Robertsonian (centric) fusion or fission is one of the predominant modes of chromosomal rearrangement in karyotype evolution among mammals. However, in karyotypes composed of only bi-armed chromosomes, creation of new chromosomal arm combinations in one step is possible only via whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART). Although this type of rearrangement has often been proposed to play an important role in chromosomal evolution, direct observations of WARTs remained rare, and, in most cases, were found in hybrids of chromosomal races in the genera Mus and Sorex. For the first time, we present the karyotype of the horseshoe bat species Rhinolophus sedulus (2n = 28, FNa = 52), where a WART between 2 metacentric autosomes was detected by G-banding and confirmed by FISH with painting probes of the vespertilionid bat Myotis myotis. Among the 6 specimens analyzed, 2 showed the heterozygous condition of the WART, 1 showed the presumed ancestral, and 3 specimens showed the derived homozygous state. As the existence of a hybrid zone at the sampling locality is thought to be rather improbable, the WART may indicate ongoing karyotype evolution in this taxon.

1.
Ando K, Uchida TA: Karyotype analysis in Chiroptera II. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Rhinolophus. Sci Bull Fac Agr, Kyushu Univ 28:119-129 (1974).
2.
Ando K, Yasuzumi F, Tagawa T, Uchida TA: Further study on the karyotypic evolution in the genus Rhinolophus (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Caryologia 46:101-111 (1983).
3.
Ao L, Gu X, Feng Q, Wang J, O'Brien PC, et al: Karyotype relationships of six bat species (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) from China revealed by chromosome painting and G-banding comparison. Cytogenet Genome Res 115:145-153 (2006).
4.
Ao L, Mao X, Nie W, Gu X, Feng Q, et al: Karyotypic evolution and phylogenetic relationships in the order Chiroptera as revealed by G-banding comparison and chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 15:257-267 (2007).
5.
Ashley T: X-Autosome translocations, meiotic synapsis, chromosome evolution and speciation. Cytogenet Genome Res 96:33-39 (2002).
6.
Baker RJ, Bickham JW: Karyotypic evolution in bats: evidence of extensive and conservative chromosomal evolution in closely related taxa. Syst Zool 29:239-253 (1980).
7.
Bogdanowicz W: Phenetic relationships among bats of the family Rhinolophidae. Acta Theriol 37:213-240 (1992).
8.
Britton-Davidian J, Catalan J, da Garça Ramalhinho M, Auffray JC, Nunes AC, et al: Chromosomal phylogeny of Robertsonian races of the house mouse on the island of Madeira: testing between alternative mutational processes. Genet Res 86:171-183 (2005).
9.
Capanna E, Redi CA: Whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART) between Robertsonian chromosomes: finding of a Robertsonian heterozygous mouse with karyotype derived through WARTs. Chromosome Res 3:135-137 (1995).
10.
Capozzi O, Carbone L, Stanyon RR, Marra A, Yang F, et al: A comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome rearrangements in gibbons. Genome Res 22:2520-2528 (2012).
11.
Castiglia R, Capanna E: Whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART) in a feral population of mice. Chromosome Res 7:493-495 (1999).
12.
Catalan J, Auffray JC, Pellestor F, Britton-Davidian J: Spontaneous occurrence of a Robertsonian fusion involving chromosome 19 by single whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART) in wild-derived house mice. Chromosome Res 8:593-601 (2000).
13.
Csorba G, Ujhelyi P, Thomas N: Horseshoe Bats of the World (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) (Alana Books, Bishop's Castle 2003).
14.
de Oliveira EHC, Neusser M, Figueiredo WB, Nagamachi C, Pieczarka JC, et al: The phylogeny of the howler monkeys (Alouatta, Platyrrhini): reconstruction by multicolor cross-species chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 10:669-683 (2002).
15.
Fedyk S, Chetnicki W: Whole-arm reciprocal translocation in a hybrid population of Sor ex araneus. Chromosome Res 17:451-454 (2009).
16.
Fredga K: The chromosome races of Sorex araneus in Scandinavia. Hereditas 125:123-135 (1996).
