Madoqua kirkii, a miniature African antelope, is noted for extensive chromosomal variation that has been categorized in four distinct cytotypes (A–D). In this investigation, we analyzed the A cytotype (2n = 46, FN = 48) using a suite of molecular cytogenetic approaches that entailed (i) whole chromosome and subchromosomal painting by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), (ii) the study of Madoqua centromeric-specific DNA derived from pooled DNA obtained from the centromeric regions of the acrocentric chromosomes, and (iii) DNA from the telomere:centromere junctions of tandemly fused chromosomes. DNA from these sources was used to probe for the persistence of interstitial satellite DNA and residual centromeric sequences in the tandem and centric fusion junctions by PCR and FISH. The analyses show centromeric sequences at two of the six tandem fusion junctions. These data, and those of hybrid specimens (A × B cytotypes) in conjunction with published information permitted an interpretation of the probable sequence of chromosomal rearrangements among the M. kirkii cytotypes. We discuss the findings in the context of chromosomal evolution in these antelopes, and the implications that these hold for ex-situ breeding programs of the species.

Keywords:
Antilopinae, Centromeres, Chromosome painting, Madoqua kirkii, Tandem fusion
1.
Ansell WFH: Order Artiodactyla, in Meester J, Setzer HW (eds.): The Mammals of Africa. An Identification Manual (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington 1971).
2.
Benirschke K, Kumamoto AT: Challenges of artiodactyl cytogenetics. La Kromosomo 45:1468–1478 (1987).
3.
Chandra HS, Hungerford DA, Wagner J: Chromosomes of five artiodactyl mammals. Chromosoma 21:211–220 (1967).
4.
Gallagher DS, Davis SK, De Donato M, Burzlaff JD, Womack JE, et al: A molecular cytogenetic analysis of the tribe Bovini (Artiodactyla: Bovidae: Bovinae) with an emphasis on sex chromosome morphology and NOR distribution. Chromosome Res 7:481–492 (1999).
5.
Howard JG, Raphael BL, Brown JL, Citino S, Schiewe MC, et al: Male sterility associated with karyotypic hybridization in Kirk’s dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii). Proc Am Ass Zoo Vet Ann Meet 58–60 (1989).
6.
Iannuzzi L, Di Meo GP, Perucatti A, Incarnato D, Schibler L, et al: Comparative FISH mapping of bovid X chromosomes reveals homologies and divergences between the subfamilies Bovinae and Caprinae. Cytogenet Cell Genet 89:171–176 (2000).
7.
ISCNDB 2000: International system for chromosome nomenclature of domestic bovids. Cytogenet Cell Genet 92:283–299 (2001).
8.
Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Musilova P, Rubes J: The use of laser microdissection for the preparation of chromosome – specific painting probes in farm animals. Chromosome Res 10:571–577 (2002).
9.
Kumamoto AT: Kirk’s dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii) and Guenther’s dik-dik (Madoqua guentheri): North American regional studbook, 1st ed (Zoological Society of San Diego, San Diego 1990).
10.
Kumamoto AT, Kingswood SC, Hugo W: Chromosomal divergence in allopatric populations of Kirk’s dik-dik, Madoqua kirkii (Artiodactyla, Bovidae). J Mammal 75:357–364 (1994).
11.
Nguyen TT, Aniskin VM, Gerbault-Seureau M, Planton H, Renard JP, et al: Phylogenetic position of the saola (Pseudoryx nghetinhensis) inferred from cytogenetic analysis of eleven species of Bovidae. Cytogenet Genome Res 122:41–54 (2008).
12.
Pauciullo A, Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Petrova K, Berardino DD, et al: Isolation and physical localization of new chromosome-specific repeats in farm animals. Vet Med 51:224–231 (2006).
13.
Platt RM, Soukup S: Banding studies in four artiodactyls and one primate species. Mamm Chromosomes Newsletter 18:122–123 (1977).
14.
Robinson TJ, Harrison WR, Ponce de León A, Elder FFB: X chromosome evolution in the suni and eland antelope: detection of homologous regions by fluorescence in situ hybridization and G-banding. Cytogenet Cell Genet 77:218–222 (1997).
15.
Robinson TJ, Harrison WR, Ponce de León FA, Davis SK, Elder FFB: A molecular cytogenetic analysis of X chromosome repatterning in the Bovidae: transpositions, inversions, and phylogenetic inference. Cytogenet Cell Genet 80:179–184 (1998).
16.
Ropiquet A, Hassanin A, Pagacova E, Gerbault-Seureau M, Cernohorska H, et al: A paradox revealed: Karyotype evolution in the four-horned antelope occurs by tandem fusion (Mammalia, Bovidae, Tetracerus quadricornis). Chromosome Res 18:277–286 (2010).
17.
Rubes J, Pagacova E, Kopecna O, Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, et al: Karyotype, centric fusion polymorphism and chromosomal aberrations in captive-born mountain reedbuck (Redunka fulvorufula). Cytogenet Genome Res 116:263–268 (2007).
18.
Rubes J, Kubickova S, Pagacova E, Cernohorska H, Berardino DD, et al: Phylogenomic study of spiral-horned antelope by cross-species chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 16:935–947 (2008).
19.
Ryder OA, Kumamoto AT, Durrant BS, Benirschke K: Chromosomal divergence and reproductive isolation in dik-diks, in Otte D, Endler JA (eds): Speciation and Its Consequences (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland 1989).
20.
Seabright M: A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2:971–972 (1971).
21.
Seluja GA, Kumamoto AT, Benirschke K: A cytotaxonomic approach in the comparative study of four Neotraginae species of different genera (Artiodactyla, Bovidae). Mamm Chromosomes Newsletter 26:39 (1985).
22.
Verma RS, Babu A: Human Chromosomes. Manual of Basic Techniques, p 240 (Pergamon, New York 1989).
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.