Chromosome homologies between the Japanese raccoon dog (Nectereutes procyonoides viverrinus, 2n = 39 + 2–4 B chromosomes) and domestic dog (Canis familiaris, 2n = 78) have been established by hybridizing a complete set of canine paint probes onto high-resolution G-banded chromosomes of the raccoon dog. Dog chromosomes 1, 13, and 19 each correspond to two raccoon dog chromosome segments, while the remaining 35 dog autosomes each correspond to a single segment. In total, 38 dog autosome paints revealed 41 conserved segments in the raccoon dog. The use of dog painting probes has enabled integration of the raccoon dog chromosomes into the previously established comparative map for the domestic dog, Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus), and red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Extensive chromosome arm homologies were found among chromosomes of the red fox, Arctic fox, and raccoon dog. Contradicting previous findings, our results show that the raccoon dog does not share a single biarmed autosome in common with the Arctic fox, red fox, or domestic cat. Comparative analysis of the distribution patterns of conserved chromosome segments revealed by dog paints in the genomes of the canids, cats, and human reveals 38 ancestral autosome segments. These segments could represent the ancestral chromosome arms in the karyotype of the most recent ancestor of the Canidae family, which we suggest could have had a low diploid number, based on comparisons with outgroup species.   

1.
Carter NP, Ferguson-Smith MA, Perryman MT, Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Leversha MA, Glancy MT, Wood SL, Cook K, Dyson HM, Ferguson-Smith ME, Willatt LR: Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics. J med Genet 29:299–307 (1992).
2.
Dutrillaux B, Couturier J: The ancestral karyotype of Carnivora: comparison with that of platyrrhine monkeys. Cytogenet Cell Genet 35:200–208 (1983).
3.
Frönicke L, Müller-Navia J, Romanakis K, Scherthan H: Chromosomal homoeologies between human, harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) and the putative ancestral carnivore karyotype revealed by Zoo-FISH. Chromosoma 106:108–113 (1997).
4.
Hameister H, Klett C, Bruch J, Dixkens C, Vogel W, Christensen K: Zoo-FISH analysis: the American mink (Mustela vison) closely resembles the cat karyotype. Chrom Res 5:5–11 (1997).
5.
Graphodatsky AS, Beklemisheva VR, Dolf G: High resolution GTG-banding patterns of dog and silver fox chromosomes: description and comparative analysis. Cytogenet Cell Genet 69:226–231 (1995).
6.
Graphodatsky AS, Yang F, O’Brien PCM, Serdukova N, Milne BS, Trifonov V, Ferguson-Smith MA: A comparative chromosome map of the Arctic fox, red fox and dog defined by chromosome painting and G-banding. Chrom Res 8:253–263 (2000).
7.
Nash WG, O’Brien SJ: Conserved regions of homologous G-banding chromosomes between orders in mammalian evolution: Carnivore and Primates. Proc natl Acad Sci, USA 79:6631–6635 (1982).
8.
O’Brien SJ, Wienberg J, Lyons LA: Comparative genomics: lessons from cats. Trends Genet 13:393–399 (1997).
9.
Todd NB: Karyotypic fission and canid phylogeny. J theor Biol 26:445–380 (1970).
10.
Wayne RK: Molecular evolution of the dog family. Trends Genet 9:218–214 (1993).
11.
Wayne RK, Ostrander EA: Origin, genetic diversity and genome structure of the domestic dog. BioEssays 21:247–257 (1999).
12.
Wayne RK, Nash WG, O’Brien SJ: Chromosome evolution of the Canidae. I. Species with high chromosome number. Cytogenet Cell Genet 44:123–133 (1987a).
13.
Wayne RK, Nash WG, O’Brien SJ: Chromosome evolution of the Canidae. II. Divergence from the primitive carnivore karyotype. Cytogenet Cell Genet 44:134–141 (1987b).
14.
Wienberg J, Stanyon R, Nash WG, O’Brien PCM, Yang F, O’Brien SJ, Ferguson-Smith MA: Conservation of human vs. feline genome organization revealed by reciprocal chromosome painting. Cytogenet Cell Genet 77:211–217 (1997).
15.
Wurster DH, Benirschke K: Comparative cytogenetic studies of the order Carnivora. Chromosoma 24:336–382 (1968).
16.
Wurster-Hill DH, Ward OG, Kada H, Whittemore S: Banded chromosome studies and B chromosomes in wild-caught Japanese raccoon dogs, Nyctereutes procyonoides viverrinus. Cytogenet Cell Genet 42:85–93 (1986).
17.
Yang F, Carter NP, Shi L, Ferguson-Smith MA: A comparative study of karyotypes of muntjacs by chromosome painting. Chromosoma 103:642–652 (1995).
18.
Yang F, Graphodatsky AS, O’Brien PCM, Colabella A, Solanky N, Sargan DR, Ferguson-Smith MA: Reciprocal chromosome painting illuminates the history of genome evolution of the cat, dog and human. Chrom Res 8:393–404 (2000a).
19.
Yang F, Milne BS, Schelling C, Dolf G, Schläpfer J, Switonski M, Ladon D, Pienkowska A, Bosma AA, Sargan DR, Ferguson-Smith MA: Chromosome identification and assignment of DNA clones in the dog using a red fox and dog comparative map. Chrom Res 8:93–100 (2000b).
20.
Yang F, O’Brien PCM, Milne BS, Graphodatsky AS, Solanky N, Trifonov V, Rens W, Sargan D, Ferguson-Smith MA: A complete comparative chromosome map for the dog, red fox and human and its integration with canine genetic maps. Genomics 62:189–202 (1999).
21.
Yoshida M, Noda H, Nagahata H, Kanagawa H, Ishikawa T: Chromosomal analysis of the Japanese raccoon dog based on the G- and C-banding techniques. Jap J vet Res 30:68–78 (1982).
22.
Yoshida TH, Harada M, Wada MY: Cytogenetical studies on the Japanese raccoon dog. VII. Karyotype analysis of 22 specimens collected in Ishikawa, Yamaguchi, Osaka and Wakayama Prefectures, Japan. Proc Jpn Acad B 61:121–124 (1985).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.