Karyotype and cytogenetic characteristics of 2 species of giant trahiras, Hopliasintermedius, São Francisco river basin, and Hopliasaimara, Arinos river (Amazon basin), were examined by conventional (C-banding, Ag-NOR, DAPI/CMA3 double-staining) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with 5S, 18S rDNA probes and cross-species Cot-1 DNA probing. Both species invariably had diploid chromosome number 2n = 50 and identical karyotypes composed of 10 pairs of metacentric and 15 pairs of submetacentric chromosomes. On the other hand, staining with base-specific fluorochromes (CMA3, DAPI) and FISH mapping of repetitive DNA sequences showed extensive interspecific differences: while the genome of H. aimara had one submetacentric pair bearing CMA3-positive (DAPI-negative) sites, that of H. intermedius had 4 such pairs; while FISH with a 5S rDNA probe showed one (likely homologous) signal-bearing pair, that with 18S rDNA displayed one signal-bearing pair in H. intermedius and 2 such pairs in H. aimara. Cross-species FISH probing with Cot-1 DNA prepared from total DNA of both species showed no signals of Cot-1 DNA from H. aimara on chromosomes of H. intermedius but reciprocally (Cot-1 DNA from H. intermedius on chromosomes of H. aimara) displayed signals on at least 4 chromosome pairs. Present findings indicate (i) different composition of repetitive sequences around centromeres, (ii) different NOR phenotypes and (iii) distinct taxonomic status of both giant trahira species.

1.
Bellafronte E, Vicari MR, Artoni RF, Margarido VP, Moreira-Filho O: Differentiated ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes in Apareiodon ibitiensis (Teleostei, Parodontidae): considerations on cytotaxonomy and biogeography.J Fish Biol 75:2313–2325 (2009).
2.
Bertollo LAC, Takahashi CS, Moreira-Filho O: Cytotaxonomic considerations on Hopliaslacerdae (Pisces, Erythrinidae). Braz J Genet 2:103–120 (1978).
3.
Bertollo LAC, Born GG, Dergam JA, Fenocchio AS, Moreira-Filho O: A biodiversity approach in the neotropical Erythrinidae fish, Hopliasmalabaricus. Karyotypic survey geographic distribution of cytotypes and cytotaxonomic considerations. Chromosome Res 8:603–613 (2000).
4.
Bertollo LAC, Oliveira C, Molina WF, Margarido VP, Fontes MS, et al: Chromosome evolution in the erythrinid fish, Erythrinus erythrinus (Teleostei: Characiformes). Heredity 93:228–233 (2004).
5.
Blanco DR, Lui RL, Bertollo LAC, Diniz D, Moreira-Filho O: Characterization of invasive fish species in a river transposition region: evolutionary chromosome studies in the genus Hoplias (Characiformes, Erythrinidae). Rev Fish Biol Fisher 20:1–8 (2010).
6.
Cioffi MB, Martins C, Centofante L, Jacobina U, Bertollo LAC: Chromosomal variability among allopatric populations of Erythrinidae fish Hopliasmalabaricus: mapping of three classes of repetitive DNAs. Cytogenet Genome Res 125:132–141 (2009).
7.
Cordani UG, Milani EJ, Thomaz Filho A, Campos DA: Tectonic Evolution of South America, 31° Internacional Geological Congress (Academia Brasileira de Ciências, e Departamento Nacional da Produção Mineral DNPM, Rio de Janeiro 2000).
8.
Diniz D, Bertollo LAC: Karyotypic studies on Hoplerythrinusunitaeniatus (Pisces, Erythrinidae) populations. A biodiversity analysis. Caryologia 56:303–313 (2003).
9.
Ferreira IA, Bertollo LAC, Martins C: Comparative chromosome mapping of 5S rDNA and 5SHin dIII repetitive sequences in Erythrinidae fishes (Characiformes) with emphasis on the Hopliasmalabaricus ‘species complex’. Cytogenet Genome Res 118:78–83 (2007).
10.
Giuliano-Caetano L, Bertollo LAC: Karyotype variability in Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus (Pisces, Erythrinidae). I. Chromosome polymorphism in the rio Negro population (Manaus, State of Amazonas).Braz J Genet 11:299–306 (1988).
11.
Hatanaka T, Galetti PM Jr: Mapping of the 18S and 5S ribosomal RNA genes in the fish Prochilodusargenteus Agassiz, 1829 (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae). Genetica 122:239–244 (2004).
12.
Howell WM, Black DA: Controlled silver staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia 36:1014–1015 (1980).
13.
Kantek DLZ, Vicari MR, Peres WAM, Cestari MM, Artoni RF, et al: Chromosomal location and distribution of As51 satellite DNA in five species of the genus Astyanax (Teleostei, Characidae, Incertae sedis). J FishBiol 75:408–421 (2009).
14.
Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA: Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201–220 (1964).
15.
Lui RL, Blanco DR, Margarido VP, Moreira-Filho O: First description of B chromosomes in the family Auchenipteridae, Parauchenipterusgaleatus (Siluriformes) of the São Francisco River basin (MG, Brazil). Micron 40:552–559 (2009).
16.
Martins C, Galetti PM Jr: Chromosomal localization of 5S rDNA genes in Leporinus fish (Anostomidae, Characiformes). Chromosome Res 7:363–367 (1999).
