We analyzed the DNA amount in X and B chromosomes of 2 XX/X0 grasshopper species (Eyprepocnemis plorans and Locusta migratoria), by means of Feulgen image analysis densitometry (FIAD), using previous estimates in L. migratoria as standard (5.89 pg). We first analyzed spermatids of 0B males and found a bimodal distribution of integrated optical densities (IODs), suggesting that one peak corresponded to +X and the other to –X spermatids. The difference between the 2 peaks corresponded to the X chromosome DNA amount, which was 1.28 pg in E. plorans and 0.80 pg in L. migratoria. In addition, the +X peak in E. plorans gave an estimate of the C-value in this species (10.39 pg). We next analyzed diplotene cells from 1B males in E. plorans and +B males in L. migratoria (a species where Bs are mitotically unstable and no integer B number can be defined for an individual) and measured B chromosome IOD relative to X chromosome IOD, within the same cell, taking advantage of the similar degree of condensation for both positively heteropycnotic chromosomes at this meiotic stage. From this proportion, we estimated the DNA amount for 3 different B chromosome variants found in individuals from 3 E. plorans Spanish populations (0.54 pg for B1 from Saladares, 0.51 pg for B2 from Salobreña and 0.64 for B24 from Torrox). Likewise, we estimated the DNA amount of the B chromosome in L. migratoria to be 0.15 pg. To automate measurements, we wrote a GPL3 licensed Python program (pyFIA). We discuss the utility of the present approach for estimating X and B chromosome DNA amount in a variety of situations, and the meaning of the DNA amount estimates for X and B chromosomes in these 2 species.

Keywords:
B chromosome, DNA quantification, Feulgen image analysis densitometry, X chromosome
1.
Abdelaziz M, Teruel M, Chobanov D, Camacho JPM, Cabrero J: Physical mapping of rDNA and satDNA in A and B chromosomes of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans from a Greek population. Cytogenet Genome Res 119:143–146 (2007).
2.
Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, Evans CA, Gocayne JD, et al: The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287:2185–2195 (2000).
3.
Alvarez-Fuster A, Juan C, Petitpierre E: Genome size in Tribolium flour-beetles: inter- and intraspecific variation. Genet Res 58:1–5 (2009).
4.
Belda JE, Cabrero J, Camacho JP, Rufas JS: Role of C-heterochromatin in variation of nuclear DNA amount in the genus Chorthippus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Cytobios 67:13–21 (1991).
5.
Bier KV, Müller W: DNS-Messungen bei Insekten und eine Hypothese über retardierte Evolution und besonderen DNS-Reichtum im Tierreich. Biol Zbl 88:425–449 (1969).
6.
Cabrero J, Viseras E, Camacho JPM: The B-chromosomes of Locusta migratoria I. detection of negative correlation between mean chiasma frequency and the rate of accumulation of the B’s; a reanalysis of the available data about the transmission of these B-chromosomes. Genetica 64:155–164 (1984).
7.
Cabrero J, López-León MD, Bakkali M, Camacho JPM: Common origin of B chromosome variants in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans. Heredity 83:435–439 (1999).
8.
Camacho JPM: B chromosomes, in Gregory TR (ed): The Evolution of the Genome, pp 223–286 (Elsevier, San Diego 2005).
9.
Camacho JPM, Cabrero J: Supernumerary segments in five species of grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acridoidea). Genetica 59:113–117 (1982).
10.
Camacho JPM, Cabrero J, Viseras E, López-León MD, Navas-Castillo J, Alché JD: G-banding in two species of grasshoppers and its relationship to C, N and fluorescence banding techniques. Genome 34:638–643 (1991).
11.
Camacho JPM, López-León MD, Pardo MC, Cabrero J, Shaw MW: Population dynamics of a selfish B chromosome neutralized by the standard genome in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans. Amer Nat 149:1030–1050 (1997).
12.
Camacho JPM, Cabrero J, López-León MD, Bakkali M, Perfectti F: The B chromosomes of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans and the intragenomic conflict. Genetica 117:77–84 (2003).
