A detailed cytogenetic study on anurans belonging to the unranked taxon Terraranae revealed the existence of microscopically recognizable XY♂/XX♀ or ZZ♂/ZW♀ sex chromosomes in 11 species. Furthermore, in some species Y-autosome translocations were found, of which 5 could be confirmed. The male individuals carrying the Y-autosome translocations still coexist with the males showing the original karyotypes. The present report gives an overview on the mitotic and meiotic structure, staining and banding properties, functional importance, and similarities and differences of these Y-autosome translocations which are very rare in vertebrates. A mathematical model was constructed that calculates the various probabilities of further chromosome rearrangements in these karyotypes with Y-autosome translocations. The localization of the differential segment containing the hypothetical male sex-determining gene in the Y chromosome is discussed.

Keywords:
Anura, Chromosome banding, Y-autosome translocation
1.
Almeida Toledo LF, Foresti H, Almeida Toledo S: Complex sex chromosome system in Eigenmannia sp. (Pisces, Gymnotiformes). Genetica 64:165-169 (1984).
2.
Almeida Toledo LF, Viegas-Péquignot E, Foresti F, Toledo SA, Dutrillaux B: BrdU replication patterns demonstrating chromosome homoeologies in two fish species, genus Eigenmannia. Cytogenet Cell Genet 48:117-120 (1988).
3.
AmphibiaWeb: http://amphibiaweb.org/ (University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA), accessed 12 December 2017.
4.
Bandyopadhyay R, Heller A, Knox-DuBois C, McCaskill C, Berend SA, et al: Parental origin and timing of de novo Robertsonian translocation formation. Am J Hum Genet 71:1456-1462 (2002).
5.
Barr HJ, Esper H: Nucleolar size in cells of Xenopus laevis in relation to nucleolar competition. Expl Cell Res 31:211-214 (1963).
6.
Birnstiel ML, Wallace H, Sirlin JL, Fischberg M: Localization of the ribosomal DNA complements in the nucleolar organizer region of Xenopus laevis, in Vincent WS, Miller OL (eds): International Symposium on the Nucleolus. Its Structure and Function, pp 431-448. NCI Monograph 23 (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda 1966).
7.
Elsdale TR, Fischberg M, Smith SA: A mutation that reduces nucleolar number in Xenopus laevis. Expl Cell Res 14:642-643 (1958).
8.
Frost DR: Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0 (accessed 7 December 2017). Electronic database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html (American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA 2017).
9.
Garagna S, Broccoli D, Redi CA, Searle JB, Cooke HJ, Capanna E: Robertsonian metacentrics of the house mouse lose telomeric sequences but retain some minor satellite DNA in the pericentromeric area. Chromosoma 103:685-692 (1995).
10.
Hedges SB, Duellman WE, Heinicke MP: New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa 1737:1-182 (2008).
11.
Hillis DM, Green DM: Evolutionary changes of heterogametic sex in the phylogenetic history of amphibians. J Evol Biol 3:49-64 (1990).
12.
Kahn J: The nucleolar organizer in the mitotic chromosome complement of Xenopus laevis. Quart J Micr Sci 103:407-409 (1962).
13.
Lynch JD, La Marca E: Synonymy and variation in Eleutherodactylus bicumulus (Peters) from northern Venezuela, with a description of a new species (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). Carib J Sci 29:133-146 (1993).
14.
Miller L, Brown DD: Variation in the activity of nucleolar organizers and their ribosomal gene content. Chromosoma 28:430-444 (1969).
15.
Miller L, Knowland J: Reduction of ribosomal RNA synthesis and ribosomal RNA genes in a mutant of Xenopus laevis which organizes only a partial nucleolus. II. The number of ribosomal RNA genes in animals of different nucleolar types. J Mol Biol 53:329-338 (1970).
16.
Moreira O, Bertollo LAC, Galetti PM: Evidences for a multiple sex chromosome system with female heterogamety in Apareiodon affinis (Pisces, Parodontidae). Caryologia 33:83-91 (1980).
17.
Morescalchi A: Amphibia, in Chiarelli AB, Capanna E (eds): Cytotaxonomy and Vertebrate Evolution, pp 233-348 (Academic Press, London 1973).
18.
Morescalchi A, Galgano M: Meiotic chromosomes and their taxonomic value in Amphibia Anura. Caldasia 11:41-50 (1973).
19.
Morescalchi A, Hureau JC, Olmo E, Ozouf-Costaz C, Pisano E, Stanyon R: A multiple sex-chromosome system in Antarctic ice-fishes. Polar Biol 11:655-661 (1992a).