17.
Guillén-Servent A, Francis CM, Ricklefs RE: Phylogeny and biogeography of the horseshoe bats, in Csorba G, Ujhelyi P, Thomas N (eds): Horseshoe Bats of the World (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae), pp xii-xxiv (Alana Books, Bishop's Castle 2003).
18.
Halkka L, Söderlund V, Skaren U, Heikkila J: Chromosomal polymorphism and racial evolution of Sorex araneus L. in Finland. Hereditas 106:257-275 (1987).
19.
Harada M, Yenbutra S, Yosida TH, Takada S: Cytogenetical study of Rhinolophus bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia) from Thailand. Proc Japan Acad Ser B 61:455-458 (1985).
20.
Hauffe HC, Pialek J: Evolution of the chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus in the Rhaetian Alps: the roles of whole-arm reciprocal translocation and zonal raciation. Biol J Linn Soc 62:255-278 (1997).
21.
Heller KG, Achmann R, Witt K: Monogamy in the bat Rhinolophus sedulus? Z Säugetierkd 58:376-377 (1993).
22.
Hirai H, Hirai Y, Kawamoto Y, Endo H, Kimura J, Rerkamnuaychoke W: Cytogenetic differentiation of two sympatric tree shrew taxa found in the southern part of the Isthmus of Kra. Chromosome Res 10:313-327 (2002).
23.
Hirai H, Mootnick AR, Takenaka O, Suryobroto B, Mouri T, et al: Genetic mechanism and property of a whole-arm translocation (WAT) between chromosomes 8 and 9 of the agile gibbons (Hylobates agilis). Chromosome Res 11:37-50 (2003).
24.
Hirai H, Wijayanto H, Tanaka H, Mootnick AR, Hayano A, et al: A whole-arm translocation (WAT8/9) separating Sumatran and Bornean agile gibbons, and its evolutionary features. Chromosome Res 13:123-133 (2005).
25.
Hoffmann FG, Owen JG, Baker RJ: mtDNA perspective of chromosomal diversification and hybridization in Peters' tent-making bat (Uroderma bilobatum: Phyllostomidae). Mol Ecol 12:2981-2993 (2003).
26.
Hood CS, Schlitter DA, Georgudaki JI, Yenbutra S, Baker RJ: Chromosomal studies of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Thailand. Ann Carnegie Mus 57:99-109 (1988).
27.
Kingston T: Response of bat diversity to forest disturbance in Southeast Asia: insights from long-term research in Malaysia, in Adams RA, Pedersen SC (eds): Bat Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation, pp 169-185 (Springer, New York 2013).
28.
Koubínová D, Sreepada KS, Koubek P, Zima J: Karyotypic variation in rhinolophid and hipposiderid bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae, Hipposideridae). Acta Chiropterol 12:393-400 (2010).
29.
Mao X, Nie W, Wang J, Su W, Ao L, et al: Karyotype evolution in Rhinolophus bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) illuminated by cross-species chromosome painting and G-banding comparison. Chromosome Res 15:835-848 (2007).
30.
Mao X, Nie W, Wang J, Su W, Feng Q, et al: Comparative cytogenetics of bats (Chiroptera): the prevalence of Robertsonian translocations limits the power of chromosomal characters in resolving interfamily phylogenetic relationships. Chromosome Res 16:155-170 (2008).
31.
Mao XG, Wang JH, Su WT, Wang YX, Yang FT, Nie WH: Karyotypic evolution in family Hipposideridae (Chiroptera, Mammalia) revealed by comparative chromosome painting, G- and C-banding. Dongwuxue Yanjiu 31:453-460 (2010).
32.
Müller S, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA, Wienberg J: Reciprocal chromosome painting between human and prosimians (Eulemur macaco macaco and E. fulvus mayottensis). Cytogenet Cell Genet 78:260-271 (1997).
33.
Müller S, Stanyon R, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA, Plesker R, Wienberg J: Defining the ancestral karyotype of all primates by multidirectional painting between tree shrews, lemurs and humans. Chromosoma 108:393-400 (1999).
