A total of 207 BAC clones containing 155 loci were isolated and arranged into a map of linearly ordered overlapping clones over the proximal part of horse chromosome 21 (ECA21), which corresponds to the proximal half of the short arm of human chromosome 19 (HSA19p) and part of HSA5. The clones form two contigs – each corresponding to the respective human chromosomes – that are estimated to be separated by a gap of ∼200 kb. Of the 155 markers present in the two contigs, 141 (33 genes and 108 STS) were generated and mapped in this study. The BACs provide a 4–5× coverage of the region and span an estimated length of ∼3.3 Mb. The region presently contains one mapped marker per 22 kb on average, which represents a major improvement over the previous resolution of one marker per 380 kb obtained through the generation of a dense RH map for this segment. Dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization on metaphase and interphase chromosomes verified the relative order of some of the BACs and helped to orient them accurately in the contigs. Despite having similar gene order and content, the equine region covered by the contigs appears to be distinctly smaller than the corresponding region in human (3.3 Mb vs. 5.5–6 Mb) because the latter harbors a host of repetitive elements and gene families unique to humans/primates. Considering limited representation of the region in the latest version of the horse whole genome sequence EquCab2, the dense map developed in this study will prove useful for the assembly and annotation of the sequence data on ECA21 and will be instrumental in rapid search and isolation of candidate genes for traits mapped to this region.

1.
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al: Gapped blast and psi-blast: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402 (1997).
2.
Barbosa A, Demeure O, Urien C, Milan D, Chardon P, Renard C: A physical map of large segments of pig chromosome 7q11-q14: Comparative analysis with human chromosome 6p21. Mamm Genome 15:982–995 (2004).
3.
Beck TW, Menninger J, Murphy WJ, Nash WG, O’Brien SJ, Yuhki N: The feline major histocompatibility complex is rearranged by an inversion with a breakpoint in the distal class I region. Immunogenetics 56:702–709 (2005).
4.
Bejerano G, Pheasant M, Makunin I, Stephen S, Kent WJ, et al: Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science 304:1321–1325 (2004).
5.
Bellefroid EJ, Marine JC, Matera AG, Bourguignon C, Desai T, et al: Emergence of the znf91 kruppel-associated box-containing zinc finger gene family in the last common ancestor of Anthropoidea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:10757–10761 (1995).
6.
Birney E, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Dutta A, Guigo R, Gingeras TR, et al: Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the encode pilot project. Nature 447:799–816 (2007).
7.
Briggs MD, Hoffman SM, King LM, Olsen AS, Mohrenweiser H, et al: Pseudoachondroplasia and multiple epiphyseal dysplasia due to mutations in the cartilage oligomeric matrix protein gene. Nat Genet 10:330–336 (1995).
8.
Brinkmeyer-Langford C, Raudsepp T, Lee EJ, Goh G, Schäffer AA, et al: A high-resolution physical map of equine homologs of HSA19 shows divergent evolution compared with other mammals. Mamm Genome 16:631–649 (2005).
9.
Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T, Honeycutt D, Owens EK, Piumi F, et al: Construction of a 5000(rad) whole-genome radiation hybrid panel in the horse and generation of a comprehensive and comparative map for ECA11. Mamm Genome 13:89–94 (2002).
10.
Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T, Kata SR, Goh G, Millon LV, et al: The first-generation whole-genome radiation hybrid map in the horse identifies conserved segments in human and mouse genomes. Genome Res 13:742–751 (2003).
11.
Dehal P, Predki P, Olsen AS, Kobayashi A, Folta P, et al: Human chromosome 19 and related regions in mouse: Conservative and lineage-specific evolution. Science 293:104–111 (2001).
12.
Demars J, Riquet J, Feve K, Gautier M, Morisson M, et al: High resolution physical map of porcine chromosome 7 QTL region and comparative mapping of this region among vertebrate genomes. BMC Genomics 7:13 (2006).
13.
