Chinese hamster ovary-human hybrid cells containing chromosomes 16, 18, X, or 21 have been used to test the ability of human kinetochores to successfully bind to spindle microtubules and to be distributed to daughter cells. The intrinsic rates of non-disjunction among these human chromosomes have been determined and compared to non-disjunction rates in cells presented with taxol as a mitotic challenge. Cells grown on culture slides were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Daughter cell pairs were identified by staining with anti-α-tubulin to identify midbodies. DNA probes specific for human centromeres were used to test for the successful passage of human chromosomes to daughter cells. Our data indicate that different human kinetochores vary in their ability to properly engage the spindle and to be successfully distributed. In addition, our data indicate that the 4 human chromosomes studied can be divided into 2 groups, based on their overall intrinsic rate of non-disjunction and their response to microtubule perturbation. The mechanism of this effect is not yet known.

1.
Athwal RS, Sandhu SS: Use of a human X mouse hybrid cell line to detect aneuploidy induced by environmental chemicals. Mutat Res 149:73–81 (1985).
2.
Carere A, Antoccia A, Cimini D, Crebelli R, Degrassi F, et al: Analysis of chromosome loss and non-disjunction in cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes of 24 male subjects. Mutagenesis 14:491–496 (1999).
3.
Catalan J, Surralles J, Falck GC, Autio K, Norppa H: Segregation of sex chromosomes in human lymphocytes. Mutagenesis 15:251–255 (2000).
4.
Cimini D, Degrassi F: Aneuploidy: a matter of bad connections. Trends Cell Biol 15:442–451 (2005).
5.
Cimini D, Howell B, Maddox P, Khodjakov A, Degrassi F, Salmon ED: Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J Cell Biol 153:517–527 (2001).
6.
Cimini D, Moree B, Canman JC, Salmon ED: Merotelic kinetochore orientation occurs frequently during early mitosis in mammalian tissue cells and error correction is achieved by two different mechanisms. J Cell Sci 116:4213–4225 (2003).
7.
Dey P: Aneuploidy and malignancy: an unsolved equation. J Clin Pathol 57:1245–1249 (2004).
8.
Hassold T, Abruzzo M, Adkins K, Griffin D, Merrill M, et al: Human aneuploidy: incidence, origin, and etiology. Environ Mol Mutagen 28:167–175 (1996).
9.
Jami J, Grandchamp S: Karyological properties of human-mouse somatic hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:3097–3101 (1971).
10.
Klein A, Zang KD, Steudel WI, Urbschat S: Different mechanisms of mitotic instability in cancer cell lines. Int J Oncol 29:1389–1396 (2006).
11.
Kops GJ, Weaver BA, Cleveland DW: On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat Rev Cancer 5:773–785 (2005).
12.
Martin RH, Rademaker AW: Nondisjunction in human sperm: comparison of frequencies in acrocentric chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 86:43–45 (1999).
13.
Salmon ED, Wolniak SM: Taxol stabilization of mitotic spindle microtubules: analysis using calcium-induced depolymerization. Cell Motil 4:155–167 (1984).
14.
Salmon ED, Cimini D, Cameron LA, DeLuca JG: Merotelic kinetochores in mammalian tissue cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:553–568 (2005).
15.
Subramanian VV, Bickel SE: Aging predisposes oocytes to meiotic nondisjunction when the cohesin subunit SMC1 is reduced. PLoS Genet 4:e1000263 (2008).
16.
Tanaka TU, Desai A: Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20:53–63 (2008).
17.
Thompson SL, Compton DA: Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J Cell Biol 180:665–672 (2008).
18.
Vanneste E, Voet T, Melotte C, Debrock S, Sermon K, et al: What next for preimplantation genetic screening? High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate. Hum Reprod 24:2679–2682 (2009).
19.
Weaver BA, Cleveland DW: Does aneuploidy cause cancer? Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:658–667 (2006).
20.
Zijno A, Leopardi P, Marcon F, Crebelli R: Analysis of chromosome segregation by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization: application to cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 372:211–219 (1996).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.