Background and Purpose: The extent to which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) influences cognitive functioning has been the subject of a number of studies often with conflicting conclusions. This paper systematically reviews the literature in an attempt to clarify this issue. Results: Although the majority of studies (16/28) reported an improvement in cognition after surgery, a substantial minority (12/28) found no change. Studies before 1984 tended to report an improvement, while later studies tended to report no change in cognition. Cognitive improvement was also more likely the longer the time interval between CEA and assessment. The studies were found to differ on many methodological factors, e.g. sample size, type of patient and control group, severity and side of carotid stenosis, the range of cognitive tests and timing of postoperative assessment. Conclusion: Given the conflicting findings, and the methodological issues, it is not possible to draw a clear conclusion regarding the impact of carotid endarterectomy upon cognition. Future research which pays attention to these methodological factors is needed in order to adequately resolve the current debate.

Keywords:
Carotid endarterectomy, Cognition
1.
Bornstein RA, Benoit BG, Trites RL: Neuropsychological changes following carotid endarterectomy. Can J Neurol Sci 1981;8:127–132.
2.
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborations: Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453.
3.
European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group: MRC European carotid surgery trial: Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–90%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235–1243.
4.
De Leo D, Serraiotto L, Pellegrini C, Magni G, Franceschi L, Deriu GP: Outcome from carotid endarterectomy. Neuropsychological performances, depressive symptoms and quality of life: 8-month follow-up. Int J Psychiatry Med 1987;17:317–325.
5.
Spencer MP, Thomas GI, Nicholls SC, Sauvage LR: Detection of middle cerebral artery emboli during carotid endarterectomy using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Stroke 1990;21:415–423.
6.
Boeke S: The effect of carotid endarterectomy on mental functioning. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1981;83:209–217.
7.
Williams M, McGee TF: Psychological study of carotid occlusion and endarterectomy. Arch Neurol 1964;10:293–297.
8.
Drake WE, Baker M, Blumenkrantz J, Dahlgren H: The quality and duration of survival in bilateral carotid occlusive disease. A preliminary survey of the effects of thromboendarterectomy; in Toole J, Sieckert R, Whisnant J (eds): Cerebral Vascular Disease. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1968, pp 242–259.
9.
Duke RB, Bloor BM, Nugent GR, Majzoub HS: Changes in performance on WAIS, Trail making test and finger tapping test associated with carotid artery surgery. Percept Mot Skills 1968;26:399–404.
10.
Goldstein SG, Kleinknecht RA, Gallo AE: Neuropsychological changes associated with carotid endarterectomy. Cortex 1970;6:308–322.
11.
Horne JP, Royle JP: Cognitive changes after carotid endarterectomy. Med J Aust 1974;1:316–318.
12.
Haynes CD, King GD, Dempsey RL: Improvement of cognitive and personality changes after carotid endarterectomy. Surg Forum 1975;26:288–290.
13.
Perry PM, Drinkwater JE, Taylor GW: Cerebral function before and after carotid endarterectomy. Br Med J 1975;iv:215–216.
14.
King GD, Gideon DA, Haynes CD, Dempey RL, Jenkins CW: Intellectual and personality changes associated with carotid endarterectomy. J Clin Psychol 1977;33:215–220.
15.
Matarazzo RG, Matarazzo JD, Gallo AE, Wiens AN: IQ and neuropsychological changes following carotid endarterectomy. J Clin Neuropsychol 1979;1:97–116.
16.
Kelly MP, Garron DC, Javid H: Carotid artery disease, carotid endarterectomy and behaviour. Arch Neurol 1980;37:743–748.
17.
Owens M, Pressman M, Edwards AE, Toutellotte W, Rose JG, Stern D, Peters G, Stabile BE, Wilson SE: The effect of small infarcts and carotid endarterectomy on postoperative psychologic test performance. J Surg Res 1980;28:209–216.
18.
Hemmingsen R, Mejsholm B, Boysne G, Engell HC: Intellectual function in patients with transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) or minor stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 1982;66:145–159.
19.
Jacobs LA, Ganji S, Shirley JG, Morrell RM, Brinkman SD: Cognitive improvement after extracranial reconstruction for the low flow-endangered brain. Surgery 1983;93:683–687.
