Distal localisation of chiasmata is common to many cereals and grasses, which consigns many genes of the complement to recombination backwaters. Releasing this potential untapped genetic variation for use in advanced breeding programmes is an ambitious and technically demanding challenge, necessitating controlled shifts in the distribution of crossover events. As part of a collaborative programme to manipulate recombination in barley, we are developing a robust and reliable molecular cytogenetic assay for recombination in this species, which will be used to gauge the success of our forward and reverse genetic interventions. Single-locus bacterial artificial chromosome clones and rDNA probes identify the 7 somatic chromosomes of the complement. Meiocytes at pachytene of meiosis were embedded in polyacrylamide and hybridised in situ with centromere and telomere probes, followed by immunolocalisation of the synaptonemal complex-associated protein Asy1 which highlights the bivalents’ axes. Optical sectioning, deconvolution and image analysis of the z-stacks of the nuclei allowed the disentanglement of each bivalent and the construction of an accurate meiotic ideogram. The landing of single-locus bacterial artificial chromosomes and the detection of late recombination proteins will complete the assay and provide a means of discerning subtle changes in recombination in this species.

Keywords:
BACs, Barley, FISH, Meiosis, Recombination
1.
Anderson LK, Stack SM: Meiotic recombination in plants. Curr Genomics 3:507–525 (2002).
2.
Anderson LK, Doyle GG, Brigham B, Carter J, Hooker KD, et al: High-resolution crossover maps for each bivalent of Zea mays using recombination nodules. Genetics 165:849–865 (2003).
3.
Armstrong SJ, Caryl AP, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: Asy1, a protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis, localizes to axis-associated chromatin in Arabidopsis and Brassica. J Cell Sci 115:3645–3655 (2002).
4.
Bass HW, Marshall WF, Sedat JW, Agard DA, Cande WZ: Telomeres cluster de novo before the initiation of synapsis: a three-dimensional spatial analysis of telomere positions before and during meiotic prophase. J Cell Sci 137:5–18 (1997).
5.
Bennett MD, Rees H: Induced variation in chiasma frequency in rye in response to phosphate treatments. Genet Res 16:325–331 (1970).
6.
Bennett MD, Smith JB, Kemble R: The effect of temperature on meiosis and pollen development in wheat and rye. Can J Genet Cytol 14:615–624 (1972).
7.
Brown SE, Stephens JL, Lapitan NLV, Knudson DL: FISH landmarks for barley chromosomes (Hordeum vulgare L.). Genome 42:274–281 (1999).
8.
Cameron FM, Rees H: The influence of B chromosomes on meiosis in Lolium. Heredity 22:446–450 (1967).
9.
Cuadrado A, Jouve N: Similarities in the chromosomal distribution of AG and AC repeats within and between Drosophila, human and barley chromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res 119:91–99 (2007a).
10.
Cuadrado A, Jouve N: The nonrandom distribution of long clusters of all possible classes of trinucleotide repeats in barley chromosomes. Chromosome Res 15:711–720 (2007b).
11.
Dale PJ, Rees H: Chiasmata and variability in Lolium and Festuca populations. Chromosoma 47:335–351 (1974).
12.
de Jong JH, Fransz P, Zabel P: High resolution FISH in plants – techniques and applications. Trends Plant Sci 4:258–263 (1999).
13.
Dowrick GJ: The influence of temperature on meiosis. Heredity 11:37–49 (1957).
14.
Elliot CG: The effect of temperature on chiasma frequency. Heredity 9:385–398 (1955).
15.
Erayman M, Sandhu D, Sidhu D, Dilbirligi M, Baenziger PS, Gill KS: Demarcating the gene-rich regions of the wheat genome. Nucleic Acids Res 32:3546–3565 (2004).
16.
Esch E, Szymaniak JM, Yates H, Pawlowski WP, Buckler ES: Using crossover breakpoints in recombinant inbred lines to identify quantitative trait loci controlling the global recombination frequency. Genetics 177:1851–1858 (2007).
17.
Fedak G: Increased chiasma frequency in desynaptic barley in response to phosphate treatments. Can J Genet Cytol 15:647–649 (1973).
18.
Gale MD, Rees H: Genes controlling chiasma frequency in Hordeum. Heredity 25:393–410 (1970).
19.
Gustafsson MG, Shao L, Carlton PM, Wang CJ, Golubovskaya IN, et al: Three-dimensional resolution doubling in wide-field fluorescence microscopy by structured illumination. Biophys J 94:4957–4970 (2008).
20.
Hamant O, Ma H, Cande WZ: Genetics of meiotic prophase in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 57:267–302 (2006).
21.
Harper LC, Cande WZ: Mapping a new frontier; development of integrated cytogenetic maps in plants. Funct Integr Genomics 1:89–98 (2000).
22.
Hassan L, Jones RN: Colchicine-induced heritable modification of chiasma frequency and distribution in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Genome 38:356–361 (1995).
23.
Jenkins G, Hasterok R: BAC ‘landing’ on chromosomes of Brachypodium distachyon for comparative genome alignment. Nat Protoc 2:88–98 (2007).
24.
Jensen J: Effects of temperature on genetic recombination in barley. Hereditas 94:215–218 (1981).
25.
Jones RN, Rees H: Chiasma frequencies and the potential variability of Lolium populations. Nature 211:432–433 (1966).
26.
