Chinese hamster stocks with various structurally abnormal chromosomes have been produced by X irradiation. Among these stocks, 18 with various reciprocal translocations were used to investigate the participation of unbalanced gametes in fertilization and the development of unbalanced embryos. Among males as well as females heterozygous for the same translocation, there is no difference in the frequency of each disjunctional class. The participation of chromosomally unbalanced gametes in fertilization was investigated by chromosomal analysis of meiotic cells in heterozygotes for the 18 reciprocal translocations and pronuclei of fertilized ova obtained from crossing these heterozygotes. Compared with the expected frequencies from MII scoring, the frequencies of male pronuclei having a common deficiency of chromosome 1 (1q17→1q42) or chromosome 3 (3p23→3q31) decreased significantly in one-cell embryos. However, the frequencies of male pronuclei with other abnormalities were all consistent with those expected from MII scoring. In contrast, the frequencies of female pronuclei with any karyotype including the same abnormalities as those decreased in male pronuclei from the translocation heterozygotes were all consistent with those estimated from MII scoring. These results revealed clearly that most gametes with nullisomies as well as disomies for any chromosomal segments may participate in fertilization, whereas only male gametes nullisomic for certain segments of chromosomes 1 and 3 failed to participate in fertilization. The zygotic selection of chromosomal imbalance was also investigated by direct chromosomal and morphological analyses of preimplantation embryos from crosses between karyotypically normal females and male heterozygotes from the 18 stocks with various reciprocal translocations. These analyses revealed that some embryos were arrested in development at the two-cell stage. The karyotype of these two-cell embryos had a common deficiency in a segment of chromosome 1 or chromosome 2. Embryos with partial monosomy including chromosomes 1, 3, 4 and 5 showed arrested development at four- to eight-cell stages. Among day 4 embryos, some chromosomally unbalanced embryos, mainly with a deficiency of segments of chromosomes 1p, 1q, 2q, 5q, 7q and 8, had fewer blastomeres than karyotypically normal and balanced embryos. The homology between Chinese hamster and mouse chromosomes relating to abnormal embryogenesis at early stages has been partially confirmed from reported maps of chromosomes. The Chinese hamster is useful for further cytogenetic studies during the stages of meiosis and early embryogenesis.   

1.
Baranov VS, Dyban AP: The prezygotic selection of male gametes in mice. Tsitologiya 18:556–561 (1975).
2.
Boué JG, Boué A, Lazar P: Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions. Teratology 12:11–26 (1975).
3.
Brandiff B, Gordon L, Ashworth KK, Littman V, Watchmaker G, Carrano AV: Cytogenetics of human sperm. Meiotic segregation in two translocation carriers. Am J hum Genet 38:197–208 (1986).
4.
Cattanach BM, Moseley H: Nondisjunction and reduced fertility caused by the tobacco mouse metacentric chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 12:264–287 (1973).
5.
Daring L, Gropp A, Tettenborn U: DNA content and morphological properties of presumably aneuploid spermatozoa of tobacco mouse hybrids. J Reprod Fert 30:335–346 (1972) .
6.
Dutrillaux B, Laurent C, Couturier J, Lejeune J: Coloration par l’acridine orange de chromosomes prelablement traits par le 5-bromo-deoxyuridine (BUDR). C R Acad Sci (Paris) 276:3179–3181 (1973).
7.
Dyban AP, Baranov VS: Cytogenetics of Mammalian embryonic Development (Oxford University Press, New York 1987).
8.
Epstein CJ: The Consequences of Chromosome Imbalance. Principles, mechanisms, and models (Cambridge University Press, London 1986).
9.
Epstein CJ, Travis B: Preimplantation lethality of monosomy for mouse chromosome 19. Nature 280:144–145 (1979).
10.
Escudero T, Abdelhadi I, Sandalinas M, Munne S: Predictive value of sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for translocations. Fertil Steril 79:1528–34 (2003).
11.
Evans EP, Breckon G, Ford CE: An air-drying method for meiotic preparations from mammalian testes. Cytogenetics 3:289–294 (1964).
12.
Ford CE: Gross genome unbalance in mouse spermatozoa: does it influence the capacity to fertilize? in Beatty RA, Gluecksohn-Waelsch S (eds): The Genetics of the Spermatozoon, pp 285–304 (Edinburgh/New York 1972).
13.
Ford CE: The time in development at which gross genome imbalance is expressed, in Balls M, Wild SE (eds): The Early Development of Mammals (Cambridge University Press, London 1975).
14.
Ford CE, Clegg HM: Reciprocal translocations. Br Med Bull 25:110–114 (1969).
15.
Ford CE, Evans EP: Non-expression of genome unbalance in haplophase and early diplophase of the mouse and incidence of karyotypic abnormality in postimplantation embryos, in Boué A, Thibault C (eds): Chromosomal Errors in Relation to Reproductive Failure, pp 271–285 (INSERM, Paris 1973).
16.
Goldman AS, Hulten MA: Meiotic analysis by FISH of a human male 46,XY,t(15;20)(q11.2;q11.2) translocation heterozygote: quadrivalent configuration, orientation and first meiotic segregation. Chromosoma 102:102–111 (1993).
17.
