Background: Clinical outcome after endovascular stroke therapy (EVT) for proximal anterior circulation stroke is often disappointing despite high recanalization rates. The ENDOSTROKE study aims to determine predictors of clinical outcome in patients undergoing EVT. Here we focus on the impact of age and recanalization on proximal middle cerebral artery (M1-MCA) or carotid T occlusion. Methods: ENDOSTROKE is an investigator-initiated, industrially independent multicenter registry launched in January, 2011, for consecutive patients undergoing EVT for large-vessel stroke. This analysis focuses on patients treated in 11 academic and nonacademic stroke centers with angiographically proven M1-MCA (n = 259) or carotid T occlusion (n = 103). Recanalization was defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score 2 or 3, and in patients with available Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) data (n = 309) as TICI scores 2b-3. Good outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 assessed after 3 months or later. Results: The median age was 68 years (25th and 75th percentiles: 56, 76 years), and the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission was 16 (13, 19); 41% of the patients had a favorable (mRS scores 0-2), and 59% had an unfavorable (mRS scores 3-6) outcome; 83% reached TIMI 2-3 flow. Independent predictors of good outcome were younger age, lower initial NIHSS scores, TIMI 2/3 recanalization and lower serum glucose levels. Outcome was highly dependent on patients' age: 60% of the patients within the lowest age quartile (range: 18-56 years) experienced good clinical outcome, decreasing stepwise over 47% (57-68 years) and 37% (69-76 years) to 17% in the highest age quartile (77-94 years). The proportion of patients with poor clinical outcome despite TIMI 2/3 recanalization (‘futile recanalization') increased dramatically from only 29% in the lowest age quartile over 34% and 40% (2nd and 3rd age quartiles) up to 53% in the highest age quartile. Results were similar in patients with available TICI scores, with ‘futile recanalization' rates increasing from 24% to 46% (lowest to highest age quartile). Conclusions: This study emphasizes the dramatic impact of patients' age on outcome in EVT for M1-MCA or carotid T occlusion, even in the presence of recanalization. Reasons for this age-related decrease in clinically successful recanalization rates urgently need clarification and may comprise patient-related factors (age-related increase in cardioembolic strokes, collateral status, comorbidities) as well as periprocedural issues (tortuous vessel anatomy in the elderly, age-dependent negative impact of general anesthesia in EVT).

Keywords:
Stroke, Mechanical recanalization, Outcome, Predictors
1.
Rouchaud A, Mazighi M, Labreuche J, Meseguer E, Serfaty JM, Laissy JP, Lavallée PC, Cabrejo L, Guidoux C, Lapergue B, Klein IF, Olivot JM, Abboud H, Simon O, Schouman-Claeys E, Amarenco P: Outcomes of mechanical endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a clinical registry study and systematic review. Stroke 2011;42:1289-1294.
2.
Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, Jovin TG, Baxter B, Nogueira RG, Clark W, Budzik R, Zaidat OO: Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012;380:1241-1249.
3.
Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Albers GW, Walker GA, Liebeskind DS, Smith WS: Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet 2012;380:1231-1240.
4.
Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, Yeatts SD, Khatri P, Hill MD, Jauch EC, Jovin TG, Yan B, Silver FL, von Kummer R, Molina CA, Demaerschalk BM, Budzik R, Clark WM, Zaidat OO, Malisch TW, Goyal M, Schonewille WJ, Mazighi M, Engelter ST, Anderson C, Spilker J, Carrozzella J, Ryckborst KJ, Janis LS, Martin RH, Foster LD, Tomsick TA: Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893-903.
5.
Meyers PM, Schumacher HC, Connolly ES Jr, Heyer EJ, Gray WA, Higashida RT: Current status of endovascular stroke treatment. Circulation 2011;123:2591-2601.
6.
Molina CA: Futile recanalization in mechanical embolectomy trials: a call to improve selection of patients for revascularization. Stroke 2010;41:842-843.
7.
Hussein HM, Georgiadis AL, Vazquez G, Miley JT, Memon MZ, Mohammad YM, Christoforidis GA, Tariq N, Qureshi AI: Occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization following endovascular treatment among patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:454-458.
8.
Marini C, Baldassarre M, Russo T, de Santis F, Sacco S, Ciancarelli I, Carolei A: Burden of first-ever ischemic stroke in the oldest old: evidence from a population-based study. Neurology 2004;62:77-81.
9.
Chesebro JH, Knatterud G, Roberts R, Borer J, Cohen LS, Dalen J, Dodge HT, Francis CK, Hillis D, Ludbrook P, et al: Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase - clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 1987;76:142-154.