34.
Naidu KN, Gururaj ME: Karyotype of Rhinolophus luctus (Order: Chiroptera). Curr Sci 53:825-826 (1984).
35.
Narain Y, Fredga K: A hybrid zone between the Hällefors and Uppsala chromosome races of Sorex araneus in central Sweden. Hereditas 125:137-145 (1996).
36.
Owen JG, Baker RJ: The Uroderma bilobatum (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) cline revisited. J Mammalogy 82:1102-1113 (2001).
37.
Pavlova SV, Kolomiets OL, Bulatova NS, Searle JB: Demonstration of a WART in a hybrid zone of the common shrew (Sorex araneus Linnaeus, 1758). Comp Cytogenet 2:115-120 (2008).
38.
Sazali SN, Besar K, Abdullah MT: Phylogenetic analysis of the Malaysian Rhinolophus and Hipposideros inferred from partial mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b gene sequences. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci 34:281-294 (2011).
39.
Simmons NB: Order Chiroptera, in Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds): Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, vol 1, ed 3, pp 312-529 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2005).
40.
Tanomtong A, Khunsook S, Supanuam P, Kaewsri S, Srisamoot N: A discovery of polymorphism of nuclear organizer regions (NORs) and whole-arm translocation (WAT) between chromosome 8 and 9 of lowland agile gibbon (Hylobates agilis unko) in Thailand. Cytologia 75:15-21 (2010).
41.
Van Tuinen P, Mootnick AR, Kingswood SC, Hale DW, Kumamoto AR: Complex, compound inversion/translocation polymorphism in an ape: presumptive intermediate stage in the karyotypic evolution of the Agile Gibbon Hylobates agilis. Amer J Phyl Anthropol 110:129-142 (1999).
42.
Veyrunes F, Watson J, Robinson TJ, Britton-Davidian J: Accumulation of rare sex chromosome rearrangements in the African pygmy mouse, Mus(Nannomys)minutoides: a whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART) involving an X-autosome fusion. Chromosome Res 15:223-230 (2007).
43.
Veyrunes F, Catalan J, Tatard C, Cellier-Holzem E, Watson J, et al: Mitochondrial and chromosomal insights into karyotypic evolution of the pygmy mouse, Mus minutoides, in South Africa. Chromosome Res 18:563-574 (2010).
44.
Volleth M, Eick G: Chromosome evolution in bats as revealed by FISH: the ongoing search for the ancestral chiropteran karyotype. Cytogenet Genome Res 137:165-173 (2012).
45.
Volleth M, Heller KG: Chromosome number reduction accompanied by extensive heterochromatin addition in the bat Glauconycteris beatrix (Mammalia; Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae). Cytogenet Genome Res 119:245-247 (2007).
46.
Volleth M, Heller KG, Pfeiffer RA, Hameister H: A comparative ZOO-FISH analysis in bats elucidates the phylogenetic relationships between Megachiroptera and five Microchiropterian families. Chromosome Res 10:477-497 (2002).
47.
Volleth M, Yang F, Müller S: High-resolution chromosome painting reveals the first genetic signature for the chiropteran suborder Pteropodiformes (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Chromosome Res 19:507-519 (2011).
48.
Volleth M, Biedermann M, Schorcht W, Heller KG: Evidence for two karyotypic variants of the lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus hipposideros, Chiroptera, Mammalia) in Central Europe. Cytogenet Genome Res 140:55-61 (2013).
49.
White TA, Bordewich M, Searle JB: A network approach to study karyotypic evolution: the chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) and house mouse (Mus musculus) as model systems. Syst Biol 59:262-276 (2010).
50.
Winking H: Some aspects of Robertsonian karyotypic variation in the European wild mice. Current Top Microbiol Immunol 127:68-74 (1986).
51.
Zima J, Volleth M, Horáček I, Cerveny J, Cervena A, et al: Comparative karyology of rhinolophid bats, in Horáček I, Vorhalik V (eds): Prague Studies in Mammalogy, pp 229-236 (Charles University Press, Prague 1992).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.