Despite the variation observed in the diploid chromosome number of storks (Ciconiiformes, Ciconiidae), from 2n = 52 to 2n = 78, most reports have relied solely on analyses by conventional staining. As most species have similar macrochromosomes, some authors propose that karyotype evolution involves mainly fusions between microchromosomes, which are highly variable in species with different diploid numbers. In order to verify this hypothesis, in this study, the karyotypes of 2 species of storks from South America with different diploid numbers, the jabiru (Jabiru mycteria, 2n = 56) and the maguary stork (Ciconia maguary, 2n = 72), were analyzed by chromosome painting using whole chromosome probes from the macrochromosomes of Gallus gallus (GGA) and Leucopternis albicollis (LAL). The results revealed that J. mycteria and C. maguary share synteny within chromosome pairs 1-9 and Z. The syntenies to the macrochromosomes of G. gallus are conserved, except for GGA4, which is homologous to 2 different pairs, as in most species of birds. A fusion of GGA8 and GGA9 was observed in both species. Additionally, chromosomes corresponding to GGA4p and GGA6 are fused to other segments that did not hybridize to any of the macrochromosome probes used, suggesting that these segments correspond to microchromosomes. Hence, our data corroborate the proposed hypothesis that karyotype evolution is based on fusions involving microchromosomes. In view of the morphological constancy of the macrochromosome pairs in most Ciconiidae, we propose a putative ancestral karyotype for the family, including the GGA8/GGA9 fusion, and a diploid number of 2n = 78. The use of probes for microchromosome pairs should be the next step in identifying other synapomorphies that may help to clarify the phylogeny of this family.

Keywords:
Avian karyotypes, FISH, Fusions, Microchromosomes, Storks
1.
Belterman RHR, de Boer LEM: A karyological study of 55 species of birds, including karyotypes of 39 species new to cytology. Genetica 65:39-82 (1984).
2.
Belterman RHR, de Boer LEM: A miscellaneous collection of bird karyotypes. Genetica 83:17-29 (1990).
3.
de Boer LEM, van Brink JM: Cytotaxonomy of the Ciconiiformes (Aves), with karyotypes of eight species new to cytology. Cytogenet Cell Genet 34:19-34 (1982).
4.
del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J: Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Ostrich to Ducks (Lynx Edicions, Barcelona 1992).
5.
de Oliveira EHC, Habermann F, Lacerda O, Sbalqueiro IJ, Wienberg J, Müller S: Chromosome reshuffling in birds of prey: the karyotypes of the world's largest eagle (Harpy eagle, Harpia harpyja) compared to that of the chicken (Gallus gallus). Chromosoma 114:338-343 (2005).
6.
de Oliveira EHC, Tagliarini MM, Rissino JD, Pieczarka JC, Nagamachi CY, et al: Reciprocal chromosome painting between white hawk (Leucopternis albicollis) and chicken reveals extensive fusions and fissions during karyotype evolution of Accipitridae (Aves, Falconiformes). Chromosome Res 18:349-355 (2010).
7.
de Oliveira EHC, Tagliarini MM, dos Santos MS, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA: Chromosome painting in three species of Buteoninae: a cytogenetic signature reinforces the monophyly of South American species. PLoS One 8:e70071 (2013).
8.
Feduccia A: The Origin and Evolution of Birds (Yale University Press, New Haven 1996).
9.
Francisco MR, Galetti PM Jr: First karyotypical description of two American ciconiiform birds, Mycteria americana (Ciconiidae) and Platalea ajaja (Threskiornithidae) and its significance for the chromosome evolutionary and biological conservation approaches. Genet Mol Biol 23:799-801 (2000).
10.
Furo IO, Kretschmer R, O'Brien PC, Ferguson-Smith MA, de Oliveira EH: Chromosomal diversity and karyotype evolution in South American macaws (Psittaciformes, Psittacidae). PLoS One 10:e0130157 (2015a).
11.
