Dissection of the molecular mechanisms underlying the transition through the complex events of the meiotic process requires the use of gene mutants or RNAi-mediated gene silencing. A considerable number of meiotic mutants have been isolated in plant species such as Arabidopsis thaliana, maize or rice. However, structural chromosome mutants are also important for the identification of the role developed by different chromosome domains in the meiotic process. This review summarizes the contribution of studies carried out in plants using structural chromosome variations. Meiotic events concerning the search of the homologous partner, the control of number and distribution of chiasmata, the mechanism of pairing correction, and chromosome segregation are considered.

1.
Akhunov ED, Goodyear AW, Geng S, Qi LL, Echalier B, et al: The organization and rate of evolution of wheat genomes are correlated with recombination rates along chromosome arms. Genome Res 13:753-763 (2003a).
2.
Akhunov ED, Akhunova AR, Linkiewicz AM, Dubkovski J, Hummel D, et al: Synteny perturbations between wheat homoeologous chromosomes by locus duplications and deletions correlate with recombination rates along chromosome arms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10836-10841 (2003b).
3.
Albini SM, Jones GH: Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and A. fistulosum. I. The initiation and sequence of pairing. Chromosoma 95:324-338 (1987).
4.
Albini SM, Jones GH: Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and Allium fistulosum. II. Pachytene observations: the SC karyotype and the correspondence of late recombination nodules and chiasmata. Genome 30:399-410 (1988).
5.
Anderson LK, Salameh N, Bass HW, Harper LC, Cande WZ, et al: Integrating genetic linkage maps with pachytene chromosome structure in maize. Genetics 166:1923-1933 (2004).
6.
Anton E, Vidal F, Blanco J: Reciprocal translocations: tracing their meiotic behavior. Genet Med 10:730-738 (2008).
7.
Barakate A, Higgins JD, Vivera S, Stephens J, Perry RM, et al: The synaptonemal complex protein ZYP1 is required for imposition of meiotic crossovers in barley. Plant Cell 26:729-740 (2014).
8.
Bass HW, Marshall WF, Sedat JW, Agard DA, Cande WZ: Telomeres cluster de novo before the initiation of synapsis: a three-dimensional spatial analysis of telomere positions before and during meiotic prophase. J Cell Biol 137:5-18 (1997).
9.
Bass HW, Riera-Lizarazu O, Ananiev EV, Bordoli SJ, Rines HW, et al: Evidence for the coincident initiation of homolog pairing and synapsis during the telomere-clustering (bouquet) stage of meiotic prophase. J Cell Sci 113:1033-1042 (2000).
10.
Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S: Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol Cell 6:989-998 (2000).
11.
Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, et al: PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327:836-840 (2010).
12.
Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver GP: Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me. Curr Genomics 11:91-102 (2010).
13.
Berchowitz LE, Francis KE, Bey AL, Copenhaver GP: The role of AtMUS81 in interference-insensitive crossovers in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genetics 3:e132 (2007).
14.
Bhalla N, Dernburg AF: Prelude to a division. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24:397-424 (2008).
15.
Bolcun-Filas E, Schimenti JC: Genetics of meiosis and recombination in mice. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 298:179-227 (2012).
16.
Brown WV, Stack SM: Somatic pairing as a regular preliminary to meiosis. Bull Torrey Bot Club 95:369-378 (1968).
17.
Carlton PM, Cande WZ: Telomeres act autonomously in maize to organize the meiotic bouquet from a semipolarized chromosome orientation. J Cell Biol 157:231-242 (2002).
18.
Carlton PM, Cowan CR, Cande WZ: Directed motion of telomeres in the formation of the meiotic bouquet revealed by time course and simulation analysis. Mol Biol Cell 14:2832-2843 (2003).
19.
Caryl AP, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: A homologue of the yeast HOP1 gene is inactivated in the Arabidopsis meiotic mutant asy1. Chromosoma 109:62-71 (2000).
20.
