Introduction: Carotid computed tomography angiography (CTA) is routinely used for evaluating the atherosclerotic process. Radiomics allows the extraction of imaging markers of lesion heterogeneity and spatial complexity. These quantitative features can be used as the input for machine learning (ML). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics-based ML assessment of carotid CTA data to identify symptomatic patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis. Methods: In this retrospective study, participants with carotid artery atherosclerosis who underwent carotid CTA and brain magnetic resonance imaging from May 2010 to December 2017 were studied. The participants were grouped into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups according to their recent symptoms (determination of ipsilateral ischemic stroke). Eight conventional plaque features and 2,107 radiomics parameters were extracted from carotid CTA images. A radiomics-based ML model was fitted on the training set, and the radiomics-based ML model and conventional assessment were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) to identify symptomatic participants. Results: After excluding participants with other stroke sources, 120 patients with 148 carotid arteries were analyzed. Of these 148 carotid arteries, 34 (22.97%) were classified into the symptomatic group. Plaque ulceration (odds ratio [OR] = 0.257; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.094–0.698) and plaque enhancement (OR = 0.305; 95% CI, 0.094–0.988) were associated with the symptomatic status. Twenty radiomics parameters were chosen to be inputs in the radiomics-based ML model. In the identification of symptomatic participants, the discriminatory value of the radiomics-based ML model was significantly higher than that of the conventional assessment (AUC = 0.858 vs. AUC = 0.706, p = 0.021). Conclusion: Radiomics-based ML analysis improves the discriminatory power of carotid CTA in the identification of recent ischemic symptoms in patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis.

1.
GBD 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke Collaborators
,
Feigin
VL
,
Nguyen
G
,
Cercy
K
,
Johnson
CO
,
Alam
T
,
Global, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016
.
N Engl J Med
.
2018 Dec
;
379
(
25
):
2429
37
.
2.
Barrett
KM
,
Brott
TG
.
Stroke caused by extracranial disease
.
Circ Res
.
2017 Feb
;
120
(
3
):
496
501
. .
3.
Baradaran
H
,
Eisenmenger
LB
,
Hinckley
PJ
,
de Havenon
AH
,
Stoddard
GJ
,
Treiman
LS
,
Optimal carotid plaque features on computed tomography angiography associated with ischemic stroke
.
J Am Heart Assoc
.
2021 Feb
;
10
(
5
):
e019462
. .
4.
Yamada
K
,
Kawasaki
M
,
Yoshimura
S
,
Shirakawa
M
,
Uchida
K
,
Shindo
S
,
High-Intensity signal in carotid plaque on routine 3D-TOF-MRA is a risk factor of ischemic stroke
.
Cerebrovasc Dis
.
2016
;
41
(
1–2
):
13
8
.
5.
Gupta
A
,
Gialdini
G
,
Lerario
MP
,
Baradaran
H
,
Giambrone
A
,
Navi
BB
,
Magnetic resonance angiography detection of abnormal carotid artery plaque in patients with cryptogenic stroke
.
J Am Heart Assoc
.
2015 Jun
;
4
(
6
):
e002012
.
6.
Saba
L
,
Saam
T
,
Jäger
HR
,
Yuan
C
,
Hatsukami
TS
,
Saloner
D
,
Imaging biomarkers of vulnerable carotid plaques for stroke risk prediction and their potential clinical implications
.
Lancet Neurol
.
2019 Jun
;
18
(
6
):
559
72
.
7.
Saba
L
,
Moody
AR
,
Saam
T
,
Kooi
ME
,
Wasserman
BA
,
Staub
D
,
Vessel wall-imaging biomarkers of carotid plaque vulnerability in stroke prevention trials
.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
.
2020 Nov
;
13
(
11
):
2445
56
.
8.
Baradaran
H
,
Gupta
A
.
Carotid vessel wall imaging on CTA
.
Am J Neuroradiol
.
2020 Mar
;
41
(
3
):
380
6
. .
9.
Cau
R
,
Flanders
A
,
Mannelli
L
,
Politi
C
,
Faa
G
,
Suri
JS
,
Artificial intelligence in computed tomography plaque characterization: a review
.
Eur J Radiol
.
2021 Jul
;
140
:
109767
.
10.
Bos
D
,
van Dam-Nolen
DHK
,
Gupta
A
,
Saba
L
,
Saloner
D
,
Wasserman
BA
,
Advances in multimodality carotid plaque imaging: AJR expert panel narrative review
.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
.
2021 Jul
;
217
(
1
):
16
26
.
11.
Zhou
T
,
Jia
S
,
Wang
X
,
Wang
B
,
Wang
Z
,
Wu
T
,
Diagnostic performance of MRI for detecting intraplaque hemorrhage in the carotid arteries: a meta-analysis
.
