Crossing over-based recombination is a powerful tool for generating new allelic combinations during sexual reproduction. It usually occurs between homologous chromosomes. However, under some conditions, homoeologues may also be capable of crossing over. Whether homologous and homoeologous crossovers are equivalent and governed by the same rules has never been established. Here we report on chromosome distribution of homoeologous crossovers in a unique system of Festuca × Lolium hybrids. Unlike in most other hybrids, in these intergeneric hybrids, homoeologous chromosomes are capable of pairing and crossing over with frequencies approaching that of homologues. At the same time, genome divergence makes cytological detection of chromosome recombination feasible. We analyzed the distribution of homoeologous recombination along individual chromosomes in a complete set of intergeneric single chromosome substitutions fromF. pratensis into tetraploid L. multiflorum. Homoeologous recombination sites were not evenly distributed along the chromosomes, being concentrated in intercalary regions of the arms and reduced in proximal and distal regions. Several recombination hotspots and cold spots were found along individual chromosomes and the recombination was not affected by the presence of a secondary constriction. Our results indicate that despite the uneven distribution of homoeologous recombination, introgression of any part of the F. pratensis genome into L. multiflorum is feasible.

Keywords:
Chromosome introgression, Festuca, Flow cytometry, Genome size estimation, Homoeologous recombination, Karyotype, Lolium
1.
Akhunov ED, Akhunova AR, Linkiewicz AM, Dubcovsky J, Hummel D, et al: Synteny perturbations between wheat homoeologous chromosomes caused by locus duplications and deletions correlate with recombination rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10836–10841 (2003a).
2.
Akhunov ED, Goodyear AW, Geng S, Qi LL, Echalier B, et al: The organization and rate of evolution of wheat genomes are correlated with recombination rates along chromosome arms. Genome Res 13:753–763 (2003b).
3.
Anderson LK, Lai A, Stack SM, Rizzon C, Gaut BS: Uneven distribution of expressed sequence tag loci on maize pachytene chromosomes. Genome Res 16:115–122 (2006).
4.
Buard J, de Massy B: Playing hide and seek with mammalian meiotic crossover hotspots. Trends Genet 23:301–309 (2007).
5.
Catalán P, Torrecilla P, Rodriguez JAL, Olmstead RG: Phylogeny of the festucoid grasses of subtribe Loliinae and allies (Poeae, Pooideae) inferred from ITS and trnL-F sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:517–541 (2004).
6.
Černoch V, Našinec I, Šramek P: Share of grassland on landscape forming in the Czech Republic. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 39:158–162 (2003).
7.
Curtis CA, Lukaszewski AJ: Genetic linkage between C-bands and storage protein genes of tetraploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet 81:245–252 (1991).
8.
Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S, Meister A, Lysak M, et al: Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison. Ann Bot 82:17–26 (1998).
9.
Dooner HK, Martinez-Ferez IM: Recombination occurs uniformly within the bronze gene, a meiotic recombination hotspot in the maize genome. Plant Cell 9:1933–1646 (1997).
10.
Drouaud J, Camilleri C, Bourguignon PY, Canaguier A, Bérard A, et al: Variation in crossing-over rates across chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals the presence of meiotic recombination ‘hotspots’. Genome Res 16:106–114 (2006).
11.
Dvořaacute;k J, Chen KY: Distribution of nonstructural variation between wheat cultivars along chromosome 6Bp: evidence from the linkage map and physical map of the arm. Genetics 106:325–333 (1984).
12.
Erayman MD, Sandhu D, Sidhu H, Dilbirligi M, Baenziger PS, Gill KS: Demarcating the gene-rich regions of the wheat genome. Nucleic Acids Res 32:3546–3565 (2004).
13.
Fojtík A: Methods of grass improvement used at the plant breeding station Hladké Životice. Genet Pol 35A:25–31 (1994).
14.
Francis KE, Lam SY, Harrison BD, Bey AL, Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver GP: Pollen tetrad-based visual assay for meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3913–3918 (2007).
15.
Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E: Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049–1051 (1983).
16.