13.
de Abreu IS, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR: Chromosomal DNA content of sweet pepper determined by association of cytogenetic and cytometric tools. Plant Cell Rep 27:1227–1233 (2008).
14.
Dearn JM: Phase transformation and chiasma frequency variation in locusts. Chromosoma 45:321–338 (1974).
15.
Doležel J, Dolezelová M, Roux N: A novel method to prepare slides for high resolution chromosome studies in Musa spp. Infomusa 7:3–4 (1998).
16.
Doležel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J: Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytom Part A 51:127–128 (2003).
17.
Fox DP: A non-doubling DNA series in somatic tissues of the locusts Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål) and Locusta migratoria (Linn.). Chromosoma 29:446–461 (1970).
18.
Garagna S, Civitelli MV, Marziliano N, Castiglia R, Zuccotti M, et al: Genome size variations are related to X-chromosome heterochromatin polymorphism in Arvicanthis sp. from Benin (West Africa). Ital J Zool 66:27–32 (1999).
19.
Geraci NS, Johnston JS, Robinson JP, Wikel SK, Hill CA: Variation in genome size of argasid and ixodid ticks. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 37:399–408 (2007).
20.
Gregory TR: Genome size evolution in animals, in Gregory TR (ed): The Evolution of the Genome, pp 3–87 (Elsevier, San Diego 2005).
21.
Gregory TR, Hebert PD: Genome size estimates for some oligochaete annelids. Can J Zool 80:1485–1489 (2002).
22.
Gregory TR, Shorthouse DP: Genome sizes of spiders. J Hered 94:285–290 (2003).
23.
Greilhuber J: Cytochemistry and C-values: the less-well-known world of nuclear DNA amounts. Ann Bot 101:791–804 (2008).
24.
Hancock JM: Simple sequences and the expanding genome. Bioessays 18:421–425 (1996).
25.
Hancock JM: Genome size and the accumulation of simple sequence repeats: implications of new data from genome sequencing projects. Genetica 115:93–103 (2002).
26.
Hardie DC, Gregory TR, Hebert PD: From pixels to picograms: a beginners’ guide to genome quantification by Feulgen image analysis densitometry. J Histochem Cytochem 50:735–750 (2002).
27.
Hsiang W: Cytological studies on migratory locust hybrid, Locusta migratoria migratoria L. × Locusta migratoriamanilensis Meyen. Acta Zool Sinica 10:53–59 (1958).
28.
Itoh H: Chromosomal variation in the spermatogenesis of a grasshopper, Locusta danica. Jap J Genet 10:115–134 (1934).
29.
Jones RN, Rees H: B Chromosomes (Academic Press, New York 1982).
30.
Juan C, Petitpierre E: C-banding and DNA content in seven species of Tenebrionidae (Coleoptera). Genome 32:834–839 (1989).
31.
Kayano H: Accumulation of B chromosomes in the germ line of Locusta migratoria. Heredity 27:119–123 (1971).
32.
King M, John B: Regularities and restrictions governing C-band variation in acridoid grasshoppers. Chromosoma 76:123–150 (1980).
33.
Kirk D, Jones RN: Nuclear genetic activity in B-chromosome rye, in terms of the quantitative interrelationships between nuclear protein, nuclear RNA and histone. Chromosoma 31:241–254 (1970).
34.
López-León MD, Cabrero J, Camacho JPM: Meiotic drive against an autosomal supernumerary segment promoted by the presence of a B chromosome in females of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans. Chromosoma 100:282–287 (1991).
35.
López-León M, Cabrero J, Dzyubenko V, Bugrov A, Karamysheva T, et al: Differences in ribosomal DNA distribution on A and B chromosomes between eastern and western populations of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans plorans. Cytogenet Genome Res 121:260–265 (2008).
36.
Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ, Abramoff MD: Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11:36–42 (2004).
37.
Mendonça MA, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR: DNA content differences between male and female chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) nuclei and Z and W chromosomes resolved by image cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 58:229–235 (2010).
38.
