The perpetuation of the species’ genomic identity strongly depends on the accurate maintenance of chromosome number through countless cell generations. The synchronous entry and progression of all chromosomes through anaphase is fundamental for the quality of mitosis and is guaranteed by error prevention and correction mechanisms that ultimately certify the bipolar attachment of chromosomes to the mitotic spindle, the uniform distribution of forces amongst different chromosomes, and the simultaneity of sister-chromatid separation. The existence of a kinetochore-attachment checkpoint (KAC; also known as spindle-assembly checkpoint) ensures a delay in anaphase onset if any kinetochore remains unattached or devoid of a proper complement of microtubules. The stochastic nature of microtubule-kinetochore interactions predisposes the mitotic process to mistakes, but different molecular players cooperate by detecting and releasing incorrect attachments and thus delaying checkpoint satisfaction. Conversely, correct microtubule-kinetochore interactions become selectively stabilized. Once anaphase onset is triggered, the segregation velocities achieved by each chromosome should be similar, so that none of the chromosomes is lagged behind. This reflects the uniformity of forces acting on the different chromosomes and relies on a conspicuous mitotic spindle property known as microtubule poleward flux. Importantly, not all incorrect attachments are detected and resolved prior to anaphase leading to asynchronous chromosome segregation, but several mechanisms are in place to prevent aneuploidy. One of these mechanisms relies on anaphase spindle forces and another, known as the NoCut checkpoint, delays cell cleavage during cytokinesis until chromosomes can free the spindle mid-region. In this review we discuss how these different mechanisms act in concert to ensure the fidelity of the mitotic process.

Keywords:
Kinetochore, Metaphase, Mitosis, Anaphase, Aneuploidy, Error correction, Flux
1.
Andrews PD, Ovechkina Y, Morrice N, Wagenbach M, Duncan K, et al: Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev Cell 6:253–268 (2004).
2.
Bakhoum SF, Thompson SL, Manning AL, Compton DA: Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 11:27–35 (2009a).
3.
Bakhoum SF, Genovese G, Compton DA: Deviant kinetochore microtubule dynamics underlie chromosomal instability. Curr Biol 19:1937–1942 (2009b).
4.
Brito DA, Rieder CL: The ability to survive mitosis in the presence of microtubule poisons differs significantly between human nontransformed (RPE-1) and cancer (U2OS, HeLa) cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 66:437–447 (2009).
5.
Cai S, O’Connell CB, Khodjakov A, Walczak CE: Chromosome congression in the absence of kinetochore fibres. Nat Cell Biol 11:832–838 (2009).
6.
Cassimeris L, Becker B, Carney B: TOGp regulates microtubule assembly and density during mitosis and contributes to chromosome directional instability. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 66:535–545 (2009).
7.
Cheeseman IM, Desai A: Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:33–46 (2008).
8.
Cheeseman IM, Chappie JS, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Desai A: The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127:983–997 (2006).
9.
Cimini D: Detection and correction of merotelic kinetochore orientation by Aurora B and its partners. Cell Cycle 6:1558–1564 (2007).
10.
Cimini D, Howell B, Maddox P, Khodjakov A, Degrassi F, Salmon ED: Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J Cell Biol 153:517–527 (2001).
11.
Cimini D, Fioravanti D, Salmon ED, Degrassi F: Merotelic kinetochore orientation versus chromosome mono-orientation in the origin of lagging chromosomes in human primary cells. J Cell Sci 115:507–515 (2002).
12.
Cimini D, Cameron LA, Salmon ED: Anaphase spindle mechanics prevent mis-segregation of merotelically oriented chromosomes. Curr Biol 14:2149–2155 (2004).
13.
Courtheoux T, Gay G, Gachet Y, Tournier S: Ase1/Prc1-dependent spindle elongation corrects merotely during anaphase in fission yeast. J Cell Biol 187:399–412 (2009).
14.
DeLuca JG, Gall WE, Ciferri C, Cimini D, Musacchio A, Salmon ED: Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127:969–982 (2006).
15.
Ems-McClung SC, Walczak CE: Kinesin-13s in mitosis: key players in the spatial and temporal organization of spindle microtubules. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21:276–282 (2010).
16.
