Background and Purpose: Ischemic stroke can be the first manifestation of cancer and it is therefore important to ascertain which stroke patients should be considered for cancer-diagnostic investigations. We aimed to determine the frequency of active cancer in patients with acute ischemic stroke and to compare clinical findings in stroke patients with active cancer to ischemic stroke patients with no history of cancer. Finally, we aimed to develop a predictive and feasible score for clinical use to uncover underlying malignancy. Methods: All ischemic stroke patients admitted to the stroke unit in the Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital were consecutively included in the Norwegian Stroke Research Registry (NORSTROKE). Stroke etiology was determined by the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. Data on cancer diagnoses was obtained from patients’ medical records and the Cancer Registry of Norway. Active cancer was defined as cancer diagnosis, metastasis of known cancer, recurrent cancer or receiving cancer treatment, all within 12 months before or after the index stroke. Based on variables independently associated with active cancer, a predictive score was developed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curves. Bayes’ theorem was used to calculate post-test probabilities of active cancer. Results: Of the 1,646 ischemic stroke patients included, 82 (5.0%) had active cancer. Increased D-dimer (OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.1–1.2, p = <0.001), lower Hb (OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5–0.7, p = <0.001), smoking (OR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2–4.3, p = 0.02) and suffering a stroke of undetermined etiology (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1–3.3, p = 0.03) were factors independently associated with active cancer. These were included in the final predictive score which gave an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.65–0.81) in patients younger than 75 years of age. Assuming the prevalence of cancer to be 5%, the score shows that if a patient fulfills all 3 score points, the probability of active cancer is 53%. Conclusions: Active cancer was found in 5% of our ischemic stroke patients. We found that a clinical score comprising elevated D-dimer ≥3 mg/L, lower Hb ≤12.0 g/dL and previous or current smoking is feasible for predicting active cancer in ischemic stroke patients.

Keywords:
Ischaemic stroke, Stroke aetiology, Hypercoagulable states, Epidemiology of stroke
1.
World Health Organization: Global Status Report on Non Communicable Diseases 2010, Chapter 1: World Health Organization, Geneva, 2011.
2.
Qureshi AI, Malik AA, Saeed O, Adil MM, Rodriguez GJ, Suri MF: Incident cancer in a cohort of 3,247 cancer diagnosis free ischemic stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2015; 39: 262–268.
3.
Aarnio K, Joensuu H, Haapaniemi E, Melkas S, Kaste M, Tatlisumak T, Putaala J: Cancer in young adults with ischemic stroke. Stroke 2015; 46: 1601–1606.
4.
Castro HHG, Alencar AP, Benseñor IM, Lotufo PA, Goulart AC: Multimorbidities are associated to lower survival in ischaemic stroke: results from a Brazilian Stroke Cohort (EMMA Study). Cerebrovasc Dis 2017; 44: 232–239.
5.
Grisold W, Oberndorfer S, Struhal W: Stroke and cancer: a review. Acta Neurol Scand 2009; 119: 1–16.
6.
Kim SJ, Park JH, Lee MJ, Park YG, Ahn MJ, Bang OY: Clues to occult cancer in patients with ischemic stroke. PloS One 2012; 7:e44959.
7.
Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Caplan LR, Donnan GA, Hennerici MG: Classification of stroke subtypes. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 27: 493–501.
8.
Schwarzbach CJ, Schaefer A, Ebert A, Held V, Bolognese M, Kablau M, Hennerici MG, Fatar M: Stroke and cancer: the importance of cancer-associated hypercoagulation as a possible stroke etiology. Stroke 2012; 43: 3029–3034.
9.
Seok JM, Kim SG, Kim JW, Chung CS, Kim GM, Lee KH, Bang OY: Coagulopathy and embolic signal in cancer patients with ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 2010; 68: 213–219.
10.
Kim SG, Hong JM, Kim HY, Lee J, Chung PW, Park KY, Kim GM, Lee KH, Chung CS, Bang OY: Ischemic stroke in cancer patients with and without conventional mechanisms: a multicenter study in Korea. Stroke 2010; 41: 798–801.
11.
Graus F, Rogers LR, Posner JB: Cerebrovascular complications in patients with cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 1985; 64: 16–35.
12.
Cocho D, Gendre J, Boltes A, Espinosa J, Ricciardi AC, Pons J, Jimenez M, Otermin P: Predictors of occult cancer in acute ischemic stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015; 24: 1324–1328.
13.
Guo YJ, Chang MH, Chen PL, Lee YS, Chang YC, Liao YC: Predictive value of plasma (D)-dimer levels for cancer-related stroke: a 3-year retrospective study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014; 23:e249–254.
14.
Schwarzbach CJ, Fatar M, Eisele P, Ebert AD, Hennerici MG, Szabo K: DWI lesion patterns in cancer-related stroke – specifying the phenotype. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2015; 5: 139–145.
15.
Hong CT, Tsai LK, Jeng JS: Patterns of acute cerebral infarcts in patients with active malignancy using diffusion-weighted imaging. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 28: 411–416.
