Various types of DNA damage, induced by endo- and exogenous genotoxic impacts, may become processed into structural chromosome changes such as sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) and chromosomal aberrations. Chromosomal aberrations occur preferentially within heterochromatic regions composed mainly of repetitive sequences. Most of the preclastogenic damage is correctly repaired by different repair mechanisms. For instance, after N-methyl-N-nitrosourea treatment one SCE is formed per >40,000 and one chromatid-type aberration per ∼25 million primarily induced O6-methylguanine residues in Vicia faba. Double-strand breaks (DSBs) apparently represent the critical lesions for the generation of chromosome structural changes by erroneous reciprocal recombination repair. Usually two DSBs have to interact in cis or trans to form a chromosomal aberration. Indirect evidence is at hand for plants indicating that chromatid-type aberrations mediated by S phase-dependent mutagens are generated by post-replication (mis)repair of DSBs resulting from (rare) interference of repair and replication processes at the sites of lesions, mainly within repetitive sequences of heterochromatic regions. The proportion of DSBs yielding structural changes via misrepair has still to be established when DSBs, induced at predetermined positions, can be quantified and related to the number of SCEs and chromosomal aberrations that appear at these loci after DSB induction. Recording the degree of association of homologous chromosome territories (by chromosome painting) and of punctual homologous pairing frequency along these territories during and after mutagen treatment of wild-type versus hyperrecombination mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana, it will be elucidated as to what extent the interphase arrangement of chromosome territories becomes modified by critical lesions and contributes to homologous reciprocal recombination. This paper reviews the state of the art with respect to DNA damage processing in the course of aberration formation and the interphase arrangement of homologous chromosome territories as a structural prerequisite for homologous rearrangements in plants.   

1.
Angelis KJ, McGuffie M, Menke M, Schubert I: Adaptation to alkylating damage in DNA measured by the comet assay. Environ Mol Mutagenesis 36:146–150 (2000).
2.
Baranczewski P, Nehls P, Rieger R, Pich U, Rajewsky MF, Schubert I: Formation and repair of O6-methylguanine in recombination hot spots of plant chromosomes. Environ Mol Mutagenesis 29:394–399 (1997a).
3.
Baranczewski P, Nehls P, Rieger R, Rajewsky MF, Schubert I: Removal of O6-methylguanine from plant DNA in vivo is accelerated under conditions of clastogenic adaptation. Environ Mol Mutagenesis 29:400–405 (1997b).
4.
Begley TJ, Samson LD: AlkB mystery solved: Oxidative demethylation of N1-methyladenine and N3-methylcytosine adducts by a direct reversal mechanism. Trends Biochem Sci 28:2–5 (2003).
5.
Bryant PE: Enzymatic restriction of mammalian cell DNA using Pvu II and Bam H1: evidence for the double-strand break origin of chromosomal aberrations. Int J Radiat Biol 46:57–65 (1984).
6.
Cornforth MN, Greulich-Bode KM, Loucas BD, Arsuaga J, Vásquez M, Sachs RK, Brückner M, Molls M, Hahnfeldt P, Hlatky L, Brenner DJ: Chromosomes are predominantly located randomly with respect to each other in interphase human cells. J Cell Biol 159:237–244 (2002).
7.
Cremer M, von Hase J, Volm T, Brero A, Kreth G, Walter J, Fischer C, Solovei I, Cremer C, Cremer T: Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells. Chrom Res 9:541–567 (2001).
8.
Döbel P, Schubert I, Rieger R: Distribution of heterochromatin in a reconstructed karyotype of Vicia faba as identified by banding- and DNA-late replication patterns. Chromosoma 69:193–209 (1978).
9.
Gisler B, Salomon S, Puchta H: The role of double-strand break-induced allelic homologous recombination in somatic plant cells. Plant J 32:177–284 (2002).
10.
Gonzales-Barrera S, Cortes-Ledesma F, Wellinger RE, Aguilera A: Equal sister chromatid exchange is a major mechanism of double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 11:1661–1671 (2003).
11.
Grandy I, Hardt T, Schmid M, Haaf T: Effects of higher-order nuclear structure and Rad51 overexpression on radiation-induced chromosome rearrangements. Cytogenet Genome Res 98:265–269 (2002).
12.
Hartley-Asp B, Andersson HC, Sturelid S, Kihlman BA: G2 repair and the formation of chromosomal aberrations. 1. The effect of hydroxyurea and caffeine on maleic hydrazide-induced chromosome damage in Vicia faba. Environ Exp Bot 20:119–129 (1980).
13.
Kaina B, Fritz G, Mitra S, Coquerelle T: Transfection and expression of human O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) cDNA in Chinese hamster cells: The role of MGMT in protection against the genotoxic effects of alkylating agents. Carcinogenesis 12:1857–1867 (1991).