Jones RN, Rees H: Genotypic control of chromosome behaviour in rye XI. The influence of B chromosomes on meiosis. Heredity 22:333–347 (1967).
27.
Karp A, Jones RN: Cytogenetics of Lolium perenne part 1. Chiasma frequency variation in inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 62:177–183 (1982).
28.
Karp A, Jones RN: Cytogenetics of Lolium perenne part 2. Chiasma distribution in inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 64:137–145 (1983).
29.
King J, Armstead IP, Donnison IS, Thomas HM, Jones RN, et al: Physical and genetic mapping in the grasses Lolium perenne and Festuca pratensis. Genetics 161:315–324 (2002).
30.
King J, Armstead I, Donnison I, Roberts L, Harper J, et al: Comparative analyses between Lolium/Festuca introgression lines and rice reveal the major fraction of functionally annotated gene models are located in recombination poor/very poor regions of the genome. Genetics 177:597–606 (2007).
31.
Kunzel G, Korzun L, Meister A: Cytologically integrated physical restriction fragment length polymorphism maps for the barley genome based on translocation breakpoints. Genetics 154:397–412 (2000).
32.
Lapitan NLV, Brown SE, Kennard W, Stephens JL, Knudson DL: FISH physical mapping with barley BAC clones. Plant J 11:149–156 (1997).
33.
Leitch IJ, Heslop-Harrison JS: Physical mapping of four sites of 5S rDNA sequences and one site of the alpha-amylase-2 gene in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Genome 36:517–523 (1993).
34.
Lhuissier FGP, Offenberg HH, Wittich PE, Vischer NOE, Heyting C: The mismatch repair protein Mlh1 marks a subset of strongly interfering crossovers in tomato. Plant Cell 19:862–876 (2007).
35.
Marcon E, Moens P: Mlh1p and Mlh3p localize to precociously induced chiasmata of okadaic-acid-treated mouse spermatocytes. Genetics 165:2283–2287 (2003).
36.
Mayer KF, Taudien S, Martis M, Simkova H, Suchankova P, et al: Gene content and virtual gene order of barley chromosome 1H. Plant Physiol 151:496–505 (2009).
37.
Mikhailova EI, Sosnikhina SP, Kirillova GA, Tikholiz OA, Smirnov VG, et al: Nuclear dispositions of subtelomeric and pericentromeric chromosomal domains during meiosis in asynaptic mutants of rye (Secale cereale L.). J Cell Sci 114:1875–1882 (2001).
38.
Mikhailova EI, Phillips D, Sosnikhina SP, Lovtsyus AV, Jones RN, Jenkins G: Molecular assembly of meiotic proteins Asy1 and Zyp1 and pairing promiscuity in rye (Secale cereale L.) and its synaptic mutant sy10. Genetics 174:1247–1258 (2006).
39.
Moens PB, Kolas NK, Tarsounas M, Marcon E, Cohen PE, Spyropoulos B: The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. J Cell Sci 115:1611–1622 (2002).
40.
Nasuda S, Hudakova S, Schubert I, Houben A, Endo TR: Stable barley chromosomes without centromeric repeats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9842–9847 (2005).
41.
Pedersen C, Giese H, Linde-Laursen I: Towards an integration of the physical and the genetic chromosome maps of barley by in situ hybridization. Hereditas 123:77–88 (1995).
42.
Rees H: Genotypic control of chromosome form and behaviour. Bot Rev 27:288–318 (1961).
43.
Rees H, Ahmad K: Chiasma frequencies in Lolium populations. Evolution 17:575–579 (1963).
44.
Richards EJ, Ausubel FM: Isolation of a higher eukaryotic telomere from Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 53:127–136 (1988).
45.
Saintenac C, Falque M, Martin OC, Paux E, Feuillet C, Sourdille P: Detailed recombination studies along chromosome 3B provide new insights on crossover distribution in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetics 181:393–403 (2009).
46.
Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Santos JL, Franklin FCH, Jones GH: Variation in chiasma frequency among eight accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 162:1415–1422 (2002).
47.
Stephens JL, Brown SE, Lapitan NL, Knudson DL: Physical mapping of barley genes using an ultrasensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization technique. Genome 47:179–189 (2004).
48.
Tang X, de Boer JM, van Eck HJ, Bachem C, Visser RG, de Jong H: Assignment of genetic linkage maps to diploid Solanum tuberosum pachytene chromosomes by BAC-FISH technology. Chromosome Res 17:899–915 (2009).
49.
Wicker T, Taudien S, Houben A, Keller B, Graner A, et al: A whole-genome snapshot of 454 sequences exposes the composition of the barley genome and provides evidence for parallel evolution of genome size in wheat and barley. Plant J 59:712–722 (2009).
50.
Wilson JY: Chiasma frequency in relation to temperature. Genetica 29:290–303 (1959a).
51.
Wilson JY: Duration of meiosis in relation to temperature. Heredity 13:263–267 (1959b).
52.
Yu Y, Tomkins JP, Waugh R, Frisch DA, Kudrna D, et al: A bacterial artificial chromosome library for barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and the identification of clones containing putative resistance genes. Theor Appl Genet 101:1093–1099 (2000).
53.
Zwick MS, Hanson RE, McKnight TD, Islam-Faridi MN, Stelly DM, et al: A rapid procedure for the isolation of Cot-1 DNA from plants. Genome 40:138–142 (1997).
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.