Chang SB, de Jong JH: Production of alien chromosome additions and their utility in plant genetics. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:335-343 (2005).
21.
Chen SY, Tsubouchi T, Rockmill B, Sandler JS, Richards DR, et al: Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape. Dev Cell 15:401-415 (2008).
22.
Choi K, Zhao X, Kelly KA, Venn O, Higgins JD, et al: Arabidopsis meiotic crossover hot spots overlap with H2A.Z nucleosomes at gene promoters. Nat Genet 45:1327-1336 (2013).
23.
Choulet F, Alberti A, Theil S, Glover N, Barbe V, et al: Structural and functional partitioning of bread wheat chromosome 3B. Science 345:1249721 (2014).
24.
Cnudde F, Gerats T: Meiosis: inducing variation by reduction. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 7:321-341 (2005).
25.
Colaiácovo MP, MacQueen AJ, Martinez-Perez E, McDonald K, Adamo A, et al: Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev Cell 5:463-474 (2003).
26.
Comings DE: The rational for an ordered arrangement of chromatin in the prophase nucleus. Am J Hum Genet 20:440-460 (1968).
27.
Corredor E, Naranjo T: Effect of colchicine and telocentric chromosome conformation on centromere and telomere dynamics at meiotic prophase I in wheat-rye additions. Chromosome Res 15:231-245 (2007).
28.
Corredor E, Díez M, Shepherd K, Naranjo T: The positioning of rye homologous chromosomes added to wheat though the cell cycle in somatic cell treated and untreated with colchicine. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:112-119 (2005).
29.
Corredor E, Lukaszewski AJ, Pachón P, Allen DC, Naranjo T: Terminal regions of wheat chromosomes select their pairing in meiosis. Genetics 177:699-706 (2007).
30.
Cowan CR, Carlton PM, Cande WZ: The polar arrangement of telomeres in interphase and meiosis. Rabl organization and the bouquet. Plant Physiol 125:532-538 (2001).
31.
Creighton HB, McClintock B: A correlation of cytological and genetical crossing-over in Zea mays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 17:492-497 (1931).
32.
Curtis CA, Lukaszewski AJ, Chrzastek M: Metaphase-I pairing of deficient chromosomes and genetic mapping of deficiency breakpoints in wheat. Genome 34:553-560 (1991).
33.
Darlington CD: The internal mechanics of the chromosomes II. Prophase paring at meiosis in Fritillaria. Proc R Soc Lond B 118:59-73 (1935).
34.
Dernburg AF, McDonald K, Moulder G, Barstead R, Dresser M, Villeneuve AM: Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94:387-398 (1998).
35.
Dong F, Jiang J: Non-Rabl patterns of centromere and telomere distribution in the interphase nuclei of plant cells. Chromosome Res 6:551-558 (1998).
36.
Driscoll CJ, Darvey NL: Chromosome pairing: effect of colchicine on an isochromosome. Science 169:290-291 (1970).
37.
Ederveen A, Lai Y, van Driel MA, Gerats T, Peters JL: Modulating crossover positioning by introducing large structural changes in chromosomes. BMC Genomics 16:89 (2015).
38.
Endo TR, Gill BS: The deletion stocks of common wheat. J Heredity 87:295-307 (1996).
39.
Erayman M, Sandhu D, Sidhu D, Dilbirligi M, Baenziger PS, Gill KS: Demarcating the gene-rich regions of the wheat genome. Nucleic Acids Res 32:3546-3565 (2004).
40.
Feldman M: The effect of chromosomes 5B, 5D and 5A on chromosomal pairing in Triticum aestivum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 55:1447-1453 (1966).
41.
Ferdous M, Higgins JD, Osman K, Lambing C, Roitinger E, et al: Inter-homolog crossing-over and synapsis in Arabidopsis meiosis are dependent on the chromosome axis protein AtASY3. PLoS Genet 8:e1002507 (2012).
42.
Fogwill M: Differences in crossing-over and chromosome size in the sex cells of Lilium and Fritillaria. Chromosoma 9:493-504 (1958).
