Meiotic recombination rates and patterns of crossover distributions along the chromosomes vary considerably even between closely related species. The adaptive significance of these differences is still unclear due to the paucity of empirical data. Most data on recombination come from mammalian species, while other vertebrate clades are poorly explored. Using immunolocalization of the protein of the lateral element of the synaptonemal complex (SYCP3) and the mismatch-repair protein MLH1, which marks mature recombination nodules, we analyzed recombination rates and crossover distribution in meiotic prophase chromosomes of the steppe agama (Trapelus sanguinolentus, Agamidae, Acrodonta, Iguania) and compared them with data obtained for the genus Anolis (Dactyloidae, Pleurodonta, Iguania). We found that, despite a smaller genome size, the total SC length and the MLH1 focus number per cell are much higher in the agama than in the anoles. The distributions of the MLH1 foci in the agama are multimodal in larger chromosomes and bimodal in smaller chromosomes without a significant centromere effect, resembling the patterns known for birds. A possible relationship between karyotype remodeling and the evolution of recombination in Iguania is discussed.

Keywords:
Immunolocalization, Meiotic recombination, MLH1 foci, Steppe agama
1.
Adegoke JA: Studies on the chromosomes of the rainbow lizard Agama agama agama (L.) with notes on polyploidy in the spermatocytes. Cytologia 53:233-239 (1988).
2.
Alföldi J, Di Palma F, Grabherr M, Williams C, Kong L, et al: The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477:587-591 (2011).
3.
Altmanová M, Rovatsos M, Kratochvíl L, Johnson Pokorná M: Minute Y chromosomes and karyotype evolution in Madagascan iguanas (Squamata: Iguania: Opluridae). Biol J Linn Soc 118:618-633 (2016).
4.
Ananjeva NB, Sokolova TM: The position of the genus Phrynocephalus Kaup, 1825 in agamid systems (in Russian). Trudy Zool Inst Akad Nauk SSSR (Leningrad) 207:12-21 (1990).
5.
Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T: Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151:1569-1579 (1999).
6.
Barton NH, Otto SP: Evolution of recombination due to random drift. Genetics 169:2353-2370 (2005).
7.
Burt A: Perspective: sex, recombination, and the efficacy of selection - was Weismann right? Evolution 54:337-351 (2000).
8.
Burt A, Bell G: Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination. Nature 326:803-805 (1987).
9.
Butlin RK: Recombination and speciation. Mol Ecol 14:2621-2635 (2005).
10.
Capilla L, Garcia Caldés MG, Ruiz-Herrera A: Mammalian meiotic recombination: a toolbox for genome evolution. Cytogenet Genome Res 150:1-16 (2016).
11.
Charlesworth D: The status of supergenes in the 21st century: recombination suppression in Batesian mimicry and sex chromosomes and other complex adaptations. Evol Appl 9:74-90 (2016).
12.
Deakin JE, Edwards MJ, Patel H, O'Meally D, Lian J, et al: Anchoring genome sequence to chromosomes of the central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) enables reconstruction of ancestral squamate macrochromosomes and identifies sequence content of the Z chromosome. BMC Genomics 17:447 (2016).
13.
del Priore L, Pigozzi MI: Sex-specific recombination maps for individual macrochromosomes in the Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Chromosome Res 23:199-210 (2015).
14.
Dumas D, Britton-Davidian J: Chromosomal rearrangements and evolution of recombination: comparison of chiasma distribution patterns in standard and Robertsonian populations of the house mouse. Genetics 162:1355-1366 (2002).
15.
Dumont BL: Variation and evolution of the meiotic requirement for crossing over in mammals. Genetics 205:155-168 (2017).
16.
Dumont BL, Payseur BA: Evolution of the genomic recombination rate in murid rodents. Genetics 187:643-657 (2011).
17.
Ezaz T, Quinn AE, Sarre SD, O'Meally D, Georges A, Graves JAM: Molecular marker suggests rapid changes of sex-determining mechanisms in Australian dragon lizards. Chromosome Res 17:91-98 (2009).
18.
Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R: DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294-299 (1994).
19.
Gauthier F, Martin OC, Falque M: CODA (crossover distribution analyzer): quantitative characterization of crossover position patterns along chromosomes. BMC Bioinformatics 12:27 (2011).
20.
Gorman GC: The chromosomes of the Reptilia: a cytotaxonomic interpretation, in Chiarelli B, Capanna E (eds): Cytotaxonomy and Vertebrate Evolution, pp 349-424 (Academic Press, London 1973).
21.
Gorman GC, Atkins L, Holzinger T: New karyotypic data on 15 genera of lizards in the family Iguanidae, with a discussion of axonomic and cytological implications. Cytogenetics 6:286-299 (1967).
22.
Gregory TR: Animal Genome Size Database. http://www.genomesize.com (2017). (accessed October 29, 2017).
23.
Hall WP: Chromosome variation, genomics, speciation and evolution in Sceloporus lizards. Cytogenet Genome Res 127:143-165 (2009).