Gill KS, Gill BS, Endo TR, Taylor T: Identification and high-density mapping of gene-rich regions in chromosome group 1 of wheat. Genetics 144:1883–1891 (1996).
17.
Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák MA, Bennett MD: The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’, and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Ann Bot 95:255–260 (2005).
18.
Hayward MD, Forster JW, Jones JG, Dolstra O, Evans C, et al: Genetic analysis of Lolium I. Identification of linkage groups and the establishment of a genetic map. Plant Breed 117:451–455 (1998).
19.
Jauhar PP: Cytogenetics of the Festuca-Lolium complex. Relevance to Breeding. Monographs on Theor Appl Genet Vol. 18, p 255 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1993).
20.
Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R: Factors influencing recombination frequency and distribution in a human meiotic crossover hotspot. Hum Mol Genet 37:601–606 (2005).
21.
Jenczewski E, Eber F, Grimaud A, Huet S, Lucas MO, et al: PrBn, a major gene controlling homeologous pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) haploids. Genetics 164:645–653 (2003).
22.
Jones ES, Dupal MP, Dumsday JL, Hughes LJ, Forster JW: An SSR-based genetic linkage map for perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Theor Appl Genet 105:577–584 (2002).
23.
Jones LE, Rybka K, Lukaszewski AJ: The effect of a deficiency and a deletion on recombination in chromosome 1BL in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 104:1204–1208 (2002).
24.
Karp A, Jones RN: Cytogenetics of Lolium perenne. Part 2. Chiasma distribution in inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 64:137–145 (1983).
25.
King J, Armstead IP, Donnison IS, Thomas HM, Jones RM, et al: Physical and genetic mapping in the grasses Lolium perenne and Festuca pratensis. Genetics 161:315–324 (2002).
26.
King J, Armstead IP, Donnison IS, Harper JA, Roberts LA, et al: Introgression mapping in the grasses. Chromosome Res 15:105–113 (2007).
27.
Kopecký D, Lukaszewski AJ, Doležel J: Genomic constitution of Festulolium cultivars released in the Czech Republic. Plant Breed 124:454–458 (2005).
28.
Kopecký D, Lukaszewski AJ, Doležel J: Meiotic behavior of individual chromosomes of Festuca pratensis in tetraploid Lolium multiflorum. Chromosome Res 16:987–998 (2008).
29.
Kopecký D, Bartoš J, Zwierzykowski Z, Doležel J: Chromosome pairing of individual genomes in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), its progenitors, and hybrids with Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.). Cytogenet Genome Res 124:170–178 (2009a).
30.
Kopecký D, Bartoš J, Lukaszewski AJ, Baird JH, Cernoch V, et al: Development and mapping of DArT markers within the Festuca - Lolium complex. BMC Genomics 10:473 (2009b).
31.
Künzel G, Korzum L, Meister A: Cytologically integrated physical restriction fragment length polymorphism maps for the barley genome based on translocation breakpoints. Genetics 154:397–412 (2000).
32.
Kurata N, Nagamura Y, Yamamoto K, Harushima Y, Sue N: A 300-kilobase interval genetic map of rice including 883 expressed sequences. Nat Genet 8:365–372 (1994).
33.
Lawrence GJ, Appels R: Mapping the nucleolar organiser region, seed protein loci and isozyme loci on chromosome 1R in rye. Theor Appl Genet 71:742–749 (1986).
34.
Leitch IJ, Bennett MD: Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linn Soc 82:651–663 (2004).
35.
Leitch IJ, Heslop-Harrison JS: Physical mapping of 4 sites of 5S rRNA sequences and one site of the α-amylase-2 gene in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Genome 36:517–523 (1993).
36.
Lenormand T, Dutheil J: Recombination difference between sexes: a role for haploid selection. PLoS Biol 3:e63 (2005).
37.
Loureiro J, Kopecký D, Castro S, Santos C, Silveira P: Flow cytometric and cytogenetic analyses of Iberian Peninsula Festuca spp. Plant Syst Evol 269:89–105 (2007).
38.
Lukaszewski AJ: A comparison of physical distribution of recombination in chromosome 1R in diploid rye and hexaploid triticale. Theor Appl Genet 83:1048–1053 (1992).
