We applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) to examine genomes of artificially produced sturgeon hybrids between sterlet, Acipenser ruthenus female (∼120 chromosomes) or Russian sturgeon, A. gueldenstaedtii female (∼240 chromosomes) and a spontaneous triploid Siberian sturgeon A. baerii male (∼360 chromosomes), respectively. The ploidy levels of progenies were analyzed by karyotyping and flow cytometry. We found that the species-specific regions were surprisingly identifiable only on some micro- and small(er) macrochromosomes in hybrid metaphases. We hypothesize that these distinguishable regions are represented by species-specific repetitive sequences driven by more dynamic molecular evolutionary mechanisms. On larger chromosomes, GISH faintly visualized only blocks of pericentromeric and telomeric repetitive sequences, remaining regions were equally shared by both parental species. We concluded that the interspecies hybridization producing viable and even fertile progeny is enabled by the fact that genomes of the species involved are likely divergent at the level of the repetitive sequences only and probably highly conserved in the coding sequences. These small differences of coding sequences are in concordance with previous estimations of relatedness of examined species producing artificial as well as natural hybrids. CGH and GISH represent a challenge in sturgeon cytogenetics as a valuable though technically not simple tool to discriminate chromosomes of parental species in hybrids. The potentials and drawbacks of CGH and GISH application in sturgeons are discussed and further experimental possibilities are proposed.

Keywords:
Acipenser, GISH, Hybridization, Macrochromosomes, Microchromosomes, Polyploidy
1.
Alföldi J, Di Palma F, Grabherr M, Williams C, Kong L, et al: The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477:587-591 (2011).
2.
Axelsson E, Webster MT, Smith NG, Burt DW, Ellegren H: Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes. Genome Res 15:120-125 (2005).
3.
Bennetzen JL: The structure and evolution of angiosperm nuclear genomes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 1:103-108 (1998).
4.
Bi K, Bogart JP: Identification of intergenomic recombinations in unisexual salamanders of the genus Ambystoma by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Cytogenet Genome Res 112:307-312 (2006).
5.
Birstein VJ, DeSalle R: Molecular phylogeny of Acipenserinae. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:141-155 (1998).
6.
Birstein VJ, Vasil'ev VP: Tetraploid-octoploid relationships and karyological evolution in the order Acipenseriformes (Pisces): karyotypes, nucleoli, and nucleolus-organizer regions in four acipenserid species. Genetica 72:3-12 (1987).
7.
Birstein VJ, Hanner R, DeSalle R: Phylogeny of the Acipenseriformes: cytogenetic and molecular approaches. Environ Biol Fish 48:127-155 (1997).
8.
Caputo V, Giovannotti M, Cerioni PN, Splendiani A, Tagliavini J, Olmo E: Chromosomal study of a lamprey (Lampetra zanandreai Vladykov, 1955) (Petromyzonida: Petromyzontiformes): conventional and FISH analysis. Chromosome Res 19:481-491 (2011).
9.
Cioffi MB, Bertollo LAC: Chromosomal distribution and evolution of repetitive DNAs in fish, in Garrido-Ramos MA (ed): Repetitive DNA. Genome Dyn 7:197-221 (2012).
10.
Crow KC, Smith CD, Cheng JF, Wagner GP, Amemiya CA: An independent genome duplication inferred from Hox paralogs in the American paddlefish - a representative basal ray-finned fish and important comparative reference. Genome Biol Evol 4:937-953 (2012).
11.
de la Herrán R, Fontana F, Lanfredi M, Congiu L, Leis M, et al: Slow rates of evolution and sequence homogenization in an ancient satellite DNA family of sturgeons. Mol Biol Evol 18:432-436 (2001).
12.
Dudu A, Suciu R, Paraschiv M, Georgescu SE, Costache M, Berrebi P: Nuclear markers of Danube sturgeons hybridization. Int J Mol Sci 12:6796-6809 (2011).
13.
Flajšhans M, Vajcová V: Odd ploidy levels in sturgeons suggest a backcross of interspecific hexaploid sturgeon hybrids to evolutionarily tetraploid and/or octaploid parental species. Folia Zool 49:133-138 (2000).
