We integrated chromosome painting information on 5 core-insectivora species available in the literature with new Zoo-FISH data for Iberian shrew (Sorex granarius) and Altai mole (Talpa altaica). Our analysis of these 7 species allowed us to determine the chromosomal features of Eulipotyphla genomes and to update the previously proposed ancestral karyotype for 2 main groups of the Sorex genus. The chromosome painting evidence with human painting probes (HSA) reveals the presence of the 2 unique associations HSA4/5 and 1/10p/12/22b, which support Eulipotyphla. There are a series of synapomorphies both for Erinaceidae (HSA3/1/5, 3/17, 11/15 and 10/20) and for Soricinae (HSA5/9, 6/7/16, 8/3/21 and 11/12/22). We found associations that link Talpidae/Erinaceidae (HSA7/8, 1/5 and 1/19p), Talpidae/Soricidae (HSA1/8/4) and Erinaceidae/Soricidae (HSA4/20 and 2/13). Genome conservation in Eulipotyphla was estimated on the basis of the number of evolutionary breaks in the ancestral mammalian chromosomes. In total, 7 chromosomes of the boreo-eutherian ancestor (BEA8 or 10, 9, 17, 18, 20–22) were retained in all eulipotyphlans studied; among them moles show the highest level of chromosome conservation. The integration of sequence data into the chromosome painting information allowed us to further examine the chromosomal syntenies within a phylogenetic perspective. Based on our analysis we offer the most parsimonious reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships in Eulipotyphla. The cytogenetic reconstructions based on these data do not conflict with molecular phylogenies supporting basal position of Talpidae in the order.

1.
Basset P, Yannic G, Yang F, O’Brien PC, Graphodatsky AS, et al: Chromosome localization of microsatellite markers in the shrews of the Sorex araneus group. Chromosome Res 14:253–262 (2006).
2.
Biltueva L, Vorobieva N, Perelman P, Trifonov V, Volobouev V, et al: Karyotype evolution of Eulipotyphla (Insectivora): The genome homology of seven Sorex species revealed by comparative chromosome painting and banding data. Cytogenet Genome Res 135:51–64 (2011).
3.
Butler P: Phylogeny of the insectivores, in Benton MJ (ed): The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods. Volume 2: Mammals, pp 117–141 (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1988).
4.
Colangelo P, Bannikova AA, Krystufek B, Lebedev VS, Annesi F, et al: Molecular systematics and evolutionary biogeography of the genus Talpa (Soricomorpha: Talpidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 55:372–380 (2011).
5.
Dixkens C, Klett C, Bruch J, Kollak A, Serov OL, et al: Zoo-FISH analysis in insectivores: ‘Evolution extols the virtue of the status quo’. Cytogenet Cell Genet 80:61–67 (1998).
6.
Douady CJ, Chatelier PI, Madsen O, de Jong WW, Catzeflis F, et al: Molecular phylogenetic evidence confirming the Eulipotyphla concept and in support of hedgehogs as the sister group to shrews. Mol Phylogenet Evol 25:200–209 (2002).
7.
Douady CJ, Douzery EJ: Molecular estimation of eulipotyphlan divergence times and the evolution of ‘Insectivora’. Mol Phylogenet Evol 28:285–296 (2003).
8.
Dubey S, Salamin N, Ohdachi S, Barrière P, Vogel P: Molecular phylogenetics of shrews (Mammalia: Soricidae) reveal timing of transcontinental colonizations. Mol Phylogenet Evol 44:126–137 (2007).
9.
Ferguson-Smith MA, Trifonov V: Mammalian karyotype evolution. Nat Rev Genet 8:950–962 (2007).
10.
Frönicke L, Wienberg J, Stone G, Adams L, Stanyon R: Towards the delineation of the ancestral eutherian genome organization: comparative genome maps of human and the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) generated by chromosome painting. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:1331–1340 (2003).
11.
Froenicke L: Origins of primate chromosomes – as delineated by Zoo-FISH and alignments of human and mouse draft genome sequences. Cytogenet Genome Res 108:122–138 (2005).
12.
Fumagalli L, Taberlet P, Stewart DT, Gielly L, Hausser J, Vogel P: Molecular phylogeny and evolution of Sorex shrews (Soricidae: Insectivora) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 11:222–235 (1999).
13.
