The analysis of meiosis in higher plants has benefited considerably in recent years from the completion of the genome sequence of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and the development of cytological techniques for this species. A combination of forward and reverse genetics has provided important routes toward the identification of meiotic genes in Arabidopsis. Nevertheless identification of certain meiotic genes remains a challenge due to problems such as limited sequence conservation between species, existence of closely related gene families and in some cases functional redundancy between gene family members. Hence there is a requirement to develop new experimental approaches that can be used in conjunction with existing methods to enable a greater range of plant meiotic genes to be identified. As one potential route towards this goal we have initiated a proteomics-based approach. Unfortunately, the small size of Arabidopsis anthers makes an analysis in this species technically very difficult. Therefore we have initially focussed on Brassica oleracea which is closely related to Arabidopsis, but has the advantage of possessing significantly larger anthers. The basic strategy has been to use peptide mass-finger printing and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry to analyse proteins expressed in meiocytes during prophase I of meiosis. Initial experiments based on the analysis of proteins from staged anther tissue proved disappointing due to the low level of detection of proteins associated with meiosis. However, by extruding meiocytes in early prophase I from individual anthers prior to analysis a significant enrichment of meiotic proteins has been achieved. Analysis suggests that at least 18% of the proteins identified by this route have a putative meiotic function and that this figure could be as high as one-third of the total. Approaches to increase the enrichment of proteins involved in meiotic recombination and chromosome synapsis are also described.   

1.
Aebersold R, Mann M: Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422:198–207 (2003).
2.
AGI, Arabidopsis Genome Initiative: Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796–815 (2000).
3.
Amagai M, Ariizumi T, Endo M, Hatkeyama K, Kuwata C, Shibata D, Toriyama K, Watanabe M: Identification of anther-specific genes in a cruciferous model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana, by using a combination of Arabidopsis macroarray and mRNA derived from Brassica oleracea. Sex Plan Rep 15:213–220 (2003).
4.
Anderson LK, Stack SM, Todd RJ, Ellis RP: A monoclonal antibody to lateral element proteins in synaptonemal complexes of Lilium longiflorum. Chromosoma 103:357–367 (1994).
5.
Armstrong SJ, Caryl AP, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: Asy1, a protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis, localizes to axis-associated chromatin in Arabidopsis and Brassica. J Cell Sci 115:3645–3655 (2002).
6.
Bhatt AM, Canales C, Dickinson HG: Plant meiosis: the means to 1N. Trends Plant Sci 6:114–121 (2001).
7.
Bradford M: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254 (1976).
8.
Bundock P, Hooykaas P: Severe developmental defects, hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, and lengthened telomeres in Arabidopsis MRE11 mutants. Plant Cell 14:2451–2462 (2002).
9.
Burgers PMJ: Eukaryotic DNA polymerases in DNA replication and DNA repair. Chromosoma 107:218–227 (1998).
10.
Caryl AP, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: A homolog of the yeast HOP1 gene is inactivated in the Arabidopsis meiotic mutant asy1. Chromosoma 109:62–71 (2000).
11.
Caryl AP, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: Dissecting plant meiosis using Arabidopsis thaliana mutants. J Exp Botany 54:25–38 (2003).
12.
Cavell A, Lydiate D, Parkin I, Dean C, Trick MA: A 30 centimorgan segment of Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 4 has six collinear homologs within the Brassica napus genome. Genome 41:62–69 (1998).
13.
Chivasa S, Ndimba BK, Simon WJ, Robertson D, Yu XL, Knox JP, Bolwell P, Slabas AR: Proteomic analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana cell wall. Electrophoresis 23:1754–1765 (2002).
14.
Chu S, DeRisi J, Eisen M, Mulholland J, Botstein D, Brown PO, Herskowitz I: The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 282:699–705 (1998).
15.
D’Amours D, Jackson SP: The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of DNA repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:317–327 (2002).
16.
Davis L, Barbera M, McDonnell A, McIntyre K, Sternglanz R, Jin Q-W, Loidl J, Engebrecht J: The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUM2 gene interacts with the DNA replication machinery and is required for meiotic levels of double strand breaks. Genetics 157:1179–1189 (2001).
17.
Dong F, Cai X, Makaroff CA: Cloning and characterization of two Arabidopsis genes that belong to the RAD21/REC8 family of chromosome cohesin proteins. Gene 271:99–108 (2001).
18.
Doutriaux MP, Couteau F, Bergounioux C, White C: Isolation and characterisation of the RAD51 and DMC1 homologs from Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 257:283–291 (1998).
