Meiosis is a fundamental and evolutionarily conserved process that is central to the life cycles of all sexually reproducing eukaryotes. An understanding of this process is critical to furthering research on reproduction, fertility, genetics and breeding. Plants have been used extensively in cytogenetic studies of meiosis during the last century. Until recently, our knowledge of the molecular and functional aspects of meiosis has emerged from the study of non-plant model organisms, especially budding yeast. However, the emergence of Arabidopsis thaliana as the model organism for plant molecular biology and genetics has enabled significant progress in the characterisation of key genes and proteins controlling plant meiosis. The development of molecular and cytological techniques in Arabidopsis, besides allowing investigation of the more conserved aspects of meiosis, are also providing insights into features of this complex process which may vary between organisms.This review highlights an example of this recent progress by focussing on ASY1, a meiosis-specific Arabidopsis protein which shares some similarity with the N-terminus region of the yeast axial core-associated protein, HOP1, a component of a multiprotein complex which acts as a meiosis-specific barrier to sister-chromatid repair in budding yeast. In the absence of ASY1, synapsis is interrupted and chiasma formation is dramatically reduced. ASY1 protein is initially detected during early meiotic G2 as numerous foci distributed over the chromatin. As G2 progresses the signal appears to be increasingly continuous and is closely associated with the axial elements. State-of-the-art cytogenetic techniques have revealed that initiation of recombination is synchronised with the formation of the chromosome axis. Furthermore, in the context of the developing chromosome axes, ASY1 plays a crucial role in co-ordinating the activity of a key member of the homologous recombination machinery, AtDMC1.

1.
Albini SM: A karyotype of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome derived from synaptonemal complex analysis at prophase I of meiosis. Plant J 5:665–672 (1994).
2.
Allers T, Lichten M: Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106:47–57 (2001).
3.
Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, et al: Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301:653–657 (2003).
4.
Arabidopsis Genome Initiative: Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796–815 (2000).
5.
Aravind L, Koonin EV: The HORMA domain: a common structural denominator in mitotic checkpoints, chromosome synapsis and DNA repair. Trends Biochem Sci 23:284–286 (1998).
6.
Armstrong SJ, Jones GH: Female meiosis in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana and in two meiotic mutants. Sex Plant Reprod 13:177–183 (2001).
7.
Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH, Jones GH: Nucleolus-associated telomere clustering and pairing precede meiotic chromosome synapsis in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Cell Sci 114:4207–4217 (2001).
8.
Armstrong SJ, Caryl AP, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: Asy1, a protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis, localizes to axis-associated chromatin in Arabidopsis and Brassica. J Cell Sci 115:3645–3655 (2002).
9.
Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH, Jones GH: A meiotic time-course for Arabidopsis thaliana. Sex Plant Reprod 16:141–149 (2003).
10.
Bechtold N, Ellis J, Pelletier G: In planta Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer by infiltration of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants. CR Acad Sci Paris Life Sci 316:1194–1199 (1993).
11.
Bishop DK, Zickler D: Early decision; meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis. Cell 117:9–15 (2004).
12.
Bishop DK, Park D, Xu LZ, Kleckner N: Dmc1-A meiosis-specific yeast homolog of Escherichia coli RecA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell-cycle progression. Cell 69:439–456 (1992).
13.
Bishop DK, Nikolski Y, Oshiro J, Chon J, Shinohara M, Chen X: High copy number suppression of the meiotic arrest caused by a dmc1 mutation: REC114 imposes an early recombination block and RAD54 promotes a DMC1-independent DSB repair pathway. Genes Cells 4:425–443 (1999).
14.
Blat Y, Protacio RU, Hunter N, Kleckner N: Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell 111:791–802 (2002).
15.
Bleuyard JY, White CI: The Arabidopsis homologue of Xrcc3 plays an essential role in meiosis. EMBO J 23:439–449 (2004).
16.
Bleuyard JY, Gallego ME, White CI: Meiotic defects in the Arabidopsis rad50 mutant point to conservation of the MRX complex function in early stages of meiotic recombination. Chromosoma 113:197–203 (2004).
17.
Bleuyard JY, Gallego ME, White CI: Recent advances in understanding of the DNA double-strand break repair machinery of plants. DNA Repair (Amst) 5:1–12 (2006).
18.
Boden SA, Shadiac N, Tucker EJ, Langridge P, Able JA: Expression and functional analysis of TaASY1 during meiosis of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). BMC Mol Biol 8:65 (2007).
19.
Borner GV, Kleckner N, Hunter N: Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117:29–45 (2004).
20.