43.
Fussell CP: The Rabl orientation: a prelude to synapsis, in Moens PB (ed): Meiosis, pp 275-299 (Academic Press, Orlando 1987).
44.
Gan H, Cai T, Lin X, Wu Y, Wang X, et al: Integrative proteomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal multiple post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of mouse spermatogenesis. Mol Cell Proteomics 12:1144-1157 (2013).
45.
Gaut BS, Wright SI, Rizzon C, Dvorak J, Anderson LK: Recombination: an underappreciated factor in the evolution of plant genomes. Nat Rev Genet 8:77-84 (2007).
46.
Golubovskaya IN, Wang CJR, Timofejeva L, Cande WZ: Maize meiotic mutants with improper or non-homologous synapsis due to problems in pairing or synaptonemal complex formation. J Exp Bot 62:1533-1544 (2011).
47.
Harper L, Golubovskaya I, Cande WZ: A bouquet of chromosomes. J Cell Sci 117:4025-4032 (2004).
48.
Higgins JD, Perry RM, Barakate A, Ramsay L, Waugh R, et al: Spatiotemporal asymmetry of the meiotic program underlies the predominantly distal distribution of meiotic crossovers in barley. Plant Cell 24:4096-4109 (2012).
49.
Higgins JD, Osman K, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: Factors underlying restricted crossover localization in barley meiosis. Annu Rev Genet 48:29-47 (2014).
50.
Hobolth P: Chromosome pairing in allohexaploid wheat var. Chinese Spring. Transformation of multivalents into bivalents, a mechanism for exclusive bivalent formation. Carlsberg Res Commun 46:129-173 (1981).
51.
Hollingsworth NM, Byers B: Hop1: a yeast meiotic pairing gene. Genetics 121:445-462 (1989).
52.
Holm PB: Chromosome pairing and chiasma formation in allohexaploid wheat, Triticum aestivum analyzed by spreading of meiotic nuclei. Carlsberg Res Commun 51:239-294 (1986).
53.
Holm PB, Wang X: The effect of chromosome 5B on synapsis and chiasma formation in wheat, Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring. Carlsberg Res Commun 53:191-208 (1988).
54.
Hunter N, Kleckner N: The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106:59-70 (2001).
55.
Jones GH, Franklin FC: Meiotic crossing-over: obligation and interference. Cell 126:246-248 (2006).
56.
Jones LE, Rybka K, Lukaszewski AJ: The effect of a deficiency and a deletion on recombination in chromosome 1BL in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 104:1204-1208 (2002).
57.
Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N: Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88:375-384 (1997).
58.
Ko DS, Cho JW, Park SY, Kim JY, Koong MK, et al: Clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and analysis of meiotic segregation modes in reciprocal translocation carriers. Am J Med Genet Part A 152A:1428-1433 (2010).
59.
Koszul R, Kleckner N: Dynamic chromosome movements during meiosis: a way to eliminate unwanted connections? Trends Cell Biol 19:716-724 (2009).
60.
Kronjaa I, Whitfielda Z, Yuana B, Dzeykc K, Kirkpatrickc J, et al: Quantitative proteomics reveals the dynamics of protein changes during Drosophila oocyte maturation and the oocyte-to-embryo transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:16023-16028 (2014).
61.
Künzel G, Korzun L, Meister A: Cytologically integrated physical restriction fragment length polymorphism maps for the barley genome based on translocation breakpoints. Genetics 154:397-412 (2000).
62.
Künzel G, Waugh R: Integration of microsatellite markers into the translocation-based physical RFLP map of barley chromosome 3H. Theor Appl Genet 105:660-665 (2002).
63.
Labrador L, Barroso C, Lightfoot J, Müller-Reichert T, Flibotte S, et al: Chromosome movements promoted by the mitochondrial protein SPD-3 are required for homology search during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. PLoS Genet 9:e1003497 (2013).