39.
Lukaszewski AJ: Physical distribution of translocation breakpoints in homoeologous recombinants induced by the absence of the Ph1 gene in wheat and triticale. Theor Appl Genet 90:714–719 (1995).
40.
Lukaszewski AJ, Curtis CA: Physical distribution of recombination in B-genome chromosomes of tetraploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet 86:121–127 (1993).
41.
Lukaszewski AJ, Lapinski B, Rybka K: Limitations of in situ hybridization with total genomic DNA in routine screening for alien introgressions in wheat. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:373–377 (2005).
42.
Maguire MP: The pattern of pairing that is effective for crossing over in complex B-A chromosome rearrangements in maize. III. Possible evidence for pairing centers. Chromosoma 94:71–85 (1986).
43.
Masoudi-Nejad A, Nasuda S, McIntosh RA, Endo TR: Transfer of rye chromosome segments to wheat by a gametocidal system. Chromosome Res 10:349–357 (2002).
44.
Mézard C: Meiotic recombination hotspots in plants. Biochem Soc Trans 34:531–534 (2006).
45.
Okagaki RJ, Weil CF: Analysis of recombination sites within the maize waxy locus. Genetics 147:815–821 (1997).
46.
Otto F: DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA, in Crissman HA, Darzynkiewicz Z (eds): Methods in Cell Biology, vol. 33, pp 105–110 (Academic Press, New York 1990).
47.
Qi LL, Friebe B, Gill BS: A strategy for enhancing recombination in proximal regions of chromosomes. Chromosome Res 10:645–654 (2002).
48.
Rees H, Dale PJ: Chiasmata variability in Lolium and Festuca populations. Chromosoma 47:335–351 (1974).
49.
Riley R, Chapman V: Genetic control of the cytologically diploid behaviour of hexaploid wheat. Nature 182:713–715 (1958).
50.
Saintenac C, Falque M, Martin OC, Paux E, Feuillet C, Sourdille P: Detailed recombination studies along chromosome 3B provide new insights on crossover distribution in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetics 181:393–403 (2009).
51.
Sall T, Flink J, Bengtsson BO: Genetic-control of recombination in barley. 1. Variation in recombination frequency measured with inversed heterozygotes. Hereditas 112:157–170 (1990).
52.
Seal AG: DNA variation in Festuca. Heredity 50:225–236 (1983).
53.
Sears ER, Okamoto M: Intergenomic chromosome relationships in hexaploid wheat. Proc 10th Int Congr Genet, Montreal 2:258–259 (1958).
54.
Shah MM, Hassan A: Distribution of genes and recombination on wheat homoeologous group 6 chromosomes: a synthesis of available information. Mol Breed 15:45–53 (2005).
55.
Sinha RP, Helgason SB: Action of actinomycin D and diepoxybutane on recombination of 2 closely linked loci in Hordeum. Canad J Genet Cytol 11:745 (1969).
56.
Sybenga J: The zygomere as hypothetical unit of chromosome pairing initiation. Genetica 37:186–198 (1969).
57.
Sybenga J: Meiotic Configurations (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1975).
58.
Thomas HM, Morgan WG, Meredith MR, Humphreys MW, Thomas H, Leggett JM: Identification of parental and recombined chromosomes in hybrid derivatives of Lolium multiflorum × Festuca pratensis by genomic in situ hybridization. Theor Appl Genet 88:909–913 (1994).
59.
Winckler W, Myers SR, Richter DJ: Comparison of fine-scale recombination rates in humans and chimpanzees. Science 308:107–111 (2005).
60.
Zwierzykowski Z, Lukaszewski AJ, Lesniewska A, Naganowska B: Genomic structure of androgenic progeny of pentaploid hybrids, Festuca arundinacea × Lolium multiflorum. Plant Breed 117:457–462 (1998).
61.
Zwierzykowski Z, Lukaszewski AJ, Naganowska B, Lesniewska A: The pattern of homoeologous recombination in triploid hybrids of Lolium multiflorum with Festuca pratensis. Genome 42:720–726 (1999).
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.