Neacomys (Sigmodontinae) comprises 8 species mainly found in the Amazonian region. We describe 5 new karyotypes from Brazilian Amazonia: 2 cytotypes for N. paracou (2n = 56/FNa = 62-66), 1 for N. dubosti (2n = 64/FNa = 68), and 2 for Neacomys sp. (2n = 58/FNa = 64-70), with differences in the 18S rDNA. Telomeric probes did not show ITS. We provide a phylogeny using Cyt b, and the analysis suggests that 2n = 56 with a high FNa is ancestral for the genus, as found in N. paracou, being retained by the ancestral forms of the other species, with an increase in 2n occurring independently in N. spinosus and N. dubosti. Alternatively, an increase in 2n may have occurred in the ancestral taxon of the other species, followed by independent 2n-reduction events in Neacomys sp. and in the ancestral species of N. tenuipes, N. guianae, N. musseri, and N. minutus. Finally, a drastic reduction event in the diploid number occurred in the ancestral species of N. musseri and N. minutus which exhibit the lowest 2n of the genus. The karyotypic variations found in both intra- and interspecific samples, associated with the molecular phylogeny, suggest a chromosomal evolution with amplification/deletion of constitutive heterochromatin and rearrangements including fusions, fissions, and pericentric inversions.

Keywords:
Amazonia, Bristly mouse, Chromosomal evolution, FISH, Karyotype, Spiny mouse
1.
Baker RJ, Bradley RD: Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. J Mammal 87:643-662 (2006).
2.
Baker RJ, Koop BF, Haiduk MW: Resolving systematic relationships with G-bands: a study of five genera of South American Cricetine rodents. Syst Zool 32:403-416 (1983).
3.
Bonvicino CR, Oliveira JA, D'Andrea PS: Guia dos Roedores do Brasil, com Chaves para Gêneros Baseadas em Caracteres Externos. Rio de Janeiro. Centro Pan-Americano de Febre Aftosa - OPAS/OMS:41-42 (2008).
4.
Bradley RD, Baker RJ: A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome-B sequences and mammals. J Mammal 82:960-973 (2001).
5.
Catzeflis F, Tilak M: Molecular systematic of Neotropical spiny mice (Neacomys: Sigmodontinae, Rodentia) from the Guiana Region. Mammalia 73:239-247 (2009).
6.
Corn PS: Straight-line drift fences and pitfall traps, in Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayek LC, Foster MS (eds): Measuring and Monitoring Biological Standard Methods for Amphibians, pp 109-117 (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC 1994).
7.
Dobigny G, Aniskin V, Volobouev V: Explosive chromosome evolution and speciation in the gerbil genus Taterillus (Rodentia, Gerbillinae): a case of two new cryptic species. Cytogenet Genome Res 96:117-124 (2002).
8.
Felsenstein JF: Evolutionary tree from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368-376 (1981).
9.
Ford CE, Hamerton JL: A colchicine, hypotonic - citrate, squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain Technol 31:247-251 (1956).
10.
Graphodatsky AS, Trifonov VA, Stanyon R: The genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals. Mol Cytogenet 4:22 (2011).
11.
Hall T: BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95-98 (1999).
12.
Hatanaka T, Galetti Jr. P: Mapping of the 18S and 5S ribosomal genes in the fish Prochilodus argenteus Agassiz, 1829 (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae). Genetica 122:239-244 (2004).
13.
Jobb G, Haeseler A, Strimmer K: Treefinder: a powerful graphical analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics. BMC Evol Biol 4:1-9 (2004).
14.
Kasahara S: Introdução à Pesquisa em Citogenética de Vertebrados. Sociedade Brasileira de Genética 45:52 (2009).
15.
Kimura M: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111-120 (1980).
16.
Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA: Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201-220 (1964).
17.
Musser GG, Carleton MD: Superfamily Muroidea, in Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds): Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, ed 3, pp 894-1531 (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2005).
