Background: Despite the compelling scientific evidence on the superiority of stroke unit care, far from all acute stroke patients have access to stroke unit care. In congruence with what has been observed when other new methods are introduced in health care, we hypothesized that there has been an inequality in the buildup phase of stroke units but that the gradients between patient groups have decreased as the total capacity of stroke unit care has increased. The purpose of this study was to explore if patients in a national sample who were socioeconomically disadvantaged (low education or low income) had reduced access to stroke unit care and if differences varied over time. Methods: All patients 18-74 years of age registered between 1995 and 2009 in Riks-Stroke, the Swedish stroke register, were included. The Stroke Unit Trialists' definition of a stroke unit has been adopted by Riks-Stroke and hospitals participating in the registry. Basic patient characteristics, stroke risk factors, process and outcome variables are recorded in Riks-Stroke. Socioeconomic data were accessed from Statistics Sweden. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for stroke unit care between prespecified patient subgroups. Results: A total of 319,240 stroke patients were included in Riks-Stroke during the years 1995-2009, and 124,173 were aged between 18 and 74 years; they were included in the final analyses. After adjustment for confounders in a multiple regression model, women were treated in stroke units slightly less often [OR 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-0.99]. There were no statistically significant associations between stroke unit care and age or between stroke unit care and cohabiting or living alone. The highest level of education predicted access to stroke unit care (secondary vs. primary school: OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07; university vs. primary school: OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10). Differences according to level of education diminished over time (p = 0.001). Income was not independently associated with stroke unit care, and over time the proportion of patients treated in stroke units increased at a similar rate in all income groups (p = 0.12). Conclusions: Even in a country with modest socioeconomic differences in the general population and public financing of all acute hospital care, socioeconomic inequalities in access to stroke unit care were evident during the early years, but they diminished as the total capacity for stroke unit care increased.

Keywords:
Stroke, Stroke unit, Socioeconomic factor
1.
Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. BMJ 1997;314:1151-1159.
2.
Riks-Stroke. http://www.riks-stroke.org (accessed 3 October 2012).
3.
Socialstyrelsen: Nationella riktlinjer för strokesjukvård 2009 (in Swedish). http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/nationellariktlinjerforstrokesjukvard (accessed 3 October 2012).
4.
Asplund K, Hulter Asberg K, Appelros P, Bjarne D, Eriksson M, Johansson A, Jonsson F, Norrving B, Stegmayr B, Terent A, Wallin S, Wester PO: The Riks-Stroke story: building a sustainable national register for quality assessment of stroke care. Int J Stroke 2011;6:99-108.
5.
Asplund K, Hulter Asberg K, Norrving B, Stegmayr B, Terent A, Wester PO: Riks-stroke - a Swedish national quality register for stroke care. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;15(suppl 1):5-7.
6.
Statistics Sweden: Longitudinal integration database for health insurance and labour market studies (LISA). http://www.scb.se (accessed 2 October 2012).
7.
Socialstyrelsen: Strokeenheter i sverige - kartläggning av dimensionering, praxis och vårdinnehåll (in Swedish). 2007;2007-123-17.
8.
Addo J, Ayerbe L, Mohan KM, Crichton S, Sheldenkar A, Chen R, Wolfe CD, McKevitt C: Socioeconomic status and stroke: an updated review. Stroke 2012;43:1186-1191.
9.
Langagergaard V, Palnum KH, Mehnert F, Ingeman A, Krogh BR, Bartels P, Johnsen SP: Socioeconomic differences in quality of care and clinical outcome after stroke: a nationwide population-based study. Stroke 2011;42:2896-2902.
10.
van den Bos GA, Smits JP, Westert GP, van Straten A: Socioeconomic variations in the course of stroke: unequal health outcomes, equal care? J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:943-948.
11.
Huang K, Khan N, Kwan A, Fang J, Yun L, Kapral MK: Socioeconomic status and care after stroke: results from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Stroke 2013;44:477-482.
12.
Kerr GD, Higgins P, Walters M, Ghosh SK, Wright F, Langhorne P, Stott DJ: Socioeconomic status and transient ischaemic attack/stroke: a prospective observational study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;31:130-137.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.