20.
Morescalchi A, Pisano E, Stanyon R, Morescalchi MA: Cytotaxonomy of Antarctic teleosts of the Pagothema/Trematomus complex (Nototheniidae, Perciformes). Polar Biol 12:553-558 (1992b).
21.
Nanda I, Schneider-Rasp S, Winking H, Schmid M: Loss of telomeric sites in the chromosomes of Mus musculus domesticus (Rodentia: Muridae) during Robertsonian rearrangements. Chromosome Res 3:399-409 (1995).
22.
Ohno S: Sex Chromosomes and Sex-linked Genes (Springer, Berlin 1967).
23.
Page SL, Shaffer LG: Nonhomologous Robertsonian translocations form predominantly during female meiosis. Nat Genet 15:231-232 (1997).
24.
Page SL, Shin JC, Han JY, Choo KHA, Shaffer LG: Breakpoint diversity illustrates distinct mechanisms for Robertsonian translocation formation. Hum Mol Genet 5:1279-1288 (1996).
25.
Saitoh K: Multiple sex-chromosome system in a loach fish. Cytogenet Cell Genet 52:62-64 (1989).
26.
Schmid M: Chromosome banding in Amphibia. I. Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer regions in Bufo and Hyla. Chromosoma 66:361-388 (1978a).
27.
Schmid M: Chromosome banding in Amphibia. II. Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer regions in Ranidae, Microhylidae and Rhacophoridae. Chromosoma 68:131-148 (1978b).
28.
Schmid M: Chromosome banding in Amphibia. IV. Differentiation of GC- and AT-rich chromosome regions in Anura. Chromosoma 77:83-103 (1980).
29.
Schmid M: Chromosome banding in Amphibia. VII. Analysis of the structure and variability of NORs in Anura. Chromosoma 87:327-344 (1982).
30.
Schmid M, Steinlein C: Sex chromosomes, sex-linked genes, and sex determination in the vertebrate class Amphibia, in Scherer G, Schmid M (eds): Genes and Mechanisms in Vertebrate Sex Determination, pp 143-176 (Birkhäuser, Basel 2001).
31.
Schmid M, Nanda I, Steinlein C, Kausch K, Haaf T, Epplen JT: Sex-determining mechanisms and sex chromosomes in Amphibia, in Green DM, Sessions SK (eds): Amphibian Cytogenetics and Evolution, pp 393-430 (Academic Press, San Diego 1991).
32.
Schmid M, Steinlein C, Feichtinger W: Chromosome banding in Amphibia. XVII. First demonstration of multiple sex chromosomes in amphibians: Eleutherodactylus maussi (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Chromosoma 101:284-292 (1992).
33.
Schmid M, Feichtinger W, Steinlein C, Haaf T, Schartl M, et al: Chromosome banding in Amphibia. XXVI. Coexistence of homomorphic XY sex chromosomes and a derived Y-autosome translocation in Eleutherodactylus maussi (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Cytogenet Genome Res 99:330-343 (2002).
34.
Schmid M, Feichtinger W, Steinlein C, Visbal García R, Fernández Badillo A: Chromosome banding in Amphibia. XXVIII. Homomorphic XY sex chromosomes and a derived Y-autosome translocation in Eleutherodactylus riveroi (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Cytogenet Genome Res 101:62-73 (2003).
35.
Schmid M, Steinlein C, Bogart JP, Feichtinger W, León P, et al: The chromosomes of terraranan frogs. Insights into vertebrate cytogenetics. Cytogenet Genome Res 130/131:1-568 (2010).
36.
Schmid M, Steinlein C, Bogart JP, Feichtinger W, Haaf T, et al: The hemiphractid frogs - phylogeny, embryology, life history, and cytogenetics. Cytogenet Genome Res 138:69-384 (2012).
37.
Shaffer LG, Jackson-Cook CK, Stasiowski BA, Spence JE, Brown JA: Parental origin determination in thirty de novo Robertsonian translocations. Am J Med Genet 43:957-963 (1992).
38.
Ward DC, Reich E, Goldberg IH: Base specificity in the interaction of polynucleotides with antibiotic drugs. Science 149:1259-1263 (1965).
39.
Weisblum B: Fluorescent probes of chromosomal DNA structure: three classes of acridines. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 38:441-449 (1973).
40.
Winge O, Ditlevsen E: Color inheritance and sex determination in Lebistes. Heredity 1:65-83 (1947).
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.