Fujiwara T, Bandi M, Nitta M, Ivanova EV, Bronson RT, Pellman D: Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells. Nature 437:1043–1047 (2005).
17.
Fuller BG, Lampson MA, Foley EA, Rosasco-Nitcher S, Le KV, et al: Midzone activation of Aurora B in anaphase produces an intracellular phosphorylation gradient. Nature 453:1132–1136 (2008).
18.
Galjart N: CLIPs and CLASPs and cellular dynamics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:487–498 (2005).
19.
Ganem NJ, Pellman D: Limiting the proliferation of polyploid cells. Cell 131:437–440 (2007).
20.
Ganem NJ, Upton K, Compton DA: Efficient mitosis in human cells lacking poleward microtubule flux. Curr Biol 15:1827–1832 (2005).
21.
Ganem NJ, Storchova Z, Pellman D: Tetraploidy, aneuploidy and cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17:157–162 (2007).
22.
Ganem NJ, Godinho SA, Pellman D: A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature 460:278–282 (2009).
23.
Gorbsky GJ, Borisy GG: Microtubules of the kinetochore fiber turn over in metaphase but not in anaphase. J Cell Biol 109:653–662 (1989).
24.
Guimaraes GJ, Dong Y, McEwen BF, Deluca JG: Kinetochore-microtubule attachment relies on the disordered N-terminal tail domain of Hec1. Curr Biol 18:1778–1784 (2008).
25.
Hassold T, Hunt P: To err (meiotically) is human: The genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2:280–291 (2001).
26.
Hoffelder DR, Luo L, Burke NA, Watkins SC, Gollin SM, Saunders WS: Resolution of anaphase bridges in cancer cells. Chromosoma 112:389–397 (2004).
27.
Holt LJ, Krutchinsky AN, Morgan DO: Positive feedback sharpens the anaphase switch. Nature 454:353–357 (2008).
28.
Janssen A, Kops GJ, Medema RH: Elevating the frequency of chromosome mis-segregation as a strategy to kill tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19108–19113 (2009).
29.
Kapoor TM, Lampson MA, Hergert P, Cameron L, Cimini D, et al: Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science 311:388–391 (2006).
30.
Khodjakov A, Pines J: Centromere tension: a divisive issue. Nat Cell Biol 12:919–923 (2010).
31.
King JM, Nicklas RB: Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. J Cell Sci 21:3815–3823 (2000).
32.
Kline-Smith SL, Khodjakov A, Hergert P, Walczak CE: Depletion of centromeric MCAK leads to chromosome congression and segregation defects due to improper kinetochore attachments. Mol Biol Cell 15:1146–1159 (2004).
33.
Kops GJ, Foltz DR, Cleveland DW: Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8699–8704 (2004).
34.
Lan W, Zhang X, Kline-Smith SL, Rosasco SE, Barrett-Wilt GA, et al: Aurora B phosphorylates centromeric MCAK and regulates its localization and microtubule depolymerization activity. Curr Biol 14:273–286 (2004).
35.
Liu D, Vader G, Vromans MJ, Lampson MA, Lens SM: Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of Aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 323:1350–1353 (2009).
36.
Liu D, Vleugel M, Backer CB, Hori T, Fukagawa T, et al: Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase. J Cell Biol 188:809–820 (2010).
37.
Loncarek J, Kisurina-Evgenieva O, Vinogradova T, Hergert P, La Terra S, et al: The centromere geometry essential for keeping mitosis error free is controlled by spindle forces. Nature 450:745–749 (2007).
38.
Maffini S, Maia AR, Manning AL, Maliga Z, Pereira AL, et al: Motor-independent targeting of CLASPs to kinetochores by CENP-E promotes microtubule turnover and poleward flux. Curr Biol 19:1566–1572 (2009).
39.
Maia AF, Feijao T, Vromans MJ, Sunkel CE, Lens SM: Aurora B kinase cooperates with CENP-E to promote timely anaphase onset. Chromosoma 119:405–413 (2010).
40.
Maiato H, Lince-Faria M: The perpetual movements of anaphase. Cell Mol Life Sci 67:2251–2269 (2010).
41.
Maiato H, Fairley EA, Rieder CL, Swedlow JR, Sunkel CE, Earnshaw WC: Human CLASP1 is an outer kinetochore component that regulates spindle microtubule dynamics. Cell 113:891–904 (2003).
