Background: Hemorrhage volume is an important predictor of outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). It is not clear why in some patients ICH volume is larger than in others. Identification of modifiable factors responsible for large-volume hemorrhage in hypertensive patients may help to reduce ICH-related morbidity and mortality. Objective: The objective of this study was to identify predictors of large-volume ICH in hypertensive patients. Methods: At a tertiary care center in Karachi (Pakistan), 157 hypertensive patients with ICH were prospectively analyzed in 2008–2009, and hemorrhage volumes were determined using CT or MRI and various factors, including duration of hypertension, medical treatment, compliance, co-morbidity, and hematologic and coagulation profiles. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of high-volume hemorrhage. A volume >30 mm3 was defined as high-volume hemorrhage. Results: Of 157 patients with hypertensive ICH evaluated, 133 patients were included in the study, and 24 patients with brain stem, cerebellum and pure intraventricular hemorrhage were excluded. The mean age of the study patients was 55 years; 56 patients (70%) were male. High-volume hemorrhage (>30 mm3) was noted in 47 (35%) patients. Mortality was significantly increased in patients with high-volume ICH (32 vs. 6% in patients with low-volume ICH). In univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with large-volume ICH were male gender (p = 0.002), hypertension lasting >10 years (p = 0.03), warfarin treatment (p = 0.05), use of >1 anti-hypertensive agent (p = 0.001) and poor compliance with medication (p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, use of >1 anti-hypertensive agent and poor compliance were also predictors of large-volume ICH. Conclusion: High-volume hemorrhage was less common (28%) in our patients with hypertension and ICH. Use of >1 anti-hypertensive agent and poor compliance were predictors of large-volume ICH.

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the cause of stroke in about 30–40% of stroke patients in Pakistan [1]. The hemorrhage volume is an important predictor of outcome in ICH patients [2], and it is well known that an increased hemorrhage volume in ICH patients is associated with increased functional disability and mortality. One study demonstrated that the predicted 30-day mortality was 93% for ICH volumes >60 mm3, 64% for those from 30 to 60 mm3 and 19% for those <30 mm3[3]. In another study, warfarin treatment in patients with INR >3.0 was associated with larger ICH volumes [4]. Apart from anticoagulation, it is not well known why some patients have large-volume and others small-volume hemorrhage. Relationships between ICH volume and duration of hypertension, number and types of anti-hypertensive medications, drug compliance and blood pressure (BP) control 3–6 months prior to the ICH event have not been elucidated yet.

Identification of modifiable factors associated with large-volume hemorrhage in hypertensive patients may help to reduce morbidity and mortality related to ICH. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify predictors of large-volume ICH in hypertensive patients.

We prospectively analyzed 157 consecutive hypertensive patients admitted for ICH in 2008–2009 at the Aga Khan University, a tertiary care center in Karachi, Pakistan. Their ICH volumes were assessed using CT or MRI, and various factors, including duration of hypertension, medical treatment, compliance, co-morbidity, and hematologic and coagulation profiles, were determined. An ICH volume >30 mm3 was defined as high-volume ICH, which was calculated using Broderick’s method [3,5].

Hypertension was defined as a history of hypertension, BP >140 (systolic) and/or >90 (diastolic) mm Hg on ≥3 measurements during hospitalization or treatment with anti-hypertensive drugs. Diabetes mellitus was defined as a history of diabetes mellitus and fasting serum glucose levels >110 mg/dl, or treatment with insulin or hypoglycemic drugs. Dyslipidemia was defined as a fasting total blood cholesterol ≥200 mg/dl and/or LDL cholesterol ≥100 mg/dl and/or triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl. Patients smoking ≥10 cigarettes/day for >10 years were classified as smokers. Patients or immediate family members were asked about the use of anti-hypertensive medications, compliance to these medications and quality of BP control at home prior to admission. Patients were regarded as non-compliant if they did not take half or more of their anti-hypertensive medication during the preceding month. BP control was classified as poor if BP was >140 (systolic) and/or >90 (diastolic) mm Hg on >50% of home measurements despite taking anti-hypertensive medication during the 1-month period preceding the ICH event.

The χ2 test and Student’s t test were used to compare both groups regarding baseline characteristics and outcome. Based on the findings in univariate analysis, a logistic regression model was built to identify predictors of high-volume ICH.

The study protocol was approved by the local ethical review committee of the hospital.

Of the 157 hypertensive patients with ICH analyzed, 133 patients were included in the study. We excluded 24 patients with brain stem, cerebellum and pure intraventricular hemorrhage, because the volume-outcome relationship of ICH in these brain areas could be different from basal-ganglia, thalamic or lobar ICH.

