During gametogenesis, the human genome can acquire various de novo rearrangements. Most constitutional genomic rearrangements are created through 1 of the 4 well-known mechanisms, i.e., nonallelic homologous recombination, erroneous repair after double-strand DNA breaks, replication errors, and retrotransposition. However, recent studies have identified 2 types of extremely complex rearrangements that cannot be simply explained by these mechanisms. The first type consists of chaotic structural changes in 1 or a few chromosomes that result from “chromoanagenesis (an umbrella term that covers chromothripsis, chromoanasynthesis, and chromoplexy).” The other type is large independent rearrangements in multiple chromosomes indicative of “transient multifocal genomic crisis.” Germline chromoanagenesis (chromothripsis) likely occurs predominantly during spermatogenesis or postzygotic embryogenesis, while multifocal genomic crisis appears to be limited to a specific time window during oogenesis and early embryogenesis or during spermatogenesis. This review article introduces the current understanding of the molecular basis of de novo rearrangements in the germline.

1.
Ayabe T, Matsubara K, Ogata T, Ayabe A, Murakami N, et al: Birth seasonality in Prader-Willi syndrome resulting from chromosome 15 microdeletion. Am J Med Genet A 161A:1495-1497 (2013).
2.
Baca SC, Prandi D, Lawrence MS, Mosquera JM, Romanel A, et al: Punctuated evolution of prostate cancer genomes. Cell 153:666-677 (2013).
3.
Batista RL, Yamaguchi K, Rodrigues ADS, Nishi MY, Goodier JL, et al: Mobile DNA in endocrinology: LINE-1 retrotransposon causing partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:6385-6390 (2019).
4.
Beck CR, Carvalho CM, Banser L, Gambin T, Stubbolo D, et al: Complex genomic rearrangements at the PLP1 locus include triplication and quadruplication. PLoS Genet 11:e1005050 (2015).
5.
Berger MF, Lawrence MS, Demichelis F, Drier Y, Cibulskis K, et al: The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer. Nature 470:214-220 (2011).
6.
Bertelsen B, Nazaryan-Petersen L, Sun W, Mehrjouy MM, Xie G, et al: A germline chromothripsis event stably segregating in 11 individuals through three generations. Genet Med 18:494-500 (2016).
7.
Butler MG, Ledbetter DH, Mascarello JT: Birth seasonality in Prader-Willi syndrome. Lancet 2:828-829 (1985).
8.
Carvalho CM, Lupski JR: Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders. Nat Rev Genet 17:224-238 (2016).
9.
Chiang C, Jacobsen JC, Ernst C, Hanscom C, Heilbut A, et al: Complex reorganization and predominant non-homologous repair following chromosomal breakage in karyotypically balanced germline rearrangements and transgenic integration. Nat Genet 44:390-397 (2012).
10.
Cleal K, Jones RE, Grimstead JW, Hendrickson EA, Baird DM: Chromothripsis during telomere crisis is independent of NHEJ, and consistent with a replicative origin. Genome Res 29:737-749 (2019).
11.
Crasta K, Ganem NJ, Dagher R, Lantermann AB, Ivanova EV, et al: DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature 482:53-58 (2012).
12.
de Pagter MS, van Roosmalen MJ, Baas AF, Renkens I, Duran KJ, et al: Chromothripsis in healthy individuals affects multiple protein-coding genes and can result in severe congenital abnormalities in offspring. Am J Hum Genet 96:651-656 (2015).
13.
Dittwald P, Gambin T, Szafranski P, Li J, Amato S, et al: NAHR-mediated copy-number variants in a clinical population: mechanistic insights into both genomic disorders and Mendelizing traits. Genome Res 23:1395-1409 (2013).
14.
Ferguson DO, Sekiguchi JM, Chang S, Frank KM, Gao Y, et al: The nonhomologous end-joining pathway of DNA repair is required for genomic stability and the suppression of translocations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6630-6633 (2000).
15.
Fukami M, Kurahashi H: Clinical consequences of chromothripsis and other catastrophic cellular events. Methods Mol Biol 1769:21-33 (2018).
16.
Fukami M, Tsuchiya T, Vollbach H, Brown KA, Abe S, et al: Genomic basis of aromatase excess syndrome: recombination- and replication-mediated rearrangements leading to CYP19A1 overexpression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:E2013-E2021 (2013).
17.
Fukami M, Shima H, Suzuki E, Ogata T, Matsubara K, Kamimaki T: Catastrophic cellular events leading to complex chromosomal rearrangements in the germline. Clin Genet 91:653-660 (2017).
18.
