The sibling species Microtus thomasi and M. atticus represent probably the highest karyotypic diversity within the genus Microtus and are an interesting model for chromosomal evolution studies. In addition to variation in autosomes, they show a high intraspecific variation in the size and morphology of both sex chromosomes. We analyzed individuals with different sex chromosome constitutions using 3 painting probes, 2 from Y chromosome variants and 1 from the small arm of the submetacentric X chromosome. Our comparative painting approach uncovered 12 variants of Y and 14 variants of X chromosomes, which demonstrates that the polymorphism of sex chromosomes is substantially larger than previously reported. We suggest that 2 main processes are responsible for this sex chromosome polymorphism: change of morphology from acrocentric to submetacentric or metacentric chromosomes and increase in size due to accumulation of repetitive DNA sequences, generating heterochromatic blocks. Strong genetic drift in small and fragmented populations of these 2 species could be related to the origin and maintenance of the large polymorphism of sex chromosomes. We proposed that a similar polymorphism variation combined with random drift fixing the biggest sex chromosomes could have occurred in the origin of some of the actual Microtus species with giant sex chromosomes.

Journal Section:
Editor's choice
Keywords:
Sex chromosome heterochromatin, Polymorphism, <italic>Microtus</italic>, Chromosome painting
1.
Acosta MJ, Marchal JA, Fernández-Espartero C, Bullejos M, Sánchez A: Retroelements (Lines and Sines) in vole genomes: differential distribution in the constitutive heterochromatin. Chromosome Res 16:949-959 (2008).
2.
Acosta MJ, Marchal JA, Mitsainas GP, Rovatsos MT, Fernández-Espartero CH, et al: A new pericentromeric repeated DNA sequence in Microtus thomasi. Cytogenet Genome Res 124:27-36 (2009).
3.
Acosta MJ, Marchal JA, Fernández-Espartero C; Romero-Fernández I, et al: Characterization of the satellite DNA Msat-160 from species of Terricola (Microtus) and Arvicola (Rodentia, Arvicolinae). Genetica 138:1085-1098 (2010).
4.
Acosta MJ, Romero-Fernández I, Sánchez A, Marchal JA: Comparative analysis by chromosome painting of the sex chromosomes in arvicolid rodents. Cytogenet Genome Res 132:47-54 (2011).
5.
Burgos M, Jiménez R, Díaz de la Guardia R: Comparative study of G- and C-banded chromosomes of five species of Microtidae. A chromosomal evolution analysis. Genome 30:540-546 (1988a).
6.
Burgos M, Jiménez R, Olmos DM, Díaz de la Guardia R: Heterogeneous heterochromatin and size variation in the sex chromosomes of Microtus cabrerae. Cytogenet Cell Genet 47:75-79 (1988b).
7.
Burgos M, Olmos DM, Jiménez R, Sánchez A, Díaz de la Guardia R: Fluorescence banding in four species of Microtidae: an analysis of the evolutive changes of the constitutive heterochromatin. Genetica 81:11-16 (1990).
8.
Castiglia R, Annesi F, Aloise G, Amori G: Systematics of the Microtus savii complex (Rodentia, Cricetidae) via mitochondrial DNA analyses: paraphyly and pattern of sex chromosome evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 46:1157-1164 (2008).
9.
Chassovnikarova TG, Markov GG, Atanassov NI, Dimitrov HA: Sex chromosome polymorphism in Bulgarian populations of Microtus guentheri (Danford & Alston, 1880). J Nat Hist 42:261-267 (2008).
10.
Conroy CJ, Cook JA: mtDNA evidence for repeated pulses of speciation within arvicoline and murid rodents. J Mammal Evol 6:221-245 (1999).
11.
Fredga K, Jaarola M, Ims RA, Steen H, Yoccoz NG: The ‘commonvole' in Svalbard identified as Microtus epiroticus by chromosome analysis. Polar Res 8:283-290 (1990).
12.
Galleni L, Tellini A, Stanyon R, Cicalo A, Santini L: Taxonomy of Microtus savii (Rodentia, Arvicolidae) in Italy: cytogenetic and hybridization data. J Mammal 75:1040-1044 (1994).
13.
Giagia EB: Karyotypes of ‘44-chromosomes' Pitymys species (Rodentia, Mammalia) and their distribution in southern Greece. Säug Mitt 32:169-173 (1985).
14.
Giagia EB, Ondrias JC: Karyological analysis of the vole Pitymys atticus (Rodentia, Mammalia) from Greece. Biol Gallo-Hellen 4:205-212 (1973).
15.
Giagia-Athanasopoulou EB, Chondropoulos BP, Fraguedakis-Tsolis SE: Robertsonian chromosomal variation in the subalpine voles Microtus (Terricola) (Rodentia, Arvicolidae) from Greece. Acta Theriol 40:139-143 (1995).
16.
Giagia-Athanasopoulou EB, Stamatopoulos C: Geographical distribution and interpopulation variation in the karyotypes of Microtus (Terricola) thomasi (Rodentia, Arvicolidae) in Greece. Caryologia 50:303-315 (1997).
17.
Golenishchev FN, Malikov VG: The ‘developmental conduit' of the tribe Microtini (Rodentia, Arvicolinae): systematic and evolutionary aspects. Russian J Theriol 5:19-26 (2006).
18.
Hsu TC, Patton JL: Bone marrow preparations for chromosome studies, in Benirschke K (ed): Comparative Mammalian Cytogenetics, pp 454-460 (Springer, New York 1969).