Gropp A: Fetal mortality due to aneuploidy and irregular meiotic segregation in the mouse, in Boué A, Thibault C (eds): Chromosomal Errors in Relation to Reproductive Failure, pp 255–269 (INSERM, Paris 1973).
18.
Gropp A, Kolbus U, Giers D: Systematic approach to the study of trisomy in the mouse. Cytogenet Cell Genet 14:42–62 (1975).
19.
Guttenbach M, Engel W, Schmid M: Analysis of structural and numerical chromosome abnormalities in sperm of normal men and carriers of constitutional chromosome aberrations. A review. Hum Genet 100:1–21 (1997).
20.
Hamerton JL: Robertsonian translocations in man. Evidence for prezygotic selection. Cytogenetics 7:260–276 (1968).
21.
Hamerton JL: General Cytogenetics, Vol I (Academic Press, New York 1978).
22.
Jacobs PA, Frackiewicz A, Law P: Incidence and mutation rates of structural rearrangements of the autosomes in man. Ann hum Genet 35:301–319 (1972).
23.
Kamiguchi Y, Funaki K, Mikamo K: A new technique for chromosome study of murine oocytes. Proc Japan Acad 52:316–319 (1976).
24.
Kaseki H, Tomoda Y, Sonta S: Frequency of chromosomally unbalanced gametes in male and female hamsters heterozygous for reciprocal translocation. Acta Obstet Gynec Jpn 39:675–680 (1987).
25.
Magnuson T, Epstein CJ: Genetic control of very early mammalian development. Biol Rev 56:369–408 (1981).
26.
Magnuson T, Debrot S, Dimpn J, Zweig A, Zamora T, Epstein CJ: The early lethality of autosomal monosomy in the mouse. J exp Zool 59:12l–129 (1985).
27.
Martin RH: Abnormal spermatozoa in human translocation and inversion carriers, in A Daniel (ed): The Cytogenetics of Mammalian Autosomal Rearrangements, pp 397–417 (Alan R Liss, New York 1988).
28.
Mouse Genome Database (1999): Mammalian Comparative Mapping Data, Mouse Genome Database, Mouse Genome Informatics Project. The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME.
29.
Mouse Genome Database (MGD) (2003), Mouse Genome Informatics, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME (URL: http://www.informatics.jax.org).
30.
Oshimura M, Takagi N: Meiotic disjunction in T(14;15)6Ca heterozygotes and fate of chromosomally unbalanced gametes in embryonic development. Cytogenet Cell Genet 15:1–16 (1975).
31.
Pickworth S, Yerganian G, Chang MC: Fertilization and early development in the Chinese hamster, Cricetulus griseus. Anat Rec 162:197–208 (1968).
32.
Ray M, Mohandas T: Proposal banding nomenclature for the Chinese hamster chromosomes (Cricetulus griseus). Baltimore Conference (1975): Third International Workshop on Human Gene Mapping. in Birth Defects: Original Article Series, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp 83–91 (The National Foundation, New York 1976).
33.
Rudak E, Jacobs PA, Yanagimachi R: Direct analysis of the chromosome constitution of human spermatozoa. Nature 274:911–913 (1978).
34.
Shi Q, Martin RH: Aneuploidy in human spermatozoa: FISH analysis in men with constitutional chromosomal abnormalities, and in infertile men. Reproduction 121:655–666 (2001).
35.
Sonta S: Transmission of chromosomal abnormalities: participation of chromosomally unbalanced gametes in fertilization and early development of unbalanced embryos in the Chinese hamster. Mutat Res 204:193–202 (2002).
36.
Sonta S, Fukui K, Yamamura H: Selective elimination of chromosomally unbalanced zygotes at the two-cell stage in the Chinese hamster. Cytogenet Cell Genet 38:5–13 (1984).
37.
Sonta S, Kitayama K: No induction of interchromosomal effect in male meiosis of Chinese hamsters with reciprocal translocations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 56:9–13 (1991).
38.
Sonta S, Kitayama K, Narita N: Further Chinese hamster stocks with X-ray-induced chromosome rearrangements and their fertility. Jpn J Genet 62:341–348 (1987).
39.
Sonta S, Oishi H: Chinese hamsters with X-ray-induced reciprocal translocations: their production and fertility. Congen Anomal 22:167–171 (1982).
40.
Sonta S, Tsukasaki M, Kohmura N, Suzumori K: Independent chromosome segregation and absence of interchromosomal effect at first meiotic division in male Chinese hamsters heterozygous for two reciprocal translocations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 71:370–384 (1995).
41.
Sonta S, Yamada M, Iida T, Ohashi M: Developmental arrest at early stages of Chinese hamster embryos homozygous for chromosomal rearrangements. Dev Biol 144:30–37 (1991a).
42.
Sonta S, Yamada M, Tsukasaki M: Failure of chromosomally abnormal sperm to participate in fertilization in the Chinese hamster. Cytogenet Cell Genet 57:200–203 (1991b).
43.
Utakoji T: Chronology of nucleic acid synthesis in meiosis of the male Chinese hamster. Exp Cell Res 42:585–596 (1966).
44.
Yang F, O’Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA: Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 8:219–227 (2000).
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.