The atypical characteristics of parthenogenetic lizards offer a rare glimpse into the evolution of asexual vertebrate genomes, addressing the genetic consequences of 2 major hypotheses regarding the absence of sex: reduced potential for adaptation and the accumulation of deleterious mutations. As a consequence of their hybrid origin, parthenogenetic lizards exhibit admixed genomes that offer opportunities to study functional genomics and the disruption of coevolved gene complexes in a potentially perpetual hybrid background. The high heterozygosity also provides substantial signal to track instances of fundamental genomic processes, such as intergenomic recombination, transcriptional silencing, and mutation. The mitochondrial genomes of parthenogenetic lizards have unveiled evidence for both slipped-strand mispairing and unconventional initiation/termination of DNA replication as mechanisms generating large, tandem duplications that are fleeting in sexual animals, as well as a rare glimpse into the intermediate steps of the duplication-random loss model of mitochondrial gene rearrangement. Several important questions remain, for instance, how do polyploid, and in particular triploid, lineages solve issues of genome dosage? What are the molecular bases of meiosis and development that enable parthenogenesis? Expanding the synergy between natural history research and molecular biology promises to address these unanswered questions. Advances in methodology (such as genomic in situ hybridization) as well as high-throughput genome and transcriptome sequencing offer new opportunities to explore the persistent questions regarding asexual genome evolution with great precision.

Keywords:
Asexual, Genomics, Mitochondrial genome, Parthenogenesis, Reptile, Sex, Squamate
1.
Adams KL: Evolution of duplicate gene expression in polyploid and hybrid plants. J Hered 98:136–141 (2007).
2.
Adams KL, Cronn R, Percifield R, Wendel JF: Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 4649–4654 (2003).
3.
Arnold AP, Itoh Y, Melamed E: A bird’s-eye view of sex chromosome dosage compensation. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 9:109–127 (2008).
4.
Avise JC, Quattro JM, Vrijenhoek RC: Molecular clones within organismal clones: mitochondrial DNA phylogenies and the evolutionary history of unisexual vertebrates. Evol Biol 26:225–246 (1992).
5.
Bazin E, Glémin S, Galtier N: Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals. Science 312:570–572 (2006).
6.
Bezy RL, Sites JW Jr: A preliminary study of allozyme evolution in the lizard family Xantusiidae. Herpetologica 43:280–292 (1987).
7.
Bi K, Bogart JP: Identification of intergenomic recombinations in unisexual salamanders of the genus Ambystoma by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Cytogenet Genome Res 112:307–312 (2006).
8.
Bi K, Bogart JP, Fu J: Intergenomic translocations in unisexual salamanders of the genus Ambystoma (Amphibia, Caudata). Cytogenet Genome Res 116:289–297 (2007).
9.
Bickham JW, Tucker PK, Legler JM: Diploid-triploid mosaicism: An unusual phenomenon in side-necked turtles (Platemys platycephala). Science 4694:1591–1593 (1985).
10.
Bogart JP, Bi K, Fu J, Noble DWA, Niedzwiecki J: Unisexual salamanders (genus Ambystoma) present a new reproductive mode for eukaryotes. Genome 50:119–136 (2007).
11.
Bogart JP, Bartoszek J, Noble DWA, Bi K: Sex in unisexual salamanders: discovery of a new sperm donor with ancient affinities. Heredity 2009:1–11 (2009).
12.
Boore JL: Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 27:1767–1780 (1999).
13.
Bottley A, Xia GM, Koebner RMD: Homeologous gene silencing in hexaploid wheat. Plant J47:897–906 (2006).
14.
Brown WM, Wright JW: Mitochondrial DNA analyses and the origin and relative age of parthenogenetic lizards. Science 203:1247–1249 (1979).
15.
Burton RS, Ellison CK, Harrison JS: The sorry state of F2 hybrids: consequences of rapid mitochondrial DNA evolution in allopatric populations. Am Nat 168 Suppl 6:S14–S24 (2006).
16.
Capaldi RA, Malatesa F, Darley-Usmar V: Structure of cytochrome c oxidase. Biochim Biophys Acta 726:135–148 (1983).
17.
Cole CJ: Chromosome inheritance in parthenogenetic lizards and evolution of allopolyploidy in reptiles. J Hered 70:95–102 (1979).
18.
