Background and Purpose: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a common manifestation in acute stroke. Aspiration resulting from difficulties in swallowing is a symptom that should be considered due to the frequent occurrence of aspiration pneumonia that could influence the patient’s recovery as it causes clinical complications and could even lead to the patient’s death. The early clinical evaluation of swallowing disorders can help define approaches and avoid oral feeding, which may be detrimental to the patient. This study aimed to create an algorithm to identify patients at risk of developing dysphagia following acute ischemic stroke in order to be able to decide on the safest way of feeding and minimize the complications of stroke using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NHISS). Methods: Clinical assessment of swallowing was performed in 50 patients admitted to the emergency unit of the University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke, within 48 h after the beginning of symptoms. Patients, 25 females and 25 males with a mean age of 64.90 years (range 26–91 years), were evaluated consecutively. An anamnesis was taken before the patient’s participation in the study in order to exclude a prior history of deglutition difficulties. For the functional assessment of swallowing, three food consistencies were used, i.e. pasty, liquid and solid. After clinical evaluation, we concluded whether there was dysphagia. For statistical analysis we used the Fisher exact test, verifying the association between the variables. To assess whether the NIHSS score characterizes a risk factor for dysphagia, a receiver operational characteristics curve was constructed to obtain characteristics for sensitivity and specificity. Results: Dysphagia was present in 32% of the patients. The clinical evaluation is a reliable method of detection of swallowing difficulties. However, the predictors of risk for the swallowing function must be balanced, and the level of consciousness and the presence of preexisting comorbidities should be considered. Gender, age and cerebral hemisphere involved were not significantly associated with the presence of dysphagia. NIHSS, Glasgow Coma Scale, and speech and language changes had a statistically significant predictive value for the presence of dysphagia. Conclusions: The NIHSS is highly sensitive (88%) and specific (85%) in detecting dysphagia; a score of 12 may be considered as the cutoff value. The creation of an algorithm to detect dysphagia in acute ischemic stroke appears to be useful in selecting the optimal feeding route while awaiting a specialized evaluation.

Keywords:
Stroke, Dysphagia, Dysarthria, Swallowing, Feeding route, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale
1.
Strong K, Mathers C, Bonita R: Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:182–187.
2.
Johnston SC, Mendes S, Mathers GD: Global variation in stroke burden and mortality: estimates from monitoring, surveillance, and modeling. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:345–354.
3.
Organização Pan Americana da Saúde. Rede Interagencial de Informações para a Saúde. http://www.opas.org.br/ripsa/produto_final_det.cfm?id=9. Accessed November, 2007.
4.
Perry L, Love CP: Screening for dysphagia and aspiration in acute stroke: a systematic review. Dysphagia 2001;16:7–18.
5.
Singh S, Hamdy S: Dysphagia in stroke patients. Postgrad Med 2006;82:383–391.
6.
Smithard DG, O’Neill PA, Park C, Morris J, Wyatt R, Martin DF: Complications and outcome after acute stroke: does dysphagia matter? Stroke 1996;27:1200–1204.
7.
Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D: Swallowing disorders following acute stroke: prevalence and diagnostic accuracy. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000;10:380–386.
8.
Westergren A: Detection of eating difficulties after stroke: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev 2006;53:143–149.
9.
Barer DH: The natural history and functional consequences of dysphagia after hemispheric stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52:236–241.
10.
Kidd D, Lawson J, Nesbit R, MacMahon J: The natural history and clinical consequences of aspiration in acute stroke. QJM 1995;88:409–413.
11.
Teasell RW, Bach D, McRae M: Prevalence and recovery of aspiration post-stroke: a retrospective analysis. Dysphagia 1994;9:35–39.
12.
Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, Rorick M, Moomaw CJ, Walker M: Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989;20:864–870.
13.
Lyden PD, Lu M, Jackson C, Marler J, Kothari R, Brott TG, Zivin J, and The NINDS rtPA Stroke Trial Investigators: Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. Stroke 1999;30:2347–2354.
14.
Kasner SE, Chaleta JA, Luciano JM, Cucchiara BL, Raps EC, McGarvey ML, Conroy MB, Localio AR: Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH Stroke Scale score form medical records. Stroke 1999;30:1534–1537.
15.
Williams LS, Yilmaz EY, Lopez-Yunez AM: Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke 2000;31:858–862.
16.
Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Neville IS, Mendes HF, Menezes DF, Mariano DC, Pereira IF, Teixiera LA, Jesus PAP, de Queiroz DCL, Pereira DF, Pinto E, Leite JP, Lopes AA, Oliveira-Filho J: Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural adaptation and structured interviewing. Cerebrovac Dis 2009;27:119–122.
17.
Daniels SK, Brailey K, Priestly DH, Herrington LR, Weisberg LA, Foundas AL: Aspiration in patients with acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1998;79:14–19.
18.
Hinchey JA, Shephard T, Furie K, Smith D, Wang D, Tonn S, Stroke Practice Improvement Network Investigators: Formal dysphagia protocols prevent pneumonia. Stroke 2005;36:1972–1976.
19.
Martino R, Pron G, Diamant N: Screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke: insufficient evidence guidelines. Dysphagia 2000;15:19–30.
20.
Leder SB, Espinosa JF: Aspiration risk after acute stroke: comparison of clinical examination and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Dysphagia 2002;17:214–218.
21.
Ramsey DJ, Smithard DG, Kalra L: Early assessment of dysphagia and aspiration risk in acute patients. Stroke 2003;34:1252–1257.
22.
McCullough GH, Wertz RT, Rosenbek JC, Mills RH, Ross KB, Ashford JR: Inter- and intrajudge reliability of a clinical examination of swallowing in adults. Dysphagia 2000;15:58–67.
23.
De Caneda MA, Fernandes JG, de Almeida AG, Mugnol FH: Confiabilidade de escalas de comprometimento neurológico em pacientes com acidente vascular cerebral. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2006;64:690–697.
24.
Teasell R, Foley N, Fisher J, Finestone H: The incidence, management and complications if dysphagia in patients with medullary strokes admitted to a rehabilitation unit. Dysphagia 2002;17:115–120.
25.
Paciaroni M, Mazzotta G, Corea F, Caso V, Venti M, Milia P; Silvestrelli, G, Palmerini F, Parnetti L, Gallai V: Dysphagia following stroke. Eur Neurol 2004;51:162–167.
26.
Walter U, Knoblich R, Steinhagen V, Donat M, Benecke R, Kloth A: Predictors of pneumonia in acute stroke patients admitted to a neurological intensive care unit. J Neurol 2007;254:1323–1329.
27.
Okubo PC, Dantas RO, Troncon LE, Moriguti JC, Ferriolli E: Clinical and scintigraphic assessment of swallowing of older patients admitted to a tertiary care geriatric ward. Dysphagia 2008;23:1–6.
28.
Barros AF, Fábio SR, Furkim AM: Correlação entre os achados clínicos da deglutição e os achados da tomografia computadorizada de crânio em pacientes com acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico na fase aguda da doença. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2006;64:1009–1014.
29.
Woo D, Broderick JP, Kothari Ru, Lu M, Brott T, Lyden PD, Marler JR, Grotta JC: Does the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale favor left hemisphere strokes? Stroke 1999;30:2355–2359.
30.
Daniels SK, Ballo LA, Mahoney MC, Foundas AL: Clinical predictors of dysphagia and aspiration risk: outcome measures in acute stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2000;81:1030–1033.
31.
McCullough GH, Wertz RT, Rosenbek JC: Sensitivity and specificity of clinical/bedside examination signs for detecting aspiration in adults subsequent to stroke. J Commun Disord 2001;34:55–72.
32.
Wityk RJ, Pessin MS, Kaplan RF, Caplan LR: Serial assessment of acute stroke using the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke 1994;25:362–365.
33.
Warnecke T, Ritter MA, Kröger B, Oelenberg S, Teismann I, Heuschmann PU, Ringelstein EB, Nabavi DG, Dziewas R: Fiberoptic endoscopic Dysphagia severity scale predicts outcome after acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;28:283–289.
34.
Horner J, Massey EW, Riski JE, Lathrop DL, Chase KN: Aspiration following stroke: clinical correlates and outcome. Neurology 1988;38:1359–1362.
35.
Langdon PC, Lee AH, Binns CW: Dysphagia in acute ischemic stroke: severity, recovery and relationship to stroke subtype. J Clin Neurosci 2007;14:630–634.
36.
Hamdy S, Aziz Q, Rothwell JC, Crone R, Hughes D, Tallis RC, Thompson, DG: Explaining oropharyngeal dysphagia after unilateral hemispheric stroke. Lancet 1997;350:686–692.
37.
Terré R, Mearin F: Oropharyngeal dysphagia after the acute phase of stroke: predictors of aspiration. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2006;18:200–205.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.