Objective: To review the complications and outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement (PEG) in 74 patients with acute stroke. Patients and Methods: Medical record review and follow-up of patients with acute stroke admitted to a referral center. Results: There were no immediate procedure-related complications. Late complications included aspiration pneumonia (11%), PEG occlusion and replacement (6%), accidental PEG removal (6%), wound infection (3%) and fatal gastrointestinal bleeding in 1 patient. In 18 patients (28%), PEG could be subsequently removed due to improvement in swallowing. Conclusion: PEG provides an effective alternative method of enteral feeding, but its impact on outcome remains uncertain. Late complications occurred in one third of the patients, but were seldom life threatening. Removal of the gastrostomy tube and resumption of oral feeding was possible in more than a quarter of the patients. All our patients who received PEG placement after acute stroke remained severely disabled; one third of the patients died from systemic complications of their stroke.

Keywords:
Stroke, Percutaneous gastrostomy, Mortality, Complications
1.
Gordon C, Langton Hewer R, Wade D: Dysphagia in acute stroke. Br Med J 1987;295:411–414.
2.
Wanklyn P, Cox N, Belfield P: Outcome in patients who require a gastrostomy after stroke. Age Ageing 1995;24:510–514.
3.
Norton B, Homer-Ward M, Donnelly MT, Long RG, Holmes GKT: A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke. Br Med J 1996;312:13–16.
4.
Raha S, Woodhouse K: Who should have a PEG? Age Ageing 1993;22:313–315.
5.
Ponsky JL, Gauderer MWL: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A nonoperative technique for feeding gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1981;27:9–11.
6.
Kaw M, Sekas G: Long-term follow-up of consequences of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes in nursing home patients. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:738–743.
7.
American Gastroenterological Association: Technical review on tube feeding for enteral nutrition. Gastroenterology 1995;108:1282–1301.
1999
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.