64.
Leu JY, Chua PR, Roeder GS: The meiosis-specific Hop2 protein of S. cerevisiae ensures synapsis between homologous chromosomes. Cell 94:375-386 (1998).
65.
Li X, Li L, Yan J: Dissecting meiotic recombination based on tetrad analysis by single-microspore sequencing in maize. Nat Commun 6:6648 (2015).
66.
Liu H, Jang JK, Kato N, McKim KS: mei-P22 encodes a chromosome associated protein required for the initiation of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 162:245-258 (2002).
67.
Liu L, Franco S, Spyropoulos B, Moens PB, Blasco MA, Keefe DL: Irregular telomeres impair meiotic synapsis and recombination in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6496-6501 (2004).
68.
Loidl J, Jones GH: Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium. I. Triploid A. sphaerocephalon. Chromosoma 93:420-428 (1986).
69.
Lukaszewski AJ: Unexpected behavior of an inverted rye chromosome arm in wheat. Chromosoma 117:569-578 (2008).
70.
Lukaszewski AJ, Curtis CA: Physical distribution of recombination in B-genome chromosomes of tetraploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet 86:121-127 (1993).
71.
Lukaszewski AJ, Kopecky D, Linc G: Inversions of chromosome arms 4AL and 2BS in wheat invert the patterns of chiasma distribution. Chromosoma 121:201-208 (2012).
72.
Luo MC, Dubcovsky J, Dvorák J: Recognition of homeology by the wheat Ph1 locus. Genetics 144:1195-1203 (1996).
73.
Luo MC, Deal KR, Akhunov ED, Akhunova AR, Anderson OD, et al: Genome comparisons reveal a dominant mechanism of chromosome number reduction in grasses and accelerated genome evolution in Triticeae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:15780-15785 (2009).
74.
Luo Q, Li Y, Shen Y, Cheng Z: Ten years of gene discovery for meiotic event control in rice. J Genet Genomics 41:125-137 (2014).
75.
Maestra B, De Jong JH, Shepherd K, Naranjo T: Chromosome arrangement and behaviour of two rye telosomes at the onset of meiosis in disomic wheat-5RL addition lines with and without the Ph1 locus. Chromosome Res 10:655-667 (2002).
76.
Maguire MP: The temporal sequence of synaptic initiation, crossing over and synaptic completion. Genetics 70:353-370 (1972).
77.
Mancera E, Bourgon R, Brozzi A, Huber W, Steinmetz LM: High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 454:479-485 (2008).
78.
Martínez M, Naranjo T, Cuadrado C, Romero C: The synaptic behaviour of Triticum turgidum with variable doses of the Ph1 locus. Theor Appl Genet 102:751-758 (2001).
79.
Mayer KFX, Martis M, Hedley PE, Simková H, Liu H, et al: Unlocking the barley genome by chromosomal and comparative genomics. Plant Cell 23:1249-1263 (2011).
80.
McKim KS, Green-Marroquin BL, Sekelsky JJ, Chin G, Steinberg C, et al: Meiotic synapsis in the absence of recombination. Science 279:876-878 (1998).
81.
Mercier R, Mézard C, Jenczewski E, Macaisne N, Grelon M: The molecular biology of meiosis in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 66:297-327 (2015).
82.
Myers S, Bowden R, Tumian A, Bontrop RE, Freeman C, et al: Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327:876-879 (2010).
83.
Namekawa SH, Iwabata K, Sugawara H, Hamada FN, Koshiyama A, et al: Knockdown of LIM15/DMC1 in the mushroom Coprinus cinereus by double-stranded RNA-mediated gene silencing. Microbiology 151:3669-3678 (2005).
84.
Naranjo T: Dynamics of rye telomeres in a wheat background during early meiosis. Cytogenet Genome Res 143:60-68 (2014).
85.
Naranjo T: Forcing the shift of the crossover site to proximal regions in wheat chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 128:1855-1863 (2015).
86.