24.
Lamborot M, Ossa CG, Vásquez M: Population cytogenetics of the “Northern Mod 1” chromosomal race of Liolaemus monticola Müller & Helmich (Iguanidae) from Central Chile. Gayana (Concepción) 76:10-21 (2012).
25.
Lenormand T, Otto SP: The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment. Genetics 156:423-438 (2000).
26.
Lisachov AP, Trifonov VA, Giovannotti M, Ferguson-Smith MA, Borodin PM: Immunocytological analysis of meiotic recombination in two anole lizards (Squamata, Dactyloidae). Comp Cytogenet 11:129-141 (2017).
27.
Lynn A, Koehler KE, Judis L, Chan ER, Cherry JP, et al: Covariation of synaptonemal complex length and mammalian meiotic exchange rates. Science 296:2222-2225 (2002).
28.
Manilo VV: Description of karyotypes of some species and subspecies of the genus Phrynocephalus from Central Asia. Vestn Zool 34:113-118 (2000).
29.
Manilo VV, Golubev ML: Peculiarities of karyotypes of Phrynocephalus species from the group guttatus sensu lato Sauria, Agamidae. Tsitologiia I Genetika 28:66-70 (1994).
30.
Melnikov D, Śmiełowski J, Melnikova E, Nazarov R, Ananjeva NB: Red'n'blues: a new species of Pseudotrapelus (Agamidae, Sauria) from Sudan, Africa. Russ J Herpetol 22:53-60 (2015).
31.
Moens PB: Zebrafish: chiasmata and interference. Genome 49:205-208 (2006).
32.
Olmo E, Signorino G: Chromorep: A Reptiles Chromosomes Database (2005). http://chromorep.univpm.it (accessed December 21, 2017).
33.
Ortiz-Barrientos D, Engelstädter J, Rieseberg LH: Recombination rate evolution and the origin of species. Trends Ecol Evol 31:226-236 (2016).
34.
Otto SP, Barton NH: The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. Genetics 147:879-906 (1997).
35.
Otto SP, Michalakis Y: The evolution of recombination in changing environments. Trends Ecol Evol 13:145-151 (1998).
36.
Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C: Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals. Mamm Genome 12:318-322 (2001).
37.
Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P: A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res 5:66-68 (1997).
38.
Pokorná M, Giovannotti M, Kratochvíl L, Caputo V, Olmo E, et al: Conservation of chromosomes syntenic with avian autosomes in squamate reptiles revealed by comparative chromosome painting. Chromosoma 121:409-418 (2012).
39.
Ratnasingham S, Hebert PD: BOLD: the barcode of life data system (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes 7:355-364 (2007).
40.
Reed KM, Sites JW Jr, Greenbaum IF: Synapsis, recombination, and meiotic segregation in the mesquite lizard, Sceloporus grammicus, complex. II. Fission heteromorphism of the FM2 cytotype and evolution of chromosome 2. Cytogenet Cell Genet 61:46-54 (1992).
41.
Reeves A: MicroMeasure: a new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data. Genome 44:439-443 (2001).
42.
Rovatsos M, Pokorná M, Altmanová M, Kratochvíl L: Cretaceous park of sex determination: sex chromosomes are conserved across iguanas. Biol Lett 10:20131093 (2014).
43.
Ruiz-Herrera A, Vozdova M, Fernández J, Sebestova H, Capilla L, et al: Recombination correlates with synaptonemal complex length and chromatin loop size in bovids - insights into mammalian meiotic chromosomal organization. Chromosoma 126:615-631 (2017).
44.
Segura J, Ferretti L, Ramos-Onsins S, Capilla L, Farré M, et al: Evolution of recombination in eutherian mammals: insights into mechanisms that affect recombination rates and crossover interference. Proc Biol Sci 280:20131945 (2013).
45.
Smukowski CS, Noor MAF: Recombination rate variation in closely related species. Heredity 107:496-508 (2011).
46.
Sokolovsky VV: Comparative and karyologic study of lizards in the family Agamidae. II. Karyotypes of five species of the genus Agama. Tsitologiya 17:91-93 (1975).
47.
Srikulnath K, Matsubara K, Uno Y, Thongpan A, Suputtitada S, et al: Karyological characterization of the butterfly lizard (Leiolepis reevesii rubritaeniata, Agamidae, Squamata) by molecular cytogenetic approach. Cytogenet Genome Res 125:213-223 (2009).
48.
Stapley J, Feulner PGD, Johnston SE, Santure AW, Smadja SM: Variation in recombination frequency and distribution across eukaryotes: patterns and processes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 372:20160455 (2017).
49.
Veller C, Kleckner N, Nowak MA: A rigorous measure of genome-wide genetic shuffling that takes into account crossover positions and Mendel's second law. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, E-pub ahead of print (2019).
50.
Zickler D, Kleckner N: Recombination, pairing, and synapsis of homologs during meiosis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 7:a016626 (2015).
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.