Furo IO, Monte AA, dos Santos MS, Tagliarini MM, O'Brien PCM, et al: Cytotaxonomy of Eurypyga helias (Gruiformes, Eurypygidae): first karyotypic description and phylogenetic proximity with Rynochetidae. PLoS One 10:e0143982 (2015b).
12.
Furo IO, Kretschmer R, dos Santos MS, Carvalho CAL, Gunski RJ, et al: Chromosomal mapping of repetitive DNAs in Myiopsitta monachus and Amazona aestiva (Psittaciformes, Psittacidae), with emphasis on the sex chromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res 151:151-160 (2017).
13.
Furo IO, Kretschmer R, O'Brien PCM, Pereira JC, Garnero ADV, et al: Chromosome painting in Neotropical long- and short-tailed parrots (Aves, Psittaciformes): phylogeny and proposal for a putative ancestral karyotype for tribe Arini. Genes 9:E491 (2018).
14.
Guerra MS: Reviewing the chromosome nomenclature of Levan et al. Rev Brasil Genet 4:741-743 (1986).
15.
Kahl MP: Social behaviour and taxonomic relationships within the Ciconiidae. Living Bird 10:151-170 (1971).
16.
Kahl MP: A revision of the family Ciconiidae (Aves). J Zool 167:451-461 (1972).
17.
Kahl MP: Family Ciconiidae, in Mayr E, Cottrell GW (eds): Check-List of Birds of the World, Vol. 1, pp 245-252 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1979).
18.
Kretschmer R, Ferguson-Smith M, de Oliveira EH: Karyotype evolution in birds: from conventional staining to chromosome painting. Genes 9:E181 (2018a).
19.
Kretschmer R, de Lima VLC, de Souza MS, Costa AL, O'Brien PCM, et al: Multidirectional chromosome painting in Synallaxis frontalis (Passeriformes, Furnariidae) reveals high chromosomal reorganization, involving fissions and inversions. Comp Cytogenet 12:97-110 (2018b).
20.
Monroe BL, Sibley CG: A World Checklist of Birds (Yale University Press, New Haven 1993).
21.
Nishida-Umehara C, Tsuda Y, Ishijima J, Ando J, Fujiwara A, et al: The molecular basis of chromosome orthologies and sex chromosomal differentiation in palaeognathous birds. Chromosome Res 15:721-734 (2007).
22.
O'Connor RE, Romanov MN, Kiazim LG, Barrett PM, Farré M, et al: Reconstruction of the diapsid ancestral genome permits chromosome evolution tracing in avian and non-avian dinosaurs. Nat Commun 9:1883 (2018).
23.
O'Connor RE, Kiazim L, Skinner B, Fonseka G, Joseph S, et al: Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution. Chromosoma 128:21-29 (2019).
24.
Olson SL: The fossil record of birds, in Farner DS, King JR, Parkes H (eds): Avian Biology, vol VIII, pp 79-238 (Academic Press, Orlando 1985).
25.
Rodrigues BS, Assis MFL, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA, de Oliveira EHC: Chromosomal studies on Coscoroba coscoroba (Aves: Anseriformes) reinforce the Coscoroba-Cereopsis clade. Biol J Linn Soc 111:274-279 (2014).
26.
Sasaki M, Ikeuchi T, Makino S: A feather pulp culture technique for avian chromosomes, with notes on the chromosomes of the peafowl and the ostrich. Experientia 24:1292-1293 (1968).
27.
Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE: Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution (Yale University Press, New Haven 1990).
28.
Slikas B: Phylogeny of the avian family Ciconiidae (storks) based on cytochrome b sequences and DNA-DNA hybridization distances. Mol Phylogenet Evol 8:275-300 (1997).
29.
Takagi N, Sasaki M: A phylogenetic study of bird karyotypes. Chromosoma 46:91-120 (1974).
30.
Zhang G: The bird's-eye view on chromosome evolution. Genome Biol 19:201 (2018).
31.
Zhang G, Li C, Li Q, Li B, Larkin DM, et al: Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation. Science 346:1311-1320 (2014).
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.