16.
Gon Y, Sakaguchi M, Takasugi J, Kawano T, Kanki H, Watanabe A, Oyama N, Terasaki Y, Sasaki T, Mochizuki H: Plasma D-dimer levels and ischaemic lesions in multiple vascular regions can predict occult cancer in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Eur J Neurol 2017; 24: 503–508.
17.
Johnson CJ, Kittner SJ, McCarter RJ, Sloan MA, Stern BJ, Buchholz D, Price TR: Interrater reliability of an etiologic classification of ischemic stroke. Stroke 1995; 26: 46–51.
18.
Naess H, Brogger JC Jr, Idicula T, Waje-Andreassen U, Moen G, Thomassen L: Clinical presentation and diffusion weighted MRI of acute cerebral infarction. The Bergen Stroke Study. BMC Neurol 2009; 9: 44.
19.
Nacu A, Fromm A, Sand KM, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L, Naess H: Age dependency of ischaemic stroke subtypes and vascular risk factors in western Norway: the Bergen Norwegian Stroke Cooperation Study. Acta Neurol Scand 2016; 133: 202–207.
20.
Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE 3rd: Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke 1993; 24: 35–41.
21.
Novotny V, Thomassen L, Waje-Andreassen U, Naess H: Acute cerebral infarcts in multiple arterial territories associated with cardioembolism. Acta Neurol Scand 2017; 135: 346–351.
22.
Lee EJ, Nah HW, Kwon JY, Kang DW, Kwon SU, Kim JS: Ischemic stroke in patients with cancer: is it different from usual strokes? Int J Stroke 2014; 9: 406–412.
23.
Selvik HA, Thomassen L, Logallo N, Naess H: Prior cancer in patients with ischemic stroke: the Bergen NORSTROKE study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014; 23: 919–925.
24.
Swets JA: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240: 1285–1293.
25.
Finelli PF, Nouh A: Three-territory DWI acute infarcts: diagnostic value in cancer-associated hypercoagulation stroke (Trousseau Syndrome). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016, Epub ahead of print.
26.
Karlinska AG, Gromadzka G, Karlinski MA, Czlonkowska A: The activity of malignancy may determine stroke pattern in cancer patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015; 24: 778–783.
27.
Gon Y, Okazaki S, Terasaki Y, Sasaki T, Yoshimine T, Sakaguchi M, Mochizuki H: Characteristics of cryptogenic stroke in cancer patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2016; 3: 280–287.
28.
Nam KW, Kim CK, Kim TJ, An SJ, Demchuk AM, Kim Y, Jung S, Han MK, Ko SB, Yoon BW: D-dimer as a predictor of early neurologic deterioration in cryptogenic stroke with active cancer. Eur J Neurol 2017; 24: 205–211.
29.
Selvik HA, Thomassen L, Bjerkreim AT, Naess H: Cancer-associated stroke: the Bergen NORSTROKE study. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2015; 5: 107–113.
30.
Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, Roy PM, Verschuren F, Ghuysen A, Rutschmann OT, Sanchez O, Jaffrelot M, Trinh-Duc A, Le Gall C, Moustafa F, Principe A, Van Houten AA, Ten Wolde M, Douma RA, Hazelaar G, Erkens PM, Van Kralingen KW, Grootenboers MJ, Durian MF, Cheung YW, Meyer G, Bounameaux H, Huisman MV, Kamphuisen PW, Le Gal G: Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA 2014; 311: 1117–1124.
31.
Halawi R, Moukhadder H, Taher A: Anemia in the elderly: a consequence of aging? Expert Rev Hematol 2017; 10: 1–9.
32.
Goffin JR, Flanagan WM, Miller AB, Fitzgerald NR, Memon S, Wolfson MC, Evans WK: Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in Canada. JAMA Oncol 2015; 1: 807–813.
33.
Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI, Bowden C, Kakkar AK, Prins M, Rickles FR, Julian JA, Haley S, Kovacs MJ, Gent M: Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 146–153.
34.
Thalin C, Demers M, Blomgren B, Wong SL, von Arbin M, von Heijne A, Laska AC, Wallen H, Wagner DD, Aspberg S: NETosis promotes cancer-associated arterial microthrombosis presenting as ischemic stroke with troponin elevation. Thromb Res 2016; 139: 56–64.
35.
Carrier M, Le Gal G, Wells PS, Fergusson D, Ramsay T, Rodger MA: Systematic review: the Trousseau syndrome revisited: should we screen extensively for cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism? Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 323–333.
36.
Zoller B, Ji J, Sundquist J, Sundquist K: Risk of haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke in patients with cancer: a nationwide follow-up study from Sweden. Eur J Cancer 2012; 48: 1875–1883.
37.
Navi BB, Reiner AS, Kamel H, Iadecola C, Elkind MS, Panageas KS, DeAngelis LM: Association between incident cancer and subsequent stroke. Ann Neurol 2015; 77: 291–300.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.