Carpenter AT: Electron microscopy of meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females: II. The recombination nodule, a recombination-associated structure at pachytene? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:3186–3189 (1975).
21.
Caryl AP, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: A homologue of the yeast HOP1 gene is inactivated in the Arabidopsis meiotic mutant asy1. Chromosoma109:62–71 (2000).
22.
Chen YT, Venditti CA, Theiler G, Stevenson BJ, Iseli C, et al: Identification of CT46/HORMAD1, an immunogenic cancer/testis antigen encoding a putative meiosis-related protein. Cancer Immun 5:9 (2005).
23.
Copenhaver GP, Housworth EA, Stahl FW: Crossover interference in Arabidopsis. Genetics 160:1631–1639 (2002).
24.
Couteau F, Belzile F, Horlow C, Grandjean O, Vezon D, Doutriaux, MP: Random chromosome segregation without meiotic arrest in both male and female meiocytes of a dmc1 mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11:1623–1634 (1999).
25.
Couteau F, Nabeshima K, Villeneuve A, Zetka M: A component of C. elegans meiotic chromosome axes at the interface of homolog alignment, synapsis, nuclear reorganization, and recombination. Curr Biol 14:585–592 (2004).
26.
Crow EW, Crow JF: 100 years ago: Walter Sutton and the chromosome theory of heredity. Genetics 160:1–4 (2002).
27.
de los Santos T, Hunter N, Lee C, Larkin B, Loidl J, Hollingsworth NM: The Mus81/Mms81 endonuclease acts independently of double Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics164:81–94 (2003).
28.
Farmer JB, Moore JES: On the meiotic phase (reduction divisions) in animals and plants. Quart J Microscop Sci S2-48:489–558 (1905).
29.
Feldmann KA: T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis: mutational spectrum. Plant J 1:71–82 (1991).
30.
Franklin FCH, Higgins JD, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Osman K, et al: Control of meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis: role of the MutL and MutS homologues. Biochem Soc Trans 34:542–544 (2006).
31.
Friesner JD, Liu B, Culligan K, Britt AB: Ionizing radiation-dependent γ-H2AX focus formation requires ataxia telangiectasia mutated and ataxia telangiectasia mutated and rad3-related. Mol BiolCell16:2566–2576 (2005).
32.
Gallego ME, Jeanneau M, Granier F, Bouchez D, Bechtold N, White CI: Disruption of the Arabidopsis RAD50 gene leads to plant sterility and MMS sensitivity. Plant J 25:31–41 (2001).
33.
Golubovskaya IN, Mashnenkov AS: Genetic control of meiosis: II. A desynaptic mutant in maize induced by N-nitroso-N-methyl-urea. Genetika 12:7–14 (1976).
34.
Grelon M, Vezon D, Gendrot G, Pelletier G: AtSPO11-1 is necessary for efficient meiotic recombination in plants. EMBO J20:589–600 (2001).
35.
Haber JE, Ira G, Malkova A, Sugawara N: Repairing a double-strand chromosome break by homologous recombination: revisiting Robin Holliday’s model. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:79–86 (2004).
36.
Hartung F, Puchta H: Molecular characterisation of two paralogous SPO11 homologues in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res28:1548–1554 (2000).
37.
Havekes FW, de Jong JH, Heyting C, Ramanna MS: Synapsis and chiasma formation in four meiotic mutants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Chromosome Res 2:315–325 (1994).
38.
Higgins JD, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH, Jones GH: The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: Evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev18:2557–2570 (2004).
39.
Higgins JD, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: The Arabidopsis synaptonemal complex protein ZYP1 is required for chromosome synapsis and normal fidelity of crossing over. Genes Dev19:2488–2500 (2005).
40.
Hillers KJ, Villeneuve AM: Chromosome-wide control of meiotic crossing over in C. elegans. Curr Biol 13:1641–1647 (2003).
41.
Hollingsworth NM, Brill SJ: The Mus81 solution to resolution: generating meiotic crossovers without Holliday junctions. Genes Dev 18:117–125 (2004).
42.
Hollingsworth NM, Johnson AD: A conditional allele of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hop1 gene is suppressed by overexpression of two other meiosis-specific genes – Red1 and Rec104. Genetics133:785–797 (1993).
43.
Hunter N, Kleckner N: The single-end invasion: An asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell106: 59–70 (2001).
44.
Jackson N, Sanchez-Moran E, Buckling E, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: Reduced meiotic crossovers and delayed prophase I progression AtMLH3-deficient Arabidopsis. EMBO J25:1315–1323 (2006).
45.