14.
Kihlman BA, Andersson HC, Natarajan AT: Molecular mechanisms in the production of chromosomal aberrations: studies with the 5-bromo-deoxyuridine-labelling method, in de la Chapelle A, Sorsa M (eds): Chromosomes Today, vol 6, p 287 (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1977).
15.
Kirik A, Salomon S, Puchta H: Species-specific double-strand break repair and genome evolution in plants. EMBO J 19:5562–5566 (2000).
16.
Koshland DE, Guacci V: Sister chromatid cohesion: The beginning of a long and beautiful relationship. Curr Opinion Cell Biol 12:297–301 (2000).
17.
Lindenhahn M, Schubert I: On the origin of hydroxyurea-induced chromatid aberrations in G2 chromosomes with BrdUrd in only one of the sister chromatids. Mutat Res 108:301–316 (1983).
18.
Lysak MA, Fransz PF, Ali HBM, Schubert I: Chromosome painting in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 28:689–697 (2001).
19.
Lysak MA, Pecinka A, Schubert I: Recent progress on chromosome painting in Arabidopsis and related species. Chromosome Res 11:195–204 (2003).
20.
Menke M, Meister A, Schubert I: N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced DNA damage detected by the comet assay in Vicia faba nuclei during all interphase stages is not restricted to chromatid aberration hot spots. Mutagenesis 15:503–506 (2000).
21.
Menke M, Chen IP, Angelis KJ, Schubert I: DNA damage and repair in Arabidopsis thaliana as measured by the comet assay after treatment with different classes of genotoxins. Mutat Res 493:87–93 (2001).
22.
Natarajan AT, Obe G: Molecular mechanisms involved in the production of chromosomal aberrations. 3. Restriction endonucleases. Chromosoma 90:120–127 (1984).
23.
Obe G, Winkel E-U: The chromosome-breaking activity of the restriction endonuclease Alu I in CHO cells is independent of the S-phase of the cell cycle. Mutat Res 152:25–29 (1985).
24.
Obe G, Johannes C, Vasudev V, Kasper P, Lamprecht I: Induction of chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells by the restriction endonuclease Dra I: dose-effect relationships and effect of substitution of chromosomal DNA with bromodeoxyuridine. Mutat Res 192:263–269 (1987).
25.
Orel N, Kirik A, Puchta H: Different pathways of homologous recombination are used for the repair of double-strand breaks within tandemly arranged sequences in the plant genome. Plant J 35:604–612 (2003).
26.
Puchta H: Doppelstrangbruchreparatur und Genomevolution bei Pflanzen. Biospektrum 5:105–108 (1999).
27.
Richardson C, Jasin M: Frequent chromosomal translocations induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 405:697–700 (2000).
28.
Richardson C, Moynahan ME, Jasin M: Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombinations suppression of chromosomal translocations. Genes Dev 12:3831–3842 (1998).
29.
Rieger R, Michaelis A, Schubert I, Meister A: Somatic interphase pairing of Vicia chromosomes as inferred from the hom/het ratio of induced chromatid interchanges. Mutat Res 20:295–298 (1973).
30.
Schubert I, Heindorff K: Are SCE frequencies indicative of adaptive response of plant cells? Mutat Res 211:301–306 (1989).
31.
Schubert I, Rieger R: On the expressivity of aberration hot spots after treatment with mutagens showing delayed or non-delayed effects. Mutat Res 44:337–344 (1977).
32.
Schubert I, Rieger R: Effects of hydroxyurea posttreatment in G2 on the frequency and distribution of mutagen induced chromatid aberrations in a reconstructed karyotype of Vicia faba. Biol Zentbl 106:59–66 (1987).
33.
Schubert I, Heindorff K, Rieger R, Michaelis A: Prinzipien der chromosomalen Verteilung induzierter Chromatidenaberrationen bei Vicia faba und deren mögliche biologische Bedeutung. Kulturpflanze 34:21–45 (1986).
34.
Schubert I, Rieger R, Fuchs J, Pich U: Sequence organization and the mechanism of interstitial deletion clustering in a plant genome (Vicia faba). Mutat Res 325:1–5 (1994).
35.
Siebert R, Puchta H: Efficient repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination between directly repeated sequences in the plant genome. Plant Cell 14:1121–1131 (2002).
36.
Winegar RA, Preston RJ: The induction of chromosome aberrations by restriction endonucleases that produce blunt-end or cohesive-end double strand breaks. Mutat Res 197:141–149 (1988).
37.
Xiao YL, Peterson T: Intrachromosomal homologous recombination in Arabidopsis induced by a maize transposon. Mol Gen Genet 263:22–29 (2000).
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.