Although a considerable body of scientific data is now available on neuroprotection in acute ischaemic stroke, this field is not yet established in clinical practice. At its third meeting, the European Ad Hoc Consensus Group considered the potential for neuroprotection in acute stroke and the practical problems attendant on the existence of a very limited therapeutic window before irreversible brain damage occurs, and came to the following conclusions. Neuroprotectants in Clinical Development: Convincing clinical evidence for an efficacious neuroprotective treatment in acute stroke is still required. Caution should be exercised in interpreting and extrapolating experimental results to stroke patients, who are a very heterogeneous group. The limitations of the time windows and the outcome measures chosen in trials of acute stroke therapy have an important influence on the results. The overall distribution of functional outcomes provides more statistical information than the proportion above a threshold outcome value. Neurological outcome should also be assessed. Neuroprotectants should not be tested clinically in phase II or phase III trials in a time window that exceeds those determined in experimental studies. The harmful effects of a drug in humans may override its neuroprotective potential determined in animals. Agents that act at several different levels in the ischaemic cascade may be more effective than those with a single mechanism of action. Current In-Hospital Management of Acute Stroke: The four major physiological variables that must be monitored and managed are blood pressure, arterial blood gas levels, body temperature, and glycaemia. The effects of controlling these physiological variables have not been studied in prospective trials, though they may all contribute to the outcome of acute ischaemic stroke and affect the duration of the therapeutic window. Optimal physiological parameters are inherently neuroprotective. Trials of new agents for the treatment of acute stroke should aim to maintain these physiological variables as close to normal as possible, and certainly within strictly defined limits. The Place of Neuroprotectants in Acute Stroke Management: Stroke patients are a very heterogeneous group with respect to stroke mechanisms and severity, general condition, age and co-morbidities. At the present time, the only firm guideline than can be proposed for patient selection is the need for early admission to enable neuroprotectant and/or thrombolytic treatment to be started as soon as possible within the therapeutic window. The severity of potential side-effects will largely determine who should assess a patient with suspected stroke and initiate treatment. There is little information on which to base the duration of neuroprotectant therapy, and more experimental data are needed. Even if prehospital treatment proves to be feasible, it should not replace comprehensive stroke management in a specialist hospital unit. Clinical trials of neuroprotectants should only be performed in stroke units. The combined approach of restoring blood flow and providing neuroprotection may be the most productive in human stroke, but current clinical trial design will have to change in order to test combination therapy. Important side-effects are those that interfere with any possible benefit or increase mortality. Pharmaco-Economic Aspects of Neuroprotectants: The early increase in hospital costs associated with neuroprotectant therapy may be balanced by the shorter length of hospital stay and lesser degree of disability of the surviving patients. The overall direct financial cost is highly dependent on the number of patients eligible for neuroprotectant therapy, which is itself dependent on the length of the therapeutic window and the severity of potential side-effects. A treatment that achieves a good functional outcome is the most cost-effective approach.

1.
Pulsinelli W: Pathophysiology of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet 1992;339:533–536.
2.
Astrup J, Siesjo B, Simon L: Thresholds in cerebral ischemia: The ischemic penumbra. Stroke 1981;12:723–725.
3.
Hossmann K-A: Viability thresholds and the penumbra of focal ischemia. Ann Neurol 1994;36:557–565.
4.
Ginsberg MD, Pulsinelli W: The ischemic penumbra, injury thresholds, and the therapeutic window for acute stroke. Ann Neurol 1994;36:553–554.
5.
Jones TH, Morawetz RB, Crowell RM, Marcoux FW, FitzGibbon SJ, DeGirolami U, Ojemann RG: Thresholds of focal cerebral ischemia in awake monkey. J Neurosurg 1981;54:773–782.
6.
Crowell RM, Marcoux FW, DeGirolami U: Variability and reversibility of focal ischemia in unanesthetized monkeys. Neurology 1981;31:1295–1302.
7.
Kaplan B, Brint S, Tanabe J, Wang X, Pulsinelli W: Temporal thresholds for neocortical infarction in rats subjected to reversible focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke 1991;22:1032–1039.
8.
Yip PK, He Y, Hsu CY, Garg N, Marangos P, Hogan EL: Effect of plasma glucose on infarct size in focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. Neurology 1991;41:899–905.
9.