Mean age of the patients was 55 years (range 19–85 years), and 56 patients (70%) were male. Diagnosis of hypertension was known in 119 (89%) patients, while 14 (11%) were unaware of their diagnosis. Duration of hypertension was >10 years in 56 (42%) patients. Only 81 patients (61%) were on any anti-hypertensive medication: 50 (38%) were treated with 1 anti-hypertensive drug while 31 (23%) were on ≥2 anti-hypertensive drugs. We were able to retrieve the history of compliance with anti-hypertensive medication for the 1-month period preceding ICH in 46 patients (35%), and 25 (19%) were poorly adherent to their medication.

Other co-morbidities included diabetes (23; 17%), dyslipidemia (11; 8%) and cigarette smoking (20; 15%). Anti-platelet medication was taken by 49 (37%) patients, while 8 (6%) patients were on warfarin.

CT scans were performed within 24 h of symptom onset in all patients. ICH were located in the basal ganglia and thalamus in 98 (74%) patients, and lobar ICH was noted in 35 (26%) patients. The mean ICH volume was 26 mm3 (range 8–96 mm3), ranging from 23 mm3 in basal ganglia/thalamus to 29 mm3 in lobar areas. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). ICH volume was <30 mm3 in 86 (65%) patients, while 47 (35%) patients had high-volume ICH (> 30 mm3). Mortality was significantly higher (32%) in patients with high-volume ICH compared to patients with low-volume ICH (6%).

Male gender (p = 0.005), use of warfarin (p = 0.05), INR >3.0 on admission (p = 0.04), use of >1 anti-hypertensive agent (p = 0.001) and poor compliance with medication (p = 0.001) were associated with large-volume ICH in univariate analysis (table 1).

Table 1

Predictors of high-volume (>30 ml) hemorrhage in univariate analysis

Predictors of high-volume (>30 ml) hemorrhage in univariate analysis
Predictors of high-volume (>30 ml) hemorrhage in univariate analysis

In multivariate analysis, predictors of large-volume ICH were use of >1 anti-hypertensive agent and poor compliance (table 2).

Table 2

Predictors of high-volume (>30 ml) hemorrhage in multivariate analysis

Predictors of high-volume (>30 ml) hemorrhage in multivariate analysis
Predictors of high-volume (>30 ml) hemorrhage in multivariate analysis

These findings indicate that more than one third of patients in this tertiary hospital referral setting had high-volume ICH, and use of ≥2 anti-hypertensive agents and poor compliance with anti-hypertensive medication were the strongest predictors of high-volume hemorrhage. Patients treated with ≥2 anti-hypertensive drugs most likely represent aggressive forms of hypertension, and non-compliance is probably associated with sustained uncontrolled BP. These findings may also be a sign of more careful management of hypertension (despite lesser compliance) by doctors. They may also suggest that during acute bleeding, the presence of more vasoplegic medication triggers a longer and more intense hemorrhage, or that a lower BP in the acute phase is associated with lower intracranial pressure (compared with patients with higher BP), resulting in prolonged and larger bleeding. Poor compliance with warfarin, in addition to anti-hypertensive medication, may be associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage.

Morbidity and mortality related to high-volume ICH could be reduced by interventions aiming to lower hemorrhage volume among these patients. It is well known from non-randomized subgroup evaluation in randomized trials (e.g. PROGRESS) and extrapolation from observation studies that aggressive BP control is associated with a lower incidence of ICH, suggesting that aggressive BP control may lead to smaller-volume hemorrhage with lower mortality. Our study confirms previous reports of a correlation between warfarin treatment and high INR and large-volume ICH [6].

A limitation of this study is its small number of study patients and limited available information regarding some aspects of BP control and medication compliance. Larger multicenter studies are required to confirm our findings.

The results of this study have been presented in preliminary form at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology in Toronto, Ont. Canada (April 2010).

The authors are grateful to Prof. Craig Anderson (George Institute of International Health, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia) for review of this paper and suggestions.

The authors have nothing to disclose.

1.
Khealani BA, Wasay M: The burden of stroke in Pakistan. Int J Stroke 2008;3:293–296.
2.
Qureshi AI, Tuhrim S, Broderick JP, Batjer HH, Hondo H, Hanley DF: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1450–1460.
3.
Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, Tomsick T, Huster G: Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage. A powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke 1993;24:987–993.
4.
Flaherty ML, Tao H, Haverbusch M, Sekar P, Kleindorfer D, Kissela B, Khatri P, Stettler B, Adeoye O, Moomaw CJ, Broderick JP, Woo D: Warfarin use leads to larger intracerebral hematomas. Neurology 2008;71:1084–1089.
5.
Kothari RU, Brott T, Broderick JP, Barsan WG, Sauerbeck LR, Zuccarello M, Khoury J: The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke 1996;27:1304–1305.
6.
Stead LG, Jain A, Bellolio MF, Odufuye AO, Dhillon RK, Manivannan V, Gilmore RM, Rabinstein AA, Chandra R, Serrano LA, Yerragondu N, Palamari B, Decker WW: Effect of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in patients with spontaneous intra-cerebral hemorrhage: does medication use predict worse outcome? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2010;112:275–281.
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Open Access License: This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.