19.
Kalscheuer V, Singh AP, Nanda I, Sperling K, Neitzel H: Evolution of the gonosomal heterochromatin of Microtus agrestis: rapid amplification of a large, multimeric, repeat unit containing a 3.0-kb (GATA)11-positive, middle repetitive element. Cytogenet Cell Genet 73:171-178 (1996).
20.
Lemskaya NA, Romanenko SA, Golenishchev FN, Rubtsova NV, Sablina OV, et al: Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). III. Karyotype relationships of ten Microtus species. Chromosome Res 18:459-471 (2010).
21.
Libbus BL, Johnson LA: The creeping vole, Microtus oregoni: karyotype and sex-chromosome differences between two geographical populations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 47:181-184 (1988).
22.
Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Bullejos M, Díaz de la Guardia R, Sánchez A: Sex chromosomes, sex determination, and sex-linked sequences in Microtidae. Cytogenet Genome Res 101:266-273 (2003).
23.
Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Nietzel H, Sperling K, Bullejos M, et al: X chromosome painting in Microtus: origin and evolution of the giant sex chromosomes. Chromosome Res 12:767-776 (2004a).
24.
Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Bullejos M, Díaz de la Guardia R, Sánchez A: A repeat DNA sequence from the Y chromosome in species of the genus Microtus. Chromosome Res 12:757-765 (2004b).
25.
Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Bullejos M, Puerma E, Díaz de la Guardia R, Sánchez A: Distribution of l1-retroposons on the giant sex chromosomes of Microtus cabrerae (Arvicolidae, Rodentia): functional and evolutionary implications. Chromosome Res 14:177-186 (2006).
26.
Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Bullejos M, Diaz de la Guardia R, Sanchez A: Origin and spread of the SRY gene on the X and Y chromosomes of the rodent Microtus cabrerae : role of L1 elements. Genomics 91:142-151 (2008).
27.
Maruyama T, Imai HT: Evolutionary rate of the mammalian karyotype. J Theor Biol 90:111-121 (1981).
28.
Mitsainas GP, Rovatsos MT, Rizou EI, Giagia-Athanasopoulou EB: Sex chromosome variability outlines the pathway to the chromosomal evolution in Microtus thomasi (Rodentia, Arvicolinae)'. Biol J Linn Soc 96:685-695 (2009).
29.
Mitsainas GP, Rovatsos MT, Giagia-Athanasopoulou EB: Heterochromatin study and geographical distribution of Microtus species (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) from Greece. Mammal Biol 75:261-269 (2010).
30.
Modi WS: Phylogenetic analyses of chromosomal banding patterns among the nearctic Arvicolidae (Mammalia: Rodentia). Syst Zool 36:109-136 (1987a).
31.
Modi WS: C-banding analysis and the evolution of heterochromatin among arvicolid rodent. J Mammal 68:704-714 (1987b).
32.
Modi WS: Heterogeneity in the concerted evolution process of a tandem satellite array in meadow mice (Microtus). J Mol Evol 37:48-56 (1993).
33.
Musser GG, Carleton MD: Superfamily Muroidea, in Wilson DE, Reeder DM (Eds) Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, pp 894-1531 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2005).
34.
Nanda I, Neitzel H, Sperling K, Studer R, Epplen JT: Simple GATCA repeats characterize the X chromosome heterochromatin in Microtus agrestis, European field vole (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Chromosoma 96:213-219 (1988).
35.
Rovatsos MT, Giagia-Athanasopoulou EB: Taxonomical status and phylogenetic relations between the ‘thomasi' and ‘atticus' chromosomal races of the underground vole Microtus thomasi (Rodentia, Arvicolinae). Mamm Biol 77:6-12 (2012).
36.
Rovatsos MT, Mitsainas GP, Paspali G, Oruci S, Giagia-Athanasopoulou EB: Geographical distribution and chromosomal study of the underground vole Microtus thomasi in Albania and Montenegro. Mamm Biol 76:22-27 (2011a).
37.
Rovatsos MT, Marchal JA, Romero-Fernández I, Fernández FJ, Giagia-Athanosopoulou EB, Sánchez A: Rapid, independent, and extensive amplification of telomeric repeats in pericentromeric regions in karyotypes of arvicoline rodents. Chromosome Res 19:869-882 (2011b).
38.
Rovatsos MT, Marchal JA, Romero-Fernández I, Cano-Linares M, Fernández FJ, et al: Molecular and physical characterization of the complex pericentromeric heterochromatin of the vole species Microtus thomasi. Cytogenet Gen Res 144:131-141 (2014).
39.
Singh A, Henschel S, Sperling K, Kalscheuer V, Neitzel H: Differences in the meiotic pairing behavior of gonosomal heterochromatin between female and male Microtus agrestis: implications for the mechanism of heterochromatin amplification on the X and Y. Cytogenet Cell Genet 91:253-260 (2000).
40.
Sitnikova NA, Romanenko SA, O'Brien PC, Perelman PL, Fu B, et al: Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 15:447-456 (2007).
41.
Volobouev VT, Gallardo MH, Graphodatsky AS: Rodents cytogenetics, in:O'Brien SJ, Nash WG, Menninger JC (eds): Atlas of Mammalian Karyotypes, pp 173-176 (Wiley, Chichester 2006).
42.
Zima J, Arslan A, Benda P, Macholán M, Kryštufek B: Chromosomal variation in social voles: a Robertsonian fusion in Günther's vole. Acta Theriol 58:255-265 (2013).
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2017
You do not currently have access to this content.