The hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin Müller, 1776) is a folivorous bird, endemic to the Amazonian region. It presents some unique characteristics, including wing claws and foregut fermentation, which make its phylogenetic relationship to other birds difficult to determine. There have been various attempts to place it among the Galliformes, Gruiformes, Musophagiformes, Cuculiformes, and Charadriiformes, but phylogenetic analyses always show low supporting values. Nowadays, the hoatzin is included in the monotypic order Opisthocomiformes, but the relationship of this order to other groups of birds is still unclear. Although its karyotype resembles the typical avian model, fissions of the syntenic groups corresponding to chicken chromosomes 1 and 2 and 2 fusions were found. The presence of 18S rDNA clusters in 2 pairs of microchromosomes is another derived character. Hence, different rearrangements were detected in the karyotype of the hoatzin, indicating it has been derived from the putative ancestral karyotype by the occurrence of fissions and fusions. However, as these rearrangements are not exclusive to O. hoazin, they do not clarify the phylogenetic position of this enigmatic species.

Keywords:
Chromosome painting, Cytotaxonomy, Hoatzin, Opisthocomiformes
1.
Avise JC, Nelson WS, Sibley CG: Why one-kilobase sequences from mitochondrial DNA fail to solve the hoatzin phylogenetic enigma. Mol Phylogenet Evol 3:175-184 (1994).
2.
Cracraft J, Houde P, Ho SYW, Mindell DP, Fjeldsa JF, et al: Response to comment on “Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds”. Science 349:1460 (2015).
3.
Daniels LM, Delany ME: Molecular and cytogenetic organization of the 5S ribosomal DNA array in chicken (Gallus gallus). Chromosome Res 11:305-317 (2003).
4.
de Oliveira EHC, Tagliarini MM, Rissino JD, Pieczarka JC, Nagamachi CY, et al: Reciprocal chromosome painting between white hawk (Leucopternis albicollis) and chicken reveals extensive fusions and fissions during karyotype evolution of Accipitridae (Aves, Falconiformes). Chromosome Res 18:349-355 (2010).
5.
de Oliveira EHC, Tagliarini MM, dos Santos MS, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA: Chromosome painting in three species of Buteoninae: a cytogenetic signature reinforces the monophyly of South American species. PLoS One 8:e70071 (2013).
6.
dos Santos MS, Kretschmer R, Silva FA, Ledesma MA, O'Brien PC, et al: Intrachromosomal rearrangements in two representatives of the genus Saltator (Thraupidae, Passeriformes) and the occurrence of heteromorphic Z chromosomes. Genetica 143:535-543 (2015).
7.
Ericson PGP, Anderson CL, Britton T, Elzanowski A, Johansson US, et al: Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils. Biol Lett 2:543-547 (2006).
8.
Furo IO, Kretschmer R, O'Brien PC, Ferguson-Smith MA, de Oliveira EHC: Chromosomal diversity and karyotype evolution in South American macaws (Psittaciformes, Psittacidae). PLoS One 10:e0130157 (2015a).
9.
Furo IO, Monte AA, dos Santos MS, Tagliarini MM, O' Brien PCM, et al: Cytotaxonomy of Eurypyga helias (Gruiformes, Eurypygidae): first karyotypic description and phylogenetic proximity with Rynochetidae. PLoS One 10:e0143982 (2015b).
10.
Gill FB, Donsker D (eds): IOC World Bird List (v3.5). DOI: 10.14344/IOC.ML.3.5 (2013).
11.
Guerra M: Reviewing the chromosome nomenclature of Levan et al. Rev Bras Genét 9:741-743 (1986).
12.
Hackett SJ, Kimball RT, Reddy S, Bowie RCK, Braun EL, et al: A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320:1763-1768 (2008).
13.
Hammar B: The karyotypes of thirty-one birds. Hereditas 65:29-58 (1970).
14.
Hedges SB, Simmons MD, van Dijk MAM, Caspers GJ, de Jong WW, Sibley CG: Phylogenetic relationships of the hoatzin, an enigmatic South American bird. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:11662-11665 (1995).
15.
Hughes JM, Baker AJ: Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin) resolved using mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Mol Biol Evol 16:1300-1307 (1999).
16.
Jarvis ED, Mirarab S, Aberer AJ, Li B, Houde P, et al: Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346:1320-1331 (2014).
17.
Kimball RT, Wang N, Heimer-McGinn V, Ferguson ELB, Braun EL: Identifying localized biases in large datasets: a case study using the avian tree of life. Mol Phylogenet Evol 69:1021-1032 (2013).
18.
Kretschmer R, Gunski RJ, Garnero ADV, Furo IO, O'Brien PCM, et al: Molecular cytogenetic characterization of multiple intrachromosomal rearrangements in two representatives of the genus Turdus (Turdidae, Passeriformes). PLoS One 9:e103338 (2014).
19.
Kretschmer R, de Oliveira EHC, Santos MS, Furo IO, O' Brien P, et al: Chromosome Mapping of the large elaenia (Elaenia spectabilis): evidence for a cytogenetic signature for passeriform birds? Biol J Linn Soc 115:391-398 (2015a).
20.
Kretschmer R, Gunski RJ, Garnero ADV, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA, et al: Chromosome painting in Vanellus chilensis: detection of a fusion common to clade Charadrii (Charadriiformes). Cytogenet Genome Res 146:58-63 (2015b).
21.
Kretschmer R, Ferguson-Smith MA, de Oliveira EHC: Karyotype evolution in birds: from conventional staining to chromosome painting. Genes 9:181 (2018a).