Naranjo T, Corredor E: Nuclear architecture and chromosome dynamics in the search of the pairing partner in meiosis in plants. Cytogenet Genome Res 120:320-330 (2008).
87.
Naranjo T, Lacadena JR: Analysis of centromere co-orientation in a rye-wheat derivative by means of C-banding. Chromosoma 73:227-235 (1979).
88.
Naranjo T, Valenzuela N, Perera E: Chiasma frequency is region-specific and chromosome conformation-dependent in a rye chromosome added to wheat. Cytogenet Genome Res 129:133-142 (2010).
89.
Neale MJ, Keeney S: Clarifying the mechanics of DNA strand exchange in meiotic recombination. Nature 442:153-158 (2006).
90.
Neiman AM: Ascospore formation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69:565-584 (2005).
91.
Newton WCF, Darlington CD: Fritillaria meleagris chiasma formation and distribution. J Genet 22:1-14 (1930).
92.
Nielsen J, Wohlert M: Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark. Hum Genet 87:81-83 (1991).
93.
Niwa O, Simanuki M, Miki F: Telomere-led bouquet formation facilitates homologous chromosome pairing and restricts ectopics interactions in fission yeast meiosis. EMBO J 19:3831-3840 (2000).
94.
Nonomura KI, Nakano M, Eiguchi M, Suzuki T, Kurata N: PAIR2 is essential for homologous chromosome synapsis in rice meiosis I. J Cell Sci 119:217-225 (2006).
95.
Osman K, Higgins JD, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH: Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 190:523-544 (2011).
96.
Padmore R, Cao L, Kleckner N: Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell 66:1239-1256 (1991).
97.
Page SL, Hawley RS: The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:525-558 (2004).
98.
Paigen K, Petkov P: Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution. Nat Rev Genet 11:221-233 (2010).
99.
Paigen K, Szatkiewicz JP, Sawyer K, Leahy N, Parvanov ED, et al: The recombinational anatomy of a mouse chromosome. PLoS Genet 4:e1000119 (2008).
100.
Pan J, Sasaki M, Kniewel R, Murakami H, Blitzblau HG, et al: A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144:719-731 (2011).
101.
Parvanov ED, Petkov PM, Paigen K: Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327:835 (2010).
102.
Pawlowski WP, Golubovskaya IN, Timofejeva L, Meeley RB, Sheridan WF, Cande WZ: Coordination of meiotic recombination, pairing, and synapsis by PHS1. Science 303:89-92 (2004).
103.
Phillips D, Jenkins G, Macaulay M, Nibau C, Wnetrzak J, et al: The effect of temperature on the male and female recombination landscape of barley. New Phytol 208:421-429 (2015).
104.
Pratto F, Brick K, Khil P, Smagulova F, Petukhova GV, Camerini-Otero RD: Recombination initiation maps of individual human genomes. Science 346:1256442 (2014).
105.
Qi LL, Friebe B, Gill BS: A strategy for enhancing recombination in proximal regions of chromosomes. Chromosome Res 10:645-654 (2002).
106.
Rasmussen SW: Chromosome pairing in triploid females of Bombyxmori analyzed by three dimensional reconstruction of synaptonemal complexes. Calrsberg Res Commun 42:163-197 (1977).
107.
Rasmussen SW, Holm PB: Chromosome pairing in autotraploid Bombyx mori females. Mechanism for exclusive bivalent formation. Carlsber Res Commun 44:101-125 (1979).
108.
Ray DT: Metaphase I configurations of the reciprocal translocations in a cytogenetic tester set of Gossypium hirsutum L. J Heredity 75:371-377 (1984).
109.
Rickards GK: Orientation behavior of chromosome multiples of interchange (reciprocal translocation) heterozygotes. Annu Rev Genet 17:443-498 (1983).
110.
Roeder GS: Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev 11:2600-2621. (1997).
111.
Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD: The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol Cell 6:975-987 (2000).
112.