Gornung E, Volleth M, Capanna E, Castiglia R: Comparative cytogenetics of moles (Eulipotyphla, Talpidae): chromosomal differences in Talpa romana and T. europaea. Cytogenet Genome Res 121:249–254 (2008).
14.
Graphodatsky A, Radjabli S, Zaitsev M, Sharshov A: The levels of chromosome conservatism in the different groups of insectivores (Mammalia, Insectivora), in Zaitsev EV (ed): Questions of Systematics, Faunistics and Palaeontology of Small Mammals, pp 47–57 (Zoological Institute USSR, St. Petersburg 1991).
15.
Graphodatsky AS, Yang F, O’Brien PC, Perelman P, Milne BS, et al: Phylogenetic implications of the 38 putative ancestral chromosome segments for four canid species. Cytogenet Cell Genet 92:243–247 (2001).
16.
Kawada S, Harada M, Grafodatsky AS, Oda S: Cytogenetic study of the Siberian mole, Talpa altaica (Insectivora: Talpidae) and karyological relationships within the genus Talpa. Mammalia 66:53–62 (2002).
17.
Miyamoto M, Goodman M: Biomolecular systematics of eutherian mammals: phylogenetic patterns and classification. Syst Zool 35:230–240 (1986).
18.
Murphy WJ, Eizirik E, O’Brien SJ, Madsen O, Scally M, et al: Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science 294:2348–2351 (2001).
19.
Stanhope MJ, Waddell VG, Madsen O, de Jong W, Hedges SB, et al: Molecular evidence for multiple origins of Insectivora and for a new order of endemic African insectivore mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:9967–9972 (1998).
20.
Symonds MR: Phylogeny and life histories of the ‘Insectivora’: controversies and consequences. Biol Rev 80:93–128 (2005).
21.
Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Tunnacliffe A, Carter NP, Behmel A, et al: Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4:257–263 (1992).
22.
Volleth M, Heller KG, Pfeiffer RA, Hameister H: A comparative Zoo-FISH analysis in bats elucidates the phylogenetic relationships between Megachiroptera and five microchiropteran families. Chromosome Res 10:477–497 (2002).
23.
Volleth M, Müller S: Zoo-FISH in the European mole (Talpa europaea) detects all ancestral boreo-eutherian human homologous chromosome associations. Cytogenet Genome Res 115:154–157 (2006).
24.
Volleth M, Yang F, Müller S: High-resolution chromosome painting reveals the first genetic signature for the chiropteran suborder Pteropodiformes (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Chromosome Res 19:507–519 (2011).
25.
Volobouev VT: Phylogenetic relationships of the Sorex araneus-arcticus species complex (Insectivora, Soricidae) based on high-resolution chromosome analysis. J Hered 80:284–290 (1989).
26.
Wienberg J: The evolution of eutherian chromosomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 14:657–666 (2004).
27.
Yang F, Carter N, Shi L, Ferguson-Smith M: A comparative study of karyotypes of muntjacs by chromosome painting. Chromosoma 103:642–652 (1995).
28.
Yang F, O’Brien PC, Milne BS, Graphodatsky AS, Solanky N, et al: A complete comparative chromosome map for the dog, red fox, and human and its integration with canine genetic maps. Genomics 62:189–202 (1999).
29.
Yang F, Alkalaeva EZ, Perelman PL, Pardini AT, Harrison WR, et al: Reciprocal chromosome painting among human, aardvark, and elephant (superorder Afrotheria) reveals the likely eutherian ancestral karyotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1062–1066 (2003).
30.
Yang F, Graphodatsky AS, Li T, Fu B, Dobigny G, et al: Comparative genome maps of the pangolin, hedgehog, sloth, anteater and human revealed by cross-species chromosome painting: further insight into the ancestral karyotype and genome evolution of eutherian mammals. Chromosome Res 14:283–296 (2006).
31.
Ye J, Biltueva L, Huang L, Nie W, Wang J, et al: Cross-species chromosome painting unveils cytogenetic signatures for the Eulipotyphla and evidence for the polyphyly of Insectivora. Chromosome Res 14:151–159 (2006).
32.
Zhdanova NS, Rogozina IuI, Minina IuM, Borodin PM, Rubtsov NB: Telomeric DNA allocation in chromosomes of common shrew Sorex araneus, Eulipotyphla [in Russian]. Cytologia 51:577–584 (2009).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.