama
Y
, Zhang
X
, Xie
W
, Zhang
S
, et al. The origin and evolution of sex chromosomes, revealed by sequencing of the Silene latifolia female genome
. Curr Biol
. 2023
;33
(12
):2504
–14.e3
. 52.
Wassarman
DA
, Solomon
NM
, Chang
HC
, Karim
FD
, Therrien
M
, Rubin
GM
. Protein phosphatase 2A positively and negatively regulates Ras1-mediated photoreceptor development in Drosophila
. Genes Dev
. 1996
;10
(3
):272
–8
. 53.
Coutelis
JB
, Ephrussi
A
. Rab6 mediates membrane organization and determinant localization during Drosophila oogenesis
. Development
. 2007
;134
(7
):1419
–30
. 54.
Keisman
EL
, Baker
BS
. The Drosophila sex determination hierarchy modulates wingless and decapentaplegic signaling to deploy dachshund sex-specifically in the genital imaginal disc
. Development
. 2001
;128
(9
):1643
–56
. 55.
Veltsos
P
, Cossard
G
, Beaudoing
E
, Beydon
G
, Savova Bianchi
D
, Roux
C
, et al. Size and content of the sex-determining region of the Y chromosome in dioecious Mercurialis annua, a plant with homomorphic sex chromosomes
. Genes
. 2018
;9
(6
):277
. 56.
Yu
L
, Ma
X
, Deng
B
, Yue
J
, Ming
R
. Construction of high-density genetic maps defined sex determination region of the Y chromosome in spinach
. Mol Genet Genomics
. 2021
;296
(1
):41
–53
. 57.
Wang
J
, Na
JK
, Yu
Q
, Gschwend
A
, Han
J
, Zeng
F
, et al. Sequencing papaya X and Yh chromosomes reveals molecular basis of incipient sex chromosome evolution
. Proc Natl Acad Sci
. 2012
;109
(34
):13710
–5
. 58.
Schield
DR
, Perry
BW
, Card
DC
, Pasquesi
GIM
, Westfall
AK
, Mackessy
SP
, et al. The rattlesnake W chromosome: a GC-rich retroelement refugium with retained gene function across ancient evolutionary strata
. Genome Biol Evol
. 2022
;14
(9
):116
. 59.
Wright
AE
, Dean
R
, Zimmer
F
, Mank
JE
. How to make a sex chromosome
. Nat Commun
. 2016
;7
:12087
. 60.
Srikulnath
K
, Ahmad
SF
, Singchat
W
, Panthum
T
. Do Ty3/Gypsy transposable elements play preferential roles in sex chromosome differentiation
. Life
. 2022
;12
(4
):522
. © 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2024
You do not currently have access to this content.