Saintenac C, Falque M, Martin OC, Paux E, Feuillet C, Sourdille P: Detailed recombination studies along chromosome 3B provide new insights on crossover distribution in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetics 181:393-403 (2009).
113.
Sánchez-Morán E, Mercier R, Higgins JD, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FC: A strategy to investigate the plant meiotic proteome. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:181-189 (2005).
114.
San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H: Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77:229-257 (2008).
115.
Scaife C, Mowlds P, Grassl J, Polden J, Daly CN, et al: 2-D DIGE analysis of the budding yeast pH 6-11 proteome in meiosis. Proteomics 10:4401-4414 (2010).
116.
Scherthan H: A bouquet makes ends meet. Nat Rev Mol Cell 2:621-627 (2001).
117.
Sears ER: Genetic control of chromosome pairing in wheat. Annu Rev Genet 10:31-51 (1976).
118.
Sears ER: Mutations in wheat that raise the level of meiotic chromosome pairing. in Gustafson JP (ed): Gene Manipulation in Plant Improvement. 16th Stadler Genet Symp, pp 295-300 (Plenum Press, New York 1984).
119.
See DR, Brooks S, Nelson JC, Brown-Guedira G, Friebe B, Gill BS: Gene evolution at the ends of wheat chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:4162-4167 (2006).
120.
Shepherd KW, Islam AKMR: Fourth compendium of wheat-alien chromosome lines, in Miller TE, Koebner RMD (eds): 7th International Wheat Genet Symp, pp 1373-1398 (Bath Press, Bath 1988).
121.
Shinohara M, Oh SD, Hunter N, Shinohara A: Crossover assurance and crossover interference are distinctly regulated by the ZMM proteins during yeast meiosis. Nat Genet 40:299-309 (2008).
122.
Stern C: An effect of temperature and age on crossing-over in the first chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 12:530-532 (1926).
123.
Thompson EA, Roeder GS: Expression and DNA sequence of RED1, a gene required for meiosis I chromosome segregation in yeast. Mol Gen Genet 218:293-301 (1989).
124.
Trelles-Sticken E, Dresser ME, Scherthan H: Meiotic telomere protein Ndj1p is required for meiosis-specific telomere distribution, bouquet formation and efficient homologue pairing. J Cell Biol 151:95-106 (2000).
125.
Trelles-Sticken E, Adelfalk C, Loidl J, Scherthan H: Meiotic telomere clustering requires actin for its formation and cohesin for its resolution. J Cell Biol 170:213-223 (2005).
126.
Valenzuela NT, Perera E, Naranjo T: Dynamics of rye chromosome 1R regions with high and low crossover frequency in homology search and synapsis development. PLoS One 7:e36385 (2012).
127.
Valenzuela NT, Perera E, Naranjo T: Identifying crossover-rich regions and their effect on meiotic homologous interactions by partitioning chromosome arms of wheat and rye. Chromosome Res 21:433-445 (2013).
128.
von Wettstein D, Rasmussen SW, Holm PB: The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Annu Rev Genet 18:331-413 (1984).
129.
Wang D, Adams CM, Fernandes JF, Egger RL, Walbot V: A low molecular weight proteome comparison of fertile and male sterile 8 anthers of Zea mays. Plant Biotechnol J 10:925-935 (2012).
130.
Wang KJ, Wang M, Tang D, Shen Y, Qin BX, et al: PAIR3, an axis-associated protein, is essential for the recruitment of recombination elements onto meiotic chromosomes in rice. Mol Biol Cell 22:12-19 (2011).
131.
Wijnker E, Schnittger A: Control of the meiotic cell division program in plants. Plant Reprod 26:143-158 (2013).
132.
Ye Y, Qian Y, Xu C, Jin F: Meiotic segregation analysis of embryos from reciprocal translocation carriers in PGD cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 24:83-90 (2012).
133.
Zhou A, Pawlowski WP: Regulation of meiotic gene expression in plants. Front Plant Sci 5:413 (2014).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.