Previous studies (Beechey, 2000) have shown that mouse proximal chromosome (Chr) 6 has two imprinting regions. An early embryonic lethality is associated with two maternal copies of the more proximal imprinting region, while mice with two maternal copies of the sub-proximal imprinting region are growth retarded at birth, the weight reduction remaining similar to adulthood. No detectable postnatal imprinting phenotype was seen in these earlier studies with two paternal copies of either region. The sub-proximal imprinting region locates distal to the T77H reciprocal translocation breakpoint in G-band 6A3.2 and results reported here show that it does not extend beyond the breakpoint of the more distal T6Ad translocation in 6C2. It has been confirmed that the postnatal growth retardation observed with two maternal copies of the sub-proximal region is established in utero, although placental size was normal. A new finding is that 16.5–18.5-dpc embryos, with two paternal copies of the sub-proximal imprinting region, were larger than their normal sibs, although placental size was normal. As no postnatal growth differences have been observed in these mice, the fetal overgrowth must normalize by birth. The imprinted genes Peg1/Mest, Copg2, Copg2as and Mit1/Lb9 map to the sub-proximal imprinting region and are thus candidates for the observed imprinting phenotypes. Another candidate is the recently reported imprinted gene Nap1l5. Expression studies of Nap1l5 in mice with two maternal or two paternal copies of different regions of Chr 6 have demonstrated that the gene locates within the sub-proximal imprinting region. FISH has mapped Nap1l5 to G-band 6C1, within the sub-proximal imprinting region but several G-bands distal to the Peg1/Mest cluster. This location, and the 30-Mb separation of these loci on the sequence map, makes it probable that Nap1l5 defines a new imprinting domain within the currently defined sub-proximal imprinting region.   

Altman R, Kellogg D: Control of mitotic events by Nap1 and the Gin4 kinase. J Cell Biol 138:119–130 (1997).
Ashara H, Tartare-Deckert S, Nakagawa T, Ikehara T, Hirose F, Hunter T, Ito T, Montminy M: Dual roles of p300 in chromatin assembly and transcriptional activation in cooperation with nucleosome assembly protein 1 in vitro. Mol Cell Biol 22:2974–2983 (2002).
Beechey CV: Linkage studies with T(6;13)6Ad. Mouse News Letter 83:165 (1989).
Beechey CV: Peg1/Mest locates distal to the currently defined imprinting region on mouse proximal chromosome 6 and identifies a new imprinting region affecting growth. Cytogenet Cell Genet 90:309–314 (2000).
Buckle VJ, Rack KA: Fluorescent in situ hybridisation, in Davies KE (ed): Human Genetic Disease Analysis, A Practical Approach, 2nd edition, pp 59–80 (IRL Press, Oxford 1993).
Cattanach BM, Beechey CV: Genomic imprinting in the mouse: Possible final analysis, in Reik W, Surani A (eds): Genomic Imprinting: Frontiers in Molecular Biology, Vol 18, pp 118–145 (IRL Press, Oxford 1997).
Cattanach BM, Beechey CV, Rasberry C, Jones J, Papworth D: Time of initiation and site of action of the mouse chromosome 11 imprinting effects. Genet Res Camb 68:35–43 (1996).
Evans EP: Standard idiogram, in Lyon MF, Rastan S, Brown SDM (eds): Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse, 3rd edition, pp 1446–1448 (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996).
Evans HK, Wylie AA, Murphy SK, Jirtle RL: The neuronatin gene resides in a “micro-imprinted” domain on human chromosome 20q11.2. Genomics 77:99–104 (2001).
Harada H, Nagai H, Ezura Y, Yokota T, Ohsawa I, Yamuguchi K, Ohue C, Tsuneizumi M, Mikami I, Terada Y, Yabe A, Emi M: Down-regulation of a novel gene, DRLM, in human liver malignancy from 4q22 that encodes a NAP-like protein. Gene 296:171–177 (2002).
Hoshiya H, Meguro M, Kashiwagi A, Okita C, Oshimura M: Calcr, a brain specific imprinted mouse calcitonin receptor gene in the imprinted cluster of proximal region of chromosome 6. J Hum Genet 48:208–211 (2003).
Ito T, Bulger M, Kobayashi R, Kadonaga JT: Drosophila NAP-1 is a core histone chaperone that functions in ATP-facilitated assembly of regularly spaced nucleosomal arrays. Mol Cell Biol 16:3112–3124 (1996).