Cole CJ, Lowe CH, Wright JW: Sex chromosomes in teiid whiptail lizards (Genus Cnemidophorus). Am Mus Novit 2395:1–14 (1969).
19.
Cuellar O: Reproduction and mechanisms of meiotic restitution in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus uniparens. J Morphol 113:139–165 (1971).
20.
Cullum AJ: Comparisons of physiological performance in sexual and asexual whiptail lizards (genus Cnemidophorus): implications for the role of heterozygosity. Am Nat 150:24–47 (1997).
21.
Danielyan F, Arakelyan M, Stepanyan I: Hybrids of Darevskia valentini, D. armeniaca, and D. unisexualis from a sympatric population in Armenia. Amphibia-Reptilia 29:487–504 (2008).
22.
Darevsky IS, Kulikova VN: Natural triploidy in a polymorphic group of Caucasian rock lizards (Lacerta saxicola Eversmann) as a result of hybridization of bisexual with parthenogenetic forms of these species. Dok Akad Nauk SSSR 158:202–205 (1964).
23.
Davoyan A, Aslanyan A, Danielyan F, Darevsky I, Martirosyan I: Revealing of allelic polymorphism in the populations of parthenogenetic lizards Darevskia dahli (Lacertidae) using locus-specific PCR. Russ J Genet 43:20–23 (2007).
24.
Dawley RM, Bogart JP (eds): Evolution and Ecology of Unisexual Vertebrates. (New York State Museum, Albany 1989).
25.
Dobzhansky T: Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of the sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21:113–135 (1936).
26.
Ellison CK, Burton RS: Disruption of mitochondrial function in interpopulation hybrids of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 60:1382–1391 (2006).
27.
Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan Y-L, Postlethwait J: Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531–1545 (1999).
28.
Fujita MK, Boore JL, Moritz C: Multiple origins and rapid evolution of duplicated mitochondrial genes in parthenogenetic geckos (Heteronotia binoei; Squamata, Gekkonidae). Mol Biol Evol 24:2775–2786 (2007).
29.
Gallardo MH, Kausel G, Jiménez A, Bacquet C, González C, et al: Whole-genome duplications in South American desert rodents (Octodontidae). Biol J Linn Soc 82:443–451 (2004).
30.
Gandolfi A, Sanders IR, Rossi V, Menozzi P: Evidence of recombination in putative ancient asexuals. Mol Biol Evol 20:754–761 (2003).
31.
Good DA, Wright JW: Allozymes and the hybrid origin of the parthenogenetic lizards Cnemidophorus exsanguis. Cell Mol Life Sci 40:1012–1014 (1984).
32.
Gregory TR, Mable BK: Polyploidy in animals, in Gregory TR (ed): The Evolution of the Genome (Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam 2005).
33.
Hardy LM, Cole CJ: Morphology of a sterile, tetraploid, hybrid whiptail lizard (Squamata: Teiidae: Cnemidophorus). Am Mus Novit 3228:1–16 (1998).
34.
Hillis DM, Moritz C, Porter CA, Baker RJ: Evidence for biased gene conversion in concerted evolution of ribosomal DNA. Science 251:308–310 (1991).
35.
Hore TA, Rapkins RW, Graves JA: Construction and evolution of imprinted loci in mammals. Trends Genet 23:440–448 (2007).
36.
Kearney M, Shine R: Morphological and physiological correlates of hybrid parthenogenesis. Am Nat 164:803–813 (2004a).
37.
Kearney M, Shine R: Developmental success, stability, and plasticity in closely related parthenogenetic and sexual lizards (Heteronotia, Gekkonidae). Evolution 58:1560–1572 (2004b).
38.
Kearney M, Moussalli A, Strasburg JL, Lindenmayer D Moritz C: Geographic parthenogenesis in the Australian arid zone: I. A climatic analysis of the Heteronotia binoei complex (Gekkonidae). Evol Ecol Res 5:953–976 (2003).
39.
Kearney M, Blacket M, Strasburg J, Moritz C: Waves of parthenogenesis in the desert: evidence for the parallel loss of sex in a grasshopper and a gecko from Australia. Mol Ecol 15:1743–1748 (2006).
40.
Kearney M, Fujita MK, Ridenour J: Lost sex in the reptiles: constraints and correlations. in Schön I, Martens K, van Dijk P (eds): Lost Sex. (Springer, London 2009).
41.
