Introduction: Patients discharged against medical advice have been shown to have worse outcomes across a host of different conditions. However, risk factors related to increased odds of discharge against medical advice remain understudied in patients who suffer from acute cerebral infarction. Methods: We retrospectively examined the 2019 National Emergency Department Sample Database for stroke patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate associations between patient- and hospital-level factors and the outcome of discharge against medical advice. Results: Of the 603,623 encounters for acute ischemic stroke, 8,858 (1.5%) were discharged against medical advice. Predictors of discharge against medical advice were lower income quartile and having either Medicaid insurance (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10–1.58) or being uninsured (OR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.03–1.58). Vascular comorbidities associated with discharge against medical advice included prior tobacco use (OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.45–1.78) and coronary artery disease (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04–1.35). Treatment with thrombectomy (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13–0.78) or systemic thrombolysis (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.23–0.66) was inversely associated with discharge against medical advice. A high modified Charlson comorbidity index (3+ vs. 0, OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.42–0.56) was also associated with a lower odds of discharge against medical advice. Presenting to a Northeastern hospital had the highest rate of discharge against medical advice, when compared to other regions (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Certain patient-level, socioeconomic, and regional factors were associated with discharge against medical advice following acute stroke. These patient- and systems-level factors warrant heightened attention in order to optimize acute care and secondary prevention strategies.

Journal Section:
Clinical Research in Stroke
Keywords:
Stroke, Discharge status, Population data, Socioeconomic status, Comorbidities
1.
Ibrahim SA, Kwoh CK, Krishnan E. Factors associated with patients who leave acute-care hospitals against medical advice. Am J Public Health. 2007 Dec;97(12):2204–8.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.100164
2.
Albayati A, Douedi S, Alshami A, Hossain MA, Sen S, Buccellato V, et al. Why do patients leave against medical advice? Reasons, consequences, prevention, and interventions. Healthcare. 2021 Jan;9(2):111.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020111
3.
Choi M, Kim H, Qian H, Palepu A. Readmission rates of patients discharged against medical advice: a matched cohort study. PLoS One. 2011 Sep;6(9):e24459.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024459
4.
Abuzeyad FH, Farooq M, Alam SF, Ibrahim MI, Bashmi L, Aljawder SS, et al. Discharge against medical advice from the emergency department in a university hospital. BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;21(1):31.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00422-6
5.
Heart association council on epidemiology A; Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153–639.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052
6.
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8
7.
Stranges E, Wier L, Merrill CT, Steiner C. Hospitalizations in which patients leave the hospital against medical advice (AMA), 2007. Statistical brief #78. Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) statistical briefs. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009.
8.
Raja A, Trivedi PD, Dhamoon MS. Discharge against medical advice among neurological patients: characteristics and outcomes. Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55(5):681–9.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13306
9.
Bhoomadevi A, Baby TM, Keshika C. Factors influencing discharge against medical advice (DAMA) cases at a multispecialty hospital. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019 Dec;8(12):3861–4.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_797_19
10.
Aliyu ZY. Discharge against medical advice: sociodemographic, clinical and financial perspectives. Int J Clin Pract. 2002 Jun;56(5):325–7.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2002.tb11268.x
11.
Stranges E, Kowlessar N, Davis PH. Uninsured hospitalizations, 2008. Statistical brief #108. Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) statistical briefs. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011.
12.
Lin Z, Han H, Wu C, Wei X, Ruan Y, Zhang C, et al. Discharge against medical advice in acute ischemic stroke: the risk of 30-day unplanned readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 May;36(5):1206–13.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06366-0
13.
Schwamm LH, Ali SF, Reeves MJ, Smith EE, Saver JL, Messe S, et al. Temporal trends in patient characteristics and treatment with intravenous thrombolysis among acute ischemic stroke patients at get with the guidelines–stroke hospitals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep;6(5):543–9.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000303
14.
Menon BK, Saver JL, Goyal M, Nogueira R, Prabhakaran S, Liang L, et al. Trends in endovascular therapy and clinical outcomes within the nationwide Get with the Guidelines-Stroke registry. Stroke. 2015 Apr;46(4):989–95.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007542
© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2023
You do not currently have access to this content.