14.
Fujiwara A, Nishida-Umehara C, Sakamoto T, Okamoto N, Nakayama I, Abe S: Improved fish lymphocyte culture for chromosome preparation. Genetica 111:77-89 (2001).
15.
Gardiner BG: Sturgeons as living fossils, in Eldredge N, Stanley SM (eds): Living Fossils, pp 148-152 (Springer, New York 1984).
16.
Haaf T, Schmid M: An early stage of ZW/ZZ sex chromosome differentiation in Poecilia sphenops var. melanistica (Poeciliidae, Cyprinodontiformes). Chromosoma 89:37-41 (1984).
17.
Havelka M, Kašpar V, Hulák M, Flajšhans M: Sturgeon genetics and cytogenetics: a review related to ploidy levels and interspecific hybridization. Folia Zool 60:93-103 (2011).
18.
Havelka M, Hulák M, Ráb P, Rábová M, Lieckfeldt D, et al: Fertility of a spontaneous triploid male Siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baerii. BMC Genetics, submitted.
19.
Hillier LW, Miller W, Birney E, Warren W, Hardison RC, et al: Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432:695-716 (2004).
20.
Knytl M, Kalous L, Symonová R, Rylková K, Ráb P: Chromosome studies of European cyprinid fishes: cross-species painting reveals natural allotetraploid origin of a Carassius female with 206 chromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res 139:276-283 (2013).
21.
Krieger J, Fuerst PA: Evidence for a slowed rate of molecular evolution in the order Acipenseriformes. Mol Biol Evol 19:891-897 (2002).
22.
Krieger J, Hett AK, Fuerst PA, Artyukhin E, Ludwig A: The molecular phylogeny of the order Acipenseriformes revisited. J Appl Ichthyol 24 Suppl 1:36-45 (2008).
23.
Kuraku S, Ishijima J, Nishida-Umehara Ch, Agata K, Kuratani1 S, MatsudaY: cDNA-based gene mapping and GC3 profiling in the soft-shelled turtle suggest a chromosomal size-dependent GC bias shared by sauropsids. Chromosome Res 14:187-202 (2006).
24.
Lanfredi M, Congiu L, Garrido-Ramos MA, de la Herrán R, Leis M, et al: Chromosomal location and evolution of a satellite DNA family in seven sturgeon species. Chromosome Res 9:47-52 (2001).
25.
Levan AK, Fredga K, Sandberg AA: Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201-220 (1964).
26.
Linhart O, Rodina M, Flajšhans M, Mavrodiev N, Nebesářová J, et al: Studies on sperm of diploid and triploid tench (Tinca tinca L.). Aquac Int 14:9-25 (2006).
27.
Ludwig A: A sturgeon view on conservation genetics. Eur J Wildlife Res 52:3-8 (2006).
28.
Ludwig A, Belfiore NM, Pitra Ch, Svirsky V, Jenneckens I: Genome duplication events and functional reduction of ploidy levels in sturgeon (Acipenser, Huso and Scaphirhynchus). Genetics 158:1203-1215 (2001).
29.
Ludwig A, Lippold S, Debus L, Reinartz R: First evidence of hybridization between endangered sterlets (Acipenser ruthenus) and exotic Siberian sturgeons (Acipenser baerii) in the Danube River. Biol Invasions 11:753-760 (2009).
30.
Lukyanov SA, Rebrikov D, Budzin AA: Suppression subtractive hybridization, in Buzdin A, Lukyanov S (eds): Nucleic Acids Hybridization: Modern Applications, pp 53-84 (Springer, Dordrecht 2007).
31.
Majtánová Z, Choleva L, Symonová R, Ráb P: Molecular cytogenetic identification of parental genomes in triploid hybrid spined loaches (Cobitis, Cypriniformes). Chromosome Res 20:812 (2012).
32.
Marková M, Vyskot B: New horizons of genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Cytogenet Genome Res 126:368-375 (2009).
33.