Lee H-S, Chen ZJ: Protein-coding genes are epigenetically regulated in Arabidopsis polyploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6753–6758 (2001).
42.
Lynch M, Blanchard JL: Deleterious mutation accumulation in organelle genomes. Genetica 102–103:29–39 (1998).
43.
Lynch M, Conery JS: The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicated genes. Science 290:1151–1155 (2000).
44.
Lynch M, Force A: The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154:459–473 (2000).
45.
Marioni JC, Mason CE, Mane SM, Stephens M, Gilad Y: RNA-seq: An assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res 18:1509–1517 (2008).
46.
Manning GJ, Cole C, Dessauer H, Walker JM: Hybridization between parthenogenetic lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and gonochoristic lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: ecological, morphological, cytological, and molecular context. Am Mus Novit 3492:1–56 (2005).
47.
Mark Welch DB, Meselson M: Evidence for the evolution of bdelloid rotifers without sexual reproduction or genetic exchange. Science 288:1211–1215 (2000).
48.
Mark Welch DB, Cummings MP, Hillis DM, Meselson M: Divergent gene copies in the asexual class Bdelloidea (Rotifera) separated before the bdelloid radiation or within bdelloid families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:1622–1625 (2004).
49.
Maynard Smith J: The Evolution of Sex. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1978).
50.
Moritz C: The origin and evolution of parthenogenesis in Heteronotia binoei (Gekkonidae) I. Chromosome banding studies. Chromosoma 89:151–162 (1984).
51.
Moritz C: Patterns and processes of sex chromosome evolution in gekkonid lizards (Sauria: Reptilia), in Olmo E (ed): Cytogenetics of Amphibians and Reptiles (Birkhäuser, Basel 1990).
52.
Moritz C: Evolutionary dynamics of mitochondrial DNA duplications in parthenogenetic geckos, Heteronotia binoei. Genetics 129:221–230 (1991).
53.
Moritz C: The origin and evolution of parthenogenesis in the Heteronotia binoei complex: synthesis. Genetica 90:269–280 (1993).
54.
Moritz C, Brown WM: Tandem duplications in animal mitochondrial DNAs: variation in incidence and gene content among lizards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:7183–7187 (1987).
55.
Moritz C, Dowling T, Brown WM: Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relevance for population biology and systematics. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18:269–292 (1987).
56.
Moritz C, Donnellan D, Adams M, Baverstock PR: The origin and evolution of parthenogenesis in Heteronotia binoei (Gekkonidae): Extensive genotypic diversity among parthenogens. Evolution 43:994–1003 (1989a).
57.
Moritz C, Brown WM, Densmore LD, Wright JW, Vyas D, et al: Genetic diversity and the dynamics of hybrid parthenogenesis in Cnemidophorus (Teiidae) and Heteronotia (Gekkonidae), in Dawley RN, Bogart JP(eds): Evolution and Ecology of Unisexual Vertebrates. (The University of the State of New York, Albany 1989b).
58.
Muller HJ: Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants. Am Nat 59:346–353 (1925).
59.
Muller HJ: Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics, in Huxley JS (ed): The New Systematics (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1940).
60.
Muller HJ: Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol Symp 6:71–125 (1942).
61.
Muller HJ: The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutation Res 1:2–9 (1964).
62.
Murphy RW, Fu J, MacCulloch RD, Darevsky IS, Kupriyanova LA: A fine line between sex and unisexuality: the phylogenetic constraints on parthenogenesis in lacertid lizards. Zool J Linn Soc 130:527–549 (2000).
63.
Olmo E, Odierna G, Capriglione T: Evolution of sex-chromosomes in lacertid lizards. Chromosoma 96:33–38 (1987).
64.
Olsen MW: Segregation and replication of chromosomes in turkey parthenogenesis. Nature 212:435–436 (1966).
65.
Omilian AR, Cristescu ME, Dudycha JL, Lynch M: Ameiotic recombination in asexual lineages of Daphnia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18638–18643 (2006).
66.
Orr HA: ‘Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants’ revisited. Am Nat 136:759–770 (1990).
67.
Otto SP, Whitton J: Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu Rev Genet 34:401–437 (2000).
68.
Parker HM, McDaniel CD: Parthenogenesis in unfertilized eggs of Coturnix chinensis, the Chinese painted quail, and the effect of egg clutch position on embryonic development. Poult Sci 88:784–790 (2009).
