Background: Although high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI) has been used as a strong imaging method for diagnosing intracranial vertebral artery dissection (IVAD), the diagnosis is sometimes challenging because a dissection has geometric changes in the natural course. The radiologic features may change or disappear over time, which makes the diagnosis confusing. Our study was to present radiological findings according to the stages in spontaneous and unruptured, IVAD on 3T HR-MRI and to guide the age estimation of IVAD with the distinguishing findings according to the stages. Methods: From January 2011 to July 2014, the 41 vertebral arteries (M:F = 18:12; age range 32-67 years) were retrospectively enrolled. Spontaneous, unruptured IVAD was diagnosed if it had a clear onset based on clinical and radiological findings. The stages were classified as acute (0-3 days), early subacute (3-10 days), late subacute (10-60 days) and chronic stage (>60 days; recovery and non-recovery groups) according to the time intervals from symptom onset, based on the prior published studies. HR-MR findings were assessed and compared in the intimal flap, double lumen, aneurysmal dilatation (maximal outer diameter, maximal wall thickness, wall thickness index and remodeling index), intramural hematoma (relative signal intensity) and vessel wall enhancement according to the stages with qualitative and quantitative methods. Two radiologists analyzed the HR-MR findings with consensus reading. Results: IVAD was classified into acute (n = 6), early subacute (n = 8), late subacute (n = 16) and chronic (n = 11) stages. HR-MR dissection findings such as intimal flap, double lumen, aneurysmal dilatation and intramural hematoma significantly decreased from the earlier stages to the chronic stage (p < 0.05). The quantitative indices in aneurysmal dilatation and the relative signal intensity of intramural hematoma showed significant higher values in the earlier stages followed by a significant decrease in the chronic stage recovery group (p < 0.05). The degree of vessel wall enhancement was higher in the earlier stage and decreased in the chronic stage (p < 0.05), but mild vessel wall enhancement was identified 900 days after symptom onset. Conclusion: The 3T HR-MRI reveals the vessel wall characteristics and provides distinguishing findings between earlier stages and the chronic stage in spontaneous and unruptured IVAD. Characterization of these radiological findings according to stages may assist with the age estimation of the dissection and may help to understand IVAD as a whole.

Keywords:
Vertebral artery dissection, High-field magnetic resonance, Dissecting aneurysm
1.
Kim TW, Choi HS, Koo J, Jung SL, Ahn KJ, Kim BS, Shin YS, Lee KS: Intramural hematoma detection by susceptibility-weighted imaging in intracranial vertebral artery dissection. Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;36:292-298.
2.
Takano K, Yamashita S, Takemoto K, Inoue T, Kuwabara Y, Yoshimitsu K: MRI of intracranial vertebral artery dissection: evaluation of intramural haematoma using a black blood, variable-flip-angle 3D turbo spin-echo sequence. Neuroradiology 2013;55:845-851.
3.
Mohan IV: Current optimal assessment and management of carotid and vertebral spontaneous and traumatic dissection. Angiology 2014;65:274-283.
4.
Kim BM, Kim SH, Kim DI, Shin YS, Suh SH, Kim DJ, Park SI, Park KY, Ahn SS: Outcomes and prognostic factors of intracranial unruptured vertebrobasilar artery dissection. Neurology 2011;76:1735-1741.
5.
Huang YC, Chen YF, Wang YH, Tu YK, Jeng JS, Liu HM: Cervicocranial arterial dissection: experience of 73 patients in a single center. Surg Neurol 2009;72(suppl 2):S20-S27; discussion S27.
6.
Han M, Rim NJ, Lee JS, Kim SY, Choi JW: Feasibility of high-resolution MR imaging for the diagnosis of intracranial vertebrobasilar artery dissection. Eur Radiol 2014;24:3017-3024.
7.
Wang Y, Lou X, Li Y, Sui B, Sun S, Li C, Jiang P, Siddiqui A, Yang X: Imaging investigation of intracranial arterial dissecting aneurysms by using 3 T high-resolution MRI and DSA: from the interventional neuroradiologists' view. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:515-525.
8.
Flis CM, Jäger HR, Sidhu PS: Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: clinical aspects, imaging features and endovascular treatment. Eur Radiol 2007;17:820-834.
9.
Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Mandrekar JN, Schleck CD, Thielen KR, Kallmes DF: Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:812-819.
10.
Naggara O, Louillet F, Touzé E, Roy D, Leclerc X, Mas JL, Pruvo JP, Meder JF, Oppenheim C: Added value of high-resolution MR imaging in the diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1707-1712.
11.
Mizutani T: Natural course of intracranial arterial dissections. J Neurosurg 2011;114:1037-1044.
12.
Chang FC, Yong CS, Huang HC, Tsai JY, Sheng WY, Hu HH, Chung CP: Posterior circulation ischemic stroke caused by arterial dissection: characteristics and predictors of poor outcomes. Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;40:144-150.
13.
Arauz A, Márquez JM, Artigas C, Balderrama J, Orrego H: Recanalization of vertebral artery dissection. Stroke 2010;41:717-721.
14.
Habs M, Pfefferkorn T, Cyran CC, Grimm J, Rominger A, Hacker M, Opherk C, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K, Saam T: Age determination of vessel wall hematoma in spontaneous cervical artery dissection: a multi-sequence 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011;13:76.
15.
Nagahata M, Manabe H, Hasegawa S, Takemura A: Morphological change of unruptured vertebral artery dissection on serial MR examinations. Evaluation of the arterial outer contour by Basi-parallel anatomical scanning (BPAS)-MRI. Interv Neuroradiol 2006;12:133-136.
16.
Hirai T, Korogi Y, Murata Y, Ono K, Suginohara K, Uemura S, Yamashita Y: Intracranial artery dissections: serial evaluation with MR imaging, MR angiography, and source images of MR angiography. Radiat Med 2003;21:86-93.
17.
Ahn SS, Kim BM, Suh SH, Kim DJ, Kim DI, Shin YS, Ha SY, Kwon YS: Spontaneous symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar dissection: initial and follow-up imaging findings. Radiology 2012;264:196-202.
18.
Sakurai K, Miura T, Sagisaka T, Hattori M, Matsukawa N, Mase M, Kasai H, Arai N, Kawai T, Shimohira M, Yamawaki T, Shibamoto Y: Evaluation of luminal and vessel wall abnormalities in subacute and other stages of intracranial vertebrobasilar artery dissections using the volume isotropic turbo-spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) sequence: a preliminary study. J Neuroradiol 2013;40:19-28.
19.
Drapkin AJ: The double lumen: a pathognomonic angiographic sign of arterial dissection? Neuroradiology 2000;42:203-205.
20.
Schoenhagen P, Ziada KM, Kapadia SR, Crowe TD, Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM: Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2000;101:598-603.
21.
Varnava AM, Mills PG, Davies MJ: Relationship between coronary artery remodeling and plaque vulnerability. Circulation 2002;105:939-943.
22.
Yoon W, Seo JJ, Kim TS, Do HM, Jayaraman MV, Marks MP: Dissection of the V4 segment of the vertebral artery: clinicoradiologic manifestations and endovascular treatment. Eur Radiol 2007;17:983-993.
23.
Sikkema T, Uyttenboogaart M, Eshghi O, De Keyser J, Brouns R, van Dijk JM, Luijckx GJ: Intracranial artery dissection. Eur J Neurol 2014;21:820-826.
24.
Findlay JM, Weir BK, Kanamaru K, Espinosa F: Arterial wall changes in cerebral vasospasm. Neurosurgery 1989;25:736-745; discussion 745-746.
25.
Ono H, Nakatomi H, Tsutsumi K, Inoue T, Teraoka A, Yoshimoto Y, Ide T, Kitanaka C, Ueki K, Imai H, Saito N: Symptomatic recurrence of intracranial arterial dissections: follow-up study of 143 consecutive cases and pathological investigation. Stroke 2013;44:126-131.
26.
Mokri B, Houser OW, Sandok BA, Piepgras DG: Spontaneous dissections of the vertebral arteries. Neurology 1988;38:880-885.
27.
Pfefferkorn T, Saam T, Rominger A, Habs M, Gerdes LA, Schmidt C, Cyran C, Straube A, Linn J, Nikolaou K, Bartenstein P, Reiser M, Hacker M, Dichgans M: Vessel wall inflammation in spontaneous cervical artery dissection: a prospective, observational positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 2011;42:1563-1568.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.