Recently, the reticulated giraffe (G. reticulata) was identified as a distinct species, which emphasized the need for intensive research in this interesting animal. To shed light on the meiotic process as a source of biodiversity, we analysed the frequency and distribution of meiotic recombination in 2 reticulated giraffe males. We used immunofluorescence detection of synaptonemal complex protein (SYCP3), meiotic double strand breaks (DSB, marked as RAD51 foci) in leptonema, and crossovers (COs, as MLH1 foci) in pachynema. The mean number of autosomal MLH1 foci per cell (27), which resulted from a single, distally located MLH1 focus observed on most chromosome arms, is one of the lowest among mammalian species analysed so far. The CO/DSB conversion ratio was 0.32. The pseudoautosomal region was localised in the Xq and Yp termini by FISH and showed an MLH1 focus in 83% of the pachytene cells. Chromatin structures corresponding to the nucleolus organiser regions were observed in the pachytene spermatocytes. The results are discussed in the context of known data on meiosis in Cetartiodactyla, depicting that the variation in CO frequency among species of this taxonomic group is mostly associated with their diploid chromosome number.

Keywords:
Crossover, Giraffe, Meiosis, MLH1, Nucleolus organiser region, RAD51, Recombination, Synaptonemal complex
1.
Al-Jaru A, Goodwin W, Skidmore J, Khazanehdari K: Distribution of MLH1 foci in horse male synaptonemal complex. Cytogenet Genome Res 142:87-94 (2014).
2.
Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T: Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151:1569-1579 (1999).
3.
Baier B, Hunt P, Broman KW, Hassold T: Variation in genome-wide levels of meiotic recombination is established at the onset of prophase in mammalian males. PLoS Genet 10: e1004125 (2014).
4.
Basheva EA, Bidau CJ, Borodin PM: General pattern of meiotic recombination in male dogs estimated by MLH1 and RAD51 immunolocalization. Chromosome Res 16:709-719 (2008).
5.
Beguelini MR, Marchesin SRC, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV, Morielle-Versute E: Nucleolar behavior during meiosis in four species of phyllostomid bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia). Genet Mol Res 10:552-565 (2011).
6.
Berríos S, Fernández-Donoso R, Pincheira J, Page J, Manterola M, Cerda MC: Number and nuclear localisation of nucleoli in mammalian spermatocytes. Genetica 121:219-228 (2004).
7.
Bidau CJ, Giménez MD, Palmer CL, Searle JB: The effects of robertsonian fusions on chiasma frequency and distribution in the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) from a hybrid zone in northern Scotland. Heredity 87:305-313 (2001).
8.
Bishop DK: RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 79:1081-1092 (1994).
9.
Bock F, Fennessy J, Bidon T, Tutchings A, Marais A, et al: Mitochondrial sequences reveal a clear separation between Angolan and South African giraffe along a cryptic rift valley. BMC Evol Biol 14:219 (2014).
10.
Borodin PM, Karamysheva TV, Belonogova NM, Torgasheva AA, Rubtsov NB, Searle JB: Recombination map of the common shrew, Sorex araneus (Eulipotyphla, Mammalia). Genetics 178:621-632 (2008).
11.
Borodin PM, Basheva EA, Zhelezova AI: Immunocytological analysis of meiotic recombination in the American mink (Mustela vison). Anim Genet 40:235-238 (2009).
12.
Brown DM, Brenneman RA, Koepfli KP, Pollinger JP, Milá B, et al: Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe. BMC Biol 5:57 (2007).
13.
Cernohorska H, Kubickova S, Vahala J, Robinson TJ, Rubes J: Cytotypes of Kirk's dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii, Bovidae) show multiple tandem fusions. Cytogenet Genome Res 132:255-263 (2011).
14.
Cernohorska H, Kubickova S, Kopecna O, Kulemzina AI, Perelman PL, et al: Molecular cytogenetic insights to the phylogenetic affinities of the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) and pronghorn (Antilocapra americana). Chromosome Res 21:447-460 (2013).
15.
Cohen PE, Pollack SE, Pollard JW: Genetic analysis of chromosome pairing, recombination, and cell cycle control during first meiotic prophase in mammals. Endocr Rev 27:398-426 (2006).
16.
de los Santos T, Hunter N, Lee C, Larkin B, Loidl J, Hollingsworth NM: The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics 164:81-94 (2003).
17.
Dumas D, Britton-Davidian J: Chromosomal rearrangements and evolution of recombination: comparison of chiasma distribution patterns in standard and robertsonian populations of the house mouse. Genetics 162:1355-1366 (2002).
18.
Dumont BL: Variation and evolution of the meiotic requirement for crossing over in mammals. Genetics 205:155-168 (2017).
19.