Eichler EE, Hoffman SM, Adamson AA, Gordon LA, McCready P, et al: Complex beta-satellite repeat structures and the expansion of the zinc finger gene cluster in 19p12. Genome Res 8:791–808 (1998).
14.
Everts-van der Wind A, Larkin DM, Green CA, Elliott JS, Olmstead CA, et al: A high-resolution whole-genome cattle-human comparative map reveals details of mammalian chromosome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:18526–18531 (2005).
15.
Ferlin A, Bogatcheva NV, Gianesello L, Pepe A, Vinanzi C, et al: Insulin-like factor 3 gene mutations in testicular dysgenesis syndrome: Clinical and functional characterization. Mol Hum Reprod 12:401–406 (2006).
16.
Frönicke L, Wienberg J: Comparative chromosome painting defines the high rate of karyotype changes between pigs and bovids. Mamm Genome 12:442–449 (2001).
17.
Goh G, Raudsepp T, Durkin K, Wagner ML, Schäffer AA, et al: High-resolution gene maps of horse chromosomes 14 and 21: Additional insights into evolution and rearrangements of HSA5 homologs in mammals. Genomics 89:89–112 (2007).
18.
Grimwood J, Gordon LA, Olsen A, Terry A, Schmutz J, et al: The DNA sequence and biology of human chromosome 19. Nature 428:529–535 (2004).
19.
Guérin G, Bailey E, Bernoco D, Anderson I, Antczak DF, et al: The second generation of the international equine gene mapping workshop half-sibling linkage map. Anim Genet 34:161–168 (2003).
20.
Gustafson AL, Tallmadge RL, Ramlachan N, Miller D, Bird H, et al: An ordered BAC contig map of the equine major histocompatibility complex. Cytogenet Genome Res 102:189–195 (2003).
21.
Gustafson-Seabury A, Raudsepp T, Goh G, Kata SR, Wagner ML, et al: High-resolution RH map of horse chromosome 22 reveals a putative ancestral vertebrate chromosome. Genomics 85:188–200 (2005).
22.
Han CS, Sutherland RD, Jewett PB, Campbell ML, Meincke LJ, et al: Construction of a BAC contig map of chromosome 16q by two-dimensional overgo hybridization. Genome Res 10:714–721 (2000).
23.
Ivell R, Hartung S, Anand-Ivell R: Insulin-like factor 3: Where are we now? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1041:486–496 (2005).
24.
Kimura K, Wakamatsu A, Suzuki Y, Ota T, Nishikawa T, et al: Diversification of transcriptional modulation: Large-scale identification and characterization of putative alternative promoters of human genes. Genome Res 16:55–65 (2006).
25.
Le Merrer M, Legeai-Mallet L, Jeannin PM, Horsthemke B, Schinzel A, et al: A gene for hereditary multiple exostoses maps to chromosome 19p. Hum Mol Genet 3:717–722 (1994).
26.
Lee EJ, Raudsepp T, Kata SR, Adelson D, Womack JE, et al: A 1.4-Mb interval RH map of horse chromosome 17 provides detailed comparison with human and mouse homologues. Genomics 83:203–215 (2004).
27.
Leeb T, Vogl C, Zhu B, de Jong PJ, Binns MM, et al: A human-horse comparative map based on equine BAC end sequences. Genomics 87:772–776 (2006).
28.
Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, et al: Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438:803–819 (2005).
29.
Liu GE, Matukumalli LK, Sonstegard TS, Shade LL, Van Tassell CP: Genomic divergences among cattle, dog and human estimated from large-scale alignments of genomic sequences. BMC genomics 7:140 (2006).
30.
Margulies EH, Vinson JP, Miller W, Jaffe DB, Lindblad-Toh K, et al: An initial strategy for the systematic identification of functional elements in the human genome by low-redundancy comparative sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4795–4800 (2005).
31.
McEwen GK, Woolfe A, Goode D, Vavouri T, Callaway H, Elgar G: Ancient duplicated conserved noncoding elements in vertebrates: a genomic and functional analysis. Genome Res 16:451–465 (2006).