22.
Kretschmer R, Furo IO, Gunski RJ, Garnero AV, Pereira JC, et al: Comparative chromosome painting in Columbidae (Columbiformes) reinforces divergence in Passerea and Columbea. Chromosome Res 26:211-223 (2018b).
23.
Ledesma MA, Cardozo DE, Montalti D, Leotta GA, Gunski RJ: Estudios citogenéticos em tres especies de Aves Antárticas. Rev Cienc Tecnol 7:68-72 (2005).
24.
Livezey BC, Zusi RL: Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zool J Linn Soc 149:1-95 (2007).
25.
Mayr G: A hoatzin fossil from the middle Miocene of Kenya documents the past occurrence of modern-type Opisthocomiformes in Africa. The Auk 131:55-60 (2014).
26.
McCormack JE, Harvey MG, Faircloth BC, Crawford NG, Glenn TC, Brumfield RT: A phylogeny of birds based on over 1,500 loci collected by target enrichment and high-throughput sequencing. PLoS One 8:e54848 (2013).
27.
Nanda I, Karl E, Griffin DK, Schartl M, Schmid M: Chromosome repatterning in three representative parrots (Psittaciformes) inferred from comparative chromosome painting. Cytogenet Genome Res 117:43-53 (2007).
28.
Nanda I, Benisch P, Fetting D, Haaf T, Schmid M: Synteny conservation of chicken macrochromosomes 1-10 in different avian lineages revealed by cross-species chromosome painting. Cytogenet Genome Res 132:165-181 (2011).
29.
Nie W, O'Brien PCM, Ng BL, Fu B, Volobouev V, et al: Avian comparative genomics: reciprocal chromosome painting between domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) and the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus, Charadriiformes) - an atypical species with low diploid number. Chromosome Res 17:99-113 (2009).
30.
Nie W, O'Brien PCM, Fu B, Wang J, Su W, et al: Multidirectional chromosome painting substantiates the occurrence of extensive genomic reshuffling within Accipitriformes. BMC Evol Biol 15:205 (2015).
31.
Nishida C, Ishijima J, Kosaka A, Tanabe H, Habermann FA, et al: Characterization of chromosome structures of Falconinae (Falconidae, Falconiformes, Aves) by Chromosome painting and delineation of chromosome rearrangements during their differentiation. Chromosome Res 16:171-181 (2008).
32.
Prum RO, Berv JS, Dornburg A, Field DJ, Townsend JP, et al: A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526:569-573 (2015).
33.
Rodrigues BS, de Assis MFL, O' Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA, de Oliveira EHC: Chromosomal studies on Coscoroba coscoroba (Aves: Anseriformes) reinforce the Coscoroba-Cereopsis clade. Biol J Linn Soc 111:274-279 (2014).
34.
Sasaki M, Ikeuchi T, Makino S: A feather pulp culture technique for avian chromosomes, with notes on the chromosomes of the peafowl and the ostrich. Experientia 24:1292-1293 (1968).
35.
Shibusawa M, Nishida-Umehara C, Tsudzuki M, Masabanda J, Griffin DK, Matsuda Y: A comparative karyological study of the blue-breasted quail (Coturnix chinensis, Phasianidae) and California quail (Callipepla californica, Odontophoridae). Cytogenet Genome Res 106:82-90 (2004a).
36.
Shibusawa M, Nishibori M, Nishida-Umehara C, Tsudzuki M, Masabanda J, et al: Karyotypic evolution in the Galliformes: an examination of the process of karyotypic evolution by comparison of the molecular cytogenetic findings with the molecular phylogeny. Cytogenet Genome Res 106:111-119 (2004b).
37.
Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE: The relationships of the Hoatzin. The Auk 90:1-13 (1973).
38.
Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE: Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: a Study in Molecular Evolution (Yale University Press, New Haven 1990).
39.
Sick H: Ornitologia Brasileira, uma introdução (Ed Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro 1997).
40.
Sorenson MD, Oneal E, García-Moreno J, Mindell DP: More taxa, more characters: the hoatzin problem is still unresolved. Mol Biol Evol 20:1484-1498 (2003).
41.
Stock AD, Mengden GA: Chromosome banding pattern conservatism in birds and nonhomology of chromosome banding patterns between birds, turtles, snakes and amphibians. Chromosoma 50:69-77 (1975).
42.
Tagliarini MM, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA, de Oliveira EHC: Maintenance of syntenic groups between Cathartidae and Gallus gallus indicates symplesiomorphic karyotypes in New World vultures. Genet Mol Biol 34:80-83 (2011).
43.
Thomas BT: Family Opisthocomidae (Hoatzins), in del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J (eds): Handbook of the Birds of the World, Volume 3, Hoatzins to Auks, pp 24-32 (Lynx Edicions, Barcelona 1996).
44.
Van Tuinen P, Valentine M: Phylogenetic relationships of turacos (Musophagidae: Cuculiformes) based on comparative chromosome banding analysis. Ibis 128:364-381 (1986).
45.
Waldrigues A, Ferrari I: Estudo cromossômico em Guira-guira (Aves). Ciên Cult 32:267-G.1.6 (1980).
46.
Waldrigues A, Ferrari I: Karyotypic study of cuculiform birds. I. Karyotype of the smooth-billed ani (Crotophaga ani). Rev Brasil Genet 1:121-129 (1982).
47.
Zhang G, Li C, Li Q, Li B, Larkin DM, et al: Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation. Science 346:1311-1320 (2014).
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.