18.
Nagamachi CY, Pieczarka JC, O'Brien PC, Pinto JA, Malcher SM, et al: FISH with whole chromosome and telomeric probes demonstrates huge karyotypic reorganization with ITS between two species of Oryzomyini (Sigmodontinae, Rodentia): Hylaeamys megacephalus probes on Cerradomys langguthi karyotype. Chromosome Res 21:107-119 (2013).
19.
Ortiz MI, Pinna-Senn E, Rosa C, Lisanti JA: Localization of telomeric sequences in the chromosomes of three species of Calomys (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae). Cytologia 72:165-171 (2007).
20.
Paresque R, Silva MJ, Yonenaga-Yassuda Y, Fagundes V: Karyological geographic variation of Oligoryzomys nigripes Olfers, 1818 (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from Brazil. Genet Mol Biol 30:43-53 (2007).
21.
Patton JL, Silva MN, Malcolm JR: Mammals of the Rio Juruá and the Evolutionary and ecological diversification of Amazonia. B Am Mus Nat Hist 244:202-292 (2000).
22.
Percequillo AR, Weksler M, Costa LP: A new genus and species of rodent from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae: Oryzomyini), with comments on oryzomyine biogeography. Zool J Linn Soc-Lond 161:357-390 (2011).
23.
Peres CA, Patton JL, da Silva MN: Riverine barriers and gene flow in Amazonian saddle-back tamarins. Folia Primatol 67:113-124 (1996).
24.
Pérez-Zapata A, Aguilera M, Ochoa J, Soriano M: Citogenética de rodepres de altura: Microryzomys minutus y Neacomys tenuipes. Acta Cient Venez 47:76 (1996).
25.
Posada D: jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25:1253-1256 (2008).
26.
Posada D, Crandall KA: Modeltest: testing the model of DNA subtitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818 (1998).
27.
Redi CA, Zacharias H, Merani S, Oliveira-Miranda M, Aguilera M, et al: Genome sizes in Afrotheria, Xenarthra, 43 Euarchontoglires, and Laurasiatheria. J Hered 96:485-493 (2005).
28.
Rocchi M, Archidiacono N, Schempp W, Capozzi O, Stanyon R: Centromere repositioning in mammals. Heredity 108:59-67 (2012).
29.
Rosa CC, Flores T, Pieczarka JC, Rossi RV, Sampaio MI, et al: Genetic and morphological variability in South American rodent Oecomys (Sigmodontinae, Rodentia): evidence for a complex of species. J Genet 91:265-277 (2012).
30.
Sambrook J, Fritsch E, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, ed 2 (Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York 1989).
31.
Seabright M: A rapid technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2:971-972 (1971).
32.
Smith MF, Patton JL: Diversification of South American muroid rodents: evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequence data for the Akodontine tribe. Biol J Linn Soc 50:149-177 (1993).
33.
Sumner AT: A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304-306 (1972).
34.
Swier VJ, Khan FA, Baker RJ: Do time, heterochromatin, NORs, or chromosomal rearrangements correlate with distribution of interstitial telomeric repeats in Sigmodon (cotton rats)? J Hered 103:493-502 (2012).
35.
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731-2739 (2011).
36.
Voss RS, Lunde DP, Simmons NB: The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana: a neotropical lowland rainforest fauna. Part 2. Nonvolant species. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 263:236 (2001).
37.
Weksler M: Phylogenetic relationships of oryzomine rodents (Muroidea: Sigmodontinae): separate and combined analyses of morphological and molecular data. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 296:149 (2006).
38.
Weksler M, Bonvicino CR: Taxonomy of pigmy rice rats genus Oligoryzomys Bangs, 1900 (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) of the Brazilian cerrado, with the description of two new species. Arquivos do Museu Nacional 63:113-130 (2005).
39.
Wilson DE, Reeder DM: Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, ed 3 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2005).
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.