Gu S, Posey JE, Yuan B, Carvalho CM, Luk HM, et al: Mechanisms for the generation of two quadruplications associated with split-hand malformation. Hum Mutat 37:160-164 (2016).
19.
Gu W, Zhang F, Lupski JR: Mechanisms for human genomic rearrangements. Pathogenetics 1:4 (2008).
20.
Hancks DC, Kazazian HH Jr: Roles for retrotransposon insertions in human disease. Mob DNA 7:9 (2016).
21.
Hastings PJ, Lupski JR, Rosenberg SM, Ira G: Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat Rev Genet 10:551-564 (2009a).
22.
Hastings PJ, Ira G, Lupski JR: A microhomology-mediated break-induced replication model for the origin of human copy number variation. PLoS Genet 5:e1000327 (2009b).
23.
Hatch EM, Hetzer MW: Linking micronuclei to chromosome fragmentation. Cell 161:1502-1504 (2015).
24.
Hattori A, Okamura K, Terada Y, Tanaka R, Katoh-Fukui Y, et al: Transient multifocal genomic crisis creating chromothriptic and non-chromothriptic rearrangements in prezygotic testicular germ cells. BMC Med Genomics 12:77 (2019).
25.
Holland AJ, Cleveland DW: Chromoanagenesis and cancer: mechanisms and consequences of localized, complex chromosomal rearrangements. Nat Med 18:1630-1638 (2012).
26.
Kato T, Ouchi Y, Inagaki H, Makita Y, Mizuno S, et al: Genomic characterization of chromosomal insertions: insights into the mechanisms underlying chromothripsis. Cytogenet Genome Res 153:1-9 (2017).
27.
Kazazian HH Jr, Moran JV: Mobile DNA in health and disease. N Engl J Med 377:361-370 (2017).
28.
Kazazian HH Jr, Wong C, Youssoufian H, Scott AF, Phillips DG, Antonarakis SE: Haemophilia A resulting from de novo insertion of L1 sequences represents a novel mechanism for mutation in man. Nature 332:164-166 (1988).
29.
Kloosterman WP, Guryev V, van Roosmalen M, Duran KJ, de Bruijn E, et al: Chromothripsis as a mechanism driving complex de novo structural rearrangements in the germline. Hum Mol Genet 20:1916-1924 (2011).
30.
Kloosterman WP, Tavakoli-Yaraki M, van Roosmalen MJ, van Binsbergen E, Renkens I, et al: Constitutional chromothripsis rearrangements involve clustered double-stranded DNA breaks and nonhomologous repair mechanisms. Cell Rep 1:648-655 (2012).
31.
Lee JA, Carvalho CM, Lupski JR: A DNA replication mechanism for generating nonrecurrent rearrangements associated with genomic disorders. Cell 131:1235-1247 (2007).
32.
Liu P, Erez A, Nagamani SC, Dhar SU, Kołodziejska KE, et al: Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements. Cell 146:889-903 (2011a).
33.
Liu P, Lacaria M, Zhang F, Withers M, Hastings PJ, Lupski JR: Frequency of nonallelic homologous recombination is correlated with length of homology: evidence that ectopic synapsis precedes ectopic crossing-over. Am J Hum Genet 89:580-588 (2011b).
34.
Liu P, Carvalho CM, Hastings PJ, Lupski JR: Mechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangements. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22:211-220 (2012).
35.
Liu P, Yuan B, Carvalho CMB, Wuster A, Walter K, et al: An organismal CNV mutator phenotype restricted to early human development. Cell 168:830-842 (2017).
36.
Lupski JR: Genomic disorders: structural features of the genome can lead to DNA rearrangements and human disease traits. Trends Genet 14:417-422 (1998).
37.
Ly P, Teitz LS, Kim DH, Shoshani O, Skaletsky H, et al: Selective Y centromere inactivation triggers chromosome shattering in micronuclei and repair by non-homologous end joining. Nat Cell Biol 19:68-75 (2017).
38.
Ly P, Brunner SF, Shoshani O, Kim DH, Lan W, et al: Chromosome segregation errors generate a diverse spectrum of simple and complex genomic rearrangements. Nat Genet 51:705-715 (2019).
39.
Maciejowski J, Li Y, Bosco N, Campbell PJ, de Lange T: Chromothripsis and kataegis induced by telomere crisis. Cell 163:1641-1654 (2015).
40.
Mackay DJ, Temple IK: Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus type 1. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C:335-342 (2010).
41.
Madan K: What is a complex chromosome rearrangement? Am J Med Genet A 161A:1181-1184 (2013).
42.