Kaneko-Ishino T, Kuroiwa Y, Miyoshi N, Kohda T, Suzuki R, Yokoyama M, Viville S, Barton SC, Ishino F, Surani MA: Peg1/Mest imprinted gene on chromosome 6 identified by cDNA subtraction hybridisation. Nat Genet 11:52–59 (1995).
Kobayashi S, Kohda T, Miyoshi N, Kuroiwa Y, Aisaka K, Tsutsumi O, Kaneko-Ishino T, Ishino F: Human PEG1/MEST, an imprinted gene on chromosome 7. Hum Mol Genet 6:781–786 (1997).
Konecki DS, Brennand J, Fuscoe JC, Caskey CT, Chinault AC: Hypoxanthinine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase genes of the mouse and Chinese hamster: Construction and sequence analysis of cDNA recombinants. Nucl Acids Res 10:6763–6775 (1982).
Kuchinka BD, Barrett IJ, Moya G, Sanchez JM, Langlois S, Yong S-L, Kalousek DK, Robinson WP: Two cases of confined placental mosaicism for chromosome 4, including one with maternal uniparental disomy. Prenat Diagn 21:36–39 (2001).
Lee YJ, Park CW, Hahn Y, Park J, Lee J, Yun JH, Hyun B, Chung JH: Mit1/Lb9 and Copg2, new members of mouse imprinted genes closely linked to Peg1/Mest. FEBS Lett 472:230–234 (2000).
Lefebvre L, Viville S, Barton SC, Ishino F, Keverne EB, Surani MA: Abnormal maternal behaviour and growth retardation associated with loss of the imprinted gene Mest. Nat Genet 20:163–169 (1998).
Lindenbaum RH, Woods CG, Norbury CG, Povey S, Rysleck G: An individual with maternal disomy of chromosome 4 and iso(4p), iso4(q). Abstract. Am J Hum Genet 49 (Suppl):285 (1991).
Mizuno Y, Sotomaru Y, Katsuzawa Y, Kono T, Meguro M, Oshimura M, Kawai J, Tomaru Y, Kiyoawa H, Nikaido I, Amanuma H; Hayashizaki Y; Okazaki Y: Asb4, Ata3, and Dcn are novel imprinted genes identified by high-throughput screening using RIKEN cDNA microarray. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 290:1499–1505 (2002).
Moore D, Haig D: Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet 7:45–49 (1991).
Okita C, Meguro M, Hoshiya H, Haruta M, Sakamoto Y-K, Oshimura M: A new imprinted cluster on the human chromosome 7q21-q31, identified by human-mouse monochromosomal hybrids. Genomics 81:556–559 (2003).
Ono R, Shiura H, Aburatani H, Kohda T, Kaneko-Ishino T, Ishino F: Identification of a large novel imprinted gene cluster on mouse proximal chromosome 6. Genome Res 13:1696–1705 (2003).
Piras G, El Kharroubi A, Kozlov S, Escalante-Alcalde D, Hernandez L, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Stewart CL: Zac1 (Lot1), a potential tumor suppressor gene, and the gene for epsilon-sarcoglycan are maternally imprinted genes: identification by a subtractive screen of novel uniparental fibroblast lines. Mol Cell Biol 20:3308–3315 (2000).
Rodriguez P, Munroe D, Prawitt D, Chu LL, Bric E, Kim J, Reid LH, Davies C, Nakagama H, Loebbert R: Functional characterisation of human nucleosome assembly-2 (NAP1L4) suggests a role as a histone chaperone. Genomics 44:253–265 (1997).
Searle AG, Ford CE, Beechey CV: Meiotic disjunction in mouse translocations and the determination of centromere position. Genet Res Camb 18:215–235 (1971).
Smith RJ, Dean W, Konfortova G, Kelsey G: Identification of novel imprinted genes in a genome-wide screen for maternal methylation. Genome Res 13:558–569 (2003).
Spence JE, Perciaccante RG, Greig GM, Willard HF, Ledbetter DH, Hejtmancik JF, Pollack MS, O’Brien WE, Beaudet AL: Uniparental disomy as a mechanism for human genetic disease. Am J Hum Genet 42:217–226 (1998).
Voss R, Ben-Simon E, Avital A, Godfrey S, Zlotogora J, Dagan J, Tikochinski Y, Hillel J: Isodisomy of chromosome 7 in a patient with cystic fibrosis: could uniparental disomy be common in humans? Am J Hum Genet 45:373–380 (1989).
Yang XP, Inazu A, Yagi K, Kajinami K, Koizumi J, Mabuchi H: Abetalipoproteinemia caused by maternal isodisomy of chromosome 4q containing an intron 9 splice acceptor mutation in the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein gene. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19:1950–1955 (1999).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.