19.
Edwards S, Li CM, Levy DL, Brown J, Snow PM, Campbell JL: Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA Polymerase ε and Polymerase σ interact physically and functionally, suggesting a role for Polymerase ε in Sister Chromatid Cohesion. Mol Cell Biol 23:2733–2748 (2003).
20.
Eijpe M, Heyting C, Gross B, Jessberger R: Association of mammalian SMC1 and SMC3 proteins with meiotic chromosomes and synaptonemal complexes. J Cell Sci 113:673–682 (2000).
21.
Escobar MA, Civerolo EL, Summerfelt KR, Dandekar AM.: RNAi-mediated oncogene silencing confers resistance to crown gall tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13437–13442 (2001).
22.
Gallardo K, Job C, Groot SP, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D: Proteomics of Arabidopsis seed germination. A comparative study of wild-type and gibberellin-deficient seeds. Plant Physiol 129:823–837 (2002).
23.
Gorg A, Obermaier C, Boguth G, Weiss W: Recent developments in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients: Wide pH gradients up to pH 12, longer separation distances and simplified procedures. Electrophoresis 20:712–717 (1999).
24.
Hartung F, Puchta H: Molecular characterization of homologs of both subunits A (SPO11) and B of the archaebacterial topoisomerase 6 in plants. Gene 271:81–86 (2001).
25.
Hasenkampf CA, Qureshi M, Rzepczyck A: Meiotin-1, a meiosis-enriched protein present in normal leptotene chromosomes and lacking in precociously condensed leptotene chromosomes. Chromosome Res 6:277–283 (1998).
26.
Klose J, Kobalz U: 2-Dimensional electrophoresis of proteins-an updated protocol and implications for a functional-analysis of the genome. Electrophoresis 16:1034–1059 (1995).
27.
Labourier E, Blanchette M, Feiger JW, Adams MD, Rio DC: The KH-type RNA-binding protein PSI is required for Drosophila viability, male fertility, and cellular mRNA processing. Genes Dev 16:72–84 (2002).
28.
Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685 (1970).
29.
Mann M, Pandey A: Use of mass spectrometry-derived data to annotate nucleotide and protein sequence databases. Trends Biochem Sci 26:54–61(2001).
30.
Moens PB, Freire R, Tarsounas M, Spyropoulos B, Jackson SP: Expression and nuclear localization of BLM, a chromosome stability protein mutated in Bloom’s syndrome, suggest a role in recombination during meiotic prophase. J Cell Sci 113:663–672 (2000).
31.
Moens PB, Kolas NK, Tarsounas M, Marconi E, Cohen PE, Spyropoulos B: The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. J Cell Sci 115:1611–1622 (2002).
32.
Ohkuni K, Hayashi M, Yamashita I: Bicarbonate-mediated social communication stimulates meiosis and sporulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:623–631 (1998).
33.
Patterson SD, Aebersold R: Proteomics: the first decade and beyond. Nat Genet 33:311–323 (2003).
34.
Sato S, Hotta Y, Tabata S: Structural analysis of a recA-like gene in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. DNA Res 2:89–93 (1995).
35.
Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M: Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem 68:850–858 (1996).
36.
Siddiqui NU, Stronghill PE, Dengler RE, Hasenkampf CA, Riggs CD: Mutations in Arabidopsis condensin genes disrupt embryogenesis, meristem organization and segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Development 130:3283–3295 (2003).
37.
Strunnikov AV, Jessberger R: Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins: conserved molecular properties for multiple biological functions. Eur J Biochem 263:6–13 (1999).
38.
Taylor SW, Fahy E, Ghosh SS: Global organellar proteomics. Trends Biotechnol 21:82–88 (2003).
39.
Tung KS, Roeder GS: Meiotic chromosome morphology and behaviour in zip1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 149:817–832 (1998).
40.
Van Rompay AR, Johansson M, Karlsson A: Phosphorylation of nucleosides and nucleoside analogs by mammalian nucleoside monophosphate kinases. Pharmacol Ther 87:189–198 (2000).
41.
Van Wijk KJ: Challenges and prospects of plant proteomics. Plant Physiol 126:501–508 (2001).
42.
Vance V, Vaucheret H: RNA silencing in plants-defense and counterdefense. Science 292:2277–2280 (2001).
43.
Watson BS, Asirvatham VS, Wang L, Summer LW: Mapping the proteome of barrel medic (Medicago truncatula). Plant Physiol 131:1104–1123 (2003).
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2005
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.