42.
Maiato H, Rieder CL, Khodjakov A: Kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle assembly during animal mitosis. J Cell Biol 167:831–840 (2004).
43.
Maiato H, Khodjakov A, Rieder CL: Drosophila CLASP is required for the incorporation of microtubule subunits into fluxing kinetochore fibres. Nat Cell Biol 7:42–47 (2005).
44.
Manning AL, Ganem NJ, Bakhoum SF, Wagenbach M, Wordeman L, Compton DA: The kinesin-13 proteins Kif2a, Kif2b, and Kif2c/MCAK have distinct roles during mitosis in human cells. Mol Biol Cell 18:2970–2979 (2007).
45.
Manning AL, Bakhoum SF, Maffini S, Correia-Melo C, Maiato H, Compton DA: CLASP1, astrin and Kif2b form a molecular switch that regulates kinetochore-microtubule dynamics to promote mitotic progression and fidelity. EMBO J 29:3531–3543 (2010).
46.
Maresca TJ, Salmon ED: Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J Cell Biol 184:373–381 (2009).
47.
Matos I, Pereira AJ, Lince-Faria M, Cameron LA, Salmon ED, Maiato H: Synchronizing chromosome segregation by flux-dependent force equalization at kinetochores. J Cell Biol 186:11–26 (2009).
48.
Mazumdar M, Misteli T: Chromokinesins: multitalented players in mitosis. Trends Cell Biol 15:349–355 (2005).
49.
McEwen BF, Heagle AB, Cassels GO, Buttle KF, Rieder CL: Kinetochore fiber maturation in PtK1 cells and its implications for the mechanisms of chromosome congression and anaphase onset. J Cell Biol 137:1567–1580 (1997).
50.
Mendoza M, Barral Y: Co-ordination of cytokinesis with chromosome segregation. Biochem Soc Trans 36:387–390 (2008).
51.
Mendoza M, Norden C, Durrer K, Rauter H, Uhlmann F, Barral Y: A mechanism for chromosome segregation sensing by the NoCut checkpoint. Nat Cell Biol 11:477–483 (2009).
52.
Miller SA, Johnson ML, Stukenberg PT: Kinetochore attachments require an interaction between unstructured tails on microtubules and Ndc80(Hec1). Curr Biol 18:1785–1791 (2008).
53.
Mimori-Kiyosue Y, Grigoriev I, Sasaki H, Matsui C, Akhmanova A, et al: Mammalian CLASPs are required for mitotic spindle organization and kinetochore alignment. Genes Cells 11:845–857 (2006).
54.
Mirchenko L, Uhlmann F: Sli15(INCENP) dephosphorylation prevents mitotic checkpoint reengagement due to loss of tension at anaphase onset. Curr Biol 20:1396–1401 (2010).
55.
Murnion ME, Adams RR, Callister DM, Allis CD, Earnshaw WC, Swedlow JR: Chromatin-associated protein phosphatase 1 regulates Aurora-B and histone H3 phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 276:26656–26665 (2001).
56.
Musacchio A, Salmon ED: The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev 8:379–393 (2007).
57.
Nasmyth K, Haering CH: Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet 43:525–558 (2009).
58.
Nezi L, Musacchio A: Sister chromatid tension and the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21:785–795 (2009).
59.
Nicklas RB, Ward SC: Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J Cell Biol 126:1241–1253 (1994).
60.
Norden C, Mendoza M, Dobbelaere J, Kotwaliwale CV, Biggins S, Barral Y: The NoCut pathway links completion of cytokinesis to spindle midzone function to prevent chromosome breakage. Cell 125:85–98 (2006).
61.
O’Connell CB, Loncarek J, Hergert P, Kourtidis A, Conklin DS, Khodjakov A: The spindle assembly checkpoint is satisfied in the absence of interkinetochore tension during mitosis with unreplicated genomes. J Cell Biol 183:29–36 (2008).
62.
Ohta S, Bukowski-Wills JC, Sanchez-Pulido L, Alves Fde L, Wood L, et al: The protein composition of mitotic chromosomes determined using multiclassifier combinatorial proteomics. Cell 142:810–821 (2010).