Xue D, Huang ZG, E SK, Buchan AM: Immediate or delayed hypothermia prevents focal cerebral infarction. Brain Res 1992;587:66–72.
10.
Li Y, Chopp M, Garcia JH, Yoshida Y, Zhang AG, R LS: Distribution of the 72-kd heat-shock protein as a function of transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke 1992;23:1292–1298.
11.
Pulsinelli W: The therapeutic window in ischemic brain injury. Curr Opin Neurol 1995;8:3–5.
12.
Jacewicz M, Tanabe J, Pulsinelli W: The CBF threshold and dynamics for focal cerebral infarction in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1992;12:359–370.
13.
The European Ad Hoc Consensus Group: European strategies for early intervention in stroke: A report of an Ad Hoc Consensus Group meeting. Cerebrovasc Dis 1996;6:315–324.
14.
The European Ad Hoc Consensus Group: Optimizing intensive care in stroke: A European perspective: A report of an Ad Hoc Consensus Group meeting. Cerebrovasc Dis 1997;7:113–128.
15.
Diener HC, Hacke W, Hennerici M, Rådberg J, Hantson P, De Keyser J, Lubeluzole International Study Group: Lubeluzole in acute ischemic stroke: A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Stroke 1996;27:76–81.
16.
Grotta J, Group ftL-I-LS: The efficacy and safety of lubeluzole in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci 1997;150(suppl):S199.
17.
Diener HC, Kaste M, Hacke W, Koudstaal P, Hennerici M, for the LUB-INT-5 Lubeluzole Study Group: Lubeluzole in acute ischemic stroke: International trial. J Neurol Sci 1997;150(suppl):S199.
18.
Davis S, Albers GW, Diener HC, Lees KR, Norris J: Termination of acute stroke studies involving selfotel treatment: ASSIST Steering Committee. Lancet 1997;349:32.
19.
Wahlgren NG: Pharmacological treatment of acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 1997;7:24–30.
20.
Fisher M, for CNS 1102-003 Investigators: CerestatTM (CNS 1102), a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist, in ischemic stroke patients: Dose-escalating safety study. Cerebrovasc Dis 1994;4:245.
21.
Turrini R: A pivotal safety and efficacy trial of Cerestat (Aptiganel HCL/CNS) in acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke 1996;27:173.
22.
Heiss WD, Ilsen HW, Wagner R, Pawlik G, Wienhard K: Remote functional depression of glucose metabolism in stroke and its alteration by activating drugs; in Heiss WD, Phelps ME (ed): Positron Emission Tomography of the Brain. Berlin, Springer, 1983, pp 162–168.
23.
De Deyn PP: The Piracetam in Acute Stroke Study (PASS). Eur J Neurol 1995;2:7.
24.
De Deyn PP, De Reuck J, Deberdt W, Vlietinck R, Orgogozo J-M, Group fmotPiASSP: Treatment of acute ischemic stroke with piracetam. Stroke 1997, in press.
25.
Bowes MP, Zivin JA, Rothlein R: Monoclonal antibody to the ICAM-1 adhesion site reduces neurological damage in a rabbit cerebral embolism stroke model. Exp Neurol 1993;119:215–219.
26.
Zhang RL, Chopp M, Zaloga C, Jiang M, Jones M, Miyasaka M, Ward P: Anti-ICAM-antibody reduces ischemic cell damage after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Neurology 1994;44:1747–1751.
27.
The RANTTAS Investigators: A randomized trial of tirilazad mesylate in patients with acute stroke (RANTTAS). Stroke 1996;27:1453–1458.
28.
STIPAS Investigators: Safety study of tirilazad mesylate in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Stroke 1994;25:418–423.
29.
Mohr J, Orgogozo J, Harrison M, Hennerici M, Wahlgren N, Gelmers J, Martinez-Vila E, Dycka J, Tettenborn D: Meta-analysis of oral nimodipine trials in acute ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 1994;4:197–203.
30.
Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R, Boysen G, Bluhmki E, Höxter G, Mahagne M-H, Hennerici M, the ECASS Study Group: Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA 1995;274:1017–1025.
31.
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group: Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–1587.
32.
Asplund K: Randomized clinical trials of hemodilution in acute ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 1989;4:1–10.
33.
Mast H, Marx P: Neurological deterioration under isovolemic hemodilution with hydroxyethyl starch in acute cerebral ischemia. Stroke 1991;22:680–683.