Jones GH, Armstrong SJ, Caryl AP, Franklin FC: Meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana; an integration of cytological and molecular approaches. Chromosome Res 11:205–215 (2003).
46.
Kironmai KM, Muniyappa K, Friedman DB, Hollingsworth NM, Byers B: DNA-binding activities of Hop1 protein, a synaptonemal complex component from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 18:1424–35 (1998).
47.
Kleckner N: Chiasma formation: Chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma115:175–194 (2006).
48.
Koornneef M, Fransz P, de Jong H: Cytogenetic tools for Arabidopsis thaliana. Chromosome Res 11:183–194 (2003).
49.
Laibach F: Zur Frage nach der Individualität der Chromosomen im Pflanzenreich. Beih Bot Zentralbl 22:191–210 (1907).
50.
Li WX, Chen CB, Markmann-Mulisch U, Timofejeva L, Schmelzer E, et al: The Arabidopsis AtRAD51 gene is dispensable for vegetative development but required for meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA101:10596–10601 (2004).
51.
Li W, Yang X, Lin Z, Timofejeva L, Xiao R, et al: The AtRAD51C gene is required for normal meiotic chromosome synapsis and double-stranded break repair in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 138:965–976 (2005).
52.
Lorenz A, Estreicher A, Kohli J, Loidl J: Meiotic recombination proteins localize to linear elements in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Chromosoma115:330–340 (2006).
53.
Lowndes NF, Toh GW: DNA repair: the importance of phosphorylating histone H2AX. Curr Biol 15:99–102 (2005).
54.
Ma H: A molecular portrait of Arabidopsis meiosis. The Arabidopsis Book, pp 1–40. (American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville 2006).
55.
Maleki S, Neale MJ, Arora C, Henderson KA, Keeney S: Interactions between Mei4, Rec114, and other proteins required for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromosoma 116:471–486 (2007).
56.
Mao-Draayer Y, Galbraith AM, Pittman DL, Cool M, Malone RE: Analysis of meiotic recombination pathways in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics144:71–86 (1996).
57.
Mercier R, Armstrong SJ, Horlow C, Jackson NP, Makaroff CA, et al: The meiotic protein SWI1 is required for axial element formation and recombination initiation in Arabidopsis. Development130:3309–3318 (2003).
58.
Mercier R, Jolivet S, Vezon D, Huppe E, Chelysheva L, et al: Two meiotic crossover classes cohabit in Arabidopsis: one is dependent on MER3, whereas the other one is not. Curr Biol 15:692–701 (2005).
59.
Mikhailova EI, Phillips D, Sosnikhina SP, Lovtsyus AV, Jones RN, Jenkins G: Molecular assembly of meiotic proteins Asy1 and Zyp1 and pairing promiscuity in rye (Secale cereale L.) and its synaptic mutant sy10. Genetics 174:1247–1258 (2006).
60.
Moens PB, Kolas NK, Tarsounas M, Marcon E, Cohen PE, Spyropoulos B: The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA–DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. J Cell Sci115:1611–1622 (2002).
61.
Neale MJ, Keeney S: Clarifying the mechanics of DNA strand exchange in meiotic recombination. Nature442:153–158 (2006).
62.
Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S: Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature436:1053–1057 (2005).
63.
Niu HY, Wan L, Baumgartner B, Schaefer D, Loidl J, Hollingsworth NM: Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol Biol Cell16:5804–5818 (2005).
64.
Nonomura K, Nakano M, Eiguchi M, Suzuki T, Kurata N: PAIR2 is essential for homologous chromosome synapsis in rice meiosis. J Cell Sci 119:217–225 (2006).
65.
Osman F, Dixon J, Doe CL, Whitby MC: Generating crossovers by resolution of nicked Holliday junctions: a role for Mus81-Eme1 in meiosis. Mol Cell 12:761–774 (2003).
66.
Osman K, Sanchez-Moran E, Higgins JD, Jones GH, Franklin FC. Chromosome synapsis in Arabidopsis: analysis of the transverse filament protein ZYP1 reveals novel functions for the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma 115:212–219 (2006).
67.
Pradillo M, Lopez E, Romero C, Sanchez-Moran E, Cunado N, Santos JL: An analysis of univalent segregation in meiotic mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana: A possible role for synaptonemal complex. Genetics175:505–511 (2007).
68.
Prieler S, Penkner A, Borde V, Klein F: The control of Spo11’s interaction with meiotic recombination hotspots. Genes Dev19:255–269 (2005).
69.