Dumont BL, Payseur BA: Evolution of the genomic recombination rate in murid rodents. Genetics 187:643-657 (2011).
20.
Fennessy J, Bidon T, Reuss F, Kumar V, Elkan P, et al: Multi-locus analyses reveal four giraffe species instead of one. Curr Biol 26:2543-2549 (2016).
21.
Froenicke L, Anderson LK, Wienberg J, Ashley T: Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting. Am J Hum Genet 71:1353-1368 (2002).
22.
Fröhlich J, Vozdova M, Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Sebestova H, Rubes J: Variation of meiotic recombination rates and MLH1 foci distribution in spermatocytes of cattle, sheep and goats. Cytogenet Genome Res 146:211-221 (2015).
23.
Gallagher DS Jr, Derr JN, Womack JE: Chromosome conservation among the advanced pecorans and determination of the primitive bovid karyotype. J Hered 85:204-210 (1994).
24.
Gibbons JG, Branco AT, Godinho SA, Yu S, Lemos B: Concerted copy number variation balances ribosomal DNA dosage in human and mouse genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:2485-2490 (2015).
25.
Gruhn JR, Rubio C, Broman KW, Hunt PA, Hassold T: Cytological studies of human meiosis: sex-specific differences in recombination originate at, or prior to, establishment of double-strand breaks. PLoS One 8:e85075 (2013).
26.
Hassanin A, Douzery EJP: Molecular and morphological phylogenies of Ruminantia and the alternative position of the Moschidae. Syst Biol 52:206-228 (2003).
27.
Holloway JK, Booth J, Edelmann W, McGowan CH, Cohen PE: MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1-MLH3-independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet 4:e1000186 (2008).
28.
Huang L, Nesterenko A, Nie W, Wang J, Su W, et al: Karyotype evolution of giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis) revealed by cross-species chromosome painting with Chinese muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and human (Homo sapiens) paints. Cytogenet Genome Res 122:132-138 (2008).
29.
Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N: Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88:375-384 (1997).
30.
Kleckner N, Storlazzi A, Zickler D: Coordinate variation in meiotic pachytene SC length and total crossover/chiasma frequency under conditions of constant DNA length. Trends Genet 19:623-628 (2003).
31.
Lynn A, Koehler KE, Judis L, Chan ER, Cherry JP, et al: Covariation of synaptonemal complex length and mammalian meiotic exchange rates. Science 296:2222-2225 (2002).
32.
Mary N, Barasc H, Ferchaud S, Billon Y, Meslier F, et al: Meiotic recombination analyses of individual chromosomes in male domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica). PLoS One 9:e99123 (2014).
33.
Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C: Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals. Mamm Genome 12:318-322 (2001).
34.
Ruiz-Herrera A, Vozdova M, Fernández J, Sebestova H, Capilla L, et al: Recombination correlates with synaptonemal complex length and chromatin loop size in bovids - insights into mammalian meiotic chromosomal organization. Chromosoma, Epub ahead of print (2017).
35.
Scherthan H, Weich S, Schwegler H, Heyting C, Härle M, Cremer T: Centromere and telomere movements during early meiotic prophase of mouse and man are associated with the onset of chromosome pairing. J Cell Biol 134:1109-1125 (1996).
36.
Sebestova H, Vozdova M, Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Kotrba R, Rubes J: Effect of species-specific differences in chromosome morphology on chromatin compaction and the frequency and distribution of RAD51 and MLH1 foci in two bovid species: cattle (Bos taurus) and the common eland (Taurotragus oryx). Chromosoma 125:137-149 (2016).
37.
Segura J, Ferretti L, Ramos-Onsins S, Capilla L, Farré M, et al: Evolution of recombination in eutherian mammals: insights into mechanisms that affect recombination rates and crossover interference. Proc Biol Sci 280:20131945 (2013).
38.
Sun F, Oliver-Bonet M, Liehr T, Starke H, Ko E, et al: Human male recombination maps for individual chromosomes. Am J Hum Genet 74:521-531 (2004).
39.
Vozdova M, Sebestova H, Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Vahala J, Rubes J: A comparative study of meiotic recombination in cattle (Bos taurus) and three wildebeest species (Connochaetes gnou, C. taurinus taurinus and C. t. albojubatus). Cytogenet Genome Res 140:36-45 (2013).
40.
Wnuk M, Villagómez DA, Bugno-Poniewierska M, Tumidajewicz P, Carter TF, Slota E: Nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) distribution and behavior in spermatozoa and meiotic cells of the horse (Equus caballus). Theriogenology 77:579-587 (2012).
41.
Yang Q, Zhang D, Leng M, Yang L, Zhong L, et al: Synapsis and meiotic recombination in male Chinese muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi). PLoS One 6:e19255 (2011).
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
2017
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.