34.
van Gijn J: Measurement of outcome in stroke prevention trials. Cerebrovasc Dis 1992;2(suppl 1):23–34.
35.
Kaste M, Fogelman R, Erilä T, Palomäki H, Murros K, Rissanen A, Sarna S: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nimodipine in acute ischemic hemispheric stroke. Stroke 1994;25:1348–1353.
36.
Wahlgren NG, MacMahon DG, De Keyser J, Indredavik B, Ryman T, INWEST Study Group: Intravenous Nimodipine West European Stroke Trial (INWEST) of nimodipine in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 1994;4:204–210.
37.
Azzimondi G, Bassein L, Nonino F, Fiorani L, Vignatelli L, Re G, D’Allessandro R: Fever in acute stroke worsens prognosis. Stroke 1996;26:2040–2043.
38.
Reith J, Jorgensen HO, Pedersen PM, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Jeppesen LL, Olsen TS: Body temperature in acute stroke: Relation to stroke severity, infarct size, mortality, and outcome. Lancet 1996;347:422–425.
39.
Dávalos A, Castillos J, Pumar JM, Noya M: Body temperature and fibrinogen are related to early neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 1997;7:64–69.
40.
Grau AJ, Buggle F, Heindl S, Steichen-Wiehn C, Banerjee T, Maiwald M, Rohlfs M, Suhr H, Fiehn W, Becher H, et al: Recent infection as a risk factor for cerebrovascular ischemic. Stroke 1995;26:373–379.
41.
Grau AJ, Buggle F, Steichen-Wiehn C, Heindl S, Banerjee T, Seitz R, Winter R, Forsting M, Werle E, Bode C, et al: Clinical and biochemical analysis in infection-associated stroke. Stroke 1995;26:1520–1526.
42.
Bova IY, Bornstein NM, Korczyn AD: Acute infection as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. Stroke 1996;27:2204–2206.
43.
Meden P, Overgaard K, Pedersen H, Boysen G: The influence of body temperature on infarct volume and thrombolytic therapy in a rat embolic stroke model. Brain Res 1994;647:131–138.
44.
Yanamoto H, Hong SC, Soleau S, Kassell NF, Lee KS: Mild postischemic hypothermia limits cerebral injury following transient focal ischemia in rat neocortex. Brain Res 1996;718:207–211.
45.
Marion DW, Penrod LE, Kelsey SF, Obrist WO, Kochanek PM, Palmer AM, Wisniewski SR, DeKosky ST: Treatment of traumatic brain injury with moderate hypothermia. N Engl J Med 1997;356:540–546.
46.
Schwab S, Stranger M, Aschoff A, Steiner T, Hacke W: Brain temperature monitoring and modulation in patients with severe MCA infarction. Neurology 1997;48:762–767.
47.
Helgason CM: Blood glucose and stroke. Stroke 1988;19:1049–1053.
48.
Toni D, De Michele M, Fiorelli M, Bastianello S, Camerlingo M, Sacchetti ML, Argentino C, Fieschi C: Influence of hyperglycaemia on infarct size and clinical outcome of acute ischaemic stroke patients with intracranial arterial occlusion. J Neurol Sci 1994;123:129–133.
49.
Weir CJ, Murray GD, Dyker AG, Lees KR: Is hyperglycaemia an independent predictor of poor outcome after stroke? Results of a long-term follow-up study. BMJ 1997;314:1303–1306.
50.
Grotta J: Why do all drugs work in animals but none in stroke patients? 2. Neuroprotective therapy. J Intern Med 1995;237:89–94.
51.
Roine RO, Kaste M, Kinnunena A, Nikki P, Sarna S, Kajaste S: Nimodipine after resuscitation from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: A placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized trial. JAMA 1990;264:3171–3177.
52.
Kothari R, Barsan W, Brott T, Broderick J, Ashbrook S: Frequency and accuracy of prehospital diagnosis of stroke. Stroke 1995;26:937–941.
53.
Kothari RU, Brott T, Broderick JP, Hamilton CA: Emergency physicians: Accuracy in the diagnosis of stroke. Stroke 1995;26:2238–2241.
54.
Adams HP, Brott TG, Crowell RM, Furlan AJ, Gomez CR, Grotta J, Helgason CM, Marler JR, Woolson RF, Zivin JA, Feinberg W, Mayberg M: Guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 1994;25:1901–1914.
