Background: Migration of thrombus through the cerebral arteries is a common cause of stroke. Thrombus emboli can be detected non-invasively using Doppler ultrasound, but even where the embolus composition is known, there is currently no method for estimating the size of an embolus based on the returned ultrasound signal. Here we report the results of in vitro experiments investigating the relationship between size and embolic signal intensity for fresh thrombus emboli with a view to estimating the sizes of thrombi detected following carotid surgery. Method: Thrombi were formed from whole blood using the ‘Chandler loop’ method under flow conditions similar to those associated with arterial thrombus formation in vivo. A total of 390 Doppler embolic signals were then measured from 37 pieces of thrombus circulated in a pulsatile closed-flow circuit. The dimensions of each of the thrombi were measured before and after circulation using an optical microscope. Relationships between thrombus size and embolic signal properties were then investigated using standard statistical methods with a view to size estimation of thrombi during clinical monitoring. Results: Although embolic signals generally became more intense with increasing thrombus size, strong oscillations due to resonance effects were observed. Pearson tests revealed strong positive correlations between embolus diameter, signal intensity and duration (r > 0.8, p ≤ 0.01). Conclusions: This study provides experimental evidence supporting theoretical predictions relating Doppler embolic signal intensity to thrombus size. In our discussion, we tentatively suggest how this information might be used to size emboli in clinical practice.

Keywords:
Carotid endarterectomy, Micro-embolic signals, Thrombus formation, Transcranial Doppler ultrasound, Embolus detection
1.
Selim M: Current concepts: perioperative stroke. N Engl J Med 2007;356:706–713.
2.
Payne DA, Jones CI, Hayes PD, Thompson MM, London NJ, Bell PR, Goodall AH, Naylor AR: Beneficial effects of clopidogrel combined with aspirin in reducing cerebral emboli in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Circulation 2004;109:1476–1481.
3.
Beldi G, Beng L, Siegel G, Bisch-Knaden S, Candinas D: Prevention of perioperative thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Br J Surg 2007;94:1351–1355.
4.
Evans DH: Detection of microemboli; in Babikian VL, Wechsler LR (eds): Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography, ed 2. Boston, Butterworth Heinemann, 1999, pp 141–155.
5.
Chung EML, Fan L, Naylor AR, Evans DH: Characteristics of Doppler embolic signals observed following carotid endarterectomy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32:1011–1023.
6.
Chung EML, Fan L, Naylor AR, Evans DH: Impact of clinical environment on embolus detection: a comparison of automated and manual detection of embolic signals. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;23:169–174.
7.
Nishi RY: Ultrasonic detection of bubbles with Doppler flow transducers. Ultrasonics 1972;10:173–179.
8.
Lubbers J, Van den Berg JW: An ultrasonic detector for microgas emboli in a bloodflow line. Ultrasound Med Biol 1977;2:301–310.
9.
Moehring MA, Klepper JR: Pulse Doppler ultrasound detection, characterization and size estimation of emboli in flowing blood. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1994;41:35–44.
10.
Moehring MA, Ritcey JA: Sizing emboli in blood using pulse Doppler ultrasound. I. Verification of the EBR model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1996;43:572–580.
11.
Russell D, Brucher R, Madden K, Clark WM, Sandset PM, Zivin J: The intensity of the Doppler signal caused by arterial emboli depends on embolus size; in Oka M, von Teutern GM, Furuhata H, Kodaira K (eds): Recent Advances in Neurosonology. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishing, 1992, pp 57–60.
12.
Markus HS, Brown MM: Differentiation between different pathological cerebral embolic materials using transcranial Doppler in an in vitro model. Stroke 1993;24:1–5.
13.
Chandler AB: In vitro thrombotic coagulation of the blood: a method for producing a thrombus. Lab Invest 1958;7:110–114.
14.
Poole JCF: A study of artificial thrombi produced by a modification of Chandler’s method. Q J Exp Physiol 1959;44:377–384.
15.
Robbie LA, Young SP, Bennett B, Booth NA: Thrombi formed in the Chandler loop mimic human arterial thrombi in structure and PAI-1 content and distribution. Thromb Haemost 1997;77:510–515.
16.
Hoskins PR, Ramnarine KV: Doppler test devices; in Evans DH, McDicken WN (eds): Doppler Ultrasound: Principles, Instrumentation and Signal Processing, ed 2. Chichester, Wiley, 2000, pp 382–404.
17.
Martin MJ, Chung EML, Goodall AH, Della Martina A, Ramnarine KV, Fan L, Hainsworth SV, Naylor AR, Evans DH: Enhanced detection of thrombo-emboli using targeted microbubbles. Stroke 2007;38:2726–2732.
18.
Ramnarine KV, Nassiri DK, Hoskins PR, Lubbers J: Validation of a new blood-mimicking fluid for use in Doppler flow test objects. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24:451–459.
19.
Ringelstein EB, Droste DW, Babikian VL, Evans DH, Grosset DG, Kaps M, Markus HS, Russel D, Siebler M: Consensus on microembolus detection by TCD. Stroke 1998;29:725–729.
20.
Fan L, Boni E, Tortoli P, Evans DH: Multigate transcranial Doppler ultrasound system with real-time embolic signal identification and archival. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2006;53:1853–1861.
21.
Fan L, Ramnarine KV, Gittins J, Evans DH: Performance analyses of two transcranial Doppler systems using an electronic phantom and a flow phantom. Ultrasound 2006;14:272.
22.
Angell EL, Evans DH: Limits of uncertainty in measured values of embolus-to-blood ratio due to Doppler sample volume shape and location. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1037–1044.
23.
Evans DH, Gittins J: Limits of uncertainty in measured values of embolus-to-blood ratios in dual-frequency TCD recordings due to nonidentical sample volume shapes. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005;31:233–242.
24.
Aubry JF, Tanter M, Pernot M, Thomas JL, Fink M: Experimental demonstration of noninvasive transskull adaptive focusing based on prior computed tomography scans. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:84–93.
25.
Abbott AL, Levi CR, Stork JL, Donnan GA, Chambers BR: Timing of clinically significant microembolism after carotid endarterectomy. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;23:362–367.
26.
Oude Egbrinke MGA, van Gestel MA, Boeders MAW, et al: Regulation of microvascular thromboembolism in vivo. Microcirculation 2005;12:287–300.
27.
Van Gestel MA, Heemskerk JWM, Slaaf DW, et al: Real-time detection of activation patterns in individual platelets during thrombo-embolism in vivo: differences between thrombus growth and embolus formation. J Vasc Res 2002;39:534–543.
28.
Kaye GWC, Laby TH: Tables of Physical and Chemical Constants, ed 15. New York, Longman, 1986, p 223.
29.
Baker AC, Duck FA, Starritt HC (eds): Ultrasound in Medicine. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1998.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.