10.
Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis S, Donnan G, Schneider D, Diez-Tejedor E, Trouillas P: Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet 1998;352:1245-1251.
11.
Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, Sgoifo A, Ponzio M, Sterzi R, Boccardi E: Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:904-913.
12.
Engelter ST, Bonati LH, Lyrer PA: Intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients of ≥80 versus <80 years of age: a systematic review across cohort studies. Age Ageing 2006;35:572-580.
13.
Engelter ST, Reichhart M, Sekoranja L, Georgiadis D, Baumann A, Weder B, Müller F, Lüthy R, Arnold M, Michel P, Mattle HP, Tettenborn B, Hungerbühler HJ, Baumgartner RW, Sztajzel R, Bogousslavsky J, Lyrer PA: Thrombolysis in stroke patients aged 80 years and older: Swiss survey of IV thrombolysis. Neurology 2005;65:1795-1798.
14.
Sandercock P, Wardlaw JM, Lindley RI, Dennis M, Cohen G, Murray G, Innes K, Venables G, Czlonkowska A, Kobayashi A, Ricci S, Murray V, Berge E, Slot KB, Hankey GJ, Correia M, Peeters A, Matz K, Lyrer P, Gubitz G, Phillips SJ, Arauz A: The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the third International Stroke Trial [IST-3]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:2352-2363.
15.
Nogueira RG, Liebeskind DS, Sung G, Duckwiler G, Smith WS: Predictors of good clinical outcomes, mortality, and successful revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing thrombectomy: pooled analysis of the Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) and Multi MERCI trials. Stroke 2009;40:3777-3783.
16.
Kim D, Ford GA, Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Vinuela F, Duckwiler GR, Jahan R, Saver JL: Intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute stroke in patients 80 and older: a comparison of results in patients younger than 80 years. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:159-163.
17.
Flint AC, Duckwiler GR, Budzik RF, Liebeskind DS, Smith WS: Mechanical thrombectomy of intracranial internal carotid occlusion: pooled results of the MERCI and Multi MERCI Part I trials. Stroke 2007;38:1274-1280.
18.
Chandra RV, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Oh DC, Chaudhry ZA, Mehta BP, Rost NS, Rabinov JD, Hirsch JA, Gonzalez RG, Schwamm LH, Yoo AJ: Elderly patients are at higher risk for poor outcomes after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke 2012;43:2356-2361.
19.
Monk TG, Weldon BC, Garvan CW, Dede DE, van der Aa MT, Heilman KM, Gravenstein JS: Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after major noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2008;108:18-30.
20.
Froehler MT, Fifi JT, Majid A, Bhatt A, Ouyang M, McDonagh DL: Anesthesia for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2012;79:S167-S173.
21.
Abou-Chebl A, Lin R, Hussain MS, Jovin TG, Levy EI, Liebeskind DS, Yoo AJ, Hsu DP, Rymer MM, Tayal AH, Zaidat OO, Natarajan SK, Nogueira RG, Nanda A, Tian M, Hao Q, Kalia JS, Nguyen TN, Chen M, Gupta R: Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke: preliminary results from a retrospective, multicenter study. Stroke 2010;41:1175-1179.
22.
Galimanis A, Jung S, Mono ML, Fischer U, Findling O, Weck A, Meier N, de Marchis GM, Brekenfeld C, El-Koussy M, Mattle HP, Arnold M, Schroth G, Gralla J: Endovascular therapy of 623 patients with anterior circulation stroke. Stroke 2012;43:1052-1057.
23.
Lansberg MG, Straka M, Kemp S, Mlynash M, Wechsler LR, Jovin TG, Wilder MJ, Lutsep HL, Czartoski TJ, Bernstein RA, Chang CW, Warach S, Fazekas F, Inoue M, Tipirneni A, Hamilton SA, Zaharchuk G, Marks MP, Bammer R, Albers GW: MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:860-867.
24.
Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, Alger JR, Nenov V, Ajani Z, Feng L, Meyer BC, Olson S, Schwamm LH, Yoo AJ, Marshall RS, Meyers PM, Yavagal DR, Wintermark M, Guzy J, Starkman S, Saver JL: A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914-923.
25.
Zaidat OO, Lazzaro MA, Liebeskind DS, Janjua N, Wechsler L, Nogueira RG, Edgell RC, Kalia JS, Badruddin A, English J, Yavagal D, Kirmani JF, Alexandrov AV, Khatri P: Revascularization grading in endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapy. Neurology 2012;79:S110-S116.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.