G-banded and C-banded karyotypes of three closely related and morphologically similar species of cotton rats, Sigmodon hispidus (2n = 52; 52 autosomal arms), S. mascotensis (2n = 28; 28 autosomal arms), and S. arizonae (2n = 22,24; 38 autosomal arms) are presented and compared. Despite the enormous difference between the higher diploid number of hispidus and the lower diploid numbers of mascotensis and arizonae, a great deal of G-band homology is retained. If the karyotype of hispidus is considered ancestral in the group, then chromosome evolution toward lower diploid numbers has proceeded through the fixation of a large number of both tandem and centric fusions. Centromeric heterochro-matin has not, however, persisted as interstitial C-band material on the tandem fusion products. The karyotypes of mascotensis and arizonae share several tandem fusion products of hispidus chromosomes indicating a common origin of the former two species from an ancestor of intermediate diploid number. Chromosome evolution from the ancestral hispidus- like karyotype to the karyotype of the common ancestor of arizonae and mascotensis proceeded almost exclusively by tandem fusion. This orthokaryotypic trend continued in the evolution of the karyotype of modern mascotensis. In the line leading from the arizonae-mascotensis ancestor to modern arizonae a trend of centric fusion predominated.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.