17.
Mayr B, Kalat M, Ràb P: Localization of NORs and counter-stain-enhanced fluorescent studies in Percafluviatilis (Pisces, Percidae). Genetica 67:51–56 (1985).
18.
Morelli S, Vicari MR, Bertollo LAC: Evolutionary cytogenetics of the Hopliaslacerdae, Miranda Ribeiro, 1908 group. A particular pathway concerning the other Erythrinidae fish. Braz J Biol 67:897–903 (2007).
19.
Oyakawa OT: Family Erythrinidae, in Reis RE, Kullander SO, Ferraris CJ Jr (eds): Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America, pp 238–240 (Edipucrs, Porto Alegre 2003).
20.
Oyakawa OT, Mattox GMT: Revision of the Neotropical trahiras of the Hopliaslacerdae species-group (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Erythrinidae) with descriptions of two new species. Neotrop Ichthyol 7:117–140 (2009).
21.
Phillips R, Hartley SE: Fluorescent banding patterns of the chromosomes of the genus Salmo. Genome 30:51–56 (1988).
22.
Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray J: Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:2934–2938 (1986).
23.
Pons J, Gillespie RG: Common origin of the satellite DNAs of Hawaiian spiders of the genus Tetragnatha: Evolutionary constraints on the length and nucleotide composition of the repeats. Gene313:169–177 (2003).
24.
Pons J, Petitpierre E, Juan C: Evolutionary dynamics of satellite DNA family PIM357 in species of the genus Pimelia (Tenebrionidae, Coleoptera). Mol Biol Evol 19:1329–1340 (2002).
25.
Potter PE: The Mesozoic and Cenozoic paleodrainage of South America: a Natural History. J S Am Earth Sci 10:331–344 (1997).
26.
Ráb P, Rábová M, Reed KM, Phillips RB: Chromosomal characteristics of ribosomal DNA in the primitive semionotiform fish, longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus. Chromosome Res 7:475–480 (1999).
27.
Rábová M, Ráb P, Ozouf-Costaz C, Ene C, Wanzeböck J: Comparative cytogenetics and chromosomal characteristics of ribosomal DNA in the fish genus Vimba (Cyprinidae). Genetica 118:83–91 (2003).
28.
Ribeiro AC: Tectonic history and the biogeography of the freshwater fishes from the coastal drainages of eastern Brazil: an example of faunal evolution associated with a divergent continental margin.NeotropIchthyol 4:225–246 (2006).
29.
Schmid M: Chromosome banding in Amphibia. IV. Differentiation of GC- and AT-rich chromosome regions in Anura. Chromosoma 7:83–103 (1980).
30.
Schmid M, Guttenbach M: Evolutionary diversity of reverse fluorescent chromosome bands in vertebrates.Chromosoma 97:101–114 (1988).
31.
Sola L, Rossi AR, Iaselli V, Rash EM, Mônaco PJ: Cytogenetics of bisexual/unisexual species of Poecilia. II. Analysis of heterochromatin and nucleolar organizer regions in Poeciliamexicanamexicana by C-banding and DAPI, quinacrine, chromomycin A3 and silver staining.Cytogenet Cell Genet60:229–235 (1992).
32.
Sumner AT: A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. ExpCellRes 75:304–306 (1972).
33.
Ugarkovic D, Plohl M: Variation in satellite DNA profiles-causes and effects. EMBO J 21:5955–5959 (2002).
34.
Vicari MR, Artoni RF, Bertollo LAC: Heterochromatin polymorphism associated with 18S rDNA: a differential pathway among Hoplias malabaricus fish populations. Cytogenet Genome Res 101:24–28 (2003).
35.
Vicari MR, Artoni RF, Bertollo LAC: Comparative cytogenetics of Hoplias malabaricus (Pisces, Erythrinidae): a population analysis in adjacent hydrographic basins. Genet Mol Biol 28:103–110 (2005).
36.
Vicari MR, Pazza R, Artoni RF, Margarido VP, Bertollo LAC: Cytogenetics and biogeography: considerations about the natural origin of Hopliasmalabaricus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) on the Iguaçu river. Braz Arch Biol Techn 49:297–303 (2006).
37.
Vicari MR, Artoni RF, Moreira-Filho O, Bertollo LAC: Co-localization of repetitive DNAs and silencing of major rDNA genes. A case report in the fish, Astyanax janeiroensis. Cytogenet Genome Res 122:67–72 (2008).
38.
Vicari MR, Nogaroto V, Noleto RB, Cestari MM, Cioffi MB, et al: Satellite DNA and chromosomes in Neotropical fishes: Methods, applications and perspectives. J Fish Biol 76:1094–1116 (2010).
39.
Wei WH, Zhao WP, Wang LJ, Chen B, Li YC, Song YC: Karyotyping of Brassicanapus L. based on Co t-1 DNA banding by fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Integr Plant Biol 47:1479–1484 (2005).
40.
Wichman HA, Payne CT, Ryder OA, Hamilton MJ, Maltbie M, Baker RJ: Genomic distribution of heterochromatic sequences in equids: implications to rapid chromosomal evolution. J Hered 82:369–377 (1991).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.