63.
Oliveira RA, Hamilton RS, Pauli A, Davis I, Nasmyth K: Cohesin cleavage and Cdk inhibition trigger formation of daughter nuclei. Nat Cell Biol 12:185–192 (2010).
64.
Pereira AL, Pereira AJ, Maia AR, Drabek K, Sayas CL, et al: Mammalian CLASP1 and CLASP2 cooperate to ensure mitotic fidelity by regulating spindle and kinetochore function. Mol Biol Cell 17:4526–4542 (2006).
65.
Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G: Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol 127:1301–1310 (1994).
66.
Rieder CL, Cole RW, Khodjakov A, Sluder G: The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol 130:941–948 (1995).
67.
Rogers GC, Rogers SL, Schwimmer TA, Ems-McClung SC, Walczak CE, et al: Two mitotic kinesins cooperate to drive sister chromatid separation during anaphase. Nature 427:364–370 (2004).
68.
Ruchaud S, Carmena M, Earnshaw WC: Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division. Nat Rev 8:798–812 (2007).
69.
Schmidt JC, Kiyomitsu T, Hori T, Backer CB, Fukagawa T, Cheeseman IM: Aurora B kinase controls the targeting of the Astrin-SKAP complex to bioriented kinetochores. J Cell Biol 191:269–280 (2010).
70.
Schwab MS, Roberts BT, Gross SD, Tunquist BJ, Taieb FE, et al: Bub1 is activated by the protein kinase p90(Rsk) during Xenopus oocyte maturation. Curr Biol 11:141–150 (2001).
71.
Silkworth WT, Nardi IK, Scholl LM, Cimini D: Multipolar spindle pole coalescence is a major source of kinetochore mis-attachment and chromosome mis-segregation in cancer cells. PloS One 4:e6564 (2009).
72.
Steigemann P, Gerlich DW: An evolutionary conserved checkpoint controls abscission timing. Cell Cycle 8:1814–1815 (2009).
73.
Steigemann P, Wurzenberger C, Schmitz MH, Held M, Guizetti J, et al: Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint protects against tetraploidization. Cell 136:473–484 (2009).
74.
Sullivan M, Morgan DO: Finishing mitosis, one step at a time. Nat Rev 8:894–903 (2007).
75.
Terradas M, Martin M, Tusell L, Genesca A: Genetic activities in micronuclei: is the DNA entrapped in micronuclei lost for the cell? Mutat Res 705:60–67 (2010).
76.
Thompson SL, Compton DA: Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J Cell Biol 180:665–672 (2008).
77.
Thompson SL, Compton DA: Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism. J Cell Biol 188:369–381 (2010).
78.
Toso A, Winter JR, Garrod AJ, Amaro AC, Meraldi P, McAinsh AD: Kinetochore-generated pushing forces separate centrosomes during bipolar spindle assembly. J Cell Biol 184:365–372 (2009).
79.
Uchida KS, Takagaki K, Kumada K, Hirayama Y, Noda T, Hirota T: Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 184:383–390 (2009).
80.
Vazquez-Novelle MD, Petronczki M: Relocation of the chromosomal passenger complex prevents mitotic checkpoint engagement at anaphase. Curr Biol 20:1402–1407 (2010).
81.
Welburn JP, Vleugel M, Liu D, Yates JR 3rd, Lampson MA, et al: Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol Cell 38:383–392 (2010).
82.
Wordeman L, Mitchison TJ: Identification and partial characterization of mitotic centromere-associated kinesin, a kinesin-related protein that associates with centromeres during mitosis. J Cell Biol 128:95–104 (1995).
83.
Yang Z, Kenny AE, Brito DA, Rieder CL: Cells satisfy the mitotic checkpoint in taxol, and do so faster in concentrations that stabilize syntelic attachments. J Cell Biol 186:675–684 (2009).
84.
Zhai Y, Kronebusch PJ, Borisy GG: Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition. J Cell Biol 131:721–734 (1995).
85.
Zhang X, Lan W, Ems-McClung SC, Stukenberg PT, Walczak CE: Aurora B phosphorylates multiple sites on mitotic centromere-associated kinesin to spatially and temporally regulate its function. Mol Biol Cell 18:3264–3276 (2007).
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.