69.
Pellegrino K, Rodrigues M, Yonenaga-Yassuda Y: Triploid karyotype of Leposoma percarinatum (Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae). J Herpetol 37:197–199 (2003).
70.
Pereira L, Gonçalves J, Franco-Duarte R, Silva J, Rocha T, et al: No evidence for an mtDNA role in sperm motility: data from complete sequencing of asthenozoospermic males. Mol Biol Evol 24:868–874 (2007).
71.
Radtkey RR, Donnellan SC, Fisher RN, Moritz C, Hanley KA, Case TJ: When species collide: the origin and spread of an asexual species of gecko. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 259:145–152 (1995).
72.
Rand DM, Haney RA, Fry AJ: Cytonuclear coevolution: the genomics of cooperation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:645–653 (2004).
73.
Rauh NR, Schmidt A, Bormann J, Nigg EA, Mayer TU: Calcium triggers exit from meiosis II by targeting the APC/C inhibitor Xerp1 for degradation. Nature 437:1048–1052 (2005).
74.
Reeder TW, Cole CJ, Dessauer HC: Phylogenetic relationships of whiptail lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus (Squamata: Teiidae): A test of monophyly, reevaluation of karyotypic evolution and review of hybrid origins. Am Mus Novit 3365:1–61 (2002).
75.
Reik W, Walter J: Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat Rev Genet 2:21–32 (2001).
76.
Ruiz-Pesini E, Diez C, Lapena AC, Preze-Martos A, Montoya J, et al: Correlation of sperm motility with mitochondrial enzymatic activities. Clin Chem 44:1616–1620 (1998).
77.
Sackton TB, Haney RA, Rand DM: Cytonuclear coadaptation in Drosophila: disruption of cytochrome c oxidase activity in backcross genotypes. Evolution 57:2315–2325 (2003).
78.
San Mauro D, Gower DJ, Zardoya R, Wilkinson M: A hotspot of gene order rearrangement by tandem duplication and random loss in the vertebrate mitochondrial genome. Mol Biol Evol23:227–234 (2006).
79.
Schmidt A, Duncan PI, Rauh NR, Sauer G, Fry AM, et al: Xenopus polo-like kinase Plx1 regulates XErp1, a novel inhibitor of APC/C activity. Genes Dev 19:502–513 (2005).
80.
Sinclair E, Scholl R, Bezy R, Crandall K, Sites J: Isolation and characterization of di- and tetranucleotide microsatellite loci in the yellow-spotted night lizard Lepidophyma flavimaculatum (Squamata: Xantusiidae). Mol Ecol Notes 6:233–236 (2006).
81.
Spinella DG, Vrijenhoek RC: Genetic dissection of clonally inherited genomes of Poeciliopsis: II. Investigation of a silent carboxylesterase allele. Genetics 100:279–286 (1982).
82.
Spiropoulos J, Turnbull DM, Chinnery PF: Can mitochondrial DNA mutations cause sperm dysfunction? Mol Hum Reprod 8:719–721 (2002).
83.
Stanton DJ, Daehler LL, Moritz CC, Brown WM: Sequences with the potential to form stem-and-loop structures are associated with coding-region duplications in animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 137:233–241 (1994).
84.
Tunquist BJ, Maller JL: Under arrest: cytostatic factor (CSF)-mediated metaphase arrest in vertebrate eggs. Genes Dev 17:683–710 (2003).
85.
Uzzell TM: Meiotic mechanisms of naturally occurring unisexual vertebrates. Am Nat 104:433–445 (1970).
86.
Yonenaga-Yassuda Y, Vanzolini PE, Rodrigues MT, Carvalho CM: Chromosome banding patterns in the unisexual microteiid Gymnophthalmus underwoodi and two related sibling species (Gymnophthalmidae, Sauria). Cytogenet Cell Genet 70:29–34 (1995).
87.
Zevering CE, Moritz C, Heideman A, Sturm RA: Parallel origins of duplications and the formation of pseudogenes in mitochondrial DNA from parthenogenetic lizards (Heteronotia binoei; Gekkonidae). J Mol Evol 33:431–441 (1991).
88.
Zhang J, Zhang YP, Rosenberg HF: Adaptive evolution of a duplicated pancreatic ribonuclease gene in a leaf-eating monkey. Nat Genet 30:411–415 (2002).
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.