Eur Radiol
.
2019 Oct
;
29
(
10
):
5129
38
.
12.
Kolossváry
M
,
Karády
J
,
Szilveszter
B
,
Kitslaar
P
,
Hoffmann
U
,
Merkely
B
,
Radiomic features are superior to conventional quantitative computed tomographic metrics to identify coronary plaques with Napkin-Ring sign
.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
.
2017 Dec
;
10
(
12
):
e006843
.
13.
Kolossváry
M
,
De Cecco
CN
,
Feuchtner
G
,
Maurovich-Horvat
P
.
Advanced atherosclerosis imaging by CT: radiomics, machine learning and deep learning
.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr
.
2019 Sep
;
13
(
5
):
274
80
. .
14.
Gillies
RJ
,
Kinahan
PE
,
Hricak
H
.
Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data
.
Radiology
.
2016 Feb
;
278
(
2
):
563
77
. .
15.
Kolossváry
M
,
Park
J
,
Bang
JI
,
Zhang
J
,
Lee
JM
,
Paeng
JC
,
Identification of invasive and radionuclide imaging markers of coronary plaque vulnerability using radiomic analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography
.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
.
2019 Nov
;
20
(
11
):
1250
8
.
16.
Kolossváry
M
,
Karády
J
,
Kikuchi
Y
,
Ivanov
A
,
Schlett
CL
,
Lu
MT
,
Radiomics versus visual and histogram-based assessment to identify atheromatous lesions at coronary CT angiography: an ex vivo study
.
Radiology
.
2019 Oct
;
293
(
1
):
89
96
.
17.
Shi
Z
,
Zhu
C
,
Degnan
AJ
,
Tian
X
,
Li
J
,
Chen
L
,
Identification of high-risk plaque features in intracranial atherosclerosis: initial experience using a radiomic approach
.
Eur Radiol
.
2018 Sep
;
28
(
9
):
3912
21
.
18.
Tuna
MA
,
Rothwell
PM
.
Diagnosis of non-consensus transient ischaemic attacks with focal, negative, and non-progressive symptoms: population-based validation by investigation and prognosis
.
Lancet
.
2021 Mar
;
397
(
10277
):
902
12
. .
19.
Sacco
RL
,
Kasner
SE
,
Broderick
JP
,
Caplan
LR
,
Connors
JJ
,
Culebras
A
,
An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/american stroke association
.
Stroke
.
2013 Jul
;
44
(
7
):
2064
89
.
20.
Gauss
S
,
Achenbach
S
,
Pflederer
T
,
Schuhbäck
A
,
Daniel
WG
,
Marwan
M
.
Assessment of coronary artery remodelling by dual-source CT: a head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound
.
Heart
.
2011 Jun
;
97
(
12
):
991
7
. .
21.
Zhang
Y
,
Wang
L
,
Zhang
Z
,
Zhang
Z
,
Zhou
S
,
Cao
L
,
Shared and discrepant susceptibility for carotid artery and aortic arch calcification: a genetic association study
.
Atherosclerosis
.
2015 Aug
;
241
(
2
):
371
5
.
22.
European Stroke Organisation
;
Tendera
M
,
Aboyans
V
,
Bartelink
ML
,
Baumgartner
I
,
Clément
D
,
ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries: the task force on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases of the European society of cardiology (ESC)
.
Eur Heart J
.
2011 Nov
;
32
(
22
):
2851
906
.
23.
Kernan
WN
,
Ovbiagele
B
,
Black
HR
,
Bravata
DM
,
Chimowitz
MI
,
Ezekowitz
MD
,
Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association
.
Stroke
.
2014 Jul
;
45
(
7
):
2160
236
.
24.
Schindler
A
,
Schinner
R
,
Altaf
N
,
Hosseini
AA
,
Simpson
RJ
,
Esposito-Bauer
L
,
Prediction of stroke risk by detection of hemorrhage in carotid plaques: meta-analysis of individual patient data
.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
.
2020 Feb
;
13
(
2 Pt 1
):
395
406
.
25.
Lubner
MG
,
Smith
AD
,
Sandrasegaran
K
,
Sahani
DV
,
Pickhardt
PJ
.
CT texture analysis: definitions, applications, biologic correlates, and challenges
.
Radiographics
.
2017 Sep
;
37
(
5
):
1483
503
. .
26.
Zaccagna
F
,
Ganeshan
B
,
Arca
M
,
Rengo
M
,
Napoli
A
,
Rundo
L
,
CT texture-based radiomics analysis of carotid arteries identifies vulnerable patients: a preliminary outcome study
.
Neuroradiology
.
2021 Jul
;
63
(
7
):
1043
52
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.