32.
Medina M: Genomes, phylogeny, and evolutionary systems biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6630–6635 (2005).
33.
Murphy WJ, Larkin DM, Everts-van der Wind A, Bourque G, Tesler G, et al: Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps. Science 309:613–617 (2005).
34.
Nef S, Parada LF: Cryptorchidism in mice mutant for Insl3. Nat Genet 22:295–299 (1999).
35.
Penedo MC, Millon LV, Bernoco D, Bailey E, Binns M, et al: International equine gene mapping workshop report: A comprehensive linkage map constructed with data from new markers and by merging four mapping resources. Cytogenet Genome Res 111:5–15 (2005).
36.
Perrocheau M, Boutreux V, Chadi S, Mata X, Decaunes P, et al: Construction of a medium-density horse gene map. Anim Genet 37:145–155 (2006).
37.
Posey KL, Hayes E, Haynes R, Hecht JT: Role of TSP-5/COMP in pseudoachondroplasia. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36:1005–1012 (2004).
38.
Raudsepp T, Lee EJ, Kata SR, Brinkmeyer C, Mickelson JR, et al: Exceptional conservation of horse-human gene order on X chromosome revealed by high-resolution radiation hybrid mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2386–2391 (2004a).
39.
Raudsepp T, Santani A, Wallner B, Kata SR, Ren C, et al: A detailed physical map of the horse Y chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9321–9326 (2004b).
40.
Sato S, Hasebe H, Sato S, Asahi Y, Hayashi T, et al: High-resolution physical mapping and construction of a porcine contig spanning the intramuscular fat content QTL. Anim Genet 37:113–120 (2006).
41.
Schibler L, Cribiu EP, Oustry-Vaiman A, Furet JP, Vaiman D: Fine mapping suggests that the goat polled intersex syndrome and the human blepharophimosis ptosis epicanthus syndrome map to a 100 kb homologous region. Genome Res 10:311–318 (2000).
42.
Song J, Dong F, Lilly JW, Stupar RM, Jiang J: Instability of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones containing tandemly repeated DNA sequences. Genome 44:463–469 (2001).
43.
Swinburne JE, Boursnell M, Hill G, Pettitt L, Allen T, et al: Single linkage group per chromosome genetic linkage map for the horse, based on two three-generation, full-sibling, crossbred horse reference families. Genomics 87:1–29 (2006).
44.
Tallmadge RL, Lear TL, Antczak DF: Genomic characterization of MHC class I genes of the horse. Immunogenetics 57:763–774 (2005).
45.
Tanaka M, Suzuki K, Morozumi T, Kobayashi E, Matsumoto T, et al: Genomic structure and gene order of swine chromosome 7q1.1→q1.2. Anim Genet 37:10–16 (2006).
46.
Wagner ML, Raudsepp T, Goh G, Agarwala R, Schäffer AA, et al: A 1.3-Mb interval map of equine homologs of HSA2. Cytogenet Genome Res 112:227–234 (2006).
47.
Xie X, Lu J, Kulbokas EJ, Golub TR, Mootha V, et al: Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in human promoters and 3′ UTRs by comparison of several mammals. Nature 434:338–345 (2005).
48.
Yang F, Fu B, O’Brien PC, Robinson TJ, Ryder OA, Ferguson-Smith MA: Karyotypic relationships of horses and zebras: results of cross-species chromosome painting. Cytogenet Genome Res 102:235–243 (2003).
49.
Yang F, Fu B, O’Brien PC, Nie W, Ryder OA, Ferguson-Smith MA: Refined genome-wide comparative map of the domestic horse, donkey and human based on cross-species chromosome painting: Insight into the occasional fertility of mules. Chromosome Res 12:65–76 (2004).
50.
Zimmermann S, Steding G, Emmen JM, Brinkmann AO, Nayernia K, et al: Targeted disruption of the Insl3 gene causes bilateral cryptorchidism. Mol Endocrinol 13:681–691 (1999).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.