Mulligan PK, Rasch EM: The determination of genome size in male and female germ cells of Drosophila melanogaster by DNA-Feulgen cytophotometry. Histochem Cell Biol 66:11–18 (1980).
39.
Ng HF: Automatic thresholding for defect detection. Pattern Recogn Lett 27:1644–1649 (2006).
40.
Nur U: Mitotic instability leading to an accumulation of B-chromosomes in grasshoppers. Chromosoma 27:1–19 (1969).
41.
Otsu N: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica 11:285–296 (1975).
42.
Pardo MC, Viseras E, Cabrero J, Camacho JPM: A supernumerary chromosome segment in Locustamigratoria. Genome 36:919–923 (1993).
43.
Pardo MC, López-León MD, Cabrero J, Camacho JPM: Transmission analysis of mitotically unstable B chromosomes in Locusta migratoria. Genome 37:1027–1034 (1994).
44.
Pardo MC, López-León MD, Viseras E, Cabrero J, Camacho JPM: Mitotic instability of B chromosomes during embryo development in Locusta migratoria. Heredity 74:164–169 (1995).
45.
Prokopowich CD, Gregory TR, Crease TJ: The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes. Genome 46:48–50 (2003).
46.
Puech M, Giroud F: Standardisation of DNA quantitation by image analysis: quality control of instrumentation. Cytom Part A 36:11–17 (1999).
47.
Rasch EM: DNA ‘standards’ and the range of accurate DNA estimates by Feulgen absorption microspectrophotometry. Prog Clin Biol Res 196:137–166 (1985).
48.
Rasch EM: Genome size and determination of DNA content of the X chromosomes, autosomes, and germ line-limited chromosomes of Sciara coprophila. J Morphol 267:1316–1325 (2006).
49.
Rasch EM, Barr HJ, Rasch RW: The DNA content of sperm of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 33:1–18 (1971).
50.
Rasch EM, Cassidy JD, King RC: Estimates of genome size in haploid-diploid species of parasitoid wasps. J Histochem Cytochem 23:317 (1975).
51.
Rees H, Shaw DD, Wilkinson P: Nuclear DNA variation among acridid grasshoppers. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 202:517–525 (1978).
52.
Rosado TB, Carvalho CR, Saraiva LS: DNA content of maize metaphasic A and B chromosomes determined by image cytometry. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 79:48–49 (2005).
53.
Rosado TB, Clarindo WR, Carvalho CR: An integrated cytogenetic, flow and image cytometry procedure used to measure the DNA content of Zea mays A and B chromosomes. Plant Sci 176:154–158 (2009).
54.
Teruel M, Cabrero J, Perfectti F, Camacho JPM: Nucleolus size variation during meiosis and NOR activity of a B chromosome in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans. Chromosome Res 15:755–765 (2007).
55.
Teruel M, Cabrero J, Perfectti F, Camacho JP: B chromosome ancestry revealed by histone genes in the migratory locust. Chromosoma 119:217–225 (2010).
56.
Tóth G, Gáspári Z, Jurka J: Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: survey and analysis. Genome Res 10:967–981 (2000).
57.
Ustinova J, Achmann R, Cremer S, Mayer F: Long repeats in a huge genome: microsatellite loci in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. J Mol Evol 62:158–167 (2006).
58.
Vilhar B, Dermastia M: Standardisation of instrumentation in plant DNA image cytometry. Acta Bot Croat 61:11–26 (2002).
59.
Viseras E, Camacho JPM, Cano MI, Santos JL: Relationship between mitotic instability and accumulation of B chromosomes in males and females of Locusta migratoria. Genome 33:23–29 (1990).
60.
Wilhelm J, Pingoud A, Hahn M: Real-time PCR-based method for the estimation of genome sizes. Nucleic Acids Res 31:e56 (2003).
61.
Wilmore PJ, Brown AK: Molecular properties of orthopteran DNA. Chromosoma 51:337–345 (1975).
62.
Zurita S, Cabrero J, López-León MD, Camacho JPM: Polymorphism regeneration for a neutralized selfish B chromosome. Evolution 52:274–277 (1998).
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.