Matsubara K, Kuraku S, Tarui H, Nishimura O, Nishida Ch, et al: Intra-genomic GC heterogeneity in sauropsids: evolutionary insights from cDNA mapping and GC3 profiling in snake. BMC Genomics 13:604 (2012).
34.
Nelson JS: Fishes of the World, ed 4 (Wiley, New Jersey 2006).
35.
Neusser M: Karyotypevolution, Genomorganisation und Zellkernarchitektur der Neuweltaffen. Thesis, München (2004).
36.
Ohno S, Muramoto J, Stenius C, Christian L, Kittrell WA, Atkin NB: Microchromosomes in holocephalian, chondrostean and holostean fishes. Chromosoma 26:35-40 (1969).
37.
Pikitch EK, Doukakis P, Lauck L, Chakrabarty P, Erickson D: Status, trends and management of sturgeon and paddlefish fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 6:233-265 (2005).
38.
Ráb P, Rábová M, Reed KM, Phillips RB: Chromosomal characteristics of ribosomal DNA in the primitive semionotiform fish, longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus. Chromosome Res 7:475-480 (1999).
39.
Rampin M, Bi K, Bogart JP, Collares-Pereira MJ: Identifying parental chromosomes and genomic rearrangements in animal hybrid complexes of species with small genome size using Genomic in situ Hybridization (GISH). Comp Cytogenet 6:287-300 (2012).
40.
Schwarzacher T, Leitch AR, Bennett MD, Heslop-Harrison JS: In situ localization of parental genomes in a wide hybrid. Ann Bot 64:315-324 (1989).
41.
Symonová R, Flajšhans M, Gela D, Pelikánová Š, Rábová M, et al: Tetraploidy in paddlefish, Polyodon spathula? - 34 years later. Abstract 19th International Colloquium on Animal Cytogenetics and Gene Mapping. Chromosome Res 18:754 (2010).
42.
Trifonov VA, Vorobieva NN, Rens W: FISH with and without COT1DNA, in Liehr T (ed): Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) - Application Guide, pp 99-109 (Springer, Berlin 2009).
43.
Tsekov A, Ivanova P, Angelov M, Atanasova S, Bloesch J: Natural sturgeon hybrids along Bulgarian Black Sea coast and in Danube River. Acta Zool Bulgar 60:311-316 (2008).
44.
Valente GT, Schneider CH, Gross MC, Feldberg E, Martins C: Comparative cytogenetics of cichlid fishes through genomic in-situ hybridization (GISH) with emphasis on Oreochromis niloticus. Chromosome Res 17:791-799 (2009).
45.
Vasil'ev VP: Polyploidization by reticular speciation in Acipenseriform evolution: a working hypothesis. J Appl Ichthyol 15:29-31 (1999).
46.
Vasil'ev VP: Mechanisms of polyploid evolution in fish: polyploidy in sturgeons, in Carmona R, Domezain A, García-Gallego M, Hernando JA, Rodríguez F, Ruiz-Rejón M (eds): Biology, Conservation and Sustainable Development of Sturgeons, pp 97-117 (Springer, Dordrecht 2009).
47.
Vasil'eva ED, Vasil'ev VP, Ponomareva EN, Lapukhin YA: Triple hybrids obtained by artificial hybridization of the Russian sturgeon Acipenser gueldenstaedtii with the hybrid of the starred sturgeon A. stellatus and the great sturgeon A. huso (Acipenseridae): the kind of inheritance of some morphological characters and fertility of the parental hybrid form. J Ichthyol 50:605-617 (2010).
48.
Vicari MR, Nogaroto V, Noleto RB, Cestari MM, Cioffi MB, et al: Satellite DNA and chromosomes in Neotropical fishes: methods, applications and perspectives. J Fish Biol 76:1094-1116 (2010).
49.
Wichman HA, Payne CT, Ryder OA, Hamilton MJ, Maltbie M, Baker RJ: Genomic distribution of heterochromatic sequences in equids: implications to rapid chromosomal evolution. J Hered 82:369-377 (1991).
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.