Marcozzi A, Pellestor F, Kloosterman WP: The genomic characteristics and origin of chromothripsis. Methods Mol Biol 1769:3-19 (2018).
43.
Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker LG, Brothman AR, et al: Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 86:749-764 (2010).
44.
Mills RE, Walter K, Stewart C, Handsaker RE, Chen K, et al: Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing. Nature 470:59-65 (2011).
45.
Nazaryan-Petersen L, Tommerup N: Chromothripsis and human genetic disease (2016). .
46.
Nazaryan-Petersen L, Bertelsen B, Bak M, Jønson L, Tommerup N, et al: Germline chromothripsis driven by L1-mediated retrotransposition and Alu/Alu homologous recombination. Hum Mutat 37:385-395 (2016).
47.
Nazaryan-Petersen L, Eisfeldt J, Pettersson M, Lundin J, Nilsson D, et al: Replicative and non-replicative mechanisms in the formation of clustered CNVs are indicated by whole genome characterization. PLoS Genet 14: e1007780 (2018).
48.
Onozawa M, Zhang Z, Kim YJ, Goldberg L, Varga T et al: Repair of DNA double-strand breaks by templated nucleotide sequence insertions derived from distant regions of the genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:7729-7734 (2014).
49.
Pannunzio NR, Watanabe G, Lieber MR: Nonhomologous DNA end-joining for repair of DNA double-strand breaks. J Biol Chem 293:10512-10523 (2018).
50.
Pellestor F, Gatinois V: Potential role of chromothripsis in the genesis of complex chromosomal rearrangements in human gametes and preimplantation embryo. Methods Mol Biol 1769:35-41 (2018).
51.
Pellestor F, Anahory T, Lefort G, Puechberty J, Liehr T, et al: Complex chromosomal rearrangements: origin and meiotic behavior. Hum Reprod Update 17:476-494 (2011).
52.
Pellestor F, Gatinois V, Puechberty J, Geneviève D, Lefort G: Chromothripsis: potential origin in gametogenesis and preimplantation cell divisions. A review. Fertil Steril 102:1785-1796 (2014).
53.
Poot M: Genes, proteins, and biological pathways preventing chromothripsis. Methods Mol Biol 1769:231-251 (2018).
54.
Poot M: Genomic earthquakes in the human germline and their ramifications. Mol Syndromol 10:291-293 (2020).
55.
Poot M, Haaf T: Mechanisms of origin, phenotypic effects and diagnostic implications of complex chromosome rearrangements. Mol Syndromol 6:110-134 (2015).
56.
Sallmyr A, Tomkinson AE: Repair of DNA double-strand breaks by mammalian alternative end-joining pathways. J Biol Chem 293:10536-10546 (2018).
57.
Schluth-Bolard C, Diguet F, Chatron N, Rollat-Farnier PA, Bardel C, et al: Whole genome paired-end sequencing elucidates functional and phenotypic consequences of balanced chromosomal rearrangement in patients with developmental disorders. J Med Genet 56:526-535 (2019).
58.
Slamova Z, Nazaryan-Petersen L, Mehrjouy MM, Drabova J, Hancarova M, et al: Very short DNA segments can be detected and handled by the repair machinery during germline chromothriptic chromosome reassembly. Hum Mutat 39:709-716 (2018).
59.
Stephens PJ, Greenman CD, Fu B, Yang F, Bignell GR, et al: Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144:27-40 (2011).
60.
Suzuki E, Shima H, Toki M, Hanew K, Matsubara K, et al: Complex X-chromosomal rearrangements in two women with ovarian dysfunction: implications of chromothripsis/chromoanasynthesis-dependent and -independent origins of complex genomic alterations. Cytogenet Genome Res 150:86-92 (2016).
61.
van Binsbergen E: Origins and breakpoint analyses of copy number variations: up close and personal. Cytogenet Genome Res 135:271-276 (2011).
62.
Weckselblatt B, Rudd MK: Human structural variation: mechanisms of chromosome rearrangements. Trends Genet 31:587-599 (2015).
63.
Zeman MK, Cimprich KA: Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 16:2-9 (2014).
64.
Zepeda-Mendoza CJ, Morton CC: The iceberg under water: unexplored complexity of chromoanagenesis in congenital disorders. Am J Hum Genet 104:565-577 (2019).
65.
Zhang CZ, Leibowitz ML, Pellman D: Chromothripsis and beyond: rapid genome evolution from complex chromosomal rearrangements. Genes Dev 27:2513-2530 (2013).
66.
Zhang CZ, Spektor A, Cornils H, Francis JM, Jackson EK, et al: Chromothripsis from DNA damage in micronuclei. Nature 522:179-184 (2015).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.