55.
Aboderin I, Venables G: Stroke management in Europe: Pan European Consensus Meeting on Stroke Management. J Intern Med 1996;240:173–180.
56.
Adams HPJ: The importance of the Helsingborg declaration on stroke management in Europe. J Intern Med 1996;240:169–171.
57.
Aronowski J, Strong R, Grotta JC: Combined neuroprotection and reperfusion therapy for stroke: Effect of lubeluzole and diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin in experimental focal ischemia. Stroke 1996;27:1576–1577.
58.
Strand T, Asplund K, Eriksson S, Hägg E, Lithner F, Wester PO: Stroke unit care – who benefits? Comparisons with general medical care in relation to prognostic indicators on admission. Stroke 1986;17:377–381.
59.
Langhorne P, Williams BO, Gilchrist W, Howie K: Do stroke units save lives? Lancet 1993;342:395–398.
60.
Duncan G, Ritchie LC, Jamieson DM, McLean MA: Acute stroke in South Ayrshire: Comparative study pre and post stroke units. Health Bull 1995;53:159–166.
61.
Jorgensen HS, Nakayama U, Raaschou HA, Larsen K, Hubbe P, Olsen TS: The effect of a stroke unit: Reductions in mortality, discharge rate to nursing home, length of hospital stay, and cost: A community-based study. Stroke 1995;26:1178–1182.
62.
Argentino C, Sacchetti ML, Toni D, Savoni G, D’Arcangelo E, Erminio F, Federico F, Ferro Milone F, Gallai V, Gambi D, Mamoli A, Ottonello GA, Ponari O, Rebucci G, Senin V, Fieschi C: GM1 ganglioside therapy in acute ischaemic stroke. Stroke 1989;20:1143–1149.
63.
Rocca WA, Dorsey FC, Grigoletto F, Gent M, Roberts RS, Walker MD, Easton JD, Bruno R, Carolei A, Sancesario G, Fieschi C: Design and baseline results of the monoganglioside early stroke trial (EST). Stroke 1992;23:519–526.
64.
Lenzi GL, Grigoletto F, Gent M, Roberts RS, Walker MD, Easton JD, Carolei A, Dorsey FC, Rocca WA, Bruno R, Patarnello F, Fieschi C: Early treatment of stroke with monosialoganglioside GM-1: Efficacy and safety results of the early stroke trial. Stroke 1994;25:1152–1158.
65.
SASS Investigators: Ganglioside GM1 in acute ischaemic stroke. Stroke 1994;25:1141–1148.
66.
Squire IB, Lees K, Pryse-Phillips W, Kertesz A, Bamford J: The effects of lifarizine in acute cerebral infarction: A pilot safety study. Cerebrovasc Dis 1996;6:156–160.
67.
Wentworth D, Atkinson R: Implementation of an acute stroke program decreases hospitalization costs and length of stay. Stroke 1996;27:1040–1043.
68.
Holloway R, Witter D, Lawton K, Lipscomb J, Samsa G: Inpatients costs of specific cerebrovascular events at five academic medical centers. Neurology 1996;46:854–860.
69.
Jorgensen HF, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: Acute stroke care and rehabilitation: An analysis of the direct cost and its clinical and social determinants: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1997;28:1138–1141.
70.
Porsdal V, Boysen G: Cost-of-illness studies of stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 1997;7:258–263.
71.
Asplund K, Marké L-Å, Terént A, Gustafsson C, Wester PO: Costs and gains in stroke prevention: European perspective. Cerebrovasc Dis 1993;3(suppl 1):34–42.
72.
Kaste M, Fogelholm R, Rissanen A: Economic burden of stroke and the evaluation of new therapies. Public Health 1997, in press.
73.
Kaste M, Palomäki H, Sarna S: Where and how should elderly stroke patients be treated? A randomized trial. Stroke 1995;26:249–253.
74.
Goldman RS, Hartz AJ, Lanska DJ, Guse CE: Results of a computerized screening of stroke patients for unjustified hospital stay. Stroke 1996;27:639–644.
75.
Vuadens P, Schluep M, Bogousslavsky J, Regli F: Justification of hospital days and discharge delays in a non-selected population of acute stroke patients. J Neurol Sci 1996;143:132–136.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.