Puizina J, Siroky J, Mokros P, Schweizer D, Riha K: Mre11 deficiency in Arabidopsis is associated with chromosomal instability in somatic cells and Spo11-dependent genome fragmentation during meiosis. Plant Cell 16:1968–1978 (2004).
70.
Qian C, Zhang Q, Li S, Zeng L, Walsh MJ, Zhou MM: Structure and chromosomal DNA binding of the SWIRM domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:1078–1085 (2005).
71.
Robine N, Uematsu N, Amiot F, Gidrol X, Barillot E, et al: Genome-wide redistribution of meiotic double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol27:1868–1880 (2007).
72.
Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM: DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 273:5858–5868 (1998).
73.
Ross KJ, Fransz P, Jones GH: A light microscopic atlas of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Chromosome Res 4:507–516 (1996).
74.
Ross KJ, Fransz P, Armstrong SJ, Vizir I, Mulligan B, et al: Cytological characterization of four meiotic mutants of Arabidopsis isolated from T-DNA-transformed lines. Chromosome Res5:551–559 (1997).
75.
Ross-Macdonald P, Roeder GS: Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell79:190–195 (1994).
76.
Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Santos JL, Franklin FCH, Jones GH: Chiasma formation in Arabidopsis thaliana accession Wassileskija and in two meiotic mutants. Chromosome Res9:121–128 (2001).
77.
Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Santos JL, Franklin FCH, Jones GH: Variation in chiasma frequency among eight accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 162:1415–1422 (2002).
78.
Sanchez-Moran E, Jones GH, Franklin FCH, Santos JL: A puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase is essential for meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell16:2895– 2909 (2004).
79.
Sanchez-Moran E, Santos JL, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: ASY1 mediates AtDMC1-dependent interhomolog recombination during meiosis in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 21:2220–2233 (2007).
80.
Shinohara M, Gasior SL, Bishop DK, Shinohara A: Tid1/Rdh54 promotes colocalization of Rad51 and Dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA97:10814–10819 (2000).
81.
Shroff R, Arbel-Eden A, Pilch D, Ira G, Bonner WM, et al: Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr Biol14:1703–1711 (2004).
82.
Snowden T, Acharya S, Butz C, Berardini M, Fishel R: hMSH4-hMSH5 recognizes Holliday Junctions and forms a meiosis-specific sliding clamp that embraces homologous chromosomes. Mol Cell 15:437–451 (2004).
83.
Sosnikhina SP, Mikhailova EI, Tikholiz OA, Priyatkina SN, Smirnov VG, et al: Meiotic mutations in rye Secale cereale L. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:215–220 (2005).
84.
Stacey NJ, Kuromori T, Azumi Y, Roberts G, Breuer C, et al: Arabidopsis SPO11-2 functions with SPO11-1 in meiotic recombination. Plant J48:206–216 (2006).
85.
Stahl FW: The Holliday junction on its thirtieth anniversary. Genetics 138:241–246 (1994).
86.
Tarsounas M, Morita T, Pearlman RE, Moens PB: RAD51 and DMC1 form mixed complexes associated with mouse meiotic chromosome cores and synaptonemal complexes. J Cell Biol147:207–219 (1999).
87.
Tsubouchi H, Roeder GS: The importance of genetic recombination for fidelity of chromosome pairing in meiosis. Dev Cell 5:915–925 (2003).
88.
Tsubouchi H, Roeder GS: Budding yeast Hed1 down-regulates the mitotic recombination machinery when meiotic recombination is impaired. Genes Dev20:1766–1775 (2006).
89.
van Heemst D, Heyting C: Sister chromatid cohesion and recombination in meiosis. Chromosoma 109:10–26 (2000).
90.
Wang TF, Kleckner N, Hunter N: Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:13914–13919 (1999).
91.
Waterworth WM, Altun C, Armstrong SJ, Roberts N, Dean PJ, et al: NBS1 is involved in DNA repair and plays a synergistic role with ATM in mediating meiotic homologous recombination in plants. Plant J 52:41–52 (2007).
92.
Weismann A: On the number of polar bodies and their significance in heredity. I. Parthenogenetic and sexual egg, in: Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems (Oxford Press, Oxford 1889).
93.
Woltering D, Baumgartner B, Bagchi S, Larkin B, Loidl J, et al: Meiotic segregation, synapsis, and recombination checkpoint functions require physical interaction between the chromosomal proteins Red1p and Hop1p. Mol Cell Biol20:6646–6658 (2000).
94.
Zalevsky J, MacQueen A, Duffy JB, Kemphues KJ, Villeneuve AM: Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. Genetics153:1271–1283 (1999).
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.