20.
Wilson SE, Bennion RS, Owens L: Effect of carotid endarterectomy on postoperative psychological test performance (abstract). J Cardiovasc Surg 1983;24:428.
21.
Brinkman SD, Braun P, Ganji S, Morrell RM, Jacobs LA: Neuropsychological performance one week after carotid endarterectomy reflects intra-operative ischemia. Stroke 1984;15:497–503.
22.
Diener HC, Hamster W, Seboldt H: Neuropsychological functions after carotid endarterectomy. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci 1984;234:74–77.
23.
Bennion RS, Owens ML, Wilson SE: The effect of unilateral carotid endarterectomy on neuropsychological test performance in 53 patients. J Vasc Surg 1985;26:21–26.
24.
Van Den Burg W, Saan RJ, Van Zomeren AH, Boontje AH, Haaxma R, Wichmann TE: Carotid endarterectomy: Does it improve cognitive or motor functioning? Psychol Med 1985;15:341–346.
25.
Hemmingsen R, Mejsholm B, Vorstrup S, Lester J, Engell HC, Boysne G: Carotid surgery, cognitive function, and cerebral blood flow in patients with transient ischemic attacks. Ann Neurol 1986;20:13–19.
26.
Parker JC, Smarr KL, Granberg BW, Nichols WK, Hewett JE: Neuropsychological parameters of carotid endarterectomy: A two-year prospective analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986;54:676–681.
27.
Greiffenstein MF, Brinkman S, Jacobs L, Braun P: Neuropsychological improvement following endarterectomy as a function of outcome measure and reconstructed vessel. Cortex 1988;24:223–230.
28.
Casey JE, Ferguson GG, Kimura D, Hachinski VC: Neuropsychological improvement versus practice effect following unilateral carotid endarterectomy in patients without stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1989;11:461–470.
29.
Monenen H, Lepojarvi M, Kallanranta T: Early neuropsychological outcome after carotid endarterectomy. Eur Neurol 1990;30:328–333.
30.
Sirkka A, Salenius JP, Portin R, Nummenmaa T: Quality of life and cognitive performance after carotid endarterectomy during long-term follow-up. Acta Neurol Scand 1992;85:58–62.
31.
Vanninen E, Vanninen R, Aikia M, Tulla H, Kononen M, Koivisto K, Partanen K, Hippelainen M, Kuikka JT: Frequency of carotid endarterectomy-related subclinical cerebral complications. Cerebrovasc Dis 1996;6:272–280.
32.
Little NS, Meyer FB: Carotid endarterectomy-indications, techniques, and Mayo Clinic experience. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1997;37:227–235.
33.
Lezak MD: Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1983.
34.
Finlayson MAJ, Johnson KA, Reitan RM: Relationship of level of education to neuropsychological measures in brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged adults. J Consult Clin Psychol 1977;45:536–542.
35.
Stern Y, Gurland B, Tatemichi TK, Tang MX, Wilder D, Mayeux R: Influence of education and occupation on the incidence of Alzheimer’s Disease. JAMA 1994;271:1004–1010.
36.
Stern RA, Silva SG, Chaisson N, Evans DL: Influence of cognitive reserve on neuropsychological functioning in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection. Arch Neurol 1996;53:148–153.
37.
Fischer P: The spectrum of depressive pseudo-dementia. J Neural Transm Suppl 1996;47:193–203.
38.
Thomas AC, Dirson S, Foyatier MN, Laurent B, Michel D: Memory complaints and anxiety. Apropos of 40 patients attending a specialized memory consultation. Encephale 1997;23:42–47.
39.
Hill RD, Allen C, Gregory K: Self-generated mnemonics for enhancing free recall performance in older learners. Exp Aging Res 1990;16:141–145.
40.
Asken MJ, Hobsen RW: Intellectual change and carotid endarterectomy, subjective speculation or objective reality: A review. J Surg Res 1977;23:367–375.
41.
Whitten RH, Gee W, Kaupp HA, McDonald KM: Extracranial surgery for the low-flow-endangered brain. Arch Surg 1981;116:1165–1169.
1999
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.